Airing sadness is no substitute to correction

 At one point in his article, Dan Burton wrote the following: “What is truly sad is that the United Nations, which, in the aftermath of the Holocaust, assisted in Israel’s creation, became, over the years, a purveyor of anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda”.

 

Well, the fact that the whole world is once again turning antisemitic according to the Jewish definition of antisemitism, attests to the reality that the Jews will label you antisemitic if you don’t fall flat on your face and lick their boots. The world—which is made of human beings, and not dogs—refuses to lower itself to that level in consequence of which the Jews accuse the entire human race of being infested with the mysterious disease of antisemitism … and there stands the stalemate.

 

Things remain frozen in place because the Judeo-Yiddish culture does not allow the human mind to grow and imagine life in its multi-dimensional potential. When something goes contrary to what was expected, the Jews brood, complain and express sadness but do nothing to change the situation. They sit on their hands instead of studying what went wrong and endeavor to correct it.

 

So then, what’s wrong with this annoying minority that cannot get along with the rest of humanity, anyway? Well, you may find clues that will answer that question in the article which Dan Burton wrote under the title: “UN peddling of false narrative on Israel does not promote Mid-East peace,” published on December 5, 2022 in The Washington Times.

 

This clue has to do with the false image that the Jews project of themselves to the world with the help of sycophantic surrogates of the Dan Burton variety. Look how he started the discussion, and you’ll understand: “The State of Israel is a modern miracle—a successful world leader in science and technology and a force for good in the world that rose from the ashes of World War 2”.

 

It is that in the same way the Jews would denigrate human beings down to the level of dogs, they elevate themselves up to the level of gods. But the reality remains that if Israel were a modern miracle—as Burton claims it is—that miracle must have been fashioned by a demon. It’s because doing what it is doing, Israel can only be a demonic miracle. In fact, lagging behind in every industry, Israel relies on the charity of million of Christians who periodically donate 25 dollars each to feed the Jews of Israel. Watch their Third World style “infomercial” on the Fox News Channel and you’ll feel sick to the stomach.

 

But how do you know that someone is more demonic than they are godly? You know it when you see them bite the hand that feeds them. Look at this passage: “Although the UN gave international legal legitimacy to the establishment of Israel, the yearning of the Jewish people for 2,000 years of exile to return to their homeland represents the true backbone and background to Israel’s rebirth”.

 

This is how the Jews begin the discussion that ultimately leads them to denounce the United Nations for not doing the equivalent of falling on its face and licking the Jewish boot. As to where and how that discussion ends. Here is an example of what the Jews rant:

 

“The UN violates its own charter by working against peace in the Middle East in its obsession with trashing Israel. The Commission of Inquiry set up earlier this year with an open-ended mandate to investigate Israel, is a case in point. The UN’s obsession with Israel has long reached the level of absurdity. One of the annual resolutions dealing with Israel condemns it for occupying the Golan Heights”.

 

Note that when the Jews complain that something or someone is not doing the right thing to encourage peace in the Middle East, they mean to say they will respond by setting the region on fire. They’ll take action, they warn, in revenge for others refusing to do things their way. And this is meant to be a spit in America’s face that finances and arms the Jews, supposedly to keep the peace in the Middle East.

 

To return to the subject of yearning, if you want to see authentic yearning, talk to the Palestinians who still remember their childhood years in Palestine, showing photographs of the old homestead, choking as they speak, and shedding the tears of loss and sorrow for what was stolen from them, knowing they’ll never see it again.

 

Contrast that reality against the attitude of second and third generation immigrants to the land their elders left behind, and you’ll know how phony the Jewish argument can be about the 80th generation yearning for a land it never saw, and imagining a connection to a place that is as alien to its made-up community as Mars will be to the Earthlings who’ll first settle there.

 

Dan Burton goes on to accuse the United Nations of being afflicted by a pathological fixation, and having been so diseased for decades.

