December 18, 2012 has been a bad day for common sense
because it is the day that the Wall Street Journal chose to inflict its brand
of logic on the world yet again. On that day, the journal published two pieces,
one by its columnist and editorial writer Bret Stephens who wrote under the
title: “Chuck Hagels' Jewish Problem” and the subtitle: “The would-be secretary
of defense has some curious views.” The other is an op-ed piece by the trio
Charles Robb, Dennis Ross and Michael Makovsky, that came under the title: “The
Economic Cost of a Nuclear Iran” and the subtitle: “Sanctions and U.S. military
force carry risks, but Teheran with a bomb would wreak havoc on global
markets.”
Bret Stephens says that Chuck Hagel has a chance of being
appointed secretary of defense, and opines that it would be a bad idea. Why is
that? you ask, and he responds: “because a 'Jewish lobby,' as far as I'm aware,
doesn't exist.” But what does that do? you ask. And he responds with this: It
proves prejudice on the part of Hagel, something that has an odor that is
especially ripe now because the Jewish lobby does not exist. See the logic?
Therefore, Hagels' pronouncement to the effect that “the Jewish lobby
intimidates a lot of people up here” has by the Stephens logic a bothersome
olfactory element to it. Get it now?
He then uses a great deal of publishing space to try and
differentiate between the “Jewish lobby” and the “Israel lobby” as if this were
relevant to the current discussion especially when you consider the fact that
“creative ambiguity” is an invention that was used as a weapon over the
decades, one that is in use even today to muddy all discussions about “them”
whomever they are, and wherever they hide.
The fact is that the rabbis, the members of the Jewish
propaganda machine and their cohorts have worked hard to blur the lines between
Semitic, Yiddish, Jewish, Israeli, Zionist and every possible combination
thereof to make the point that if and when non-Jews decide to take up a related
subject, they better be prepared to say good things and only good things
because if they don't, they will be denounced as anti-Semites, put on a watch
list and attacked relentlessly.
Stephens also minimizes the purported effectiveness of the
Jewish vote by citing the fact that in Hagel's State of Nebraska, there are
only 6,100 Jews in a population of 1.8 million people. And he quarrels with his
use of the word “intimidates … because it suggests that legislators ... adopt
positions … out of personal fear. Just what does that Jewish Lobby have on
them?”
Good Question, Bret! But guess what, my dear reader. He
answers his own question at the end of the piece. Speaking of the 63% of Jewish
Americans who voted for Mr. Obama last month, he says this: “...maybe some of
these voters could speak up now … [they] like to fancy their voice carries
weight in their party … prove it.”
And the author is seconded in his effort by the Wall Street
Journal that chose to publish on the same page the Robb, Ross and Makovsky
piece. These are members of the notorious Washington Institute for Near East
Policy, a septic tanks that pretends to be a think tank. And if Stephens is
still asking the question: “Just what does that Jewish Lobby have on them?” he
better have a talk with Charles Robb whose long list of scandals involves such
things as adultery he lied about, allegations of drug use and breach of
fiduciary trust. They blackmailed him, Bret, and they got him to bark the
nonsense on their behalf.
So then, what are these three clowns saying now? They
already suggested on previous occasions that Uncle Sam should get into the
business of raping Iran while making things look like the Israeli eunuch is
doing the screwing. This way, they said, the world will come to believe that
Israel is a stud and not the eunuch that it is. And the clowns went on to say
that Israel needs to cultivate the image of stud because it needs a deterrent
that will make everybody fear it, and thus remain peaceful.
You see, my friend, these sort of ideas don't come out of
nowhere. They begin as horrible things and mutate to become other horrible
things. For example, rapists justify what they do by saying that rape is the
ultimate act of love. Out of this group comes another group that says its
members rape only to safeguard virginity. This is like Hitler saying war is the
ultimate act of civilization. And now we have a Semitic, Yiddish, Jewish,
Israeli, Zionist group that says when America maintains Israel as an ongoing
crime against humanity, it does humanity good because it saves it from itself.
It's all made of the same screwed up material that takes on different shapes,
forms and colors.
And what else does the trio of clowns want to do? It wants
to do a group masturbation of the intellect, and do it in public. Look what
they do to ejaculate their moral syphilis into the heads, hearts and souls of
America's legislators: “Living with a nuclear Iran is … like the fiscal cliff,
this is a matter of … economic … security.” As you can see, the first thing
they do is connect the fiscal cliff with the question of Iran.
Then to make themselves believable, they assure us that: “We
led a … task force … that examined the energy-related costs of inaction.”
Inaction here means America refraining from bombing Iran. But see how the masturbation
goes? People are worked up about the fiscal cliff, and while the energy is
still floating in the air, they tap into the subject to suck some of its
excitement. This way, they hope to render their readers excited enough to
attain orgasm about what they will say next.
And what they found, they say, is the unfolding of five
possible scenarios, the worst case being “a Saudi-Iran nuclear exchange.” The
first thing that comes to mind is that Iran – which is well ahead of Saudi
Arabia in this field – has taken more than 20 years to get to where it is
today, and still has no bomb, let alone an arsenal to risk a nuclear exchange
with a neighbor.
What that means is that Saudi Arabia will not have a bomb,
let alone an arsenal for a generation or two should the government there decide
to embark on such a program which it has not done. But if it does, the energy
situation in the world will be so different by then, any assumption we make
today will be like predicting the weather forty years into the future. Only
Jewish masturbators of the Intellect would attempt to make such a prediction.
Go play with yourselves somewhere else, kids; your
pornography is disgusting the rest of us.