One in Remission and one in Metastasis

Call me cancer survivor if you want but until all test results are in, and sufficient time has passed, there will be no certain way to determine that the cancer which infected my colon has vanished for good. As of now, it looks like it is in remission, which is good news to me. But I still face other health issues that will force me to stop writing for long stretches of time.

As to the truly bad news; it is that the world has not changed much: The cancer by which people still avoid looking at the subject of Jewish responsibility when it comes to problems created by the Jews themselves ... well, this problem is in metastasis and still menacing the world. The last I looked at before checking into a hospital was: “Obama's Middle East Fantasy” by Eli Lake, published in Bloomberg View on February 6, 2015.

This is an article which basically tells America it has failed to be what the Jews desperately want it to be; the lawnmower that grazed the Middle East of its indigenous populations, replanting the patch of land with newly converted Jewish settlers plucked from around the world. And despite the fact that something like this has always been the Jewish dream, fantasy and delusion, Eli Lake, finds a novel reason to blame America for not playing this role. It is because of Obama's fantasy and delusion, says the author of the article.

Whereas bygone eras produced leaders that were delusional fantasists when it came to understanding the realities of the world, America has produced Obama, its very own delusional fantasist, says Lake. And of course, we must expect that future eras will produce delusional and fantasist leaders who will not understand reality as it, and will do the things that will fail to rescue the Jews from themselves.

By the time I got out of the hospital, there was an article in the Orange County Register that hinted at the reality of the Jewish problem since time immemorial. It came under the title: “The Jewish world is contracting toward U.S., Israel,” written by Joel Kotkin and published on February 13, 2015. It said this: “Even then, Jews faced discrimination. Greeks, Romans and other ancient peoples often misunderstood and detested the Jews in their midst. As the Greek Sibylline Oracle suggested: “Every sea and every land is full of you, and everyone hates you, because of your ways.”

Thus, according to Joel Kotkin, Jews can invade any land they want, fail to integrate with the indigenous population but impose on it their own ways, however misunderstood and objectionable they may be, and then blame the entire schmaltzy, degenerating situation on the local populations for not seeing that: “The universality of the Jewish experience grows not from the soil, but from culture and thought developed largely in 'exile.' In this respect, the erosion of the French Jewish community, as well as others, is not just a tragedy for that country, but for the world.”

This means that the Jewish colonial power that never actually materialized has been the first to claim it is mandated to civilize the cultures it invades. But if the latter reject rather than embrace the Jewish ways – however at odds they may be with their own – the locals must be held responsible for what happens to the Jews as a result of the choices they alone make ... giving them the right to claim and receive compensation.

Because what fails to grow in the soil is rootless, the Jewish culture eventually comes to be seen by others as a strangling vine, suffocating them and sucking the life out of them. And despite this reality, you find an article written by Michael Ledeen under the title: “A Chance for Italy to Distinguish Itself” and the subtitle: “Confronting anti-Semitism, Islamic State and Russia's Putin.” It was published in the Wall Street Journal on Feb. 17, 2015

In it, the author plays the classic game of telling potential recruits to the Jewish ideology that the rewards will be awesome if they stick with their plan of marching all the way to conversion. And this is because there is hope that the Jews will be understood eventually. To wit, he goes on to say, tiny Italy is standing up to the combined destructive power of the Islamic State, Russia's Vladimir Putin, and humanity's anti-Semitism.

In fact, this is how the Jewish self-delusional fantasy always begins. But by the time it runs its course, the Jews find themselves facing not hope, by facing the proverbial one way rail line to a concentration camp and what comes after that.

Quiet Reflections on universal Healthcare

I depart from the sort of writing I have been doing lately, even from the style that I have adopted because I feel obliged to do so ... whether or not the effort I am about to undertake will bear fruit. It is that I am going to be away for a period of time that ranges somewhere between a few weeks and a longer duration depending on several factors … but that's not the story. The real story is that the system of universal healthcare we have here in Canada is one that no person on this planet should be without … and I have good reasons for saying so.

I have always tried to avoid talking about myself or the family, but I must say a few things now to illustrate the points I am trying to make. There was a time when a man working alone could support a family of seven, paying to send five children to private schools from kindergarten to college, including private tutoring when needed, and the flying lessons for the one that grew up and became a pilot. I must say, however, that I broke from tradition and chose to go to public school for one year just to see what it's like to be in a public school in Egypt.

And you know what, my friend, none of that would have happened if one of us was stricken by a catastrophic illness. Life as we lived it would have been different if the illness that I caught more than 65 years ago had developed into something more serious than it turned out to be. I caught malaria as a toddler, and the symptoms kept returning three years in a row at Christmas time before they vanished for good. Now a septuagenarian, something happened just before Christmas that caused me to spend the holiday in hospital. It is the kind of catastrophic illness that would have ruined the family had it happened long ago, had it not been in Canada where there is universal healthcare.

I knew I had a problem a few months ago when I was running out of energy, and was getting short of breath when making even a small physical effort. Seeing my cardiologist once a year, I waited for the day of the appointment to tell him of my condition. He thought that ten years after my quadruple bypass, a blockage could have developed, and that I may need a stent. He ordered a series of preliminary tests before going for the more definitive angiogram.

That in itself would not have been catastrophic except for the fact that the preliminary tests indicated the presence of pulmonary fibrosis. I will have to undergo a biopsy on both lungs to determine exactly what that is before a remedy can be prescribed. And then, something worse happened just a few days later. I lost as much as half a liter of blood to the toilet bowl. I went to the hospital where they checked the stomach and found nothing wrong there. They checked the colon where they discovered a growth, later confirmed to be cancer.

