No more than you can run your train simultaneously on a railway track which goes in one direction, and another which goes in the opposite direction, can the Americans run the narrative of their exceptionalism in both directions simultaneously; and do so without shredding the ground beneath their feet whereby they’ll see themselves swallowed by the angry nonsense they create as they try to have it both ways.
Try as they may, however, and failing as they do each and
every time, the Americans insist they can accomplish the impossible, pushed as
they are to act by a force they cannot begin to comprehend.
It all began when the offspring of the ultimate force of
darkness rose to challenge the supremacy of said force, claiming it is ready
and able to sit on the throne for a thousand years, and govern all which is and
all which will be. A cosmic-size battle between the two contenders ensued,
culminating in the ultimate force of darkness defeating its offspring who were the
Nazis and the Fascists. Siding with America, the superpower-in-waiting and its
allies, the Jews won the Second World War that was fought by others.
Realizing that they cannot project the supremacy they are
convinced was theirs by divine will, the Jews painted America with the colors
of their Zionist project, thus made the superpower look, talk and behave like
an authentic member of the ultimate force of darkness. This was the successful Judaization
of superpower America.
Upon this, the Jews embarked on a new project they called Pax
Americana according to which they would push America to get involved in forever
wars, till such time that everything will have been consumed by fire. And this
would be the point at which the Jews will start rebuilding the planet to make
it safe for Jews to live in, so accomplished by taking total control of the
planet.
For that scheme to succeed, the Jews came up with the
double-track railway approach to the fictitious exceptionalism that covers both
America and the Jewish made-up concoction known as Israel.
And so, for now, each time that you hear or see someone of
the Clifford D. May variety speak of America, you’ll know that he means the
Judaized America that’s nothing more than Israel’s shadow playing out the
culture of war and megadeaths on the translucent screen of human misery.
You’ll find that Clifford May has done it again by writing
an article that came under the title: “U.S. Must lead in shaping the future of
the world,” and the subtitle: “Either we do it or our enemies do it,” published
on July 5, 2022 in the Washington Times. Here is a condensed version of what’s
said in the article:
“America embarked upon a noble experiment: We would establish a
community of nations, named the United Nations. Members would embrace
‘fundamental human rights.’ They would agree to settle conflicts through
diplomacy. They would pledge to abide by international laws. They would impose
consequences on those who undermined this ‘rules-based order.’ For several
decades, this arrangement was successful because the Soviet-American
competition did not become overheated. In 1991, the Soviet flag lowered for the
last time over the Kremlin. A resentful and revanchist Putin came to power.
Bill Clinton brought the People’s Republic China into the World Trade
Organization. Today, China’s ruler, Xi Jinping, is subverting the UN and other
international organizations, bullying China’s neighbors, and threatening Taiwan.
He formalized an alliance with Putin who said: ‘The struggle we are waging is
for our sovereignty.’ What does he think limits Russia’s sovereignty? The
rules-based order. Why should Americans care? If Mr. Putin swallows Ukraine, he
is likely to attack other former Russian/Soviet possessions. But why should we
worry about quarrels in faraway lands? The answer: Because if we do not, it
will mean the end of what we call the Free World. The United States will become
an isolated island in an ocean dominated by despotic empires. Our freedom and
prosperity will diminish. Our children and grandchildren will not thank us. The
less-bad alternative is to recommit to the goals we fought for in World War II
and the Cold War: That means continuing to help Ukrainians by sending them the
materiel [they should have received long ago]. It’s also essential to help
Taiwan become difficult for Xi to ingest. We need to strengthen our military
and defense alliances. We must insist that our partners bear more of the burden
than they are currently. American leadership is indispensable — one hopes they
recognize that. But America cannot serve indefinitely as our friends’ Guard.
One hopes they recognize that, too”.
Now my dear reader, I’ll ask you to do something for yourself.
