New system to protect cities of Planet Earth

 Ever since early man grabbed a stone and hit a beast that was attacking him, the human species was given a gift that supplemented the process of natural selection by which nature made most organisms evolve into stronger and more lethal versions of themselves. They evolved into specimen that could defend themselves better, also pursue more formidable preys.

 

Whereas most animals failed to develop the ability to turn the metal and mineral resources made available by nature, into a tool or a weapon, human beings quickly became the toolmakers and weapons fabricators who did much to enhance life on Earth but also threatened it with extinction.

 

In fact, a study of the way that weapons of war developed over the ages, suggests that the makers of attack weapons almost always preceded the makers of defense weapons. To wit, because it is illogical to defend against something that isn’t there, few inventors spent time anticipating what might come along against which they’ll be called upon to defend.

 

But then, it happened that both the offensive and defensive weapons became so sophisticated and so much more destructive, they were used to fulfill both purposes. For example, a ballistic missile that is installed to retaliate against an attacker, also served to defend the homeland. It did so by intimidating all potential aggressors. Likewise, an anti-ballistic missile that’s installed to defend the homeland, tells the enemy it can attack it without fearing retaliation.

 

And so, the new system of defense I am proposing is meant to diminish the possibility of one side getting so far ahead technologically, it would cause the unthinkable to happen by design or by mistake. Thus to begin with, the system will have to be mass produced – done so by the collective effort of all humankind – and given to all the cities in all the nations, and used solely for the protection of the planet’s achievements.

 

How will the system work?

 

Because it has been impossible for a laser beam to deliver as much kinetic energy to an incoming missile and destroy it in flight (as would a hail of bullets) it was necessary to think in terms of combining the advantage of the laser to create a coherent light, with the advantage that solid bullets can provide, thus produce a non-lased yet coherent beam of metals.

 

The secret to making the system work, lies in the discovery that light exerts pressure on a solid by a process known as the Compton Effect. This is so real and useful, the spaceships of the future are envisioned to sail the solar winds. Exploiting the phenomenon in the construction of our system, we build a powerful laser to which we attach a supplier of metal bullets in powdered form—bullets that the laser will forcefully push out. How is this done?

 

There will be a vertical tube topped by a hopper containing a powdered metal such as lead. The metal will fall onto a lattice that’s connected to a positive current. This will strip the metal of its electrons. The metal will continue to fall onto another lattice that’s connected to a negative current. This will strip it of its positive protons. What’s left will be neutrons that will clump together, attracted by their nuclear force. They will, in effect, contribute to making themselves a coherent beam of metal.

 

The neutrons will enter a chamber where they’ll meet the beam of the laser. They will be pushed out as a hail of coherent metal bullets at a speed that will approach that of light. And this will bring down any and every warhead launched to destroy a city.

 

If every city in the world were protected by such a system, we would all feel better about the destiny of our species. So, let’s get on with it.

Missed opportunities in Brian Mulroney’s saga

 I begin by alerting the readers to the reality that given my age and physical condition, my memory to retain names is no longer what it was, and my ability to put events in their proper chronological order is also suffering. What remains vivid in my memory are the incidents that made a strong impression on me at the time that they occurred.

 

Here is the saga of my give-and-take with former Prime Minister of Canada Brian Mulroney who passed away yesterday leaving behind a legacy that historians will see as being honorable given what he accomplished for the country that elected him to serve. But when it came to handling my case and doing me justice, the saga shows a number of gaps.

 

It all began when the talk about the secession of Quebec from Canada was growing louder in the English speaking community embedded in the French Canadian Province of Quebec. Before you know it, a full blown movement by the French separatists of the Province had risen, and was successfully pushing forward their agenda.

 

Despite being let down by Mulroney on two previous occasions with regard to the subject of my persecution at the hands of the Canadian Jewish Congress and the RCMP, I wrote a letter to then Prime Minister Brian Mulroney supporting his position on the referendum for separation that was proposed for Quebec.

 

Letting me down happened once when my member of Parliament was Speaker of the House of Commons. He tried to help me but Mulroney forced him to resign. And it happened a second time when the President of the Unted States, Ronald Reagan pressured Mulroney to resolve my case, and Mulrooney verbally attacked on the floor of the House.

 

Still, to my surprise, Mulroney wrote me a personal letter asking that I get involved in the ensuing debate. I did just that in the hope that it will nudge him to work on my case; one that had seen me tortured for several decades already. Little did I know then that my action will trigger a series of happenings showing moments of great triumph but also moments of great disappointment.

