It is interesting to know that even science-fiction has shied away from exploring the possibility or reversing the thinking process by reversing the polarity of the brain signals, which are after all, electrical impulses.
To have a visual reference as
to what reverse polarity can do, think of a remotely controlled toy car in the
hands of a child. He can make the car that's going forward, reverse direction
and go backward by sending a signal that tells the controlling mechanism to
reverse the polarity of the current that's fueling the toy's motor.
Can something like this happen
to the human brain, and make it think backward instead of forward? This does
not mean think backward in time, instead of forward into the future. Rather, it
means thinking in such a screwing manner as to hold and purvey opinions that
might go as follows:
“We are legitimate soldiers
because we kill more of them using precision guides munitions. And they are
terrorists because they respond by throwing stones at us, and by using
primitive weapons that rarely injure or kill any of us. Thus, logic dictates
that we must feel terrorized by them because our actions fill them with much
hate and they will want to retaliate. On the other hand, they must not feel
terrorized by us because they should feel honored that we give them the
opportunity to die by the blast of state-of-the-art bombs”.
That’s really, really sick.
But are there other ways by which a mentality such as that, exhibits the
possibility that reverse polarity of the brain exists, and that we can no
longer ignore it? To answer this question, we have two recently published
articles that give ample examples as to how the Jews permanently live in a
state that has the polarity of their brains reversed.
One article came under the
title: “Biden's bad foreign policy deals,” and the subtitle: “His diplomats,
like Obama's, give without getting.” It was written by Clifford D. May and
published on April 13, 2021 in The Washington Times. The other article came
under the title: “Media cheers a return to the failed Iran deal,” written by
Michael Goodwin, and published also on April 13, 2021 but in the New York Post.
To explain the reason for
writing his article, Clifford May began by saying he fails to understand why as
clever as Barack Obama is, he did not use the leverage available to him when
negotiating with others. May went on to give examples as to where Obama failed
to do so. In the first example, he blamed the Cold War on Russia when in
reality, it was America, inspired by Winston Churchill, that unleashed the Cold
War, not only on Russia but all of humanity.
Clifford May continued in that
vein by blaming Cuba for the measures it has taken to defend itself as if the Bay
of Pigs was a Cuban aggression against America when the reality is the reverse.
Clifford May then took on Iran, and blamed it for the state of distrust that
exists between that country and America when the reality is that Iran respected
the terms of the nuclear deal, which makes it a trustworthy actor, whereas it
was America under the leadership of a madman, that reneged on the deal.
Done with Barack Obama,
Clifford May took on Joe Biden. He accused the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)
of lacking legitimacy, and blamed Biden for lending it that legitimacy when in
fact, the UNHRC enjoys enormous legitimacy by the fact that the world approves
of its work. By contrast, America lacks legitimacy by the fact that the world
has rejected it because it rejected the world in order to protect Israel.
Clifford May also attacked
UNRWA for helping to feed the Palestinian refugees that Israel is trying to
starve to death. To justify his attack, he accused UNRWA and the Palestinian
Authority of being corrupt when the reality is that almost every president and
prime minister of Israel were caught taking bribes and stealing even from the
funds that foreign governments paid to help the Holocaust survivors.
As to Michael Goodwin, the
reverse polarity of his cerebral operation is manifested throughout his article
by the fact that he treats Israel and Donald Trump as icons of goodness, and
treats everyone that does not consort with them as evil.
For example, speaking of the
New York Times’s view regarding the talks that just started to revive the Iran
nuclear deal, Goodman said there was an alternative view, and wrote the
following: “The Times is still drinking the Kool-Aid that the original pact was
a success and is worth saving. To committed dead enders, Iran's violations of
the terms and spread of regional terrorism are irrelevant”.
Furthermore, Goodman called
Iran's moderates, “unicorns that only blinkered leftists can see.” He lamented
that Biden had no interest in protecting Israel, and that Biden cast Israel as
an obstacle to peace than a friend of America. Goodman also lamented that
millions of taxpayers’ dollars as well as a veto over America's policies
regarding the Palestine-Israel dispute –– are given to the Palestinians.
These are the Jewish talking
points that were repeated forevermore, and were forevermore refuted because
they represented the exact opposite of the truth. They were refuted not just in
words but in the way that the American people voted in the last election as
well as the way that the world has welcomed the outcome of that election.
Finally, it must be said that
since no one has ever tried to brainwash members of the mob of pundits, the
fact that we find them in the lamentable state of thinking in reverse, says
they must have hypnotized themselves into this condition.
Maybe if we gave Clifford May and Michael Goodwin a remote-controlled toy car that moves forward and backward, they’ll realize that for every backward manner of thinking, there is a forward manner, thus be motivated to re-hypnotize themselves into thinking the right way, and seek joining the civilized world.