Call it Political Correctness (PC), call it fear of Jewish
reprisals or call it what you wish, but it must be said that Andrew Peek did
not write history. That's because he missed half the story he is supposed to be
telling.
It was not out of ignorance that he did so but out of
something that's left for the reader to imagine. Still, fully aware that he is
truncating the truth, Peek wrote an article under the title: “Modern jihadism
began in 1979,” and had it published on December 14, 2015 in the New York Daily
News. The point he is making is that modern jihadism began with three events,
all of which happened in 1979. They were the Iranian Revolution, the Soviet
invasion of Afghanistan
and the misuse of Saudi money.
He speaks of the Iranian Revolution as if it were a
spontaneous combustion sort of thing – which is a convenient way to absolve the
Americans of the role they played to trigger it. He also speaks of the Soviet
invasion of Afghanistan as
if the Russians were alone responsible for the horror that followed … all this,
despite the role that the United
States and its allies played in that drama.
And he speaks of Saudi money as if it – and not Jewish money – was at the root
of all evil.
But even if the author had corrected those deficiencies, the
account he gave of that history would still be considered a mutilation of the
truth because it omits a great deal. Let us, therefore, be educated about
something, thus help prevent future ignoramuses from adding to the noise
pollution that's choking intelligent debate on this subject. To this end, let
it be known that until the Muslims got involved in wars, the Arabic word
'jihad' meant to strive, and was used as such. Thus, each individual alive
strove to secure life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, for example.
When the wars happened – regardless as to who started them –
the Arabs began to speak of “jihad fee sabeel Allah.” It means to strive for
the sake of God; interpreted to mean holy war. Because people who do not speak
Arabic could not remember that whole sentence, they used the single word
“jihad” to mean Islamic holy war. The result has been that every violent move
made by a Muslim for whatever reason became an act of Islamic holy war against
the infidels, in the eyes of those who didn't know. And that's a ludicrous
proposition on its face.
The truth is that Muslim war-like violence outside a
conventional war did not start until the 1960s. If jihadism is defined as the
use of terror against civilians to achieve political ends, this was a tactic
first used by the European Jews at the start of the Twentieth Century against
the British in Palestine .
It was later adopted by the Palestinian Christians who were themselves copied
by the Tamils of Sri Lanka. And it was these Tamils who were the first to use
suicide bombers in their war against government forces.
When you study the history of violence in the Middle East , you find that all the incidents were
triggered, aided and abated by the Jews of Israel who profited from them. That
history began when the Muslims of Palestine (who are the majority) were so
timid at resisting the Jewish occupation of their country; the Christians (who
are the minority) took up the task. They looked abroad for inspiration on how
to command attention; how to make the world notice their plight.
They learned from the African Americans that when you hijack
a plane and force it to land at an airport that you select, the media notices
you and gives you an opportunity to air your grievances. Well, the Palestinians
did not choose a Cuban airport to land the Israeli and Western planes they
hijacked; they chose airports that were closer to home. But whereas the
Americans refrained from bombing Cuba ,
and listened to the grievances of the African Americans instead, the Israelis
responded to the Palestinian acts by mounting military operations whose level
of violence was so ferocious, France
stopped giving them warplanes.
That's when the Muslim Palestinians began to resist the
occupation of their land. In response, Israel
created Hamas and taught its members how to terrorize Fatah, but Hamas
eventually turned against Israel .
It also happened that Israel
thought it could clear Lebanon of Palestinian fighters but created Hezbollah
instead. As to Israel 's
relationship with Sri Lanka ,
let be known that the Jews made tons of money selling weapons to both sides in
that conflict.
The truth is that every drop of blood that was spilled – and
continues to be spilled in that region – happened because the Jews came to it
and have been masterminding the kind of biblical horrors that put into effect
the fundamental precepts of their ideology ... that which is falsely called a
religion. This is how the Jews pray to their God. And they love to pray
non-stop.