How can a handful of Jews take control of a superpower in
half a century or less? And how do these people subsequently seek to take
control of the world? These are the questions that many souls around the globe
have been asking; and these are the questions to which the Jews have always
given the same answer. They said: We are a smart people and we make arguments
which are so impressive, no one can match us. And so, we win in every forum,
each time that we participate in a debate.
Well, it has been demonstrated in nearly 1,600 articles
published on this website that the only time the Jews won an argument, is when
they debated in a forum that invited no one but them. Because no one that
disagrees with the Jewish point of view was allowed to come and present an
opposing opinion, the Jews had the floor all to themselves at which time they
made their case, and made up the case for invisible opponents as well. These
would be opponents whom the Jews have portrayed with such distortion, you
couldn't figure out who they were talking about. But when it happened that
despite the precautions, the Jews met real people who pushed back with real
counter-arguments, the Jews were crushed en masse like a swarm of bugs under a
steamroller.
These realities fully exposed, there remains another
question: What mechanism was used by the solo-debating Jews to have convinced
the wielders of power in America
to yield some of their powers or to relinquish all of them without question?
The way to find out is to study the nuts and bolts of that mechanism. Lucky for
us, Clifford D. May has put together a revealing article highlighting those
nuts and bolts. It has the title: “The Parchin Precedent” and the subtitle:
“The premise underlying the Iran
nuclear agreement is 'trust, don't verify.'” It was published on August 25,
2015 in The Washington Times.
To tell the audience what the article is about, he starts
with this backgrounder: “U.N. to let Iran
inspect nuke work site … a secret side agreement under which Iran is to
police its own suspected facilities.” You can tell right away that the nuts and
bolts he is using are fake ones. It is because he says the agreement is secret
even though he later admits: “Rep. Pompeo and Sen. Cotton, met with officials
of the IAEA who disclosed that 'certain elements of the deal are – and will
remain – secret.” Here again, he uses the word 'secret' instead of
'confidential,' having already substituted 'agreement' for 'certain elements of
the deal.'
The fact is that countries, organizations and companies all
over the world own secrets that relate to inventions, procedures or operations
they guard jealously, and that other entities do what they can to steal. The
properties remain secret, however, till such time that the owners are required
to furnish them to another party – such as a UN agency, for example. When this
happens, the receiving party pledges to keep them, or at least keep parts of
them – confidential. That's what happened in this case; and there is nothing
unusual about it.
Instead of developing arguments around these realities,
Clifford May, and those like him, have created an entirely fictitious narrative
based on false analogies they put together for the occasion. Here are three of
them in his words: (1) The host of a radio talk show asked how this was
different from letting athletes test their own urine for drugs. (2) A colleague
of Clifford May said that the next time the IRS questioned his tax returns,
he'd offer to conduct a “self-audit.” (3) It occurred to him that erratic
drivers could administer their own breathalyzer tests.
Those false analogies are the nuts and bolts holding
together the fictitious narratives that convinced the American wielders of
power to partially or fully yield their powers to the Jews. In addition,
something else emerges from the Clifford May article. It is the way by which
the Jews use the situations they create to fashion a process they hope will
allow them to extend their influence abroad. Look at this: “the idea was to
keep Congress in the dark – in apparent violation of the Review Act which promised
that all materials … made between Iran and any other parties, would
be made available for congressional review.” That is, the Jews want to see
American Law enforced on the UN and Iran .
In fact, despite the title of the Clifford May article, the
precedent that should worry us is not that the Iranians wish to inspect
themselves; it is that the Jews wish to extend to the world the laws they
fashion in the Congress of the United
States .