What would you say if you were told that the Germans are sending out signals of warning and distress about a Government of Ireland that uses the resilience of the Irish economy to overwhelm, undermine and destroy the German economy? No question about it, you will say that either the German economy is not the whale that people think it is or the Irish economy is not the minnow that people think it is. Well, this is what happened in one case around the world except that it did not involve the German and Irish economies; it involved the Israeli and Palestinian economies. And when you understand what happened here you will see that the Israelis and their American cohorts had reasons to want to sabotage the peace process, something they did for several years while pretending to talk peace. You will realize that when these people accused the Palestinians of rejecting peace, there was nothing on the table to accept or to reject. The whole thing was a sham; an elaborate Jewish American sham.
The reason why clarity is now coming to this question is that a few things have changed -- which is also why the Israelis are using the considerable reach of the Jewish propaganda machine to signal to their friends around the world that if the Palestinians succeed in having it their way and if they gain economic independence -- let alone a full fledged political independence – it will mean the end of the Israeli economy. In other words, these people are saying that the Palestinian economy is starting to pose an existential threat to that of Israel. And this makes you wonder whether the Palestinians have a top notch economy you were not aware of or the Israelis have an economy that – if left to itself -- could not compete against some huddled masses living in squalor conditions in refugee camps; people whose necks may soon be liberated from the boots of an American equipped Jewish army of primitive savages.
Here is what is happening. A warning was written by Pinhas Inbari under the title: “Palestinians set to undermine the Oslo Agreements” and published in the online magazine of the World Jewish Congress on October 3, 2011. And here is the key sentence that tells you what the warning is about: “Israel has always rejected these demands, arguing that a breach of the customs border would expose Israel to the danger of dumping.” But what is dumping? you ask. Well, dumping usually refers to an item – such as steel, for example -- that a country (call it A) would sell into another country (call it B) at below the cost of production. This has the effect of killing the steel businesses of country B which will allow country A to monopolize the steel market of B. What usually happens after that is that A will raise the price of steel to the level that the market will bear, having no competition that can check it. And the end result will be that country B will gradually become impoverished while A will gradually become wealthier.
But the Inbari article goes beyond this because it warns about the dumping of not one or two items; it warns about the general dumping of all sorts of Palestinian goods and services into Israel. This would indeed threaten the entire Israeli economy but only if the Palestinians had the economic base with which to accomplish such a feat or if they can develop that kind of a base right after the Jewish American boots are lifted off their necks. Wait a minute you say, wait a minute. What is going on here? For decades we were led to believe that Israel was a “start up nation” of economic miracles whose ingenuity, influence and abilities were relied upon by the mighty economies of America, Germany and China to develop onward and to progress upward to reach the level of economic dream lands that they have become. And now you tell us that this same Israel is wetting its pants; worried sick about the thought that a bunch of Palestinian refugees can destroy its economy? How are we supposed to process information as shocking as this? Well, take a deep breath, my friend, and listen carefully. How? you ask. Well let me tell you how. Very simply; once and for all, put it in your head that when the Jewish propaganda machine talks about the Israeli economy, it talks bullshit. It is nothing but Jewish bullshit.
Okay. But what does Inbari and all the fearful people like him say will happen in practical terms? To answer this question, we need to know what they see on the ground at this time and what they project into the future. What they see in the West Bank – excluding the people of Gaza and the Palestinians of the diaspora who may wish to go home after the peace is installed -- is a demographically young population of 2.5 million people. This is equal to one third the current population of Israel which happens to be an older one.
At this time, the West Bank has a labor force of about 750,000 people that will quickly go to 1.25 million when Palestine will be liberated. Add to this the population of Gaza and that of the diaspora, and you can envisage a labor force of somewhere between 2.5 and 3 million people. Already now, the West Bank has a goods producing force of about 150,000 which is half that of Israel; the rest being in the service industries. When peace will come, the Palestinian labor force in the goods producing sectors could triple or do better to reach half a million people. And this will be a larger force than that of Israel – even though the total population of Palestine will still be smaller than that of Israel. As to why the Palestinian goods producing labor force will overtake that of a larger population, it is because Jews do not work to produce wealth; they work to accumulate the wealth that is produced by someone else or they join the army to kill and loot those who work for a living.
What the Israelis do now to maintain the image of a viable economy is that they import from abroad most of the durable and non-durable goods they consume -- from food to fuel to furniture to appliances to cars and so on. This represents about 14% of their total consumption. Another 4% go into the consumption of goods produced locally by small manufacturing industries in food processing, textile, plastics and the like. And a whopping 82% of the Israeli consumption consists of services in the fields of education and health that people agree are of low quality; and services in the field of security which is nothing more than the perpetuation of an occupation that is fast becoming a disservice to the Israelis as much as it is to the Palestinians.
At this time the Israelis buy most of the goods they consume from Asia and Europe, and they get the American and German taxpayers to pay for them or they borrow money and get the American government to endorse the loans. When Palestine will be free, the Israelis will buy most of these goods from the Palestinians who will start to mass produce them at very competitive prices. What little production there is now in Israel in terms of food processing, textile, building material and chemicals will be overwhelmed by the Palestinian industries and will be put out of business. After that, it will take little time for the Palestinians to challenge the Israelis even in the business of polishing diamond and the business of making jewelery.