 

Well, I don’t know what kind of society Dan Burton grew up in, but based on the one in which I grew up, and having been a teacher, I can report that fixation does not go from the creator to the creation, but goes in the other direction. That’s because a youngster — be that an offspring in relation to its parents or a student in relation to its teachers — will always look to the creator of their character for approval. They do so at the same time as they hunger to be free and independent of their elders. That’s what fixation is made of.

 

Similarly, Israel wanting what the Jews have always craved, it hungers to see the United Nations approve of it but also wants to see the United Nations throw itself at the feet of Jews and lick their boots the way that members of the American Congress, such as Dan Berton, used to do. That is an Israeli fixation, and a sick one at that.

 

Thank heaven, there is only one American Congress that can plague and denigrate humanity this much.

The welcome promise to end the playing of games

 There is renewed talk about war and nuclear weapons happening now in the same ambiguous way that such talk happened previously.

 

That’s when Israel first adopted the posture of having its surrogates work to make the world believe it has nuclear weapons while refusing itself to confirm or deny the news.

 

It happened the second time when, despite the denial by Iran, Israel accused it of working to produce the bomb with which it plans to inflict Holocaust 2 on the Jews of Israel.

 

And it is happening now for the third time as ambiguous talk about the use of nuclear weapons in the Eurasian War, fills the air.

 

That kind of talk has always been viewed as dangerous because ambiguity can lead to miscalculation, thus trigger an accidental war that nobody wants.

 

So then, if the ambiguous way to communicate a warning to others is unacceptable, what would be the proper way to let others know they risk triggering a deadly conflagration they cannot win if they continue doing what they started?

 

The answer to that question begins by recognizing that to be ambiguous is to play games. This will lead to the answer that the best way to send your message to others, is the direct approach of telling where you draw the red line that must not be crossed.

 

To be clear about all of this, we begin by defining “playing games,” and trace its origin down to our genetic code. Here is how that goes:

 

Playing games is the art of engaging in the gentle simulation of real life combat. It is a training exercise that helps to strengthen the muscles of young primates, and sharpen their reflexes.

 

This is what prepares the young to fend for and defend themselves when they’ll grow up and face the world of competition without the protection of their parents. 

 

We see that in the young of cats and dogs we keep in the home as pets, and we study the antics of primates that engage in all sorts of game playing as they live in the wild.

 

What differentiates us, human beings, from the rest of the primates, is that we have a versatile brain. It is restless, and likes to spend much time altering old ideas and toying with new ones. The problem is that not every idea turns out to be a helpful addition to the preservation of life, the number one requirement mandated by nature for there to be something that’s more than inanimate existence.

 

Thus, what we have is a situation in which we are given a tool that prepares us to face the realities of a life that can be harsh, but also a tool which, in the quest to enhance our capabilities, risks creating the condition that comes close to ending life itself.

 

Clifford D. May is discussing one such situation in his latest column. It came under the title: “China’s Communist ruler Xi not playing game with U.S.” It was published on December 6, 2022 in The Washington Times.

 

The writer begins by attributing a state of mind to China’s ruler Xi Jinping, speculates as to what this can lead to, and concludes with the warning that the survival of the global democratic experiment is at stake because Jinping does not play games when it comes to saying what’s on is mind — all of which was thoroughly documented and explained by scholars Matt Pottinger, Matthew Johnson and David Feith, according to Clifford May.

 

He goes on to say these scholars have shown that Xi Jinping has the explicit objective of replacing the modern nation-state system with a new order featuring Beijing at its pinnacle. To this end, Jinping is utilizing all instruments of Chinese national power such as the initiative known as the Community of Common Destiny for mankind.

 

What’s bad about this initiative according to Clifford May, is that it is not different from “Marx’s vision of a stateless, collectivized world in which China will mold the interests of the Chinese people and those of the world’s people together.” When you add to this what else Jinping has said, you’ll know why the West must reject his vision. It is that China’s social system is incompatible with that of the West, and this will lead to a sharp struggle even a war, according to Jinping. But it is a war that does not horrify the Chinese leader if we are to believe Clifford May.

