The justice you must beg for is Jewish tyranny

 It so happens that in the land of Oz, there lives a wizard. It is not clear what he can do that others cannot, but a wizard he is nevertheless. By contrast, it happens that in the land of Jewish Canuckistan, there lives a wizard who can produce ideas that make the head of human beings spin like a windcrane.

 

The latest of the Jewish ideas, is a proclamation that would have Canadians, North Americans and all Westerners reject the idea that justice is a Human Right, but is a gift that must be begged for and may only be granted by the Supreme Jewish Wizard.

 

Although this is a new idea that’s right out the wizard’s head, its roots began to grow sometime ago. In fact, the phenomenon can be seen to develop during two occasions around matters that relate to me personally. It happened once at the intellectual level, and once at the material level.

 

What rattled me intellectually, and I said so at the time, was the Jewish-Israeli demand that for the latter to implement a modicum of justice in the occupied territories, thus make life more bearable for the Palestinians, the oil-rich Arab countries must pay the Jews billions of dollars. In other words, the Jews were telling the Arabs that to return the Moral Rights and material possessions they stole from the Palestinians, the Jews must be rewarded by Arabs who would agree to beg and pay for what the Jews continue to impound.

 

As to what happened to me personally at the material level, it is a true story that unfolded in Montreal before I opened my own school. I was teaching in a small private school that had a difficult past caused by internal problems which pitted the partners (all brothers I believe) against each other.

 

When I landed there, two brothers owned the school with one of them being away on a long vacation in Greece, the country of his origin. I dealt with the brother in Montreal and nothing unusual happened for a few weeks. The man then asked me if I could lend him money to buy his brother’s share, thus own the school outright, but then negotiate a partnership with me.

 

Even though the family owned a school that had a successful past, the brothers were working at least on a part-time bass to make ends meet. And my would-be partner in Montreal was assuring me that the returning brother will be so hungry for money after spending all that he had on a long vacation, we could buy his share of the school for a very low price.

 

He went on to say that to close the deal, all he needed at that point were $5,000.00, which left me with the impression that he’ll be adding more to it and make a better offer to his brother. We wrote a one-page contract in which we stipulated the terms of the agreement and waited, supposedly for the return of the vacationing brother.

 

A week or so passed and the unimaginable happened. I entered a room at the school and saw my would-be partner sitting around a small table with two other men. They were gambling. I did not know then, and I still do not know what game they were playing. All I can tell is that each player put the same amount of money ($10.00 or $20.00) on the table, upon which the dealer gave them a number of cards. Each player would throw open one card on the table, and the winning player (I did not know by which criterion) collected the money. They played round after round, each lasting less than a minute. And here is the mordant catch, my debtor did not win once in the two dozen rounds I saw them play.

 

The effect on me was like seeing my $5,000.00 dollars vanish into thin air. Unable to think of anything to say or do as I watched three grown men caught in a trance that was pumping enough adrenalin in their veins to stampede over an army of humans and crush it, I kept my mouth shut and quietly exited the room, determined to start thinking seriously about opening my own school, and do it alone.

 

Meanwhile, I sued my debtor and would-be partner to return the money he used for purposes other than what his contract with me was stipulating. And that’s when I was hit with a second nasty surprise. It was that to avoid defending himself in court, the man asked his boss to lend him money to pay me. And guess what, my friend, the boss turned out to be a Jew. Instead of lending money to his employee, he told him of a “better way” to resolve this matter. He said he should borrow from his bank who would give him a loan if I—who needs to be paid—could be convinced to endorse the loan.

 

Do you know what that would have meant? It would have meant that the contention which existed between me and my borrower, would have become one that’s now between me and his bank. The man could stop making payments to the bank at any time, and the bank would have come after me. So very diabolically Jewish, so very satanically disgusting.

 

It turned out this was the kind of Jewish solution that turn the thieving borrower/lender moguls of financial services into the giant banks that keep tumbling every once a while. In my case, when the borrower stopped payment, I would have had to beg the Greek gambler or his Jewish boss to render justice by paying the bank that’s now after me.

 

These are the realities I learned in real life which tell me not to trust the Canuckistan Government which seems to tell me that to get the money owed to me, I should beg for justice to be done. Not a chance.

An impossible mission drafted by lunatics

 Can you be made to love a stranger or a group of them because someone asked you to ? Because you were commanded to? Because it was made a condition of your employment?

 

Can a loveless marriage, arranged under coercion ever develop the authenticity of the naturally developed love which normally takes roots and flourishes between two people?

 

Of course, you cannot be made to love an individual or a group of the same kind because you were asked, commanded or threatened if you don’t. In fact, any level of real or perceived coercion will cause you to pushback against what’s being imposed on you, developing instead a level of hatred that will grow in time for those you are forced to love, and those forcing you to love them.

