They Created The Disposable American Citizen

Imagine a character yelling to someone what amounts to two opposite ideas in the same breath. He yells at one side of the mouth: Help me; I need you to protect me because my enemy is strong and he is determined to kill me. At the same time, he also yells at the other side of the mouth: Hear me say you need me because I am the only one strong enough to protect you from my enemy who is also your enemy.

Do you think this is too absurd a scene to ever take place? Well, believe it because it is happening right now. The Israeli and American Jewish leaders are yelling this kind of absurdity, and the political and journalistic crowd in America is listening attentively. The absurd talk is taking place because the Jews have developed the cheeky art of talking at both sides of the mouth. As well, the listening crowd in America was rendered gullible enough to accept a message in one ear, and the opposite message in the other ear without being rattled. As you can see, my friend, the cheeky Jew and the politico-journalistic crowd in America have come to form a devilishly perfect match. It is as if they deserve each other.

When you glance at the matter superficially, you may think that the Israelis and the American Jews are only referring to Iran as being their enemy. But when you dig deeper into the subject of Jewish relation with humanity, you find that the Jews have at one time or another selected as the enemy of the day all of the Arabs in whose home they are now squatting; all of the Muslims whose religion they are inciting against; all of the Christians in whose homes they were repeatedly beaten, burned alive, pogrommed, holocausted, gassed or incinerated; and all of humanity which they say is afflicted with a genetic defect they call Antisemitism.

So you ask: What are these people up to now, anyway? And the answer is that they are working on a project they believe will get them what they have been waiting for since the beginning of time. This may not be the coming of the Messiah they once believed will show up and deliver them from the miserable existence they have led throughout time, but will be something of equal value to them. It will be the deliverance they will secure for themselves by war and by destruction; a deliverance that no Messiah will hand to them on a silver platter the way they used to think.

But because they do not have the wherewithal to take on a nation or a group that can defend itself, the Jewish leaders in America have come up with the idea of merging Israel with superpower America. This would be the way to achieve their goals – they openly argued among themselves – since America looks like it has the power to take on the whole world and subjugate it for them. However, for this project to succeed, it will be necessary for them to first subjugate America itself and have it bend to their will. And this is something they were convinced they could do by infiltrating the key American institutions and run them to benefit their causes; and by taking control of the politico-journalistic crowd to use as their own private bullhorn.

They have been working on those ideas for several decades now, and the result is here for everyone to see. What is apparent at this time is that these people have managed to create the disposable American citizen. It happened in a nation that has come to believe it is exceptional because it can attract the cream of the crop from around the world. These would be the people who come to the country as immigrants to stay, or they come as students and then apply to stay. It is said that the work of these newcomers, their ingenuity and their dedication are the ingredients by which America retains the number one spot worldwide in the economic, military and political fields. Being a little skeptical about this narrative, you ask if this is the whole story.

And the answer is no, it is not. The fact is that several nation states around the world and throughout history were able to attract extraordinary people from everywhere else, and they rose to the top of the heap where they held the spot for centuries. If we apply the same rule to them, we should call them all exceptional but then create a problem we cannot solve because it would be paradoxical in nature. The idea being that to be exceptional, you must be an exception to the rule, it means you must be one of a kind. But given that this does not apply to America or to any historical nation state, we must conclude that to call any nation exceptional is to defy logic.

Attracting extraordinary people from around the world has been the history of the United States of America since its beginning nearly five centuries ago but something new was added to the mix only lately. It has to do with the fact that most newcomers wish to absorb as much as possible of the prevailing culture as fast as they can. If the first generation does not do it, the second generation does. The trouble is that these people may become too influenced too fast by the existing culture thus lose the extraordinary traits that their parents came with. When this happens, they transform from extraordinary to ordinary. And if they go too far absorbing the wrong norms of the existing culture, they risk being put away or put out for good as if they were useless dead wood and a burden on society.

The truth is that two million of these people – be they established Americans or newcomers – are in that category at present, and many more come and go every day. They are in jail serving time of various lengths or they sit on death row waiting to be executed. It is that the disposable American citizen is very much a reality in America today. Simply put: They get them in; if they don't work out as well as expected, they are disposed of. And this is happening in the America that used to be thought of as exceptional because it could produce its own extraordinary people. It can no longer do so and thus cannot keep up with the rest of the world economically or politically; a reality that has serious ramifications.

It is that America now relies entirely on extraordinary people coming from abroad; a source that is drying up because these people find better opportunities in a world that is moving ahead while America remains stuck where the leaders of the Jewish lobby keep it in gridlock. The latter do this because they believe that America in gridlock is the best way to serve their causes and those of Israel. To this end, they have used their quasi magical abilities to paralyze the goose and make it lay its golden eggs on demand. If this sounds like a metaphor, the reality is that those Jewish leaders made the Congress of America look less like a goose and more like a coop of dumb turkeys. But the eggs of the metaphor remain golden, and the Jews as well as Israel will tell you they enjoy harvesting them in real life.

