You may think of mercury as molten metal used in
thermometers to measure the ambient temperature, and you may think of it as a
planet that can be called affectionately the first rock from the sun. But there
is also the word mercurial which means something when applied to people on
planet Earth, this third rock from the sun.
Mercurial refers to individuals who are apparently so
erratic in their thinking and their behavior, they change positions regularly
to suit the moment, thus gain something from a situation where they contributed
nothing in terms of equity or effort. They are so mercurial, in fact, that in
trying to find out what they are doing or what they are seeking to do, you
won't be able to pin them down on anything … anymore than you could make
mercury take one shape and stay solidly with it.
And when you have many people of the same group being
afflicted by that condition, the group as a whole gets to be marked as
mercurial, a word that has come to mean devious, shifty, shady, slippery,
tricky, dishonest, unfaithful, unreliable, undependable, untrustworthy and
more. Throughout the centuries and everywhere on this planet, the Jews, as a
group, have come to be referred to by those adjectives – and there is a good
reason for it; they are all these things and worse.
You can see a glaring example of this in what is unfolding
at this time with respect to the nuclear deal that six nations have negotiated
with Iran on behalf of the world. As always, because someone – this time Iran –
is seen to be making progress in science and industry, the Jews who now have a
base of terrorist operations they call Israel, are trying to sabotage that
progress. And as always, they found a sucker – this time America – who would listen
to them and sacrifice life and treasure to do the dirty work they cannot do
themselves.
Thousands upon thousands of articles have been published on
this subject, and thousands upon thousands of similar views have been expressed
in the audio-visual media. They were authored mostly by Jews, but also by their
non-Jewish running dogs, especially the so-called Evangelicals who recently
converted to the fanatic view that each and every Jew – with a wiener or
without – is a Jesus Christ in his or her own right; a god that must be
worshiped to ensure their salvation and that of Planet Earth. No one, however,
has mentioned Mercury as yet, but you never know with these people; they are
liable someday to make a claim there too.
For now, you can look at two pieces, published on two
consecutive days, clearly showing the mercurial character of these people. The
articles also show how they go about sucking the suckers – this time the
American legislators – into their sphere of influence, and how they get them to
commit the most heinous acts of national betrayal in return for so very little;
at times for nothing at all.
The first piece is an editorial that came under the title:
“Europe's Ayatollah Gold Rush” and the subtitle: “The business sprint to Iran
means sanctions will never 'snap back'”. It was published on August 12, 2015 in
the Wall Street Journal. The second piece is an article that came under the
title: “Rejecting the Deal Doesn't Mean War.” It was written by Lee Smith and
published on August 13, 2015 in the Weekly Standard.
The editors of the Journal expand on the idea with which
they start their piece. It is this: “The U.S. Congress still hasn't voted on
the nuclear deal with Iran, but European companies are already rushing to
invest in the Islamic Republic.” They also point out that the Italian Foreign
Minister told the Iranians that their two countries “can work together in the
fields of trade, commerce and economy.”
They end the editorial by concurring with (1) an Italian
company of which they say: “Finmeccanica is betting that broader international
sanctions won't 'snap back,'” and (2) Emanuele Ottolenghi who says: “The
[power] plant deal, inked well before the [nuclear] deal even begins to be
implemented, shows that U.S. sanctions can no longer deter global business from
signing huge deals in Iran.”
As to Lee Smith, he concurs with Robert Satloff who says:
“For its part, Europe is unlikely to respond to a vote of [congressional]
disapproval by terminating its sanctions … European business leaders are unlikely
to value the Iranian market more than the U.S market.” And that’s the opposite
of what the Journal editors have said.
The reality is this: Oh yes they would, Lee Smith. Yes they
would, Robert Satloff. And that's because the European companies can build
power plants in Iran where power plants are needed, and the country has no
means to build them on its own. This is in contrast with the United States of
America where they have power plants galore, and have the means to build more
if they need to.
Think about it. At a time when American businesses are
closing in America to open in the emerging markets, you can be certain that
businesses in the industrialized countries of Europe are doing likewise. These
companies are not going to stay home or worse, go to America when the American
businesses are fleeing America. They may sell their cars in America but they
will build their car manufacturing plants in a China, a Thailand or an Iran.