 

Believe it or not, this is the kind of diabolic matchmaking which the Government of the United States of America has decided to undertake so as to counter what they—whomever they are—call antisemitism. You’ll find a full account of this story in the Jewish online publication Algemeiner. It came under the title: “Biden Administration Releases Historic ‘Comprehensive and Ambitious’ Plan to Counter Antisemitism,” written by Andrew Bernard and published on May 25, 2023.

 

Well, my friend, if you cannot imagine being made to love the unlovable, you are one whiff away from imagining 100 antisemitic silver bullets fired into the hearts of America’s civil servants. Why is that, you ask? You’ll find the answer in the first paragraph of the Bernard story. It says the following: “President Joseph Biden released the first-ever national strategy for fighting antisemitism, a 60-page document with more than 100 action items for the federal government and civil society”.

 

As if this were not enough, Andrew Bernard further reports that: “The strategy says that the US has embraced the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism supported by most American Jewish groups, however it also says that the IHRA definition is one of several and that the administration welcomes, appreciates and notes other such efforts”.

 

But will this calm the fear of those in the American civil service who are familiar with the way that the Jews begin by asking for a finger yet end up owning the hand, the shoulder and everything else you got, including your unconditional love, your kitchen sink and the toilet bowl? The answer is no, these people will not calm down. What will happen instead is that the anger generated by fear will bottle up in their hearts, and will express itself at some point forcefully if not explosively.

 

Lest you believe that all which has been happening lately, must have taught the Jewish leaders a powerful lesson about being moderate when it comes to asking the government for favors, the following passage in the Bernard story should dispel your optimism. Here is the infamous passage: “Many Jewish groups and leaders including the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) had called for the IHRA definition to be adopted as the ‘Sole’ definition of antisemitism in the plan”.

 

This prompts us to pause, to catch our breath and to mull over the relationship that may exist between the “definition” of a word that’s embraced by the government, and the written or unwritten “law” which the government enforces on its civil servants day in and day out, as each individual wonders if what he or she said has or has not violated the definition of a word they never heard of before, but may now cause them to be ostracized or forced to resign or fired outright.

 

And while the Jews who demand that the IHRA  definition be adopted at the exclusion of all other definitions, feel they stand on solid ground and can continue to implement their highly successful policy of “creep and grab” what others cannot have, the American civil servants and the rest of society will turn the language of the underground into a mainstream of everyday discourse. This will happen because not knowing what the neighbor thinks or believes, each individual will protect the self by keeping mum at first, but then burst out by speaking what has heretofore been considered unspeakable.

 

But if you believe for a moment that the Jewish leaders have learned that it is better to begin an intellectual journey by staging an adversarial debate in which the opposing groups challenge each others’ assumptions, you’ll be disappointed to see the following mind boggling statement. Here it is as reported by Andrew Bernard: “Chairman of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law Kenneth Marcus said:”

 

“Much of the language of the document is far more consistent with IHRA than with Nexus… It’s just unfortunate that they muddle what would otherwise have been a very good discussion of definitions by praising a definition inconsistent with their approach.”

 

Do you realize what Chairman Kenneth Marcus is saying? He says that a very good discussion can be had if the American Government adopts the IHRA definition of antisemitism at the exclusion of all other definitions. In other words, he is telling the Government to shut everybody up and listen to the Jewish voice only so as to have “a very good discussion”.

 

Well then, this forces me to remind lawyer Kenneth Marcus of the reality that governments listening to Jews at the exclusion of all others is what has caused the current flare up of antisemitism — indeed caused all the anti-Jewish violence seen in history.

 

Keep pushing your luck, Ken, and before you know it, you’ll hear Gentiles and Jews haggle (not debate) what the ultimate fate of the Jews must be.

Why the likely always happens to the unlikely

 Jewish Alan Dershowitz and Jewish Andrew Stein, say they are privy to the sentiments of “long range planners in Israel.” Because the discussion concerns the long range, you know that it has to do with the strategic intrigues their Israeli counterparts are scheming—and trying to inflict on America.

 

All of that came in the article which the two writers cowrote under the title: “Why Biden might be the Dems’ last pro-Israel president,” published on May 18, 2023 in the New York Post. Whereas this kind of article would have been considered a run-of-the-mill ordinary piece written by dreaming quacks that had nothing better to do at the time, it means something different given the writers’ stature and the positions they occupy within the American society.

 

It is that Alan Dershowitz is a prominent lawyer and professor emeritus at Harvard Law School. In this capacity, he represents the legal side of what the Jews in America and abroad are scheming for America. Andrew Stein, on the other hand, once served as New York City Council president; he thus represents the political side of what the Jews in America and abroad are scheming for America.