The egg that the Jews want America to lay at this time is the destruction of Iran. As always, they began implementing this new project by crying out the lamentation that they face an existential threat from a country that is developing the nuclear means to annihilate Israel and all Jews. When this did not move the war weary Americans, the Jews said that Iran was threatening the Arabs as well. When the Arabs did not even bother to comment on this absurdity, the Jews said that the Arabs will themselves become a threat because they too will want to develop the nuclear means that will threaten the region even more. And they said nothing about the horror that is Israel and that is already there sitting as a permanent threat to the region and to the world.

When that story did not move the Americans either, the Jewish leaders changed their tune. They began to say that Iran was developing the means to threaten Europe, threaten America and the whole world. They advised that the thing to fear now will not only be one Saddam mushroom cloud but the numerous clouds that will float in the skies of many nations on more than one continent.

But why would Iran take on the whole world and risk being annihilated by it if Israel is the only thing that Iran wants to destroy? Aha, said the Jewish leaders, this is a good question. And the answer they gave is that the Iranians are an irrational bunch. Never mind that these people have been around for thousands of years and have done well for themselves, they are irrational because the Jews now say so.

Well, well. But tell me this, my Jewish friend: Does that line of reasoning mean it is rational for America to launch a war on Iran instead of working to have a Middle East that will be free of nuclear weapons? In fact, this is an outcome that was asked for repeatedly by the nations of the region, including Iran. The only entity that rejected the idea was Israel. Why is that?

This was a question to which the Jewish leaders responded as follows: Because America needs the protection of Israel more than Israel needs the protection of America. They went on to explain that this was a symbiotic relationship where America plays the role of the giver and Israel the role of the taker. And it is at this point where you determine that what you see is more like a parasitic relationship. But that's a subject for another day.

The fact remains, however, that America can ill afford the burden that Israel has become. It is that in the eyes of the Jewish leaders and the Israelis, what matters is that America keeps transferring to Israel what is asked for, and keeps protecting it from every threat it brings on itself. Other than that, America may let extraordinary people come to its shores all it wants and replace the useless dead wood it sees as a burden on its society.

And the world is demanding that an end be put to this charade because it is taking on the pattern that has led to previous catastrophes on a world scale.

The world is now saying in unison: never again, never again, never again.

How To Liberate Jewish Dominated America

There is soon going to be an election in America, and except for two thirds of the members in the United States Senate, the job of everyone else is up for grabs. It is expected that many of these people will be re-elected because the odds have always favored the incumbents, but some members will be replaced by new faces because they did not want to run for the office again, or because they ran and were defeated by someone new.

Most of the newly elected members if not all of them will have already encountered the subtle and the not so subtle hands of the lobby groups that will seek to infiltrate their offices if they win the election, intrude on their legislative work if they will have it, and dominate them for the period of their tenure if they will be so lucky as to get it. But the intensity of the meddling exerted by the lobbyists on the candidates during the campaign while running for office will pale when compared to what the lobbyists will exert on the newcomers when the latter will finally move into their offices and begin to exercise the powers vested in them by virtue of their electoral win.

The two most active and most demanding lobbies that the new Senators and new House Representatives will encounter when they start working will be the Gun lobby of America and the Jewish lobby of everywhere else. Members of the first lobby will seek to put a gun in every American hand claiming this to be necessary for the purpose of hunting animals of the tame variety and the wild one, and for the purpose of protecting the self from human beings who may look tame on the surface but are very much on the wild side under the skin. The lobby characters will also claim that military guns used in wars would be perfect to hunt tame animals and wild humans. Go figure.

As to the members of the second lobby, they will seek to put an American made bomb in every Jewish hand claiming this to be necessary for the purpose of defending their most cherished values. They will assert that such values do exist but will not spell out exactly what they are. The lobbyists will also seek to put a bank account full of donated American money – spirited out of the country through the loopholes of the tax code – in the hands of every Jew who happens to live somewhere, anywhere and everywhere on planet Earth. And they will claim that such action is necessary to promote the aforementioned cherished and still mysterious values.

As to the incumbent legislators who will be re-elected, they know all about the monkey business that goes on to make up those realities because they lived with them in the years that they sat in the House of Representatives or the Senate. They are familiar with the tricks employed by the Jewish lobby in particular because these are the sort of tricks that no one ever forgets. What is clear-cut about them is that the lobbyists who pull them start by deceiving the intended victim. To do this and succeed, they begin the game by acting softly while flashing a big smile. And like the fox that comes dressed in the clothes of a lamb, they fool the unwary and start their long journey of deception at this point.

