To seek the truth and to forgive are powerful tenets of
Christianity and of Islam, not of Judaism. I learned of this truth not because
someone taught me a lesson on the subject but because I discovered it myself. I
learned of that truth ever so slowly as it dawned on me over a period of many
years that horrible things were happening all over the places, and I struggled
trying to understand why the things were the way they were. More precisely, I
struggled with the question: Why human beings are made to suffer needlessly
even in the places where suffering must never be allowed to happen?
I alluded to such notions in my previous writings but had no
example till now that would illustrate what I had in mind. What changed are
three passages in the speech delivered to the UN General Assembly on September
25, 2012 by the American President, Barack Obama. The first passage is this:
“It depends on the freedom of citizens to speak their minds ... without fear.”
The second passage is this: “...when anyone with a cell phone can spread
offensive views … the notion that we can control the flow of information is
obsolete. The question, then, is how we respond.” And the third passage is
this: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.
Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate
we see when ... the Holocaust is denied.”
There is in those passages a contradiction so massive; I
could write a book about it. But this is not what I plan to do because that
contradiction pales when compared to what else is revealed by those passages.
What there is, my friend, is an example of how the self-appointed leaders of
the religion they call Rabbinical Judaism, have managed to institutionalize the
lies they manufacture, and to inflict capital punishment on the people who
refuse to consider those lies the new gospel truth.
What follows is a brief history of what happened over the
past few decades. As it stands, it happens to be an eloquent account addressing
the three passages in the President's UN speech. It responds specifically to
his query: “The question, then, is how to respond.” It also tells why the
President's presentation may prove to be inadequate, and why a followup is
necessary if the intent is to make the world a better place for mankind.
How did the Jewish leaders do it? First, they used the media
to pound into the heads of the populations that hosted them – mostly in Europe
and North America – that they are Semites and
that to deny the Holocaust, is to exhibit an antisemitism whose goal is to
annihilate all Jews. They spun every item that crossed their desk in such a way
as to argue that harboring a sentiment that tends to deny the Holocaust was to
have a criminal intent whether or not you have the wherewithal to annihilate
any Jew.
This done, they worked to pass a law forbidding the denial
of the Holocaust, a move that had the effect of intimidating the whole of
society. And this intimidation is what acted as a deterrent whether or not a
law was eventually passed to criminalize the denial of the Holocaust. The main
point to retain from this, is that the relentless effort conducted by the
Jewish leaders, and the publicity that resulted have acted as a deterrent for
the rest of society not to venture into certain territories. And this should
answer the President who asked: “The question, then, is how we respond.” Well,
the Jewish leaders knew how to respond.
Now outlawed by the enactment of an actual law or by the
social pressures that were generated by the process, the mention of the
Holocaust – let alone its questioning or its outright denial – became a crime
that most people were afraid to commit intentionally or inadvertently. An
internal system of self-censorship was instilled in people, a setup that
remains in effect to this day because it keeps reinforcing itself with the
passage of time.
But matters did not stop here because, in fact, the setup
became a powerful weapon in the hands of those who used it, who abused it and
still do to achieve many of the other purposes they have in mind. It is that
they call deniers of the Holocaust the people they dislike for any reason at
all. This gives them a license to inflict maximum punishment on them – such as
a lifetime sojourn on the blacklist, for example.
Watching these people go through those steps over the
decades, you come to realize that the Rabbinical Judaism which powers them is a
religion so different from Christianity, the two can only be at war with each
other. And this, my friend, is what explains why the Jews have been rejected in
Christendom over the centuries, and why they are shunned all over Europe even
today by the local populations there. But this is not all that you learn about
them because when you study them closely, something else hits you in the face.
What you learn is that these people only know how to start
something, and they never think of an exit strategy or a plan B that would tell
them where to stop or when to go in reverse if something goes wrong. Instead, they
launch every project that turns them on, and they keep going unguided like a
ballistic missile because they believe that no matter what they do, and no
matter what happens in the end, God will always come to their rescue.
However, because experience has taught them that God can be
a very patient Being with a horizon that extends to eternity, they decided it
is always better to get someone else to do the dirty work for them. If things
go well, they collect; if things go bad, they trash the sucker that helped them
and go look for another sucker. Over time, they discovered that in a democracy
which is beginning to rot, the quintessential pushover they can use, abuse and
take for sucker is the politician who gets to be elected and the bureaucrat who
gets to be appointed. And so they started to work on the people that run the
various branches of government as well as their agencies.