 

So then, what is it that the Jews as individuals and as the “Jewish Central” collective, are scheming with regard to the long range strategic transformation of America? Here, in condensed form, are the words of Dershowitz and Stein, that answer the question:

 

“Long-range planners in Israel worry Joe Biden may be the last pro-Israel Democratic president. More fundamentally, they fear Israel is becoming a wedge issue separating Democrats from Republicans. Backing [Israel] has historically been bipartisan. But this has changed recently”.

 

In other words, despite the fact that America’s elites are beginning to take their own words seriously with regard to defending “our democracy” as they call it, the Jewish lawyer and the former Jewish legislator wish to maintain the country in the dark age. This is where America lived for decades, a time when the Jewish commands to America were implemented more promptly than Hitler’s commands to his troops ever were. America was then more fascistically Jewish than Germany was a Nazi dictatorship.

 

To explain why the era of Jewish monopoly over America’s decisions-making is coming to an end, Dershowitz and Stein offer the notion that a generational split has occurred in the American society concerning the governance of the country. It applies to matters that relate to both domestic and foreign affairs. Thus, whereas the younger generations are moving toward a more open and less discriminatory society while working under the banner of the Democratic Party, other forces are trying to freeze America in its current status quo while working under the banner of the Republican Party. Here is how our two authors explained this part:

 

“Domestic political support for Israel among Democratic officials has wavered of late. This reflects the ambivalence among voters about Israel, with polls showing favorable attitudes toward the Palestinian side, even by young Jews. The diminishing support for Israel among the Democratic Party is coupled with the expanding support among Republicans. Israel is less central to Jewish voters’ identity than it used to be. Other issues are at least equally important. Indeed, Israel is more important to many Christian evangelicals than to some Reform and Conservative Jews”.

 

This means that the success which the Jewish leaders now score going against some people, and used to score going against many more people — all that while maintaining a tight grip on their followers the way they managed to do — was made possible by the leaders’ own opportunistic exploitation of the people’s frazzled emotional state. The two ideas the Jewish leaders weaponized to that end, were the need to guard against the likely existential threat to Jewish life, and the need to believe in the unlikely salvation that religion can and will deliver.

 

And so, the Jewish leaders engaged and continue to engage in the preaching of a narrative that promises to deliver on those two notional requirements. Here is how Dershowitz and Stein handled that part of what they want you to believe is the responsibility they have toward their followers and the human race:

 

“Israel will become even more of a wedge issue, especially since all likely Republican candidates in 2024 and beyond are certain to continue Donald Trump’s vigorous advocacy. That wedge is evident already in several European countries, where the government’s support for Israel depends on whether the right or left wins. Things may change, of course. If Israel were to become involved in a hot war with Iran that posed an existential threat, many more Jewish voters might prioritize their support”.

 

It could not have escaped the readers that Dershowitz and Stein are so immersed in their one-dimensional mode of thinking, they fail to see what is unfolding around them, and how it impacts the  situation they grew accustomed to seeing as static and almost never changing.

 

It is that China, Russia and a few other nations are giving America a taste of its own Jewish medicine. This alone will prompt even the most sissified of the Evangelicals to reconsider their relationship with the likes of the Dershowitzes and the Steins.

The deep roots of lawnmowing and haircutting

 In the language known as Zionspeak, lawnmowing means bombing the neighbors’ properties you cannot steal. Haircutting means aggressively working to keep the neighbors at a permanent disadvantage.

 

Despite the reality that Jews are the main zionspeakers who practice lawnmowing and haircutting, they pretend to reflect the cultural traits of Western Civilization known to live by the Islamo-Christian practice of tolerance, forgiveness, compassion and togetherness — in opposition to the zionspeaking aggressors.

 

In fact, the reason why lawnmowing and haircutting are in the air these days, is because the entity where Zionspeak is practiced has convinced Clifford D. May to write a piece about it. And so, he came up with an article he wrote under the title: “Bashar Assad is back, and the Arab League’s got him,” published on May 16, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

It is that when the need for change first came to the Arab country of Tunisia causing the rise of a mini-uprising in that country, the movement (known as the Arab Spring) was copycatted in several Arab countries, one of these being Syria. Historically, a pivotal country in “combustible” Levant, it was inevitable that Syria would burst as it did. In fact, it all began with the 1916 Sikes-Picot Agreement by which the Anglo-French colonial powers of the West acquire and shared among themselves the spoils that were relinquished by the “Sick Man of Europe,” the dissolving Ottoman Empire.