The foxy characters will maintain their soft posture as long as they will get what they ask for. But if and when this will come to an end, the Jewish lobbyists will switch to the next stage of the game which is to sting the American legislator. There are many ways to execute this treacherous act, but the way they prefer the most is the way of the scorpion. It consists of the lobbyists flipping allegiance and working toward the goal of getting rid of the American legislator. Calling him or her uncooperative, the lobbyists will seek to have them booted out of office and replaced by someone new, someone who will be more pliant to the dictates of the Jewish lobby and be more sympathetic to the never ending demands of Israel.

On the other hand, most of the re-elected American legislators who were uncooperative during the time that they were in office and have managed to avoid being booted out, will have been subjected to another kind of treatment at the hands of their apparently friendly Jewish handlers. They will have been beaten into a zombie-like state of existence by insidious psychological methods employed by those same handlers. The legislators will return to the House of Representatives or the Senate, and will act without thinking to rubber stamp and approve every demand that is made by an agent of the Israeli government or by a local Jew.

What is disheartening to learn about this whole sordid mess is that the returning legislators will not warn the newcomers of what has been happening to them, and what is about to happen to all the newly elected members. Some of the veterans may even collaborate with their Jewish handlers and with those handling the newcomers to mollify the latter, thus prepare them to quietly accept what is about to hit them. They will be made to think that what happens here on the Hill is the way that things ought to happen because this is what passes for normal in this greatest and most magnificent of legislative bodies despite the gridlock it is famous for.

What this means – when all is said and done – is that the old timers will work like a bunch of aging prostitutes to have the newcomers accept, even welcome being dominated by an American Jew or an Israeli intruder. These will have come to tell the novices what to think, what to do and how to help the various causes that serve the Jewish and Israeli interests without questioning the premise of what they are asked to do because the gridlock must never happen when it comes to Jewish or Israeli issues.

To do the thing as well as they can, the newcomers will be told how to engage in the moral equivalent of having a value based cerebral intercourse with their Jewish masters. They will be taught how to lie passively on their backs or their bellies and enjoy taking in what is given to them. They will be shown how to fake a heavenly sort of ecstasy at the end of each exercise. And they will be shown how to let out an orgasmic outburst that will shake the earth with the energy they discharge as they praise Israel and everything Jewish.

It is for these reasons that we must warn the newly elected American legislators of the realities that exist on ground zero of the American political, military and economic life. These are the reasons why we must counsel the newcomers to watch for and be careful about the insidious tricks that the Jewish leaders and the Israeli intruders will employ to deceive them right at the start. These people must realize that if they let themselves be influenced at this point, the chances are that they will remain under the influence till they leave office on their own, or they are booted out of it having outlived the purpose of slavishly serving their Jewish masters.

Our aim must be to diminish the chances that the legislators will end up serving the Jewish and Israeli causes like devoted hookers whose interest will be to please the moral pornographers who come to dominate them and impregnate them with the demonic seeds that seek to teach the young generation of young Americans all about the new normal. They are here to teach America’s young that the God they need to worship is not in heaven with a name like God the Father or Jesus the Son, but that the gods are numerous and they live among us bearing names that sound very much like Jewish names.

To this end, the newcomers to the Congress must be made to understand, and they must constantly be reminded that if they discard their state of vigilance, they will be reduced to a state of existence as described above rather than left alone to work for the country whose people elected them to serve it, serve them and serve no one else – especially not Israel or the Jews who have been served way more than they deserve already.

Thus, it is imperative that the newcomers be made to understand that the best way to avoid becoming an American congressional prostitute in the service of World Jewry is to reject the advances of those who will come and tell them how to do things they know little or nothing about.

They need to be warned that when they hear someone whisper in their ear: “You can't go wrong doing this or that,” they should take it to mean they are being set up to do something contrary to the interests of America; something that will benefit a Jewish cause or an Israeli one.

Avoiding that approach, the way for the American legislators to proceed when something needs to be done, is to conduct their own research so as to better understand the subjects they are tackling. If they need advice from someone, they should seek it from people who are far removed from the Washington Beltway and from the circle of professional lobbyists – especially those who work for the Jewish causes.

Finally, it must be said that it will take time for America to extricate itself from the snare now gripping it, but the country still has the chance to liberate itself and be saved from the Jewish influence that is known to be so toxic, it has managed to destroy many a country throughout history.

You do not wish this fate upon yourself, America. You must, therefore, never tempt a fate of this power and virulence. Instead, you should avoid conjugating with those who come loaded with moral syphilis and seek to ejaculate it into the skulls of the young and vulnerable among you.

Good luck to you and to the world.

