Thursday, July 22, 2010

They Want An End Run And A Mutiny

Once in a while the Wall Street Journal teams up with someone that speaks its language. When it does, it often turns to John Bolton who is naturally disposed to say and do extreme things. On July 13, 2010 the Journal published an article over his signature under the title “Beyond the Obama Nuke Policy” for which the editors of the publication chose the subtitle: “How Congress and opinion leaders can counter administrative weakness on North Korea and Iran.” And like the subtitle says, the Journal and Bolton ask the Congress of the United States and what they call opinion leaders to do an end run on the American constitution. They openly incite the mutinous act of usurping from the Presidency the powers vested in that office by the constitution to conduct the foreign policy of the country. The aim of Bolton and the Journal is to see that things are done in a manner that suits Israel and the international Zionist movement regardless of what the cost will be to America and the American people.

Bolton and the Journal admit in the first paragraph of the article that there was: “...considerable behind-the-scenes squabbling [at] the UN Security Council...” before a condemnation of North Korea was issued which was the best that could be done considering that other members of the Council, mainly China and Russia, were full participants in the decision making process as mandated by the Charter of the United Nations to which America is a signatory. And they do admit in the second paragraph that the US Congress passed more sanctions against Iran to be added to those issued by the Security Council. And they do admit that these sanctions came on top of the measures taken in this regard by the European Union. And they do admit that Leon Panetta, who is the Director of the CIA, is well aware of the limitations that these actions may have in preventing Iran's progress toward becoming a nuclear state. In effect then, they admit that things are going in compliance with international law, with the American constitution, in accordance to the plan of the executive branch which consulted with the legislature to work out a solution that best suits the current circumstances; and all this without losing sight of the fact that this may not be enough to deter Iran but that further measures may have to be taken when the time comes and if the situation warrants it.

So then, what is the problem? Well, the way the Journal and Bolton see things, the litany of measures cited above do not amount to a hill of beans, and they express their view this way: “Tehran and Pyongyang can plainly see [that] President Obama's nonproliferation strategy is intellectually and politically exhausted.” And they ask: “...are we consigned to two more years of growing danger?” And they respond: “Not if Congress and opinion leaders take steps without White House leadership...” Having dismissed the Executive Branch as having been rendered useless by exhaustion, they now dismiss the members of the Congress who voted for sanctions that were not forceful enough to suit Israel's taste and the taste of the Zionist movement. Bolton and the Journal then come up with three initiatives - as they call them - which they promise are merely openers because: “[The] White House proliferation policy [being] comatose, we must search elsewhere for second-best alternatives. Until 2012, second best is all we have.” In other words, until the next election happens, Bolton and the Journal call for the suspension of the constitution and they promise to take matters in their own hands in the interim. They promise activities they call openers which they will escalate till they defeat the plan worked out by two branches of the US government, the European Union and the United Nations.

But this can hardly be called a problem and there must be something else that is the real problem in the eyes of those two; so what is it? Well, the problem, as they see it, is that even if everything goes according to plan, the outcome will not satisfy the Israelis and their Zionist friends who are in the habit of quenching their thirst with blood, more blood and blood alone. Consequently, Bolton and the Journal have decided to forge ahead toward a new goal. They put together a Judeo-Zionist plan that can be implemented in three steps. First, they want to demonize Iran and North Korea which they say are allied in the nuclear field and are working closely with Syria. Second, they want their mutinous friends in the Congress and elsewhere to encourage Israel to attack Iran. To this end, they want to arm Israel with the right sort of weapons and they want to support it in every way possible when the attack comes. And of course, they want to replenish Israel after the attack with the weapons it will lose when carrying out the attack. Third, having created a fait accompli, they want to reassure the world, especially China and South Korea that all went well and that all will get even better.

How do they hope to accomplish all that? Well, this is a mystery that is not a real mystery. In fact, many have a good idea as to how the Jewish organizations get their way in America but these people were called anti-Semitic and were banished from participating in the debates. To them, the phenomenon is not a mystery as much as it has been to a public that was kept in the dark. Luckily, Bolton and the Journal are now doing the public a favor by openly admitting to a procedure that describes the mystery. They say they will rely on a media that is controlled by the Jewish organizations and rely on the male and female bimbos who are in charge of the US Congress to do the work while they orchestrate the openers and escalate their activities till blood runs in some street or Armageddon breaks out whichever comes first. Thus, the dance of the bimbos that transformed the American superpower into a laughable joke turned out to be the phenomenon that also allowed the Jewish organizations to take control of America and mobilize its resources thus serve Israel and the Zionist causes. The cat is out of the bag and the mystery has been revealed; it is the work of the congressional bimbos, stupid.

