Saturday, March 19, 2016

Accusing others of what they are

Fifty years ago the Americans began to listen to the Jewish opinion makers and to those of their surrogates, believing that such opinions were made in the interest of America and the American people. In fact, that was the assurance given to the ruling class in Washington by Jews who sounded so sincere, the captains of the American ship of state did not suspect otherwise.

The Jews then adopted a policy of conflating the interests of America with those of Israel. They started the trend insidiously and kept enlarging it at a rate so slow, the growth was almost imperceptible at first. But by the time that a generation had passed, the Jews and their surrogates were talking about America and Israel as if they were one and the same body … with Israel being the head and America the economic and military muscles.

By the time that a second generation was firmly planted in America (more precisely the symbiotic duo that is now America/Israel) humanity had come to regard that generation as being the biggest threat to world peace, and the most serious danger ever faced by civilization. These ideas reached their climax during the reign of George W. Bush (the W), who was the forty-third president of the United States. At the end of his second term in office, W was replaced by Barack Obama who turned out to be the antidote the world was waiting for.

Almost immediately, Obama started to work on repairing the damage that his predecessors had caused America when they listened to the Jews; when they deferred to them, deputized them, delegated powers to them, and in the case of the W, by handing them the key to the executive office and staying out of it himself.

As if by habit, the Jews started to cajole, beg, warn and threaten Obama in an effort to make him toe their line but failed to do so in any serious or lasting way. Frustrated, the Jews went as far as to declare Obama an anti-Semitic enemy of Israel as well as enemy number one to an American population they pretended to represent by virtue of being Jews who also happened to be American.

Having defied them by conducting negotiations with Iran, and coming to an agreement with that nation on nuclear matters, the Jews attacked Obama as if he were the worst thing that happened to Jews since the Holocaust. Their attacks on the American President continue to this day, the latest being an article that came under the title: “Iran's missiles and the nuclear deal” and the subtitle: “Agreement backers must answer for a lethal combination,” written by Cal Thomas and published on March 16, 2016 in The Washington Times.

Our author begins his presentation by planting the seeds of its own destruction early on. Here is what he says: “When Iran's leaders believe they get their marching orders directly from Allah, there is no way they would violate those instructions.” Allah is Arabic for God, which is the word used by all Muslims – Arabs or not – including the Iranians. Thus what Thomas says about the Iranians applies to all Muslims.

So we want to know: What does Thomas say Allah has been saying to Muslims? And he tells us that Allah's instructions to them “include the eradication of Israel and the defeat of the 'Great Satan,' which would be America.” That's where we recoil because there are 65 Muslim nations on the Planet, inhabited by a billion and a half Muslims. Thus, the question: Should we believe Thomas's assertion that all these people and all those nations want to eradicate Israel and defeat America?

Since the answer is an emphatic no, that kind of talk by Cal Thomas serves only one purpose: to warn the readers that the article is the product of a schizo-paranoid mind. This being the case, we must consider everything in it to be suspect. And this effectively demolishes the entire Thomas thesis.

So, we ask: Why did it come to this? Why did Cal Thomas fail to see he was making a sweeping generalization that had the potential to kill everything he is laboring to articulate? The answer to that question sheds light on an important character of the Jews and their surrogates. It is that they always accuse someone else of what they see in themselves.

The truth is that the Old Testament, which is the Jewish bible, ends with the description of an apocalypse that promises to usher the era of Jewish rule over the entire planet. This is the character that Cal Thomas is falsely attributing to the Iranians and all Muslims. It is a hypocritical stance, and the very Jewish thing to do.