Imagine If Mitt Romney Wins This Thing

To imagine what it would be like if Mitt Romney won the election, you'll have to think the unthinkable. Start with this analogy: Visualize a teenager in a wealthy home where the parents constantly tell him or her they cannot befriend this boy or that girl, and they cannot see this movie or attend that concert. You will have a constant hell in that home where the teenager will forever do what the parents have forbidden, because breaking the rules and maintaining a hellish home is what teenagers are genetically predisposed to do.

Imagine now the teenager discovering that the father is having an affair behind the mother's back, and that the mother is having an affair behind the father's back. Being a snoopy twit, the teenager that knows his or her way around the family computer, discovers those two realities at the same moment. Being a smart aleck and an opportunist, he or she uses the discovery to turn the table on the parents. In fact upon the discovery, the teenager puts together a strategy built on blackmail by which it tells each parent – just for fun – who they can and cannot talk to, and where they can and cannot go.

More than that, the teenager manages after a while to get the two parents to constantly seek currying favor with him or her by praising it no matter what it does – be it good, bad or indifferent – and by criticizing the other parent for not doing enough to tend to the needs of the offspring. Still more than that, currying favor by the parents includes the urging of neighbors, friends and relatives to constantly praise the teenaged son or daughter, and to always acquiesce to their request no matter what it may be, with the understanding that the parents will pay the cost no matter what it comes to.

And because, the neighbors, the friends and the relatives relish the idea of being reimbursed by the wealthy parents for what they do to please the capricious teenager, they always welcome what he or she asks for, so as to promptly acquiesce to the request and then rush to ask for a reimbursement that they know the parents will not question no matter how exorbitant they make it to be.

This, my friend, is what the relationship between America and Israel will look like if Mitt Romney wins the election, and he moves into the White House as President of the nation and Commander-in-Chief of its armed forces. The executive branch of the homeland will play the role of one parent that is under Jewish blackmail the same way that the legislative branch is now playing the role of the other parent which happens to be already under the same sort of blackmail.

This will happen because the Jewish leaders who have forever lived like parasites feeding off the gullible that they managed to pilot in the direction of subservience are eying America, hoping to make it their next victim. They see Romney as the perfect example of someone they can blackmail given that his religion has treated the Jews in a manner that is not politically correct in this day and age. These people who call themselves Christians when other Christians question the claim, have been baptizing dead Jews posthumously to make sure that they go to Heaven whether or not they would have liked it; whether or not their relatives would permit it.

And it will happen because the two houses of the U.S. Congress are already under the control of the World Jewish Congress and of AIPAC because many members of the American legislative body are under blackmail because of sexual misconduct they are committing now or have committed in the past. As well, there are the members who have a thing or two which may not be of sexual nature that they wish to keep under wraps but that the Jews know about and dangle in their faces to extort concessions from them.

The one difference between the reality in America today and the analogy of the teenager in a wealthy home is that America is no longer the wealthy nation it used to be. Whatever concession it makes to placate Israel and world Jewry, comes at a high price because America borrows the money to pay for it. As to the reputation and the prestige that the superpower loses every time it stands in Israel's corner – well, this has always been a loss that cannot be calculated or replaced.

Allow Romney to get into the White House, and the crumbling of America will accelerate.

The Choice Cannot Be Clearer

When President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney had their third presidential debate on October 22, 2012, Romney said a few things that should be looked at closely. In response to the first question posed by moderator Bob Schieffer, the Governor gave a long response, part of which went like this: “With the Arab Spring, came a great deal of hope that there would be … opportunity for greater participation on the part of women in public life, and in economic life in the Middle East.”

And right there; right off the bat you could tell that this was the mouth of a dumb and ignorant puppet that is animated by strings pulled by the hands of his Jewish handlers. You know it is Jewish because the Jews are the ones who harbor among them groups that want to become “Dear Abby” and “Ann Landers” to the rest of the world. Their aim would be to turn everyone into good little boys and good little girls that worship the Jews as the gods who chose to live among us here on good old Planet Earth.

And you know he is dumb and ignorant because he failed to make the connection inside whatever stuff he has in his skull – that many of the women in the Middle East have made the same choice that his wife made when she decided to raise her kids at home rather than participate in the life of the nation by taking part in “public life” or what he calls “economic life” which presumably means outside the home.

The fact of the matter is that families in the Middle East are on the whole large ones because the transformation from a rural existence to an urban one is not yet complete in that part of the world. But where the transformation is happening at a steady pace in a country like Egypt, for example, the younger generations are changing the composition of both the workforce and the student body. In fact, the workplace is now 25 percent female while the percentage of women going to college is outpacing that of the men. There are more women going on to university in Egypt at this time than there are men. You dig that Mitty boy?