 

Operating by the dictates of the “divide and conquer” mentality, the colonial powers wasted no time subverting the existing Islamo-Christian practice of tolerance, forgiveness, compassion and togetherness, gradually replacing it with that of the zionspeaking aggressors who were themselves rewarded with Palestine, a sizeable piece of the Levant. And whereas Palestine was given away to strangers from Europe, a good chunk of Syria, known as Lebanon – that happened to be Christian dominated – was severed from the mother country and made to operate as an independent country.

 

As designed by the colonial powers and expected by the rest of the world, Lebanon did eventually erupt in a civil war. The Lebanese themselves and the Arab League took the right decision when they called on Syria to intervene and restore peace to that country. Syria did just that, and left with its head high for an accomplishment that nevertheless warned Syria a similar fate could befall it because the forces that went after Lebanon were now going against Syria.

 

The result has been the introduction into Syria of a bloody Arab Spring that brought hundreds of terrorist groups to work on demolishing the very idea of a Syrian nation. These groups were organized by the Zionspeakers and financed by the colonial powers of old, as well as those aspiring to dominate. They were then and continue to be the people who believe they were chosen and put in charge of creating a perfect world for tomorrow and beyond.

 

In the face of such history, and operating under the hammer of that kind of developments, Bashar Assad who is the President of Syria, relied on the friends who would help him maintain the integrity of Syria. Together they defeated the forces of nihilism, and kept alive the people as well as the nation of Syria despite the unfortunate reality that the zionspeakers and their terrorist allies managed to exterminate half a million Syrians, and blame their crimes on Assad.

 

Now that it is all over for the Syrian troubles, it is time for those like Clifford May to cry over spilled milk. This is what he has done in his article, omitting many of the relevant historical events, putting out a decidedly false narrative, reversing some of the facts, and distorting many more.

 

With a sense of bitterness, Clifford May finally comes down to telling his audience about the cultural traits of Western Civilization under which the Islamo-Christian people of the Arab World practice tolerance, forgiveness, compassion and togetherness — all that in opposition to the zionspeaking aggressors whose “death cult” now claims hundreds of thousands of young American lives every year. Here, in condensed form, is the passage that tells you about Clifford May’s mood:

 

 

“Assad is now being rewarded. The Arab League has announced that Syria’s membership, suspended in 2001, will be restored and that Mr. Assad will attend its next summit in Saudi Arabia. Will there be handshakes, hugs and backslapping? The Arab League has 22 members. Some are moderate. Some are rich (thanks to oil and gas); most are poor. All are majority Muslim, and most are majority Sunni. Over 400 million people live in the nations of the Arab League, though not all are Arabs. Minorities — e.g., Kurds, Druze, Coptic Christians, Maronites — populate those countries”.

 

It remains to be said that according to Clifford May and those like him in the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and outside of it — the truth has been confirmed with regard to the saying that goes as follows:

 

It is better to have loved and lost like it might happen to an Islamo-Christian, than never to have loved. It is also never as good to have hated and succeeded like a zionspeaker might seek to do, than never to have tried wiping out a generation of young Americans.

Those you plan to cannibalize, hide them first

 The mere expression of the word: “cannibal” provokes such a rattling in the body of listeners, it takes a fair amount of explanation to convince ordinary people that cannibalism done at the moral level, is different from the one done at the flesh-eating physical level.

 

In fact, the difference between the two is like that which exists among the primitive savages who get nourishment from consuming members of their own species, as opposed to that which exists among the ambulance chasers who seek to benefit materially by exploiting the blood-spilling mishaps suffered by the casualties of accidents.

 

In addition, physical cannibalism is a one-time affair that’s terminal and irreversible. Moral cannibalism, on the other hand, can be done repetitively because nothing prevents the ambulance chasers from doing it again and again to the same victims or to new ones. A moral cannibal may also abuse past victims by offering false advice on how they can alleviate their pain.

 

What will surprise you to learn, dear reader, is that moral cannibalism is the foundation upon which modern capitalism operates, and that you knew it all along. In fact, you have known it since the time you realized that you were living in a society where “dog eat dog,” and that to have your back scratched, you must scratch the back of others from time to time. And when you think of the system as being one that consents to mutual exploitation, you opt for lapping the competition at breakfast before being devoured at the dinner table.

 

All of these tendencies are so prevailing in the existing cultures, layers upon layers of equally repulsive but related phenomena have come to dominate the modern way of life. One of those ways, and perhaps the most cowardly of all, is that which seeks to hide the intended victim before starting the ritual of devouring it. And of all the cultures that exist on Planet Earth, no one has come close to being as cowardly as the Jews.