 

The writer goes on to list a litany of mischievous behavior by China, all of which, he asserts, have the goal of controlling and manipulating the population of China and those abroad, including America. But the one point that the writer did not make because it goes against his grain, is the reality that absent a Chinese ambiguity, there has never been talk about a nuclear war in the Indo-Pacific region.

 

And so, because Xi Jinping is not playing games, no ambiguity is created, and the world is spared the agony of having to live in a state of nuclear terror. We should be thankful for that.

 

Still, should we not expect something more from Clifford May who is renown for being the diehard king of hawks? Yes, we should expect more, and he did not disappoint, except that this time, he made his point in a very subtle way. Here is how he put it:

 

“Mr. Biden has said several times that the US will defend Taiwan if necessary. But without increased spending to elevate American military capabilities and readiness, Mr. Xi is unlikely to be deterred — or defeated, should push ever come to shove”.

 

And he closed his argument as follows:

 

“The first step: Clear and unequivocal recognition that Mr. Xi isn’t playing games”.

 

Hurray for that, and may there be more Mr. Xis who will clean up a world that’s drowning in nuclear ambiguities.

America finally adopts the Palestinian cause

 American intellectual pursuits, international diplomacy and local politics have sunk so low into the Jewish cesspool, they are often reduced to a debate about two personalities trying to outdo each other.

 

You can see an example of that in the article that Jed Babbin wrote under the title: “Biden adopts the Palestinian cause,” and the subtitle: “The president's team is intent on undoing everything Trump did – no matter how good it was.” The article was published on December 3, 2022 in The Washington Times.

 

That article is such a joke, I’ll be forgiven for starting the discussion by telling a joke that will serve as allegory to what Babbin has started. Here is the joke: Because monks take a vow of silence, they don’t ask that they be served if and when they need something. They can, however, ask that someone else be served if they see a need for that.

 

So, there was this monk who saw a cockroach in his soup at dinner time. Unable to tell the waiter about it lest he violate the custom, he came up with an ingenious solution. He told the waiter that the monk sitting near him, is missing a cockroach in his soup, and the waiter got the point. So, there you have it, my friend. The need of the monk was brought to light via the pretense that another monk had a false need.

 

You’ll know how that joke mirrors Jed Babbin’s logic by recalling the time — years ago — when Netanyahu went to the United Nations, shaking in his boots and telling a worldwide audience that Iran was only days away from producing the bomb that will inflict a holocaust on Israel’s Jews. Now, my friend, juxtapose that image with what Jed Babbin is saying in his article:

 

“The Arab nations, terrified by the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran, saw Mr. Trump’s Abraham Accords as the best chance to align themselves with the US and Israel, the only regional power able to face up to Iran”.

 

So, there you have it according to Jed Babbin. It wasn’t Netanyahu shaking in his boots years ago about Iran’s real or imagined capabilities. It’s about the Arab nations which are currently terrified about Iran’s capabilities that never materialized to begin with. Thus, analogous to the story of the monks, Netanyahu’s fears are responded to with the pretense that it is the Arabs who are fearful of Iran. And while they are at it, why not add that the Arabs are looking to Israel and America to protect them. It is that when the Jews begin their diarrhea of self-praise, they don’t stop even after the cesspool fills up.

 

Believing that he sits at the apex of intellectual pursuits, international diplomacy and local politics, Jed Babbin went on to say the following with great pride: “As this column has pointed out before, Mr. Biden and his team are intent on undoing everything Mr. Trump did, no matter how good it was.” And so, he proceeded to tell stories that did more than mutilate history, they made minced meat out of history.

 

That situation arose because Babbin could not get to the core of his argument—which is that President Biden must not adopt the Palestinian cause—without inventing a string of events that never happened while at the same time ignoring a string of events that did happen. But why was it necessary for Babbin to get into this kind of squabble at the present time?