And when someone is dumb, ignorant and manipulated by the self-designated gods, he makes statements that give out the signature of the hands pulling on the string. Here is one such statement: “We have – in Egypt, a Muslim Brotherhood president.” He does not say what is good or what is bad with this development because he hasn't got a clue, and his handlers did not dare telling him what they meant. They did not dare because they knew he will be up to his eyeballs in dog manure trying to explain that a democratic act undertaken in Egypt, while good in itself, may turn out to be bad for the bloodsucking entity they call Israel.

But what do the Jewish terrestrial gods, the Abbys and the Landers want to do with the Middle East? Here it is (not out of the horse's mouth but out of the idiot's mouth): “We're going to have to put in place a … strategy to help the world of Islam … reject radical extremism.” He later elaborated this way: “My strategy is broader than that … the key … is a pathway to get the Muslim world to be able to reject extremism on its own.” Where did that come from? you ask. Well, it came right out of the Jewish propaganda machine.

The fact is that when these people decide on controlling something, they begin their blitz with what you may call an assault by verbal barrage. That is, they start telling everybody what to say, when to say it and how to say it. They do this because they know from experience that when a critical mass of people get to say what they want them to say, their lie becomes the accepted truth – at least long enough for them to accomplish what they aim for. When this is done, they take what gains they can lay their hands on and run, leaving behind a mess that someone else has to clean up.

Here is a perfect example of that: “We don't want another Iraq, we don't want another Afghanistan ... The right course for us is to ... go after the ... various anti-American groups and the jihadists, but also help the Muslim world.” Thus, having made a mess of the relationship between America and the Muslim world with their cry: “Zey know nossing about za damacracy,” they now leave it to someone else to clean up the mess, and try something else. They leave it to Romney to ask the obvious question: “And how do we do that?” And he answers: “A group of Arab scholars came together … to look at how we can help ... And the answer they came up with was this: ...”

 He enumerates what the Arab scholars came up with, which is the usual you find anywhere in the world.

But this is not the important point in that passage. Look at this portion of it: “to look at how we can help” It is this “WE” that should tell you the Jewish gods, the Abbys and the Landers are still hungry to control the world. And the way they want to do it in the Middle East is the way they did it in America. Like parasites they want to latch onto something good they see happening there, highjack it and pilot it to serve their interests. Nothing can be more Jewish than to pretend the Arab scholars came together and came up with a set of recommendations to hand to that “WE” which presumably includes the idiotic puppet known as Mitty boy.

The trouble is that the Jewish leaders tried for centuries to control the Arabs but failed because the latter would not let them get out of line. And so, they turned their attention to what used to be a gullible Europe where they had it their way for a while till the Europeans discovered what they were up to and dealt with them via the pogroms, holocausts, gas chambers and incinerators.

So now, they want to use the power and prestige of America to do to the Arabs what they could not do on their own. If you're an American and you think about it, you will know that you have one of two choices: either you let them manipulate your system, the result of which will be that you will respond in a way similar to what the Europeans did. Or you put those troublesome Jews in their place before they get any further, and live free of their tricks like the Arabs did for centuries without as much as laying a finger on them.

The choice is yours, America. It is either Romney and the inevitable American holocaust. Or it is the status quo and a steady – albeit a slow progress – toward a more desirable world.

Smart Alec Romney Has Done It Again

He has done it again. Romney has played the game his Neocon bosom buddies know well, and use all the time. They took over America by pulling a Smart Alec trick that suits every moment, but has one and the same purpose each and every time. It is to reserve for themselves the right to exercise free speech while denying it to others. The Neocons did it to America and took it over; Romney tried it on Obama and failed miserably.

As he did many times before, Romney told the President, yet again, that attacking him was not a strategy while he was himself attacking the President with unprecedented viciousness. Nothing could be more Jewish than that, except maybe the Fox News Network where there are more than Jews running the joint. But whatever their creed, most of them look and sound like a sewer pipe that never stops flushing.

Whether or not President Obama was aware of it, there remains the fact that when the editors of the Wall Street Journal (which is the printed sister publication of Fox News) critiqued the second presidential debate which took place on October 16, 2012, they concentrated on the points that were brought to the fore by the candidates with regard to the economy and to foreign policy. But the editors understood not a word of what the President was saying as demonstrated in the editorial they published under the title: “A President Without a Plan” and the subtitle: “A more spirited Obama. But he still has no agenda for the next four years.”

And what happened last night, October 22, 2012 in the third debate between the same two candidates is that the President hammered the points he made in the second debate with such vigor this time, he could not have failed getting through the thick skull of the editors. If they did not get it in the second debate, they should get it now. But if they don't, well maybe they should consider taking up another profession. And so, let us look at that infamous Journal editorial while discussing last night's debate.