The first step, they say, is for the opinion leaders and the bimbos to demand intelligence collection on the North Korea-Iran connection so as to disseminate the information to the public. They say they want this to happen because Pyongyang is close to some Middle Eastern countries, especially Syria, which Israel loves to bomb when it knows it can get away with it. Well, anybody that believes intelligence gathering is not happening now must be comatose and they are the ones who should be banished from the debates. Every sane person knows that intelligence gathering is happening all the time at a feverish pace but some things are kept secret because they lose their value if made public. In fact, the information that Bolton and the Journal are using against the Administration is based on intelligence they pretend does not exist. So then, what is it that they want? This is what they want: “...enhanced congressional and public discussion might even awaken the Obama administration.” What they want is that the information be made public even though such action will compromise its value. And they want this to happen to give Bolton and the Journal the opportunity to politicize the information thus create the noise that will in the end serve the goals of Israel and the worldwide Zionist movement.

The second step, they say, is for “...outsiders [to] create broad support for Israel's inherent right to self-defense against a nuclear Holocaust and defend the specific tactic of pre-emptive attacks … Congress can make it clear, for example, that it would support immediate resupply and rearming to make up for Israeli losses in the event of such an attack. Having visible congressional support in place at the outset will reassure the Israeli government, which is legitimately concerned about Mr. Obama's likely negative reaction to such an attack.” What we have here is a statement that is worth its weight in gold to those who know something about the tactics employed by the Jewish organizations but have little in the form of hard proof to make the point. But there is here what I call the parasite's chain-like approach to siphoning off the blood of the host, and the evidence is accumulating as to the soundness of the theory behind it all. It happened during the lightening invasion of Iraq that even before the W had declared the mission accomplished, the mouthpieces of the Jewish organizations were debating where to go next: left to Syria or right to Iran? They were asking.

This is the theory. Even though the Jewish organizations want the whole world, they know they cannot swallow it all in one gulp so they break up their wishes into bite size morsels they string like a chain of links. As they make America feed Israel one link, they soften and prepare the next while lining up a few more links behind that. In the case of the Iraq war, the countries of Syria and Iran were being prepared as the next morsels. As for the current example, the first link is the request to support Israel's right to self-defense. Behind that comes the support for the specific tactic of pre-emptive attacks. Behind that stands the idea of supporting the resupply of weapons to Israel. And before this is finished and done with, you can be certain that there will be other links in the never ending chain that keeps depleting America of its blood. And visible support of the American congress for Israel is needed here, they say, because Israel has legitimate concerns about the illegitimate doubts that the American President has for a plan that will embroil America in wars for generations to come. They may call this hubris in Yiddish and they may call it gall in English but the proper word for it is that it is the talk of a jerk and an asshole to be polite about it.

The third step, they say, is for the opinion leaders to prepare China for what will happen to North Korea after the demise of the regime there. They do not come out honestly and explain how they want to see the demise come about but say this: “...Congress and others must bring the discussion about post-Kim North Korea to the fore and highlight the opportunity it provides to topple the entire regime.” They admit this could lead to chaos but they promise that with the right planning, the death of Kim Jong II could set the stage for reunifying the Korean Peninsula. And they urge their bimbos in the media and the Congress to take control of the matter because: “...the White House [is] essentially mute on this subject.”

It would be too generous to call Bolton and the editors of the Wall Street Journal a bunch of idiots for expressing the belief that they can fool China this easily; it is more appropriate to call them mentally retarded. But it is even worse than that because look what they go on to say: “Congress can ... minimize the impact of possible refugee[s] … by pledging ... assistance...” And there is this: “...nonofficial conversations about ... military intervention ... could reassure China that our intention is ... to peacefully end the North.” And there is this: ”Many Japanese and South Korean leaders ... can help China understand that its ... interests are best served by addressing the inevitable.”

I can imagine the Chinese official look incredulously in the eyes of the American, Japanese and South Korean envoys who will go to China to reassure the folks down there and make them understand where their interests lie. And I can imagine the Chinese official say this: “Go tell the US Congress that it takes money to give assistance to refugees. If America comes to borrow money from us to alleviate a refugee problem it intends to create on our border, I tell America to go shove it in the rear end of every congressional bimbo that has participated in thinking up this whorish plan. Get the hell out of here, all three of you, and don't you ever come back again for whatever reason.”