Having also discovered that this was a slippery slope they
can use to their advantage, they worked to codify the lies that they
manufactured, thus institutionalized them and made them irreversible. For
example, without explaining why it was necessary to pass a law that makes it a
criminal offense to communicate with a terrorist organization, they generated
no opposition when they pushed such a law through the legislature. Come to
think of it, who would have objected to that? But once they had the law in
their pocket, they started picking on the people and organizations they
disliked; had them designated as terrorist, thus criminalized talking to them
or dealing with them – even if your purpose is to find out who they are or what
they want.
When it came to this project, the Jewish leaders had more
luck with the Americans than the Europeans. Bit by bit, they succeeded in
isolating America
from the rest of the world as would a sex master who gets jealous when his male
bimbo tries to hang around with other men. Being in complete control of America
by now, they used the media, the so-called think tanks, the various branches of
government and every institution they could lay their hands on to extend their
influence to the rest of the world. They had a few successes executing this
plan in the places where they wanted to demonstrate how tightly they controlled
superpower America .
As to the places where they had a difficult time
intimidating the people or getting them under their control, the Jewish leaders
got the Americans to insult these people for no reason that looked like a
rational thing to do. For example, the Jews instilled in the American officials
the habit of disparaging the Arabs each time that they mentioned buying oil
from them. The hell with this, said the Arabs, if you don't like our oil, don't
buy it. But don't come here looking for a bargain buying from us then go home
and insult us every time that a Jewish speechwriter stuffs your mouth with foul
words. We had it up to here with this childish behavior.
Related to that notion was the wondering expressed by
President Obama during his speech to the UN General Assembly: “The question,
then, is how we respond.” The answer is that you consider Rabbinical Judaism to
be not a religion but a group of evil people implementing an evil agenda whose
purpose is to plunge the world into chaos. You do not hire these people for
sensitive positions, and you do not let them write speeches for you. This done,
you make a herculean effort to rescind all the laws and resolutions (binding
and non-binding) which are Jewish-specific or Israel-specific that were passed
by either House of the Congress.
And you never forget this fact: a dogma is a creed to which
people adhere if they want to be a part of the religion that propounds that
creed. Thus, a dogma is not open to query or discussion in whole or in part. It
is a take-it-or-leave-it proposition which means you either stay in the
religion or you be excommunicated from it. Thus, to turn the Holocaust into a
dogma that people must believe in, or see themselves be excommunicated from
society by law or by social pressure, is to turn Rabbinical Judaism into a
super religion to which all other religions must be subjugated.
This puts the Jewish leaders into the position of being
God-like creatures. And there is no doubt in my mind that this is how and why
America's Christian pastors of the boob tube got on their dumbbell podiums and
told their flocks of sheep to worship the Jew like a God. But this is the kind
of pornography to which no child should ever be exposed as you can already see
the effect of it on the children who grew up believing you do not achieve
success in life by working or praying; you achieve it by kissing up to a Jew,
if not do worse than that.
Thus, for the President of the United States to say that we
must: “condemn the hate we see when ... the Holocaust is denied” is to suggest
that a query into that historical event is akin to violating the dogma of the
super religion they call Rabbinical Judaism, perhaps a sacrilegious act that is
so sinful, one would go to hell for it. Not only that but the American
President seems to suggest that the mere fact of making a query about the
Holocaust is to commit an act of hate.
No, Mr. President, the Holocaust is not a dogma; it is a
historical event that is open to query like any other historical event. And the
President of Iran has every goddamn right to ask questions about it, and you
have no right to bomb his country because he committed that heresy – if this is
what questioning the Holocaust has become in America.
In fact, Sir, if you bomb Iran , you will have committed the
ultimate act of hate that will kill Iranians and Americans alike. Furthermore,
to redeem itself, such act of madness will transform the denial of the
Holocaust into a dogma to which every human being will aspire to adhere for the
next thousand years and beyond. That line of thinking, Mr. President, is a
self-defeating proposition no matter what excuse you find for it.
So then, what was the big lesson that I learned over the
years studying such events? I learned that Christianity and Islam have one
common bond you do not find in Judaism. It is the power to forgive. When you
forgive, you start anew. When you don't, you keep going till a catastrophic
event stops you.
This is why Christianity and Islam always had a new
beginning despite their shortcomings. Such was never the case with the Jews
whose religion absolutely forbids them from forgiving anything at all. And this
is why these people never stop repeating the provocations that send them to
their calamitous end each and every time.