 

It was necessary because Netanyahu got elected Prime Minister of Israel, and he called on his moral prostitute in America to start spewing the kind of venom that will justify his Hitlerian plan to annex the West Bank instead of doing the right thing, which is to end the criminal occupation of Palestine. Here, in condensed form, is how Jed Babbin formulated Netanyahu’s call:

 

“Since 1974, when Yasser Arafat addressed the UN General Assembly, the Palestinians have been an obstacle to peace. The Arab nations insisted that the Palestinian issue be resolved before they would address Israel’s demands. The Oslo Accords set forth the idea of a trade of land for peace. Israel would surrender lands to create a Palestinian state; in turn, the Palestinians would agree to recognize Israel’s right to exist. Israel has offered peace on those terms at least three times. In 2000, 2005, and 2008 when Israel proposed a map of a Palestinian state. President Mahmoud Abbas promised to study the map and return to the negotiations. He broke that promise. The Oslo Accords failed because ‘land for peace’ never ends a war; it only delays an end until one side is defeated. Nevertheless, Mr. Biden has long been committed to the land for peace theory”.

 

The reality is that at the end of each negotiation, when the agreements were written up and ready to be signed, Israel came up with a new demand out of nowhere in a transparent move to sabotage what had been accomplished. The new demands would be so egregious, Arafat felt that the Jews wanted more than the shirt on his back, thus iconically lamented the question: Are you asking me to striptease?

 

The most egregious demand being that the Palestinians should agree to call Israel a Jewish state — which would be a license for Israel to expel all non-Jews out of occupied Palestine — the demand froze the negotiations between the two sides, which is where things stand now.

 

And then, for some strange reason, Jed Babbin could not resist shooting himself in the foot at the end of his discussion. What he did was cite the most apt example you can think of, that would demolish his argument. Whereas the whole world sees that Russia’s invasion and annexation of Ukraine is analogous to Israel’s criminal invasion and annexation of Palestine, Babbin wrote this:

 

“The same holds true with respect to Russia’s war in Ukraine. Any such deal will delay, not deter or defeat Russia’s desire to conquer Ukraine”.

 

One can only guess what Netanyahu will want to do now with a surrogate as incompetent as Jed Babbin.

With a friend like this who needs a quisling?

 In the array of relationships that children forge with others, some are understandable whereas others seem puzzling and nonsensical. For example, it does not take the newborn long before they develop a strong bond with the caregiver such as a parent or guardian. This is understandable because the supreme need of a child is to be fed. Because the caregiver is associated with the service, a bond develops naturally between the two.

 

Half a dozen years or so later, the child begins to learn how to proceed in life by watching the preteens say and do the things which are proper to their age. The younger ones imitate them to feel older and just as capable. One demeanour the young adopt, is the attempt to make friends. Not realizing that friendship substitutes for the bond they once developed with the caregiver, the child approaches another child, and in a cold and straightforward manner asks: Do you want to be my friend?

 

A few more years later, the child faces the troubles and difficulties normally associated with the teen years. He/she begins to differentiate between the individuals who stand by them and lend a hand when needed, and those who abandon them, having perhaps even added to their woes. In time, a new kind of bond develops between the teenagers that help each other. But what kind of bond would that be? Well, it must be said, it’s the little understood sentiment we call love.

 

Whereas this situation represents the way that nature conducts its evolutionary process, human beings have created small and massive organizations that relish forging relationships between them. But in the way that a rose made of plastic, is different from a natural rose, the bonds that human beings create artificially lack the smell of authenticity which alone, can give strength to the bond. Absent that authenticity, the bonds dissolve at the drop of a hat in favor of assuming a more rewarding pursuit.

 

One of the corniest bonds ever to have been fabricated between a fake entity and a superpower, is that which the Jews proclaim—as much as a million times a day—exists between the United States of America and Israel. Not only is this claim disgustingly absurd on its face given the vast gulf that separates the raison d’être of the two entities, it also happens that the Israelis never miss an opportunity to show the American people how easily they manage to con their political leaders, exploit their super powerful republic and promote the interests of worthless Israel.

