Imagine you get acquainted with someone and you instinctively prepare yourself to find out what kind of a person he is. You take note of what he says he likes and dislikes about other people and other things, and you carefully study what he is like himself.
Having accumulated enough information, you correlate the
pieces to see if they reveal something about this person. Sure enough, you detect
a strong correlation between what he says he likes, and what he is like
himself. You conclude that this guy is very much a narcissist.
Are there people like that? Of course there are. Are
there organizations like that? Of course there are. A perfect image of
themselves is what companies pay public relation outfits to paint of them.
That’s not to speak of the political parties who depend on projecting a good
image of themselves to attract donors, especially of the deep pocket kind, and attract
constituents of the kind that actually votes.
So then, what’s odd about this? Nothing is odd. In fact,
this situation represents life as ordinary as it gets for the human species on
Planet Earth. But there is an exception. To understand this part, we do two
things. One, we study the relationship that an organization has with its
members. And two, we study the relationship that a country has with its people.
Normally, an organization such as a company represents
the proverbial tight ship. This means it has a more or less rigid hierarchy
that leaves very little room for the members to do or say as they wish. The
same cannot be said of political parties whose mother’s milk is the free and
open debates that prepare the members to engage the opposition come election
time. This makes it look like the jurisdiction, if not the entire country, seem
to have as many independent thinkers as there are voters.
And this brings us to the exception. It is the Jews and
the relationships they have with each other. It is also the relationship they
have with Israel which they say represents their collective, as well as the
relationship they have with the organizations to which they belong. And it is
the relationship they have or seem to have, with the rest of humanity and the
organizations that represent its collective such as the United Nations, the
International Criminal Court and other world bodies.
You’ll find language addressing all these relationships
in an article that came under the title: “The UN Reminds Us What Kind of Place
It Is,” written by Bobby Miller, and published on December 14, 2022 in National
Review Online. Miller begins the discussion by mentioning a film that was made
by a Jew thirteen years ago and titled: “incompetence and corruption at
the heart of the UN.” Miller goes on to say that nothing has changed since then
because “Every time the UN starts to look like a somewhat credible institution,
we’re reminded of how astonishingly ridiculous a place it is”.
Bearing in mind that Bobby Miller is of the kind that
when he sees or hears something he doesn’t like, complains that he saw or heard
an antisemitic trope denigrating all Jews — it stuns you to see that he does
not hesitate to denigrate all of humanity the way that he did by calling the
United Nations, which represents all of us, “astonishingly ridiculous.” In
effect, therefore, he wants us to be careful about what we say and do to avoid
hurting their feelings, at the same time that he passionately insults the
entire human race without giving a thought what this does to our feelings. And this
is a display of Jewish narcissism in full flowering.
Miller goes on to explain his thinking by mentioning the
fact that the United Nations removed Iran from the Commission on the status of
Women, which he says is a positive development, but wonders why Iran had a seat
on the commission in the first place. His beef does not end here because China
whose one-child policy, he says has engendered female infanticide, is still on
the panel. Bobby Miller also mentions Qatar which he accuses of human-rights
abuses, and laments that it continues to retain its seat on the UN Human Rights
Council.
And what would be a discussion about Jewish thinking
without encountering an instance when a Jew advises humanity not to believe
what it sees with its own eyes, but believe what the Jews tell it to. It
happened this time when Bobby Miller advised humanity not to believe what it
sees in America’s political circles, but believe the Jews who say it isn’t what
it seems. Here is how he spun this piece of illogic:
“It has recently emerged that the UN’s managing attorney overseeing the Human Rights Council’s probe into Israel’s treatment of Palestinians during the 2014 conflict between Israel and Gaza-based groups claimed that the US government was under the thumb of the Jewish lobby. Evidently, antisemitism is a problem at the UN. Surprise, surprise”.
Here, Bobby Miller is advising the human race that to
tell the truth is to commit an antisemitic act, which itself has been defined
as a call to wipe the Jews off the face of the Earth. That is, Bobby Miller,
speaking in the name of all Jews, is saying that the telling of the truth is an
existential threat to the Jews. In other words, Miller is confirming that Jews
can only survive in a sea of lies. Hitler must be giggling in his gave.
Finally, as expected, someone advocating the Jewish and
Israeli causes, could not end his discussion without shooting himself in the
foot. Here is how Bobby Miller did it: “We can’t dispense with the UN
Security Council. But efforts to reform it should be a priority of the incoming
Congress”.
Because the American Constitution stipulates that foreign policy is the responsibility of the Executive branch, which depends less on the lobbies than does the Congress – for Bobby Miller to urge that the Congress usurp from the Executive responsibility for the UN Security Council, makes him a closet believer that the US government is under the thumb of the Jewish lobby, master of the US Congress.