At one point, the editors described Obama's plan with these words: “The paucity of this promise.” And this prompts you to ask what the promise was. Well, here it is as they enumerated it themselves: “He wants to hire 100,000 teachers.” And there is this: “He wants to invest in solar and wind and biofuels, energy-efficient cars.” And also this: “He wants to raise taxes on the rich.” And this too: “He wants to pass immigration reform.” And there is this as well: “He has a plan for manufacturing and education and reducing our deficit in a sensible way, using the savings from ending wars to rebuild America and pursuing the energy of the future.” Does this represent paucity? Of course not. And these were the points that the President made again last night while Romney was trying to silence him. No paucity last night either.

It is normal that when you see something like this, you wonder what would constitute abundance in the eyes of these people. But you do not have to go too far looking for an answer because the editors of the Journal inadvertently gave their own. Since they were discussing the debate between Obama and Romney, they were compelled to contrast the plans that were presented by each man. And so you look closely at what the editors of the Journal have called the Romney plan. After all, they complained that “Mr. Obama spent most of his time attacking Mr. Romney … his tax plan … or the statement he made last year.” And guess what, my friend; this is what happened again in last night's debate. It is as if the third debate was a carbon copy of the second.

You comb the editorial anyway and hit on this passage: “The Republican followed by reciting the economic failings...” and you let out a loud scream: Whoa! They say Obama attacked; and say the Republican recited? Is this what it comes down to? Are these editors – like their Fox counterparts -- unleashing on their President the set of words they were using to describe the Vietcong and the Taliban who always attacked and never defended? Are they reserving for “the Republican” the nice words they were using to describe America's friends and allies who democratically described and never attacked? Are the editors of the Journal implying that the Democrats are enemies of America; and the Republicans its friends?

This is so disconcerting, you ask yourself: Why did they see the need to resort to this kind of language? Do they think that Obama is this bad, and Romney this good? Or is it something else?  And you find the answer right away. It is that there was nothing else they could do to attack their President. In fact, here is what they said in this regard: “Mr. Romney could have done better making the case for his agenda.” As to the exchange over Benghazi, they had this to say: “We agree was Mr. Romney's weakest moment.” And they ended the editorial like this: “Mr. Romney will have a chance to do better … next week.” Well, guess what, he didn't last night.

Instead, what Romney did was deny that he vehemently advocated letting the car companies go bankrupt – having seen that Obama's decision was the right one for the country and for the American workers who are also voters. But then look what this incorrigible man did: He employed the same vehemence he denied he employed in the past to now attack Obama for assisting the companies that work to develop electric cars, and the batteries that power them. Well, let's call a spade a spade: this guy has a low IQ.

And yes, those editors of the Journal and their audio-visual clones should consider taking up another profession. As to Mr. Romney, he will do well to withdraw from the presidential race instead of seeking to make of America a mess as big as the mess that his surrogates have made of journalism.

The world yearns for a bit of quality time; something we can achieve by cutting and raking the weed.

Watch Romney Mutilate History Jewish Style

When President Ronald Reagan ordered the bombing of Libya in retaliation to the bombing of a nightclub in Germany in which American service personnel were killed, it was thought that Gaddafi will not be heard from again. But this is not what happened because the man himself or people representing him were heard from again and again, especially by the people of an airline company called Pan Am, and the people in a Scottish town called Lockerbie.

The reason why it is important to mention this historical fact at this time is that the warmongers in America and elsewhere who want to embroil the United States of America in a war without end are at it again making up the history that suits their current purpose even if it contradicts what they were saying a few days ago when they had a different purpose in mind and they needed to tell a different story.

The occasion this time is that Mitt Romney who wants to be President of the United States will soon be debating the sitting President Barack Obama, and the subject of the discussion will be foreign policy. It is expected that the Libya episode will come up, and to prepare for the event, Romney's surrogates are running around telling audiences that their man would know how to deal with foreign subjects because Reagan knew how to do that, and Romney will do likewise. They falsely claim that Gaddafi was never heard from after the Reagan response because the latter did not shy away from war. Thus, they conclude that war would be the appropriate answer to every unpleasant situation.

But the fact remains that unpleasant situations do not occur solely on the international stage, and the American people have learned this lesson over and over again. They understand that when someone kills a number of innocent people he may or may not know, or he kills a prominent person for no apparent reason, the true and hidden reason is that the person doing the killing is insane. The last thing you want to do in such cases is what the media used to rush doing, find out the name of the killer and repeat it endlessly in print and on the air. In doing so, the media gave the insane the reward he wanted most, his 15 minutes of fame. This encouraged the other borderline cases to copycat the act and get their reward.