 

The greatest moment of disappointment came to my attention when my writing supporting the Mulroney position, was not going to help solve my problem. This happened when everybody was hanging on to every word I wrote, yet a member of the British Columbia Legislature who wanted to see me take full part in the debate, complained that they were negotiating with a ghost. This meant that Mulroney was going to maintain the demonic wall of silence.

 

As to the greatest moment of triumph, it came when I solved a pernicious misunderstanding that was threatening to sink the Mulroney position. Here is the reality:

 

In French, there are the two words, “distinct and distingué.” In English there are the two words, “distinct and distinguished.” The first word, “distinct” has the same meaning in both languages. There can be no confusion there. As to the second word, it means something different in each language. And so, when the separatists were demanding that the English recognize Quebec as having a “distinct” culture that must be taken into account, the English cried bloody murder, believing that the French wanted to make themselves “distinguished” over the English.

 

When I explained all that, reassuring the English that the French were not vying for supremacy, the temperature was lowered dramatically, and the debate proceeded normally. It is that a great deal had been lost in the translation, and I was the one to repair the damage that ensued.

 

Even people as honorable as Brian Mulroney fear the power of the police state they are called upon to govern.

Here’s the story, and here’s the suspicion

 The leader of the Opposition expressed puzzlement as to why Justin Trudeau is adamant about keeping under wrap what came to be known as the “Lavalin Scandal.” This being the case, I have a real story and a suspicion to tell, that might shed light on the mystery.

 

Here is the part of the story that happened to me:

 

At the same time that I sent a copy of my invention for turning salt water into fresh water to McGill University, I had also sent a copy to Lavalin for appraisal and possible use. They summoned me to discuss the project, and we had a good discussion, at the end of which they seemed to suggest I should be the one to try selling the idea to the desert countries in need of such projects.

 

They told me that Lavalin was already doing power and water projects in Libya, and that I should have an easy time selling the idea to these people. But given my other involvements and obligations in Canada, I could not see myself take on a new responsibility and so, I turned down their offer.

 

Shortly thereafter, I heard rumors to the effect that Lavalin executives were nabbed by the RCMP for committing fraud. This being a pattern that was familiar to me, it did not move me. I lumped it together with the David Johnson development that was itself yet another proof demonstrating that Canada was a police state in the business of punishing the good people who would talk to me rather than persecute me.

 

And here is the part of the story that makes me suspicious about further machinations that must have unfolded then, and that Justin Trudeau would rather keep hidden from the public view:

 

There is the strong possibility that the documents which the leader of the Opposition wants to see, contain the name of the “invisible” man who must never be seen or talked about in public. That’s yours truly.

 

And this makes it interesting to see how the murderous government of Canada will resolve the challenge it is facing without blowing the case sky high.

Justin Trudeau’s antics expose a failed leader

 How do you think an aggrieved man in the past, sought relief for his ordeal, and if possible compensation for what he lost?

 

Well, you don’t have to go too far back tracing the early steps we, of the human race, took to that end, and now view as having been our early march into civilization. In fact, what was done in the past is done now under our noses, and we don’t even know what it is we’re looking at.

 

You might think of the relief and compensation which are dispensed in today’s underdeveloped societies by a village elder rather than a judge who serves as member of a government elected by that society, have changed—but you’d be making a mistake. The reality is that justice in a modern society is handed out in the same way today as it was in the past, and continues to be in primitive societies. We are all in it drinking from the same cup.

 

Whereas judges are expected to remain impartial in every case they preside over, thus rule in accordance with instructions set beforehand and applying equally to everyone, the paper trail and record of judges show they all have biases that affect their judgment. Worse has been the intrusion of Liberal-Democratic hypocrisy into the system of justice as can be seen to happen in the jurisdictions that tie Democracy with Human Rights, and pretend to champion Human Rights by the mere fact that they think of themselves as being democratic.

 

In fact, the notion of Human Rights was invented to signify that judges do not dispense a justice that belongs to them or to the state, but that it is inherent to everyone by right of birth. And this is what you cannot impress upon someone like Justin Trudeau who is currently Prime Minister of Canada, and believes that he owns the justice which everyone seeks. Consider his latest antic in this field.

 

Battered by criticism for the monumental failures he committed and neither enhanced his image nor helped Canada regain the stature it lost on the world stage due to his antics, Justin Trudeau arranged for taking a tour of the Western Democracies where played more of his antics, thus worsened all that he tried to ameliorate.