 

An article that makes this point with absolute clarity came under the title: “FBI to investigate death of Shireen Abu Akleh as Israel calls probe ‘serious mistake,” and the subtitle: “In September, the IDF concluded its own investigation into the death of Abu Akleh, who was killed during a firefight between Israeli forces and Palestinian gunmen in Jenin.” It was written by Jonathan S. Tobin and published on November 14, 2022 in the Jewish News Syndicate.

 

After narrating the events the way that he thinks unfolded, Jonathan Tobin jotted down the bottom line. It is this:

 

“Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz said Israel would not cooperate with the FBI’s probe into the killing of Abu Akleh, adding in a statement: “The US Justice’s decision to investigate the death of Shireen Abu Akleh is a serious mistake”.

 

What makes Israel’s stance a disgusting proposition, is that the case of Shireen Abu Akleh reflects in some ways the mirror image of countless other cases, but with a twist that gave the Israeli minister of defense the opportunity to spit in America’s face, do so deliberately and do it in full view of the American people and the whole world.

 

You see, my friend, there was a time when Israel had embarked on a policy of inviting American Jews to visit war zones in occupied Palestine where they stood the chance of getting killed in a crossfire between the combatants. When this happened, America’s Jews worked on exploiting the situation … which they did on two levels. First, the Jews worked on getting as much compensation as they could, and have it sent to Israel. Second, they worked on passing laws that were meant to shackle future American Congresses the way this is happening now. In fact, it is why the Executive and Legislative branches of the American government spend more time getting around their own unworkable laws than work to improve the lives of the people who elect them.

 

But with Shireen Abu Akleh being of non-Jewish Palestinian origin, the Israelis did not see how they could exploit the situation, thus had their Minister of Defense spit in America’s face. And this is what proves the fallacy of the claim which says that the friendship between America and Israel is strong, genuine and eternal. In fact, you don’t have to be a genius to realize that the claim is nothing more than a bunch of hooey that will never pass the smell test.

 

What to make of all this?

 

It is that every cash cow has a limit as to how much it can be milked. The intelligent exploiter doing the milking will sense that the limit has been reached and move away to hook up with another cash cow.

 

But when it comes to the Jews, their performance throughout the centuries, has proven them to be operating at the level of a newborn that’s totally dependent on its caregiver.

 

By habit and by tradition, the Jews abuse the current victim till it kicks them in the face, at which time they switch on their other habit; that of crying out: antisemitism, antisemitism.

He curses the return of his elders’ boomerang

 David Harsanyi lives in the bubble of there being nothing before he came into existence, and then suddenly everything that surrounds him, appearing along with him. The man is simply incapable of fathoming the situation of everything he sees today having roots that go back to a time before he was even a glimmer of desire in his father’s eyes.

 

He wrote an article under the title: “For The Left, ‘Antisemitism’ Is Little More Than A Partisan Talking Point,” and the subtitle: “Anti-Jewish sentiment is far from a one-party problem.” It was published on November 29, 2022 in The Federalist.

 

On the surface, that article looks and feels like Harsanyi has adopted a new approach to making his point, but in reality, the article is made of the same old mix of cataloguing what he believes was done to Jews, and whining about it endlessly. The one thing we can be thankful for, however, is that he skipped the habit of citing endless statistics compiled by his people and by the security apparatus of the country, all of which attest to the reality that acts of antisemitism are rising in America along with the rest of the world.

 

What makes the article look and feel different is that David Harsanyi took on a Jewish columnist who rejected the old approach of cataloguing what’s being done to Jews or whining about it. Even though she is of his age group, she seems to know that whatever Harsanyi is whining about, is nothing more than the boomerang his elders threw in he air decades ago, now returning to hit him in the face, and will do so as long as he continues to ignore the lessons of the past.

 

It is that if you multiply by 10,000 any compilation the Jews can produce about the wrong that’s done to them today, you’ll get an idea of how much wrong was done to the Arabs and the Muslims in the aftermath of the 1967 Israeli attack on its neighbors. It was a wrong of the most vicious kind, done to the Arabs and Muslims by the Jews themselves and by those who believed that the war in the Middle East signaled the return of the messiah who will be here to effectuate great changes favoring Jews.