 

You’ll know why this is so when you read: “For the sake of Israel, Admit that a Palestinian Identity Exists,” an article that was written by Mike Konrad, and published on May 12, 2023 in The  American Thinker. But before we look at that opinion piece, here is the account of an eyewitness who was forced to live the horrible experience for decades. That eyewitness is none other than yours truly. Here is my story:

 

Unable to scare away the merchants who advertised their businesses in the smalltown newspaper I founded, affiliates of the Jewish inspired Toronto giants: Torstar and Thompson, pooled their efforts and devised a plan to hit me at levels they knew I had no means to defend myself.

 

They began at the business level by putting pressure on the headquarters of franchises, telling them to force their franchisees to stop advertising in my newspaper. Those that refused to do so were closed or the franchises given to someone else. The idea, of course, was to cause my newspaper to vanish, and when this happens, I vanish with it.

 

Despite all of this, I still managed to put out a newspaper containing enough advertising to pay my bills. But the newspaper contained something else that the giants did not like. These were the editorials I wrote. No, it was not so much the content of the editorials that bothered them — most of which they deemed to be kosher, anyway. What they could not stomach, however, was the fact that I had independent opinions. And having opinions of my own made it unnecessary to hitch my thinking to theirs and parrot what they came up with everyday.

 

I continued to survive the attempts to silence and vanish me because I still had politicians who advertised in my newspaper, and paid for the service. This is when affiliates of the Jewish inspired Torstar and Thompson responded by demonstrating how much power they had over the politics as well as the governance of the country. Here is what they did:

 

They allowed the politicians to continue advertising in my newspaper which was essential for them, but with the proviso that the cheques they sent me were no longer the official cheques of the office that requested the advertising. But because the politicians had to cover for the incurred expense, they decided week after week to send me cheques from a private female account — all that to pay for advertising they desperately needed to have while under orders to negate my existence.

 

If you think this is too burlesque already it could not get worse, wait till you read the rest of the story. It happened that the town covered by my newspaper was served by two Members of Provincial Parliament (MPP.) Both were conservative but competed ferociously against each other, outdoing one another to endear themselves to voters who called on both when they needed help and/or advice. Because of this, I always had at least one MPP advertising with me, and this was enough to keep me going for a while longer. So then, my dear friend, guess what happened next.

 

What happened was something that would not befit a primitive tribe living in a South American jungle. It is that affiliates of the Jewish inspired Torstar and Thompson, ordered the Government of Ontario to scale down the number of MPPs serving the Province from the existing 133 down to 103. And there should be only one member serving the town covered by my newspaper.

 

All these cockamamie ideas were unearthed and exploited when the Jews discovered it was becoming evermore difficult to rob people who are alive and willing to defend themselves. Thus, using the pretext that Jewish theft was the will of God, they responded to the changing times as follows: First, make the people vanish then take their possessions.

 

And that’s what the Mike Konrad article is all about. Read it and you’ll see how the Jews develop destructive ideas which they adapt to use against individuals, institutions and countries.

They seek having it both ways but lose both ways

 The world does not need more reminders that Jews have been behind almost every war that plagued humankind since the beginning of time, and neither does the world need convincing that the Jews intend to continue fanning the flames of war to the end of time.

 

We know this to be true because the Jews say so themselves whenever they get trapped and say it inadvertently trying as they do to speak about something else — actually, more like lying about other things as well. As to the reason why Jews get caught in traps of their own making; it’s because they suffer from yet another debilitating habit, that of trying to have it both ways in every case that crops up, whether the ways are compatible or they prove to be contradictory.

 

For example, lured by the image of dollar signs dancing in front of their noses whenever they stir the pity of Christians, the Jews of America and those of Israel periodically call on the Fox News Channel to help them seek the life-giving charity which keeps Israel afloat. However, parallel to that, and stirred by the sentiment that Jews must not be portrayed as helpless, those of America and Israel also engage in grandiose propaganda that falsely tells the world Israel’s per capita GDP is greater than those in Europe or Japan, thus considered one of the highest in the world. If you want to imagine how this looks like, think of someone saying that the derelict begging at the door of the Salvation Army is Keith Rupert Murdoch. Would you believe it?

 

In fact, endless arguments along similar illogical lines, are strung up by the Jews to say that Israel can and cannot defend itself, that America is and is not responsible for the defense of Israel, and that the world may or may not have the responsibility to prevent the Jews from being final solutioned.

 

An article, published recently, shows how such muddles unfold in the daily life of Planet Earth. It came under the title: “Israel’s 75th birthday,” and the subtitle: “Despite endless war, Jewish state survives and even thrives.” It was written by Clifford D. May and published on May 9, 2023 in The Washington Times. The following is a condensed compilation of the standard blather which is regularly spewed by Jewish propagandists:

 

“Israel’s military is powerful; its intelligence services are clever. It’s earned the nickname ‘startup nation,’ and boasts a per capita gross domestic product exceeding France’s. Iran’s rulers have for years been threatening Israelis with genocide while developing nuclear weapons. Tehran’s proxy, Lebanon-based Hezbollah, has some 150,000 missiles aimed at Israel, a growing number precision-guided. Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other Iran-backed groups increasingly operate in the northern West Bank, which the Palestinian Authority governs”.