 

He held a news conference jointly with the Prime Minister of Poland during which time, Trudeau let his fondness for the word “Democracy” run to the limit of endurance. He did so without this time, mentioning the term: “Human Rights” that used to make the bulk of his verbal diarrhea. Why is that?

 

Being the copycat that he is, Trudeau used Democracy in the same way that those who cheapened it have been using it. And so, he did not see harm in him using it too. He just did not think of the countries that use the word in their name, thus managed to put Canada in their company. They are Yemen, Ethiopia, Somalia, Afghanistan and Vietnam.

 

When it comes to the use of the term “Human Rights,” however, Trudeau knows what will happen if he ventures into that territory: he’ll get battered again. It is that he knows he has no inkling what the term means to the Canadian citizens he relentlessly crucifies by violating their Human Rights to please his Jewish masters. He thus entered into the “once bitten, twice shy” mode and froze there where he’ll probably stay to the end of time. Good riddance.

 

Still unable to fulfill the duties of leader, Justin Trudeau chose to act the way that tin-pot dictators do: He turned the country he is supposed to serve into the country that serves him. Given that his ambition has always been to rise to the level of prominence to which his meritless father Pierre Elliott Trudeau had attained, Young Justin sought the leaders he identified as potential flatterers, and started listening to what they said they desperately wanted.

 

In possession of everyone’s wish list, Trudeau went on a tour that was perceived by the world in the style that cartoons are drawn and perceived. To imagine the scene, think of a left hand that’s holding a bag, itself emblazoned with the Star of David, and showing images of cash and weapons as well as the inscription: Goodies for everyone.

 

The idea behind the tour was to give each foreign leader the goods that made them heap praises on Canada and its Prime Minister. In fact, this is how the press conference session unfolded as Trudeau stood beside the Prime Minister of Poland while the latter was drenching him with the fake praises that aimed to make Trudeau look like an advance Liberal Democrat when in reality he has always been a Third World butcher of the most cowardly variety.

Malfeasance by the two half-brains of Sisyphus

 In Greek mythology, Sisyphus represents the ungifted brut who keeps on gifting the innocent with gratuitous hurts. To punish him for what he does, the gods devised a plan that forced him to push a boulder up a hill for all of eternity.

 

In addition, the gods made it so that when the boulder approached the top of the hill, it rolled back to the bottom – and each time, Sisyphus would have to start all over again.

 

Now my friend, imagine a Sisyphus that’s made of two half-brains, both doing the same thing but each doing it in its own way. What metaphor, would you say the scene alludes to when looking at analogs in what goes on in the good old Earth named planet of man?

 

Well then, representing one half of the brains, try Jake Tapper who anchors the cable TV station CNN. As to the other half of the brains, try Justin Trudeau who is Prime Minister of Canada.

 

Here is what Justin Trudeau does that earned him the contempt of humanity:

 

When the Opposition asks him a question in Parliament, he always responds by lying about the accomplishments he says he realized in the vein of that question. This done, Trudeau accuses the Opposition of playing political games rather than suggest solutions he can steal and use and take credit for. Finally, Trudeau ends his response by promising that in the Sisyphean pattern, he’ll continue doing what he’s doing — a fitting punishment for making himself a fake distributor of gratuitous hurts.

 

As to what Jake Tapper has been doing lately, his game proved to be a great deal more convoluted. To begin with, here is the situation that contributed to his exposition:

 

In the never-ending quest to pin on Hamas the crimes committed by the American equipped Israeli Terror Force (ITF), Jake Tapper has been implementing an agenda that was fashioned by Jewish Central. It consists of inundating every piece of truth about the evil doings of Jews, with a tsunami of lies representing the opposite of what the truth was revealing.

 

Choosing to ignore the logical process of presenting the victims of rape, and have them describe their ordeal as did the women who accused Clinton, Trump and other men, the Jewish Central’s agenda preferred to show the hearsay of fake witnesses who said they got their rumors, not from the victims themselves, but from the hearsay of other fakes that had come before them.

 

To tell the story where it all started, it must also be said that Tapper plunged head-on into the fabricated controversy which tried to exploit the apparent unpopularity of Hamas among the elites of America’s political operatives. To that end, a bunch of frustrated women that wanted to make big hay discussing the subject of rape but never succeeded, hit on the idea of associating what they may have been suffering in silence, to the lie that Hamas raped Israeli women … and they managed to drag Jake Tapper into their scheme.