 

Thousands upon thousands, ranging from politicians and journalists to Commoners and paupers, did the equivalent of throwing themselves on the ground, flat on their faces, to be close to a Jewish boot they could lick while cursing the Arabs and the Muslims and praising the messiah. Throngs of misled and misguided ruffians fell into this degrading posture because they thought that the messiah was going to make the Jews kings and queens of the planet, and they hoped that the flattered Jews will give them a high office in the empire they’ll build.

 

And what did the Arabs and the Muslims do in response? They did nothing because they knew that anything they do would stir what the Jews were producing. Realizing that this was raw sewage, they allowed the incoming flow to rest one layer on top of another, and let the sunshine disinfect the environment which the Jews and their sycophants were poisoning.

 

Whether or not the Jewish columnist that Harsanyi targeted has read that history, she seems to know what the Arabs and Muslims knew then. I can attest to that because I was there during all the time that this was happening. The woman has adopted the attitude that should dampen antisemitism if only the Harsanyis of his world would stop stirring the pot of raw sewage.

 

But David Harsanyi is not stopping. Instead, he is trying to build on what his elders started decades ago, not realizing that what goes around comes around like a boomerang that has no pity for what the Jews did to others or what is done to them now.

 

Another thing that Jews of the Harsanyi kind are doing, not knowing that it hastens the return of the boomerang, is mix what is essentially a matter of human dignity if not human rights, with the crassness of politics. Mind you, it is not even politics of the polished kid but politics of the mudslinging kind. What follows is the condensed form of what Harsanyi has written in this regard:

 

“It must be privilege that explains how a New Yorker could write a column about the resurgence of antisemitism during the Trump era without once noting what was going on in her hometown. There have been hundreds of attacks targeting Jews in New York, and only a single perpetrator has served one day in prison. Mentioning that the culprits are predominantly black or Hispanic, and live in one of the nation’s most left-wing cities, would necessitate acknowledging that antisemitism can’t be neatly laid at the feet of Republicans. That is inconvenient, no doubt”.

 

The prevailing politics in America nowadays concerns the battle between the Left and the Right. It is a local concern with ramifications that can influence nothing more than one party winning big this time, and being tossed out of office the next time. By contrast, what we had at the time, was an ongoing battle between a nuclear armed Communist Soviet Union and a nuclear armed Capitalist America.

 

Despite the stakes being this high—and contrary to what the Jews are doing now—none of us who wrote about the subject of our treatment, tried to exploit the situation by scaring the readers as to what can happen if things were not done our way.

 

The most that came from us was a limited number of letters sent to the editors of existing newspapers. They were no more offensive to Jews than the one I wrote informing the readers they should not listen to propaganda because Egypt is a civilized country.

 

And what happened to me? I was cancelled for life. Nearly 60 years of what I could have accomplished, were I allowed to live a normal life, were wiped out. And why is that? Because the Canadian Jewish Congress convinced my government to declare war on me. It did so by putting the Royal Canadian Mounted Police at its disposal, a bumbling organization of ignorant fools who turned my life into a hellish existence.

 

How does that stack up against what David Harsanyi and other Jews are blowing their entrails out of their bellies as they howl: antisemitism, gimme more privilege — antisemitism, gimme more privilege.

An American nightmare believed to be a dream

 When confronted with a problem, you can either get to the bottom of it and fix what has gone wrong, or you can ignore it and let it fester.

 

The people who develop the habit of solving their problems as they crop up also develop the habit of minding their own business. They assume that all the others are like them, therefore do not see the need to tell them their slip is showing or advise them of anything.

 

As to those who ignore their own problems and let them fester, they constantly see or imagine the slips of other people. They talk about them openly in every gathering they find themselves, even confront those whom they fault for letting their slip show, whether or not this is true, and they strongly advise what must be done to fix problems that may not exist.

 

The philosophy of life guiding the first kind of people is that of “live and let live.” They know they are not perfect, therefore do not expect or wish that others be. They accept the others as they are, and want the others to accept them as they are. Of course, in solving their own problems, these people seek to come as close as possible to perfection knowing they may never get there. But that’s good enough for them.