 

Whereas these passages highlight the self-defeating contradictions that accompany the Jewish arguments, they do not show how the Jews deal themselves fatal blows when it comes to the matter of measuring credibility. Look at the following quote, taken from May’s recent article:

 

“On the 2023 World Happiness Report, only Finland, Denmark and Iceland rank above Israel”.

 

This is a classic demonstration of Jewish thievery that sooner or later injects a killer poison into the bloodstream of Jewish credibility. Here is how that hoax started:

 

It happened that at the start of our effort to participate in the ongoing conversation concerning world affairs — especially those pertaining to the Middle East — I and people like myself were met with beastly levels of Jewish opposition which they exerted in the belief that freedom of expression was a Jewish monopoly to be used only by them or by others with their permission.

 

Because we, Arabs, went ahead anyway and expressed ourselves without seeking their permission, the Jews developed a way to respond. They recruited the media outlets, institutions and politicians who felt honored being a part of the gangrape party which the Jews threw for them. Thus, every time that one of us said or did something that made sense, the Jews engaged one of their recruits to respond. As expected, they did so without naming any of us because they wanted us to remain the invisible victims of their constant thieving activities. So very disgusting. So very Jewish.

 

Because it happened that I was interested in writing realistically (some said gloomily) about world affairs at the same time that I wrote lighthearted fictional comedy, the question arose as to how I could be of such opposite moods simultaneously. Well, the Jews who portrayed themselves as being experts in everything, answered the question. Surprisingly, for the first and only time, they gave the correct answer. They said that the Egyptians were by their genetic nature the happiest people on Earth. Thus, while reflecting my nature, I was also exhibiting the sad reality of the times in which I lived.

 

That did not sit well with the population at Jewish Central. Made of characters who are powered by the genetic forces of thievery, Central ordered that a way be devised to make Israel look like the place where happy people live. But because those in charge of devising the scheme could not make their assertions sound credible, they pulled the trick of last resort. They said that the happiest people on Earth live both in Israel and America. This made it so that to cast doubt on Israel’s happiness was to cast doubt on America’s happiness as well — and not too many people were willing to do that.

 

But now that millions of Americans are being slaughtered in mass shootings, drug overdoses, suicides and careless accidents, no one dares to negate the reality that America is the gloomiest patch of real estate on the surface of Planet Earth, or that Israel – which doomed America – is even worse off.

They can’t be more concerned than the laden

 Those who run around proclaiming the flippant saying that “Israel is the envy of the world,” have found a corollary that twins with it. They now ask if “Egypt is about to collapse.” In so doing, they reinforce the two lies in the hope of making them stick in the minds of people that may be interested in the truth, but not so much as to dig deep into it.

 

The people behind all of this — call them professional haters of Egypt — recruited David Schenker, and had him write an article in which he explains their newly formulated point of view. The article came under the title: “Is Egypt Headed Toward Collapse?” and the subtitle: “Egypt has been described as ‘too big to fail.’ However, a further deterioration is possible.” It was published on May 5, 2023 in National Interest.

 

Schenker begins his discussion with a paragraph that paints a picture of Egyptian and American officials who are perfectly serene concerning the state of the Egyptian economy. But this is deceptive, said Schenker. How does he know that? He knows it because the Egyptian businessmen he met (but never named) were despondent, knowing that the economy was in freefall, he assures us.

 

Well, that was in February, said Schenker, and this is the month of May, a business quarter later that’s long enough to have affected the life of an economy. But Egypt does not seem to have hit bottom as yet, or is about to do so anytime soon. In fact, what Schenker does next dissuades you from entertaining the idea that the economy is in a hurry to collapse. Look how Schenker did that: “Today’s precipitous decline was set in motion nearly a decade ago”. Well then, how many more decades will it take for a shaky economy to collapse? Don’t hold your breath.

 

What’s really going on today in that part of the world, anyway?

 

We begin to understand what’s going on when we study the pattern of games that foreign investors play, and we decipher the intent of the tricks they pull for the purpose of obtaining favorable business deals. We also understand why the recipients of foreign investments act the way they do in response.

 

Think back to a time when hydrocarbons were discovered in abundance in Egypt, and around its maritime economic zone. Fearing that this will motivate the country to sell its resources at a price so cheap, it will lower the price of hydrocarbons throughout the region, the Gulf oil moguls offered to help Egypt in every way possible to help it maintain a tough bargaining stance while negotiating with the big oil companies.