And while Pinhas Inbari is not saying it openly, it is clear that this is what worries him and worries the World Jewish Congress. He sounds the alarm about the effect of the upcoming Palestinian economy on Israel but he attributes his fears to the usual boogeymen at which he and his cohorts have always pointed the finger. These boogeymen are what the Jewish leaders call the security of Israel and the de-legitimization of the Jewish state -- whatever that means. And to draw you into the world of his fantasy, Inbari begins by hitting you with an opinion that is more accusatory than it is enlightening: “Any change to the Protocols would undermine the very fabric of the Oslo Accords.” How and Why? He does not explain.
He does not explain but he repeats the point later on without explaining it this time either. Here is what he writes: “... in addition to economic repercussions, the PLO's current demand to alter the Protocols also has a political and, – as far as Israel is concerned – a security aspect. Aside from the protection of its economy, Israel is worried it will not be able to secure its borders...” Later still, he says this: “At the same time, the Palestinians may use the Protocols to wreak havoc on Israel's economy and advance their campaign of de-legitimization against Israel.” This is clearly the product not of a genuine paranoia but a fake one. It is paranoia manufactured by people who know what they are doing; and they are doing it to manipulate their followers whose lack of sophistication they exploit to the hilt.
Thus, Inbari takes solace in the fact that the Palestinians are not obsessed with the idea. What idea is that? Well, it is the idea of the Palestinians using the potential of their rising economy to “wreak havoc” on the Israeli economy then go on to de-legitimize the Jewish state. But where did the idea come from in the first place? It came from his imagination which is gripped with a fake paranoia as shown earlier. But if this is the case, what then is the true position of the Palestinians? Since you asked, here it is in his own words: “Still, the Palestinians are talking in terms of 'changes' and not the 'abrogation' of the protocols.” But knowing this should have cured him of his paranoia, fake or not -- should it not? No, not really. Why not? Because … well, it is because there are many reasons … Uh … I take that back … there are not many reasons. There is one reason out of which flow many sub-reasons. Get my drift? Not really but keep going. Well, you see, it is understood that only the Jews are good people and everybody else is bad. Everybody includes the Palestinians, you see. Get my drift? But when the Palestinians do something good it is not because they are good; it is because they fear doing the bad thing and not be able to get away with it. Get my drift now? No. But go on and give some examples.
Here is one example: “Actual 'abrogation' may have international repercussion on the Palestinians' statehood bid...” But unlike the opinions that Inbari has been voicing up to now without explanation, he is clear as to why the Palestinians should fear abrogating the Protocols. Here is what he says in this regard: “...as it [the bid] will present the nascent state as a country that does not respect its international obligations...” Clear and forceful. But while this is pure conjecture on his part, he completely ignores the fact that Israel has for all practical purposes unilaterally abrogated the Protocols a long time ago. Here is one instance where he indirectly admits to this without realizing what he did: “...Nabil Sha'at … adviser to Mahmoud Abbas, demanded that 150,000 Palestinians resume work in Israel proper as provided in the protocols.” The truth is that Israel reneged on this provision of the Protocols in favor of importing foreign workers to punish the Palestinians who want to be free, and to starve them into accepting the occupation if not loving it.
You want another example? Here is another one: “In addition, the Palestinians cannot afford to abrogate the Protocols because they do not enjoy a sustainable economy that is separate from the State of Israel. In fact, the Palestinians rely heavily on the Protocols for their revenues.” But this, my dear reader, is bullshit like only a Jew can blurt out and still maintain a straight face. The revenues this guy is talking about are taxes that the Israeli army collects from the Palestinians and hands them over to the Palestinian Authority. However, the moment that the Palestinians will go free, they will stop paying taxes to the Israelis and will pay them to their own government instead. When this happens, the Palestinians will be better off not worse off which means they have nothing to fear and everything to look forward to, contrary to what Inbari is saying.
Inbari then makes two points that say more about his wishful thinking than the reality of the situation on the ground. The first point is this: “Politically, the establishment of customs points along the 1967 would spell internal disaster for the Palestinians.” How and why? you scream but you get no answer. The second point he makes is this: “Hamas … would not accept … change imposed by Ramallah, despite the recent reconciliation between [it and] Fatah, as it has not even … compromise[d] on the … issue of daylight savings time...” What all this says to you and me is that when the Jewish leaders fantasize about something, they cheer for their worst enemy if they believe he can deliver the destruction they hunger to see befall someone. And this is such a demonic thought to harbor, you wonder if these people will ever be reformed.
Then there is the obligatory closing which consists of reiterating that if you're not a Jew you have bad intentions; and if you're a Palestinian you have the worst of intentions. Here is how Inbari formulates this thought: “It is in Israel's interest that the Palestinians enjoy a thriving economy … It is another issue … if [they] care more about waging lawfare … cynically using the economy and international agreements to attain their goals.”
You see, my friend, what these people are saying is that Jews are a good people because they only tolerate what is good for them and what is in the interest of Israel. And they say that the Palestinians are a bad people because they respect international agreements and the rule of law, a stance that makes them a cynical people. By this, Inbari and the World Jewish Congress insinuate that when the Palestinians go to court, they don't go to seek relief or obtain justice, they go to wage lawfare. Get it? The Palestinians wage lawfare to destroy Israel. To them, this is a new holocaust in the making and they need help fast.
Quick, get the American bunch of idiots in the Congress to pass resolutions. Have them pass non-binding resolutions telling the world that the Palestinians do not want peace and asking the world to weep for Israel. And have them pass unanimous resolutions that condemn people everywhere in the world who object to Israel's commission of crimes against humanity because the Jews have good intent no matter what crime they commit and the Palestinians have bad intent no matter how much they are made to suffer in silence. Get my drift, buddy?