Can the difference between reality and the misinterpretation of reality be worth a quarter of a trillion dollars and counting? Can that difference be the main factor to trigger a nuclear war?
Let’s look at the premise behind the first question. What
we have nowadays is a Jewish propaganda machine that’s pursuing two parallel
discourses.
The first is the decades old discourse that would have
you believe Israel’s Arab neighbors are bloodthirsty monsters whose sole
purpose in life is to kill all Jews. Consequently, if America were to leave
Israel unprotected, the result will be millions of dead Israeli Jews. Using this
discourse, Israel has been able to siphon off about a quarter of a trillion
dollars so far from a dumb-dumb American Congress of moral prostitution, and
there is no end in sight.
The other discourse is a more recent formulation
describing the Arabs as being the sweetest, most suave beings whose grace is
rivaled only by that of the angels. Indeed, say the Jews, Israel could not have
better friends than the Egyptians who will help it sell its natural gas, the
Emirates who will take it with them to Mars, and the Saudis who were the first
to come up with the idea of an Abraham Accord.
As to the second question, all you need to do is listen
to the Russians and the Ukrainians talk about the ongoing war between them, and
you’ll realize how easy it would be for one of them to misinterpret what the
other is saying and in a panic, decide to be the first to use the nuclear and/or
chemical weapons they have in their possession.
When it comes to relaying a message that may have
repercussion on them and their interests, the Jews are masters at relaying — not the
message the way it was formulated originally — but the interpretation they put on
the message. For example, boycotting someone’s business is a common occurrence,
and has been for a long time. Those who are boycotted get the message, change
their behavior or absorb the inconvenience of the boycott and try to live with it.
The exception is Israel and its mouthpieces who interpret
the BDS movement as an attempt to destroy Israel and inflict a holocaust on its
people. This is how everything that the Jews dislike is misinterpreted and
wrapped for delivery to the public and the American Congress. The Jews refuse
to see things for what they are; they see them as a deliberate attempt to do
away with Israel and annihilate all Jews.
At times, it can happen that a Jew becomes interested not
only in the affairs of Israel, but America’s relationships with the rest of the
world. A Jew in this category yearns for a war that will engulf the whole
world. He would see an America that’s led by Jewish commanders embark on conquering
the planet. The latter would become the property of the Jews as if it were handed
to them by the long awaited messiah who may still come to attend the
celebration or maybe not.
A well known Jew in that category is Clifford D. May. His
writings have always reflected that kind of mentality. His latest contribution
came in the form of an article that was written under the title: “The death of
MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction)” and the subtitle: “And the urgent need to
reestablish deterrence.” It was published on March 22, 2022 in The Washington
Times.
Clifford May’s aim being to argue in the most subtle of
ways that World War III will be good for America, he first had to dismiss the
MAD principle as being no longer useful. He then had to interpret the
utterances of Vladimir Putin and present them as being pure evil, thus make the
man look like a demon incarnate. How does Clifford May accomplish all that? The
answer is the deliberate misinterpretation of the key elements in the narrative.
Here is how Clifford May dismissed the MAD principle:
“The idea behind the MAD principle was to make nuclear warfare a
lose-lose proposition. Now, however, President Vladimir Putin rules the roost.
He’s more of a L’etat c’est moi kind of guy. Three days after invading Ukraine
he put his nuclear forces on alert”.
Translation: MAD no longer frightens people. Because Putin dismissed it,
America will have to assume that he will use weapons of mass destruction if
cornered too tightly. This will cause America to put its own arsenal of such
weapons on high alert. And anything can happen after that.
Now look at the following passage. It is Clifford May
introducing Vladimir Putin. He described him as a primitive savage who would go
on a rampage and loot his neighbors mercilessly. Even then, Clifford May did
not stop here. Immediately after that misrepresentation, he quoted Vladimir
Putin saying something frightening. It is meant to convey the following message
to the audience: Don’t blame me; look at his words. My view of him was inspired
by what he said.
Here is that passage:
“He [Putin] warned the US and other
NATO countries that any attempt to prevent him from pillaging and conquering
his neighbor would result in consequences ‘such as you have never seen in your
entire history’”.
Clifford May is only one of the many Jews who are highly
skilled and capable of making the readers believe that what they write (from their
imagination) is not their fantasy but the considered opinion of someone else. In
fact, America was flooded with such fabrications during the last half century.
That work so confused America’s governing elites, they
became like children taken by the hand for a walk in the park. And like
children, the supposed big shots of American diplomacy never understood the
game that the foreign and Jewish adults were playing on the world stage.