It’s important that you do it because no one appreciates the power of an indoctrination
that’s directed at them without personally digging deep into the meaning of the
words which are fired at them by propaganda experts. Well, you just read the
gospel that Clifford May’s people want you to believe they adhere to, and want
the world to accept as their manifesto for fixing the world. You’ll find below,
the condensed version of an article written under the title: “The International
Criminal Court and Negative American Exceptionalism,” and the subtitle: “the
United States cannot say it is upholding the principle of holding war criminals
accountable unless it applies the relevant rules and laws of war to everyone,
including itself and states it favors, and not just to regimes it dislikes.” It
was written by Paul R. Pillar and published on July 5, 2022 in the National
Interest. Do the comparison between the two articles to detect and appreciate
the force that these people use in the attempt to maintain America’s leaders in
the constant state of betraying their country to serve Israel and only Israel.
Here is that version:
“The US has presented problems by resisting participation
in international projects because they raise the possibility of US freedom of
action being restricted or of foreigners judging Americans’ actions. This
pattern goes back as far as the debate over membership in the League of Nations.
US rejection of the League rendered it weaker than it could have been, and a
weakened League was an ingredient in the twenty years crisis that culminated in
another world war. Such American resistance, notwithstanding US membership in
the later UN, has been an exception to much talk through about the US being
part of a liberal internationalist consensus. A narrow, and negatively defined,
conception of American exceptionalism is the cause of this pattern. This
conception sees the US not just as better or bigger than anyone but as a state
that doesn’t have to follow the rules the US would like to see other countries
follow. A contributing factor has been the Senate’s role in the ratification of
treaties. Domestic politics and personal pique have been related contributing
factors. In recent times, Donald Trump withdrew from the World Health
Organization (WHO) in the middle of a global pandemic, asserting that ‘China
has control’ of the WHO, and using a China-bashing strategy to deflect blame
away from his own handling of the Covid-19 pandemic. The trouble is that some
of these international organizations and conventions are useful from the
standpoint of US interests. This has become all the more the case with the
Russian war in Ukraine. In response to Russian atrocities against civilians,
President Joe Biden has labeled Russian president Vladimir Putin a war
criminal and said, ‘he should be held accountable’. Setting aside the
difficulty of gaining physical custody of Putin or other senior Russian
leaders, there is an international institution up and running that is
tailor-made for investigating and trying war crimes: the International Criminal
Court (ICC). That is one of the purposes for which the ICC was created. It
provides an impartial forum that no national forum could in weighing such
crimes. 123 nations are members of the ICC, but the US is not. It participated
in negotiation of the court’s founding treaty but was one of seven countries that
voted against it, the Rome Statute. Bill Clinton signed the treaty but never
submitted it to the Senate. Since then, the ICC has been the target of varying
degrees of hostility from the US. The hostility reached an extreme under Trump
and Mike Pompeo, who imposed sanctions on the ICC’s chief prosecutor and
another senior official of the court. You know something is wrong when the
world’s superpower is sanctioning not war criminals but the people who are
responsible for investigating and prosecuting war criminals. The Biden
administration still objects to ICC investigations of possible war crimes in
Afghanistan and in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The ICC is a court of last
resort and supersedes national courts only if the nation involved is unable or
unwilling to handle a case. Thus, if the US holds accountable its own personnel
who have committed war crimes, it has nothing to worry about regarding US
citizens being hauled before the ICC or anyone else’s court. The objection to
investigating war crimes in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict consistently
overlooks how that investigation targets possible crimes by both sides in the
conflict. The US habitually provides cover for Israel in international
organizations and routinely argues that Israel is being singled out for
disproportionate treatment. The record of the ICC demonstrates otherwise. If
there has been any disproportionate treatment, it has been aimed far more
at Africans. The US played a critical supporting role in bringing some of
those Africans to the ICC to face justice. This was an example of the US being
happy to apply to others rules of international conduct that it does not want
applied to itself, or to those it favors. That is not how a rules-based
international order is supposed to work. Putin’s war in Ukraine has suddenly
made believers in the ICC out of many opponents of the court, notably
Republicans in Congress. That’s fine as far as it goes. It doesn’t take much
political courage to call for an investigation of Russian war crimes in
Ukraine. But the US cannot say it is upholding the principle of holding war
criminals accountable unless it applies the relevant rules and laws of war to
everyone, including itself and states it favors, and not just to regimes it
dislikes”.
Do you see the level of insanity that the Judeo-Zionist
culture has injected into what used to be a society shining with the brilliance
of clear thinking and high morality?
Weep for America, my friend. Weep and weep some more.