 

To help those women give credibility to their diabolic plan, Tapper tried to pull a magical trick that backfired on the entire project, exposing it for what it was, and burying it once and for all. What Jake Tapper did was that he relied on the distraction of the audience as it tried to sort out what was true from what was false, and suggestively asked the second hand witness he was interviewing if Hamas deliberately raped Israelis in front of family so as to make the latter suffer more.

 

Fortunately, the interviewee did not get the hint of what he was trying to accomplish, thus responded in the negative. Still, this alone, proved that the Jewish aim from the start was to pin on Hamas the crimes of the Jews. So then, what was it that blew the big lie into a pile of trash?

 

It was that a truth which lasted thousands of years, proved impossible attenuate, let alone erase. It is that none other than the Jewish bible itself, has been telling of the Jews who tortured the children of their opponents in front of the parents to make the latter suffer more.

 

This is the eternal truth which the contemporary Jewish lies are designed to inundate. May the gods afflict them with failures that will last from now to all of eternity.

Unlike the Gulag, slow murder in Canada

 Is it possible for the maker of a message to botch his own work as he tries to embellish and purvey it? Well, two situations developed lately that have the potential to give some kind of answer to that question.

 

The first situation was generated by an encounter between the Prime Minister of Canada and the leader of the opposition. The second was generated by the arguments that Clifford D. May who wrote an article that was meant to be on a different subject, but got involved in this one.

 

Clifford May told what he knows about the Russian dissident Alexei Navalny whom he describes as being Putin’s only serious rival.

 

Given the amount of knowledge about Russia that Clifford May has displayed mastery of as shown in his past writings year after year, it is surprising that his current attempt at explaining who the Russian dissident is, and what happened to him, falls short of what’s expected of Clifford May. Of course, it could be that (a) dissent in Russia is of little concern to him, or it could be that (b) he saw in the current story, an aspect that’s more compelling than dissent in Russia.

 

In fact, a serious analysis of Clifford May’s article, which came under the title: “Murder in the Gulag,” tells more about the American messenger Tucker Carlson who brought the story to light, than the message of the Russian dissident who, according to May, was murdered in a Russian gulag precisely because his message offended the high and mighty of that unhappy place.

 

Reflecting the (a) possibility, it can be said that by the time we wrap your heads around all of that, and come to read the subtitle of the article, we get shocked by what Clifford May is trying to do. Look what the subtitle of the article says: “Alexei Navalny, Putin’s only serious rival, has been eliminated,” which means that May is tickled more by the entertainment value that’s displayed in the rivalry of two “political gladiators” — a rivalry that ended in the disappearance of one rival — than May is preoccupied with the ramifications of the message which the “eliminated” left behind.

 

Reflecting on the (b) possibility, it can be said that Clifford May concluded that telling the story of the living American Tucker Carlson, will garner him a bigger audience than that of the dead Russian Alexei Navalny. And so, May went all out to tell, dissect and criticize the dispassionate manner by which Carlson told a Russian story; one that should have awakened his patriotic sentiment and compelled him to show the many ways by which the American system of governance is said to be superior to the Russian.

 

Failing to do this, Clifford May only managed to produce yet another ho-hum article to add to his pile of boredom. As to the situation that was generated by an encounter between the Prime Minister and the leader of the opposition, it shows clearly how a born loser draws defeat from the jaws of victory.

 

What happened that brought those two men into conflict, was the revelation by the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that he will table legislation in Parliament on Human Rights next week. This prompted the Leader of the Opposition to point out the irony in the violator of Human Rights pretending to protect what he violates. It is like the fox who sits on the eggs of chicken to incubate them. You know what happens next.

 

Still, Trudeau responded by saying that the Opposition did not read the legislation it is criticizing, and must wait till it is tabled before raising objections. Well, this is the kind of give-and-take that happens all the time between two who are at loggerhead. Understanding why they happen can be more beneficial than dismissing the arguments altogether.

 

Well then, when the Leader of the Opposition criticized the Prime Minister, he was saying that on the basis of the available prima facie evidence, a Prime Minister that lived in violation of Human Rights, is one that cannot protect Human Rights. In pointing this out, the Opposition gave the Prime Minister the opportunity to show regret, if not contrition for what he did in the past, and go on from there toward a future that will help him amend his prior failures.

 

The Prime Minster failed to do any of that in the distant past as well as the recent past, thus let stand the accusation concerning the slow-motion rape and murder to which he subjected and continues to subject his own citizens.