 

But now that the moguls are running around the world — along with everyone else, looking for good investment opportunities but finding them dwindling — look what’s happening:

 

“Inflow of capital from the Gulf is predicated on military divestment from the economy. The government published a list of thirty-two military-owned companies to be sold off. Optimistic appraisals of this initiative faded when it emerged that only minority shares in these enterprises were on offer. While some assets on the block may be appealing, Gulf investors are unlikely to invest in non-controlling interests in opaquely operated—and perhaps overvalued—state-owned enterprises. Like oil-rich Gulf States, the IMF is skeptical about Sisi’s commitment to actually sideline the military from the Egyptian economy. The first review in the four-year program was slated for March 15, but the IMF has delayed the evaluation—and the disbursal of loan tranches—until Cairo makes progress on privatization”.

 

Clearly, therefore, when we recall the stance of the Egyptian and American officials who exhibited serenity concerning the stability of the Egyptian economy, and we contrast such reality against that of the self-serving would-be investors, we can only conclude that there is more credibility in the behavior of those professing the “steady as she goes” method of dealing with an economy that’s now firing on all cylinders — than those who pretend to panic seeing the economy collapse, having predicted for decades that it will.

 

The unrefuted truth is that the revenues from the Suez Canal that used to be below 5-billion dollars a year, has now exceeded the 8-billion mark. Tourism is getting back to where it was before the pandemic. Remittances from the expats living abroad has exceeded the 30-billion a year. Egypt is becoming the number one or near-number-one exporter of citrus fruits, strawberries, onions and tomatoes. Its fish production went up ten folds, from 300,000 tons a year before implementing the aquaculture business to 3-million tons after it.

 

In addition, the country is fast becoming an energy hub, producing and selling both conventional and “green” energy for itself and its neighbors. Big and small local and international companies are falling over each other trying to establish businesses in Egypt where they produce the pocket calculators and the jumbo flat screens, the toasters and the microwave ovens, the heaters and the air-conditioners, the freezers and the refrigerators … and everything else that’s used in a household or an office.  

 

No, Egypt is not about to collapse, and the proof is that the imagined collapse is nothing more than the daydream of its professional haters.

 

All we can say to these people is: Dream on.

The longer they wait, the harsher the judgment

 I did mention sometime ago what happened when I first started a small newspaper in the town where I lived. It was the story of the Jew who was sent to me by his rabbi to convey the important message that should I get into trouble, I can count on the rabbi to bail me out. All I needed to do to earn this privilege, said the messenger, was to write a letter to the rabbi asking him – in essence – to take over the newspaper, and have his staff run it as they see fit.

 

Instead of motivating me to sell my heart and soul to the ever scheming Jews, that incident incentivized me to intensify my study of the Jewish character as it operates openly and insidiously to hypnotize and eventually take control of the communities it infiltrates. I learned a lot about this aspect of the Jewish operation and wrote about it since.

 

Memory of that event has come to me lately on account of what I sense the criminal syndicate that’s holding my money is trying to do. It is trying to force me to contact them and ask that they render to me what they owe me. But this being what got them to delay looking into the matter for 55 years, the intent behind their latest move, as I see it, is to grab onto a new communication from me; one that will give them license to continue delaying serving the cause of justice for another 55 years … well past the length of time I am expected to remain alive.

 

But a license is not something they’ll get from me because they got something else instead. It’s a substitute that was so contrary to what they expected, it will take them decades if not centuries to realize how much face they lost during the time that they delayed compensating me for the criminal persecution they inflicted on me throughout my adult life.

 

Judging them by their behavior, it is obvious that they fail to see what has happened to them as well as the image of Canada they have been projecting to the world. They still think of Canada as being the Lilly White most immaculate of the virgins, which is the image they have been projecting to the world for decades. But now that the mask has come down, they fail to see the grotesque blue, red and green cancerous pimples which are covering their faces and that of Canada.

 

What the world now sees when looking at Canada, is not a perfect model of how Human Rights is handled in a perfect country, but a disgusting model of how Human Rights is murdered in a criminal system by the very magots that end up feeding on the rotting corpse. And this is how posterity will view Canada next year, a decade later, a century beyond that … and forevermore.

 

Of curse, all this can change if the abominable creatures behind it can demonstrate an ability to redeem themselves. However, time being of the essence, the change will depend on how long it will take those creatures to activate the process of redeeming themselves. They need to keep in mind that the longer they wait, the harsher the judgment of history will be.