 

As to the philosophy of life guiding the second kind of people, it is that of “push everyone around lest they push you around.” They pursue and seek to highlight the faults of others before the others discover and highlight their faults. They express the disgust they have for others before the others express the disgust they have for them. Of course, the more that the problems of these people fester, the more aggressive they become at faulting others for the real and imagined faults they see in them. And so, they spend their time warning everyone to straighten up or else.

 

The nature and severity of that “or else” depends on who is doing the warning. They can be a powerless nobody whose clownish performance will produce derision and laughter, or they can be a powerful somebody whose performance will be seen as tyrannical, thus rejected by those they mistreat.

 

However, something new has materialized in the weird times that we live. It is that a parasitic symbiont that had been around for ages, has surfaced once again, as it did from time to time throughout the centuries. This time, the parasite took possession of a powerful but benevolent giant whose good deeds used to attract the people of the Earth to its side. Now, however, the parasite has turned the giant into a pest who runs around accusing people of showing their slips, whether true or false, and warning them of severe consequences if they do not straighten up.

 

The disturbing thing about the parasite surfacing at this time, is that it has shown a strong ability to infect others and have them play the role of pilots guiding the giant on how to be destructive. They regularly send the giant to rampage through neighborhoods around the globe, turning them into piles of rubbles.

 

The parasite is known to be a worldwide syndicate of criminal elders who stole a country and made it their base of operations. They recruit the unwary and turn them into surrogates that speak for the syndicate. One such surrogate is Kelly Sadler who recently wrote an article under the title: “Biden emboldens the world’s worst dictators, despite his promises,” and the subtitle: “Rights, values get lost in the pursuit of a green agenda.” It was published on December 1, 2022 in The Washington Times.

 

In a nutshell, Kelly Sadler wants President Joe Biden, who represents superpower America, to get tough with much of the world. She sees dictators ruling everywhere, and believes they deride the rule of law because Joe Biden neglected to stand up to them despite the promise he made to do so when running to be president of the united States. Here is how Kelly Sadler expressed her thoughts:

 

“In 2020, candidate Joe Biden promised to put democracy at the heart of US foreign policy and to stand up for human rights. In 2021, Antony Blinken sent a cable to all US diplomats, telling them to support local activists in their efforts to improve human rights and promote democratic values. But as the last year has demonstrated, what’s actually at the heart of Mr. Biden’s foreign policy is the foolish pursuit of a green agenda — human rights and democracy be damned. Last week, Mr. Biden lifted some sanctions on Venezuela, giving Chevron Corp. a license to resume oil production there. He freed two relatives of socialist Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who were being held in US jails”.

 

What Kelly Sadler, the parasitic surrogate of the symbiont, chose to do here, is ignore mentioning America’s problems, neglecting to urge that they be solved, something she badly needs to do before telling others they must solve their problems. 

 

Surely, there is enough in America that needs to be fixed before worrying about the implications of an American company pumping oil in Venezuela.

 

There are 600 mass shootings happening every year in the country. 100,000 young men and woman get overdosed, many of whom die before they can be rescued. Nearly 10,000 neglected and sometimes homeless veterans commit suicide.

 

Gangs of youngsters invade stores in broad daylight and rob them in full view of the police that do nothing to stop them. Neglected and destitute, many of the mentally ill draw attention to their plight by pushing people under the buses and the subways. Cops shoot people in the back as they flee, and people ambush cops by luring them into traps.

 

No program that was ever devised by the government to aid people who were hit by a disaster, was implemented without being substantially looted not only by corrupt gangs but also corrupt corporations that already make millions running legitimate operations.

 

Blinded by the poison injected into it by the parasitic symbiont, America fails to realize it is transforming into a decomposing corpse that’s beginning to stink, but it is running around telling others that the American dream is still alive.

Real or imagined, climate change created a burst of creativity

 Addressing his readers as “dear” for the first time, and doing it twice in his latest column, Clifford May sought not to scare the readers about foreign enemies intent on fighting America to the death, but charm them with ideas he never deliberated previously, namely those pertaining to climate change.

