Jonathan Jacoby wrote an article that caught my attention because he is trying to do something in writing that I’m familiar with, having gone through what he proposes, and gotten stung several times over the years.
Before starting this blog,
which is in its fourteenth year, I had been struggling for forty years to
present my point of view in any way I could, despite the tsunami of attacks
that were relentlessly mounted to silence me. I wrote in English and saw my
pieces circulated inside several loops here in North America. I wrote in Arabic
and saw my pieces published in local ethnic newspapers. I wrote in English and
saw my pieces published in foreign newspapers. I started my own newspaper and
then started this blog.
On several occasions during
that time, I was asked to participate in a truce whereby I would stop exposing
Jewish trickery in return for their ending the slander of the people to whom I
was born, and with whom I lived for a while before deciding to come settle in
Canada. I accepted the Jewish truce deal. I stopped exposing them for what they
are. They stopped slandering the people that never did them any harm––but only
for a short period of time; a very short period of time.
What happened each time that I
observed the truce, is that their reporters and pundits slyly, quietly and
stealthily started to insert anti-Arab and anti-Egyptian tropes into some of
the pieces they wrote, increasing their double-crossing activities with the
passage of time, to finally infest all of the pieces they wrote. I was stabbed
in the back in this manner so many times, I now find it extremely difficult to
believe that what Jonathan Jacoby is proposing will work.
The paragraph that follows,
contains what Jacoby is proposing. As you read it, bear in mind that when he
says Israel should say this or respond in that manner, he refers to the pundits
in North America and elsewhere who speak in the name of Israel and plead its
case. Here are Jacoby's words:
“No matter what the
motivations of its detractors, it is Israel's responsibility to respond to
their criticism. Israel should not divert attention from the debate over its
polices by simply labeling its critics anti-Semitic for voicing their disapproval.
It must engage in a political debate about its policies. If Israel does not
succeed in justifying its actions, it will have to face the political
consequences. Israel has a responsibility not to devalue the dangers of
anti-Semitism by misrepresenting it. Its critics have an obverse and no less
important responsibility. They cannot allow opposition to Israeli policies to
justify the dismissal of legitimate concerns about anti-Semitism”.
What might happen now, is that
Israel's critics will take that advice to heart believing that if they stop
criticizing Israel, the extremist Jews will stop attacking such innocent people
as members of the American House of Representatives who refuse to prostitute
themselves, the Palestinian and Iranian leaders who cannot be intimidated by
American power, and everyone else that refuses to toe the Jewish line.
But will that prompt the Jews
to reciprocate and adopt a conduct that will be compatible with any of the
cultures considered to behave in accordance with mainstream human behavior?
Well, from my experience over the decades, I must answer that question in the
negative. That's because the way I see the Jews respond, is to lie low for a
while, then slip into their old habits. That is, they will gradually intensify
the tricks they pull on others; tricks that humanity has always considered
obnoxious.
Well then, if that will not
work, how can the Jewish problem be solved?
The way to approach the
problem, is for the Jewish leaders to come together and resolve to reject
everything in their religion which causes them to behave the way they do. They
will make a list of the salient points that must be purveyed among the
rank-and-file so that they all come to sing from the same song sheet. If this
happens, it will not take long for humanity to see that the Jews are serious
about wanting to integrate with the rest of the human race. It will welcome the
Jews and together, will start a new chapter for Planet Earth.
What the Jewish leaders must
not do, is fall into the trap that Jonathan Jacoby fell into. Here it is in his
own words: “Singling out Israel because it is a Jewish state is anti-Semitic.”
But the reality is that people do not do that.
However, the fact is that
Israel is singularly different from the other countries in that it was created
by the United Nations (UN). It became the greatest violator of the UN
resolutions. It is the only entity that seeks to replace an indigenous
population with riffraff imported from around the globe. And it is the only
thief that has been insulting his victims because they want to take their case
to court.
What the Jews need to do is
recognize that humanity’s rejection of the Israeli behavior, is the rejection
of a character that is as naturally offensive to human sensibilities as
crapping on someone’s sofa. In the same way that you cannot make someone love
you for crapping on his sofa, Israel cannot make itself loved for behaving the
way that it does.
But if you say that Jews cannot be Jews unless they do what they do … well then, you have identified why it is difficult to solve the Jewish problem. Simply stated: The Jews ARE the Jewish problem.