 

If it so happens that those in the Government of Canada that have come under the hypnotic spell of the Jews, but are now trying to breakaway from those controlling them — feel like helpless, here is the secret they can use to free themselves of the Jewish spiritual grip of death. It is an incantation that may sound religious but is a pagan chant that does more to invigorate the cantor than summon a supernatural force to come and help fix a difficult situation. Here is how the incantation goes:

 

I summon thee, ye gods of the psycho-moral intifada, and besiege you to fill me with the courage that’ll make me stand up to the most evil force ever to invade this Planet of Innocent Human Beings.

Renewed Cold War in the head of the fantasist

 To remain on the path he seems incapable of abandoning, Clifford D. May has effectuated intellectual somersaults to convince his audience that the old Cold War is still on, and has not been replaced – as some believe – by a struggle between two nation-states or two opposing ideologies.

 

May pulled those tricks by writing an article that came under the title: “The new — or perhaps renewed — Cold War,” and the subtitle: “You can't win it if you don't know you're in it.” The article was published on May 2, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

It is obvious at the outset that the writer aims to develop an argument by which to establish that war is more dangerous than a struggle between opposing nations or ideologies. Thus, ignoring the Chinese history of the last seven decades, Clifford May made it sound like America continues to be at war because it made the mistake of misunderstanding the evil intent of the Communists, and not because the 1950s Cultural Revolution made of China the super techno-industrial giant that it is today.

 

Instead of admitting to that reality, here in condensed form, is how Clifford May effectuated two somersaults, one of which attribute to Americans the many successes that the Chinese people and their leaders have scored for themselves in the relatively short period of time they had available to them:

 

“We did not see China’s transition because the conventional wisdom held that the People’s Republic of China was sliding away from communism, embracing freer markets and freer trade in pursuit of prosperity. Other freedoms would surely follow. We Americans could facilitate these historical changes. In 2001, President Bill Clinton pushed to give the PRC permanent normal trade relations with the US and membership in the World Trade Organization. As a senator and vice president, Joe Biden was a strong advocate of closer relations with the PRC. He believed that a rising China is a positive development, not only for China but for America and the world. Running for president a decade later, he told voters that China’s rulers are not bad folks. But guess what? They’re not competition for us either. His National Security Strategy, published last October, asserts that the Cold War is over and we do not seek conflict or a new Cold War”.

 

To strengthen his argument, Clifford May effectuated a second somersault when he invoked what Matt Pottinger had told the House select Committee on China, namely that in a cold war, the US should have two primary objectives. The first was articulated by Ronald Reagan even before he became president: We win, and they lose, said Reagan.

 

To which Clifford May has added that this doesn’t imply the termination of CCP rule in China. It doesn’t even mean containment — the core of US policy toward the Soviet Union. It does suggest ‘constrainment’ — preventing the PRC from becoming the global hegemon, enforcing its rules internationally while the US resigns itself to becoming a has-been power in a world where liberty dies.

 

And this leads to the false assertion that the second vital objective in a cold war will be to prevent it from becoming hot. But because this will be impossible to achieve without there being evil characters to deter and keep at bay or silence by defeating and taking out for good, Clifford May began this part of his argument by imagining appropriate but non-existent evil characters, as you’ll see in what follows:

 

“Listen to Chinese President Xi Jinping, who declared that it is his ‘historical mission’ to utilize the tools of dictatorship to realize a future in which capitalism will inevitably perish and socialism will inevitably triumph. Marxism, he said, was created in order to change the destiny of human history. Whoever rejects that world will be rejected by the world”.

 

Of course, Chinese President Xi Jinping said no such thing. But defamation is a standard somersault that’s frequently pulled by Jews behind the back of their victims such as you see them do incessantly to the Iranians whom they accuse of planning a second Holocaust. You also see the Jews do it to their other challengers in the region; those they accuse of terrorizing the Jews who are themselves the terrorists that never cease to descend on occupied Palestine — coming from everywhere in the world — armed with the deadliest and most terrorizing American-made weapons you can imagine.

 

But what’s the purpose of the defamation? It is to establish the superiority of America over its foes, thus cement the idea that deterrence will not lead to war by the process of reciprocal escalation. In fact, Clifford May would have you believe that if America were to embark on a strong drive to arm itself, it will scare China and its allies enough to prevent them from misbehaving in the Pacific region or anywhere else in the world.

 

Finally, Clifford May has endorsed Michael Pillsbury’s coauthored report in which the two writers argued that “protecting the US homeland and prosperity and diminishing China’s ability to harm the US will require a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach”.

 

And being the unrepentant warmonger, Clifford May continues to cling to the idea that this may be a heavy lift, but the alternative could be for historians of the future to write that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a battle won in a war lost because Americans wrongly believed the war had ended.

 

Clifford May has “eternal war” run in his bloodstream, and you can be certain he’s not about to bleed.