The Wall Street Journal which is known to represent World
Jewry, and known to stand as the movement's loudest megaphone, has revealed
what it wishes to see happen sometime in the near future. It did so in an
editorial titled: “Al Qaeda, again” and subtitled: The terrorist don't seem to
agree that they have been defeated,” published on January 19, 2013. The editors
of the Journal have expressed their wish this way: “Between his Inaugural
address … and the State of the Union speech … we hope President Obama finds
space to include some comments on Algeria . And Mali . And Benghazi .”
The occasion is that there has been an election in the United States of America
where the President was re-elected. A new Congress was also elected and
inaugurated as will soon be the President. Composed of members of the House
representing their districts, and of senators representing their states, the
veteran legislators and the rookies among them will soon begin doing their part
in the Congress to join the President in the governance of the nation.
The legislators will do their part using the powers that
were conferred on them by the American people, will do it in accordance with
the terms that were enshrined in the Constitution by the founding fathers of
the nation, and do it in accordance with the amendments that were introduced in
later years as well as the statutes that came into effect after that.
There is no doubt that if left to themselves, the
legislators would discharge their duty at a high level of honesty or better,
each according to their talent and their abilities. However, the constitution
provides for the petition of these people by their constituents, a necessary
provision in the democratic system that is not without consequences. It is that
the provision leads to pressure being brought to bear on the legislators from
the outside – some of which will be legitimate pressure and some will be
illegitimate. This is where the matter usually starts to go complicated; where
the system opens itself to potential abuse and deterioration.
Looking at the life of a nation that may be a full democracy
or a quasi democracy, the groups that exert illegitimate pressure on its
legislators can only be identified or assessed after the fact – most likely a
long time after the fact. The reality is that the members of such groups or
their proxies will come into the life of a legislator from the outside,
disguised as legitimate lobbyists. They will go through the motion of
presenting what seems to be a lawful petition when, in fact, the presentation
will be neither a petition nor a lawful act. Instead, it will be a bribe, a
blackmail or both, wrapped into a proposition that invites the legislator to
betray his or her conscience – even betray their oath of office to advance the
causes of the outside group.
Some legislators will knuckle under the pressure of the
blackmail, other legislators will succumb to the lure of the bribe, and one or
the other will end up using the powers conferred on them to act not in
accordance with the terms enshrined in the Constitution or the amendments
introduced in later years or even the statutes that came after that. What they
will do, instead, is act in a scandalous manner then hope to get away with it.
This has been the political history of the United States of America
since it came together as a nation, and where groups that promoted one cause or
another have come and gone. Some groups lasted a long time; other groups lasted
a short period of time, but never before did a group come along with the intent
to fundamentally alter the substance of the nation. Never before, that is,
until now.
There is now a lobby that is a veritable shape shifter; one
that changes its appearance as easily as it changes its methods of operation,
even its name. It started as an anti-defamation league then became a political
action committee then became a Jewish defense league then became a Jewish lobby
then became a Zionist lobby then became an Israeli lobby then became je ne sais
quoi, which (translated from the French) means: don't know what else – probably
a thousand other things.
Whatever the name they assume for
a given occasion, the members of that group are gradually adopting the policy
of spending less energy to fight the notion that their intent is to alter the
substance of the nations they infiltrate. Instead, they are spending their
effort to make their activities look like a package of divine virtues handed to
them from above. The package contains a revelation, they say, to the effect
that they were chosen to fix the affairs of humanity by subjugating it to their
volition – a mental disposition they promise will someday prove to be the
expression of God's will.
All of that is spelled out in the
Old Testament, they say, a book they consider to be the bible of their
religious beliefs. When you go through that book, my dear reader, you will find
in it all the blood, the terror, the gore, the horror, the pain and the
suffering you can imagine – all spread out from cover to cover on each and
every page. And there is also the fire that will be used to cleanse what is
undesirable, and make way for what the Jews will bring to humanity when the
Messiah will hand them the scepter of the sovereign, instructing them to take
command of God's creation and head it from here to eternity.
Hence, the question for the rest
of us to ask: What is it that these people do to prepare for the day when they
believe the Messiah will show up? The answer is that they try to take as much
control as they can of anyone who will let them get away with it. They have
learned over the years that President Obama is less a pushover than some of his
predecessors, thus they concentrate on the Congress which has traditionally
been the cesspool of American political treason and subordination to Jewish
dictates. They will get to work and will recruit as many members of both
chambers as they can to tell the people of America and the people of the world
that the Jews are in charge of the superpower; of its culture, its finances and
its military.
You can see this in the way that their current editorial is
structured. Having lamented that: “Mr. Obama has tried to keep the world … at
arm's length,” they went on to assert that: “it is impossible to blink from the
reality … al Qaeda is … an active threat to U.S. interests.” Then they did
something that is very Jewish. To see what that is, look at the debating style
they have used. First, they said this: “When the French sent troops and planes
to Mali last week … the U.S. support it
expected didn't come.” Without hesitation, they added that they know: “The
geopolitical strategists at al Qaeda promptly (that's promptly) upped the
ante.”
But you ask: What is it that the
strategists did promptly? And the editors of the Journal answer: “[they did]
what's described as a well-planned offensive.” Well planned offensive in a
week? Wow, you say to yourself, these Jews did it to themselves again. Eager to
have it both ways, they stated a paradox. They said that al-Qaeda mounted and
executed a well-planned (time-consuming) offensive, and did it (promptly). Just
as it is with the clarity they see in the moral ambiguities they continually
spout, these people see promptness in the time consuming activities of
al-Qaeda. What sick mentality!
And so you ask what do they propose America should
do now? For one thing, they say at the beginning of the editorial they want to
see the President address the issue at some point between his inaugural address
and his State of the Union speech.
Then toward the end of the editorial, they lament the policy
called “light footprint” which America
has adopted with regard to what they call “committed terrorists.” And then,
they conclude with this: “It's a dangerous world” which is the reason why they
“hope that at John Kerry's … confirmation … at least one Senator presses ...
deeper … about the threat of terrorism in the Maghreb .”
So here you have it, my friend, they say that talk by the
President and deeper talk by a Senator should do the trick. Do you believe
this? Of course not. Unconvinced of their argument, you ask yourself: Is this
the story of the mountain that went into labor and produced a mouse? Or is it
something else?
From the looks of it, the answer
should be that it is something else. It must be that the editors of the Journal
are serving notice on the members of both chambers of the Congress that they
expect them to froth at the mouth deeper “pearls of wisdom” than they ever did
before.
And my advice to the American
legislators is to rebuff these lobbyists the moment they approach them. It is
important to do so early on because if they succumb to the temptation even
once, they will be drawn into a cesspool of horrific toxicity as would a baby
that is pulled by its umbilical cord into the jaws of a monster whose habit is
to never let go of a prey.