The one thing that must be understood about insanity is that it can be motivated to go into action by a trigger that may sound meaningless to the rest of us but makes sense to the insane. We must, therefore, seek to identify those triggers and do what we can to avoid setting them off. This says that the first trigger we must avoid is the tendency to reward the killers by giving them the notoriety they crave. But while this is a universal kind of trigger common to most killers, every community would have a set of triggers peculiar to it operating at the local level. Thus, each community must look at itself and find out what motivates its people to act in a way that might be considered insane – and avoid promoting those tendencies.

And when a country like America becomes the target of an insane movement taking root somewhere else on the planet, the thing you must avoid doing is reward the potential offenders with the publicity they seek – the very thing for which they train and are prepared to die for. You especially avoid having the President of superpower America – such as a George W. Bush – publicly mention a name like Abu-Masaab el-Zarkawi. And you avoid parading the arsenal of weapons you are fielding in the conduct of what you call the war on terror. For example, bragging about the ingenuity it took to identify a culprit by the DNA in the saliva he left on a postage stamp, has proved to be akin to pumping high octane fuel in a high performance engine. Committing that mistake must have played a major role in turning the 1993 attempt on the World Trade Center into the 9/11 tragedy that was perpetrated eight years later on that same Center.

You can argue all you want who started the war that triggered the chain reaction which culminated in that tragedy, but the fact remains that regardless as to who the culprit was, the result has been that every action caused a reaction, and the ensuing sequence will continue to unfold till it dies by itself or keeps piling the tragedies on top of each other with no end in sight. For example, many young Americans enlisted in the military after the events of 9/11 because they felt that they and their country were attacked for no reason. In their view, they were enlisting to go fight against the people who attacked them.

But what happens in real life is that the people who live in those places and had nothing to do with the events that unfolded half a world away, view the Americans as invaders that have no business attacking them in their own homes in their country. And so, like their American counterparts, they respond by enlisting to fight against the Americans. But having no regular army in which to enlist, they train to commit what they view as the ultimate self-sacrifice; that which they call martyrdom they commit to avenge the death of their loved ones and protect those still alive.

It is extremely difficult to look at the amount of tragedy yielded by events such as these and remain unaffected. But to play the role of a detached observer, we must make the effort to look at the situation with a cold eye so as to see the internal logic by which each side rationalizes their responses. To this end, we cease to pass judgment as to who may be at fault but we do not avoid judging which side has the greater responsibility to take the first step that can lead to the breaking of the chain of reactions and counter-reactions. Like it or not, we find that responsibility almost always falls on the shoulder of the stronger side, especially in the cases where the dispute has lasted a long time, its origin has faded and has been forgotten.

What adds appeal to that line of thinking is the fact that history seems to fortify the arguments often made in its favor. For example, fear in the form of a ghost called “domino theory” is what prompted the staging of a fake incident that led to the passing of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution by which the war in Vietnam was escalated, the result of which was that America's back was broken. And fear in the form of a fantasy called “Mushroom Cloud” is what led to the trumped up charges that Saddam of Iraq was hiding weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and the passing of a resolution authorizing the launch of a war against that country, the result of which was that Iran's back was strengthened. The lesson to learn from all this is that war does not produce fog but that the fog is produced by the warmongers who profit by the continued state of war.

But who is it that produces these ghosts and these fantasies? The answer is that someone weak produces them to incite someone strong like America to fight on their behalf a war they cannot fight themselves. This is why the fear of al-Qaeda is currently being turned into an illusion called “Radical Islam” and “Political Islam.” The idea behind it all is to embroil America in a never ending war against Islam, having accused it of fighting a “perpetual war against the West,” and warning that if America did not unleash an Armageddon against it, Islam will overrun the civilized world and take it back to the Dark Ages. This is how Romney put it: “I believe that if America does not lead, others will … and the world will grow darker, for our friends and for us.”

This being the background, we can now envisage how the upcoming debate will unfold between President Obama and challenger Romney. To help us do this, we have the speech on foreign policy that was given by Romney on October 8, 2012. In it he made the mistake of drawing a parallel between contemporary and historical events even though no resemblance exists between the two. He said that the “attack on our Consulate in Benghazi … was likely the work of forces affiliated with [al-Qaeda.]” He went on to say: “We have seen this struggle before.” And he explained it by drawing the parallel with WWII: “Statesmen like Marshall rallied our nation to rise to its responsibilities as leader of the free world … This is what makes America exceptional.”

If you are puzzled as to why he made a blunder of this magnitude, what comes next in the speech answers your question. Look at this passage: “The relationship between the President … and the Prime Minister of Israel, our closest ally in the region, has suffered great strains … Iran today has never … posed a greater danger to our friends, our allies, and to us.” In fact, the world is beginning to realize that a noise you may call “Jewish disease” seems to permeate every discussion carried out in America these days. It is the tendency to pick a historical incident, spin it in a way that buttresses the argument you are now making, then draw the conclusion that suits your current purpose however much it contradicts what you said before and exposes you as being a flip-flopper.

