If anyone had illusions that the volcano spewing molten lead
in the belly of Jews was about fear of a nuclear bomb rather than the Jewish
thirst to see America
destroy the progress made by Christians and Muslims who seek to improve their
lives in the Middle East , now is the time to
kill those illusions.
Once again, a Jewish dominated major publication in New York
has come up with an article about the twinning of the Suez Canal; a piece that
is nothing less than the 'puke-a-roo' (to coin a new term) which has
characterized the Jewish American coverage of that event. It was written by
David D. Kirkpatrick under the title: “Suez Canal Upgrade May not Ease Egypt's
Economic Journey,” published on August 7, 2015 in the New York Times.
If you want to know what the article is really about, you
encounter a sentence early on that sets the stage for you. Here it is: “The
Hype about the canal, some analysts say, does little to ease the doubts of
investors.” In fact, the Jewish propaganda machine in the English speaking
world, started on this train the moment that it became clear the Egyptian
economy was not going to collapse as a result of the double revolution which
hit the country four years ago.
The captains of that propaganda machine were aware that when
a society goes through a difficult period and comes out of it nearly intact as
did Egypt, it renews itself and from there, goes on to build a much brighter
future. And they knew that the investors were also aware of the same thing.
This is why the Jews pulled all the stops to try and discourage the investors
from going into Egypt .
And that's the demonic effort to which the New York Times is contributing its
new article.
Now, when you have a guy that doesn't know the difference
between a million and a billion such as to say: “the canal's expansion aims to
add $100 million [instead of billion] a year to the economy,” when he also says
that he encountered economists who contradicted the government's forecast for
an economic renewal, you wonder what kind of economists he has been talking to,
or whether he understood anything of what they were telling him.
Look at the list of woes he says have hit the economy: (1)
the construction of a new capital has fallen flat; (2) moves to reduce the
deficit and stabilize the currency appear to have stalled; (3) energy
shortages, foreign exchange restrictions and the threat of violence are
impediments to investments. The trouble is that every item on that list is a
fiction that people like him only dream about. And you can be certain that when
these projects will be finalized, he and they will write about them, trying to
minimize their importance the same as they are now doing with the canal.
If you're looking for specifics as to what the Jewish
propaganda machine is trying to achieve, here is a clue: “The creation of jobs
will depend on attracting investors to build factories or logistics facilities
in planned industrial zones around the canal.” But the one who wrote these
words must also know that the Chinese and the Russians, among many others, have
already staked out industrial zones and have been erecting factories. Despite
all this, he comes back to his favorite theme: “Experts said there was little
reason to think that shorter transit time would attract investors put off by
the other challenges.” In other words, you Anglophile investors, don't go
invest in Egypt
because you're not going to like it. Or maybe it is the Jews who will not like
it.
If you didn't know how a military carpet bombing worked,
you'll get a hint of that when you see how a journalistic carpet bombing was
done by the New York Times on Egypt .
First, here is what the reporter quoted a professor as saying: “Sure, Egypt needs
that kind of infrastructure to produce jobs but they have got a long way to
go.” Of course, nobody doubts that, given that the prof was talking about
thousands of square miles of factories, and the amenities that accompany them,
including the accommodation of the workers.
You then see the following in the paragraphs that follow:
Military attacks in Cairo and North Sinai have scared away investors … the
government spent millions to improve Egypt's energy infrastructure but deprived
industries of power to placate consumers … the improvements in homes came
partly at the expense of factories … Rather than increase taxes, the government
lowered the top income tax rate … also put off for at least two years a
proposed tax on capital gains … many analysts now expect that the government
will also postpone the start of a value-added-tax.”