 

In fact, what Trudeau did instead, was that he wrapped himself with the customary defensive shield of accusing the Opposition of attacking him for being the least credible advocate of Human Rights to succeed at protecting Human Rights. And that did not sit well with the Prime Minister who believes he is so perfect, he cannot be criticized for anything.

 

The conclusion is inevitable, the Opposition is saying: Get out of this hypocritical mode, Justin; let someone else do the job you’re about to botch yet again; let someone credible fix what you never knew was so important, violating it as you’ve been doing, was sacrilegious through and through.

 

Step aside Justin, and let Canada start a new day in the glory of being a true defender of Human Rights.

Convincing arguments begin by telling the truth

 Clifford D. May says he has advice to give a Hamas leader, and proceeds to do so basing his counsel on what he says is the history of what transpired in the situation which unfolded in occupied Palestine and continues to unfold at the same furious pace.

 

To that end, May wrote a column telling in detail how each of the four instructions he gives the Hamas leader, relates to what he says is the history of a “The Gaza War” that has lasted more than four months already. The trouble with what May calls history, is that his narrative does not come close to being history. It is wishful thinking morphed by language to sound like history.

 

You can see how Clifford May uses his writing skills as he tries to transform the repugnant image of Israel’s performance that came out of the incident which started “The Gaza War,” in the column that he wrote under the title: “Hamas Leader Yahia Sinwar has four options” and the subtitle: “He can wait, go into exile, stop the fighting or become a martyr,” published on February 13, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

The reality being that Israel — which boasts it has intelligence capabilities that keep it safe as well as help America and the Western allies protect their homelands — has itself suffered a massive intelligence failure by all accounts on October 7, 2023.

 

Because the plan of the Hamas leaders was clearly designed to take live hostages for the purpose of trading them against the Palestinian kids whom Israel kidnaps regularly in the occupied territories and throws into prison, the Hamas commandos that carried out the raid into Israel on that day, made sure to protect Israeli lives as well as they did their own.

 

Despite all of this however, it happened that a thousand or so Israelis who were partying, were killed during an operation that was supposed to last one hour but took it eight hours to come to an end. But how and why did this happen?

 

The answer rests in the reality that the never-ending rhetoric of Israel and its Jewish and non-Jewish American mouthpieces, clashed head-on with what happened on the ground. The Jews were saying that Israel was the most efficient military in the world. It turned out that the Israeli military was shown to be the most incompetent ragtag army the world has ever seen.

 

And so, whereas the Palestinians were trying to save Israeli lives (if only because they were more valuable to them than dead Jewish bodies,) the delayed and disorganized response of the Israeli army contributed much to the number of lost lives.

 

These people died because they fought back alone against a disciplined Palestinian army instead of surrendering peacefully to it; they also died because the partying Israelis called on the army to come and help but were let down, perhaps deliberately by a Netanyahu and his coalition who almost lost the last election because they did not come hard on the Palestinians. The perception has now been established that the so-called guardians of Jewish security will trade Jewish lives for material gains that would enrich them personally.

 

In fact, it was thought that dead Israeli bodies coming home in body bags to be buried, would revive the popularity of Netanyahu’s coalition, but these people saw a contrary situation develop. The bloodthirsty leaders of Israel saw their ideas and actions repudiated by the Israeli masses as did the human masses everywhere in the world who hit the streets of their cities and towns in sympathy with their Israeli counterparts.

 

Seeing their invocation of the Holocaust — which they tried desperately to rhetorically if not morally associate with the October 7 event — fail to mitigate the world’s opposition to Israel’s unrelenting murderous crimes against humanity, the said coalition came up with a plan to win the propaganda war using demagoguery where, even the monstrous lies failed to produce results.

 

They said that the Hamas people; those whom the world has come to respect because of their honesty and intellectual integrity, raped Israeli women. But this is garbage that has been debunked on the pages of this blog. Instead of damning the innocent Hamas, the fake accounts of the Jews exonerated them by telling the readers that the rape has always been the Jewish attempt of injecting their moral syphilis into the hearts and souls of Westerners.

 

Please, my friend, go ahead and read the long and tedious Clifford May article to learn more about how a twisted mentality manages to twist the reality that is observed on the ground but then flounders upon further scrutiny, doing more damage to its causes and coming closer to convincing humanity that codling the Jews must stop, and harsh treatment for bad conduct must begin.

 

It is the only way the Jews will have security, and we’ll have peace in the world at long last.