There is no doubt that these passages were written for Romney by his Jewish speechwriters, advisers and donors; the same sort of people who said that Gaddafi was never heard from after Reagan bombed him, who said that bombing the civilian nuclear power station in Iraq engendered no consequences, and said many other falsehoods considered to be the overt mutilation of history. It is something they do to make the events comply with the mythology of the Old Jewish Testament, and set the stage for Armageddon to happen thus bring to Earth the Messiah they are waiting for.

And to make it all sound reasonable, Romney will attack the President's position. You already see this tendency in his speech: “The President is fond of saying that 'The tide of war is receding' … but … with Iran closer to nuclear weapons capability … it is clear that the risk of conflict in the region is higher now … we are missing [the] opportunity to win new friends … in the Middle East … I will reaffirm our historic ties to Israel … the world must never see any daylight between our two nations … And I will roll back President Obama's … cuts to our national defense...”

And so you ask: Is this what the American people want? No, it is not, and he knows it too. In fact, he says this: “I know many Americans are asking a different question: 'Why us?' I know many Americans are asking whether our country today – with our ailing economy, and our massive debt, and after 11 years at war – is still capable of leading.”

He does not say whether or not America still has the wherewithal to continue assigning to itself the job it was not able to continue doing since the victories of WWII. And instead of adopting the kind of policies that President Dwight Eisenhower adopted and called on his successors to adopt as well, Romney chose to take the Jewish path of spreading fear and demagoguery. This is how he ended his speech: “I believe that if America does not lead, others will … and the world will grow darker, for our friends and for us.” A Jewish fantasy through and through.

But what if America continues to fail? Will this make the world grow brighter? Wake up, Mitt.

The Second Obama And Romney Debate

President Barack Obama who is running to be reelected, and Governor Mitt Romney who is challenging him for the job had a debate last night, October 16, 2012 in a town hall kind of setting. Members of the audience asked the questions, the moderator Candy Crowley kept the encounter civilized, and the debaters fought a vigorous battle.

The difference between the two opponents being that the President has a record to defend while the Governor has a vision that needs to be explained, I expected to see Romney raise questions about the Obama record; and I expected to see Obama press Romney on the details of his plans for America. What happened instead was that Romney attacked the Obama record to disparage it and not to ask for clarifications. As to Obama's performance, he did press Romney to explain his plans but the latter did not respond in any straightforward manner.

The general thinking being that the world has gone through a turbulent time during which America was shaken by economic circumstances that began to unravel in 2008, I was hoping to see Mitt Romney speak more broadly about economic matters, especially in terms of the world economy and how America relates to it. This, in my view, is an important topic at this time because the consequences of what happened in 2008 are felt in the rest of the world, most notably Europe. As well, North Africa started to convulse shortly after the events in America, and that resulted in consequences which continue to influence the neighboring Middle Eastern region.

Events like these ought to have motivated someone aspiring to be in charge of the lives of others, to be serious when it comes to drawing plans for the future of the nation. But it seems that Mr. Romney failed to do so. He did not pause to give himself the time to think of a way to conserve and consolidate the gains that were achieved in the past. He did not reflect about what happened that led to 2008, or how to chart a way forward to get on the road to a more certain future and remain on it. And he did not reorganize his priorities to make sure that what he may do will result in creating the most good to benefit the largest number of people.

Having scored low marks in all these areas, I wondered why Romney wanted to be President of the United States in the first place. I grew up with the notion that there comes a time in the life of an individual when he seeks a moment of calm to collect his thoughts, rejuvenate his mind and renew his vision. And when the ambition is to lead the nation, renewing the vision becomes an important endeavor especially after an episode that put into question many of the old assumptions about the nation, and what needs to be done to get it back on track. I looked for a sign that Romney had undergone such a moment of reflection but found none and were disappointed.

And while I deemed that Romney had scored a failure, I could see that Obama had succeeded in avoiding the distractions that would have veered him away from the goals he envisaged for the future of America. He seemed to have developed the skills he needed to navigate his way through the mountain of noise that Romney was throwing at him. He stayed with what he knew was genuine stuff, and thus made his points with utmost clarity. And so I asked myself: What was behind Romney's performance, and what did he manage to achieve in the end?

Well, I have come to believe that the Romney distractions were generated because he has a cause that may well be his own, but a cause that is also of the people who bankroll his campaign. Their collective goal would be to harness the political, financial and military potential of the American nation, and make that potential work for causes which are not what the American people want for themselves.

May the people realize this truth before they go to the polls.