 

You may think of the writer’s move as being a strategic decision; one that’s designed to woo the audience to his side. In fact, as you’ll see when you read the column, May is proceeding by playing dove while at the same time describing his “socialist globalist foes” as being progressive hawks. This being a reversal of the image that had been perceived by the public during the decades, it says that Clifford May has decided to be correct and appreciated rather that wrong and feared.

 

Clifford May’s column came under the title, “COP27 indictment: Americans are climate criminals and must pay,” and was published on November 29, 2022 in The Washington Times. Calling the Americans climate criminals in the title, is explained in the text as indicting America and other wealthy nations for crimes committed against the climate.

 

To develop his argument, May relied this time on a style of writing he seldom, if ever, used before: it is the analogy that tells the story in a nutshell. He should be praised for that, but this does not mean I cannot point out that the analogy is missing something—a small something to be sure. It is that the caveman in the story had the option of lighting the fire outside the cave in which case it would not have bothered his neighbors. Today, we all live in one planetary cave without the luxury of an outside where those who are bothered by the smoke and the other derivatives can escape.

 

To some people, that difference amounts to a small inconvenience, but seen by an increasing number of people as potentially carrying massive implications for the future — which is what the debate on climate change is all about. And so, taking one side of the argument, Clifford May started to make his point by stating realities that cannot be refuted. Here they are:

 

 “A few millenniums later [fossil fuels] began powering locomotives, steamships and internal combustion engines, and new products and services were created on a scale previously unimaginable. There is a well known link between energy and wealth. Because Americans and Europeans first worked that out on an industrial scale, they benefited first and foremost. If developing countries are to develop, they must have affordable and abundant energy. There’s no other way”.

 

This shows that the writer is aware of the two planks that make up the debate about climate change. One plank concerns the discomfort of having to live with a climate that’s changing for the worse. The other plank concerns the difficulty in prospering materially while operating in a climate that’s deteriorating.

 

And this is what prompted the writer to delve into a discussion about solutions which, in theory, could serve the two planks simultaneously. Here is how he stated that possibility: “Can’t renewables — wind and solar power — substitute for fossil fuels? No, not in the near term. The wind doesn’t always blow, the sun doesn’t always shine, and batteries capable of storing large amounts of energy do not yet exist”.

Yes, large capacity batteries would be needed to store energy when the wind blows and the sun shines for use when the wind does not blow and the sun disappears. But the one ingenious thing that physics has done is that it made energy convertible from one state to another in myriad of ways: Mechanical, electrical, potential, hydraulic and what have you.

 

Believe it or not, a new idea would make use of the elevator principle. That is, when there is sunshine and/or wind, the electricity generated is used to raise tons of concrete hundreds of feet up in the air. This is converting electricity into a potential energy that can later be turned back into electricity by letting the descending (falling) concrete run an electric generator.

 

A similar old idea that is actually adopted in the Northern European countries, makes use of the excess electricity produced at night when the country is asleep, to pump the water of the hydroelectric station from the foot of the fall back up into the lake so that it can be reused when the country wakes up, turns on the lights and runs the industrial machines.

 

More practically than all of this, and better suited to serve the developing countries, is the idea of converting all kinds of naturally produced energies into electricity that immediately converts itself into a  gaseous fuel. Compressed into a fluid that can be stored as easily as the butane gas that’s powering your barbecue, that fuel is hydrogen, hereinafter called Green Hydrogen.

 

And while we’re at it, the same principles, same machinery and same installations are used to produce Green Ammonia, a valuable commodity used to increase the production of food.

 

Given that most underdeveloped countries are situated in zones where the sun shines brighter and more often than the other places, the drive to build installations for the production of green energy, green hydrogen and green ammonia, is in full swing.

 

In fact, plans are currently being made, and contracts are negotiated to sell the excess energy produced by the developing world to the developed one — be that electrical or chemical energy. This is an ideal solution that should allay the fears of Clifford May and all those like him.