There is virtue in things flaming out for, this is how a
great deal of information is released. For example, much of what is known about
the chemical elements we use everyday was obtained because they were torched.
On a bigger scale, all that we know about the universe was
obtained thanks to a science called spectroscopy. This is the analysis of the
light that reaches us from the stars. It is generated because the elements of
which the stars are made, flame out and produce a great deal of information
about them and about the distant galaxies in which they are located.
Something analogous happens here on Earth when people or
movements or ideologies act out with such extreme zeal, they flame out and
release information about themselves that were heretofore kept hidden from
view. You can see an example of that in an article that came under the title:
“AP Was Right, Critics Were Wrong, About IAEA Side Deal,” written by Omri Ceren
and published on August 21, 2015 in the Weekly Standard.
Whatever the name of the movement to which Ceren belongs –
try Neocon – it is now in the process of flaming out, producing information
about itself that was little known up to now. In fact, when you come right down
to it, you'll find that the ideology under which the Neocons operate looks very
much like a fashioned-to-suit-the-moment version of what the Rabbinical Jews
have been working on for centuries.
What comes out the Ceren article is a demonstration of a
strategy that the Jews have been using during that time with varying degrees of
success, but has failed spectacularly in the matter of the nuclear deal that
was negotiated between Iran and the P5+1 nations who acted on behalf of the
international community. When a number of passages in the article are closely
examined, the age old Jewish strategy comes out clearly.
What it entails is the use of seemingly legitimate and
harmless procedures ... but is in reality nothing less than an insidious trick
aimed at putting down and solidifying the outcome that the Jews want to see
before the negotiators even sat around the table to negotiate. What also comes
out is that these tricks reflect the way that the Jews have acted in the
Congress, resulting in the American legislators always debating the issues
vacuously, ending with a legislative product that paralyzes the business of
America while fast-tracking the interests of Israel and the Jews.
Look how Ceren starts his article: “The Obama administration
spent the last two years telling lawmakers and reporters...” A little later on,
he has this: “Here's Wendy Sherman in 2013: the Joint Plan requires Iran to
'address past and present practices … including Parchin.'” And later still:
“State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf in 2015: 'we would find it … very
difficult to imagine a Plan of Action that did not require access at
Parchin...'”
You can see that the questions which led to those
pronouncements during the past two years were aimed at putting down and
solidifying the outcome before the negotiators even sat around the table to
negotiate. So we want to know what Omri Ceren thinks happened at the end of the
negotiations. And here is what he says: “Republican senator Jim Risch suggested
[note this word suggested] that the West had collapsed on the requirement...”
And with that suggestion out there, things began to happen in an effort to
prove its validity.
And so, when the Associated Press's (AP) reporter got access
to the document that details what has been agreed upon, the Neocons started
spinning its content to make it sound like “the West had collapsed” during the
negotiations with Iran. Because the procedure in question is customarily
executed by the IAEA, the matter was left up to that UN agency to explain it.
What happened is this: “IAEA chief put out a statement seeking to defend the
deal...” And there was this: “State Department spokesman John Kirby declined to
back the White House validators who had attacked the AP's report...”
But the fact is that the IAEA chief did not seek anything
but to explain what the deal was about. And John Kirby did not need to do
anything to discredit the AP report, as it was discredited by its own people.
Here is how this happened according to Ceren himself: “After the AP article was
published, someone – presumably an overeager AP editor – tried to save some
space by cutting several paragraphs from the original draft. That triggered a
lot of conspiracy theories about the AP retracting the story.”
This is the point at which the Neocon trick flamed out. To
revive it, the Jewish propaganda machine and its useful idiots gathered around
John Kirby and tried to do to him what the Jewish lobby has been doing to the
legislators in the American Congress. The idiots tried to make Kirby agree to
an outcome before anyone knew, outcome to what exactly? Here is a question they
asked him: “that Iran
would take soil samples … that there wouldn't be any IAEA inspectors in the
facility … you don't challenge those per se?” And here is Kirby's answer: “I'm
not going to get into speaking about the details between the IAEA and Iran or any
other nation for that matter.”
To end the article, Omri Ceren who falsely accused the
“conspiracy” theorists of attacking the AP story following its retraction by
its creators, now comes up with a conspiracy theory of his own. It goes like
this: “that will confirm suspicions that the IAEA has been pressured by parties
who want to put aside concerns in order to preserve the deal at all costs.”
So you ask: what's he basing that on? And there is no answer
because it is Jewish phony baloney of the kind that has been nourishing the
intellectually anemic clowns in the American Congress.