That's when all the other tests were put on hold till I undergo the cancer operation which will see half of my colon taken out. A determination will have to be made after that as to whether I should first go for the lung biopsy or the angiogram. Treatment for either or for both will follow, something that will require months of care at a cost that would have broken the budget of any middle class family.

This is why it baffles me that a country like America – having the potential for giving its people the kind of peace of mind I am enjoying at this time as I go into this thing – and not giving it. Even as a child, I could sense the anxiety that the adults around me felt every time my situation worsened. Would my mother have to go to work? Would we have to go to public schools? We had a car in the 1940s called Ballila, and then a Vauxhall later on; we also had bicycles and scooters. Would we have to sell all these and learn to live without them?

I can imagine the anxiety that people in America feel every time someone in the family falls ill. And why does this happen? There is only one explanation; it is that some people believe in the dogma which says it is okay to make money off people in dire need of something. And there is nothing more dire than seeing a member of the family getting worse and moving closer to death. Universal healthcare will do away with that, replacing it with the peace of mind that will rob the rapacious of the leverage they have to suck the blood of the desperate before ordering the blood work that will indicate what remedy they require.

Capitalism ceases to be capitalism when it relies on the exploitation of those it can compel to make it rich. This is where America stands today, and this is how it lost its capitalistic edge to newcomers who understand capitalism as well as did the old American generations, and better than does the new one.

I'll see you here again at some point in the future.

Seeking Wealth and Power by Fraud

Accusing people who disagree with them of antisemitism, and using the Holocaust as a backdrop to warn that when you disagree with the Jew, you help pave the way for the next holocaust, has served the Jewish leaders well and has strengthened their organizations for something like three quarters of a century.

But like the bullet which comes out the muzzle of a gun, the Jewish choice of treating humanity with ballistic aimlessness has hit a snag, and is in the process of flattening out. Accusing someone of being antisemitic for saying A instead of B, and accusing him of being antisemitic for saying B instead of A, has confused people, has forced them to shut up and has allowed the Jew to monopolize the public square in which he spoke alone for himself and spoke alone for everyone else.

This is how the ballistic bullet eventually meets its match which is the inevitable random wall of steel against which it crashes, melts and flattens out. You can see this happen in the column that was written by Thomas L. Friedman under the title: “A Bad Mistake,” published on February 4, 2015 in the New York Times. Having benefited from the setup just describe, perhaps more than any other Jew, Friedman is beginning to realize that coming out the muzzle of a gun with high energy and nothing more than a fantasy to the effect that there will be a salutary Armageddon at the end of the journey – will take the Jews nowhere more pleasant than the practice has taken them during the past few centuries … nowhere but the same old proverbial holocaust.

And so he counsels: “If Netanyahu wants some intelligent advice, he should listen to ... the widely respected Michael Oren who said that the whole gambit was creating the impression of a 'cynical move.'” Well, my friend, that's a loaded sentence because it shows how the Jews have been operating, why their approach has failed, and what makes them retain the old habit which keeps crashing them against the walls of steel.

The fact is that the Jews never listened to a counsel that was not their own because they always believed it was the most intelligent counsel on the planet. That was an idea they fanatically inculcated in their own young and in the young of an American public on which they spent a huge effort to “educate.” But what is it that Oren and Friedman worry about? It is that “the gambit was creating the impression of a cynical move.” As you can see, they do not worry about the cynicism of the gambit; they worry about the impression it is creating. This is so typical of the Jewish culture; the world must understand that they consider kosher the commission of any crime as long as they can make it look like it was committed to serve the greater good. The Palestinians know this well because they have been at the receiving end of Jewish criminal conduct … always whitewashed in America.

So you ask: Who was doing the whitewashing? And you get hit in the face with a reality that dizzies you long enough to miss the significance of this: “Netanyahu; his ambassador; the pro-Israel Aipac; Sheldon Adelson, the huge donor to Bibi and the G.O.P.; and Boehner all live in their own self-contained bubble.” Okay, but who was doing the whitewashing, and who is saying this now? Brace yourself, my friend, because here comes the answer: Tom Friedman of the New York Times spent his career up to now whitewashing every Jewish and Israeli crime; and he is only now talking about the self-contained bubble where Jewish decisions are made before they are shoved down the throat of the American people.

But like the kid who may someday become a late bloomer – but remains for now among the least intelligent – Tom Friedman who learned all those things by rote and by having them hammered into his thick skull over the decades, still cannot see the uselessness in choosing to stick with the form rather than the substance of what needs to be done. Look what he did when he tried to give advice to Netanyahu: “this speech to Congress is in poor taste … the anti-Semites, who claim Israel controls Washington, will have a field day.”

As you can see, he is not concerned that an unhealthy relationship has developed between the American Congress and the Jewish organizations; he is worried that someone will have a field day pointing out this reality. And then, to argue that it is illegitimate to even see this truth or to reveal it to the world, he calls it an act of anti-Semitism. It is hopeless.

But according to him, that will lead to the holocaust that humanity, and not the Jewish organizations, will be responsible for. Thus, no matter how these people feel about a new development, they always come full circle and seek to maintain the status quo by using fraudulent arguments. They are hopeless.

Jewish Hate given Form you can see and touch

I must warn the readers that something is pointed out in this presentation that will cause the Jewish mutilators of history to scramble and hastily re-mutilate the already mutilated history of their creation. What these characters have overlooked is a chronological reality that makes their fake narrative vanish into thin air without them realizing it. Now that they will be told about it; they will re-mutilate what they have mutilated once before.

To make it sound like the Arab Jews in the Arab lands wanted to stay in the countries they called home for centuries, but that their own countrymen (Christian and Muslim Arabs) chased them out, the history mutilators of the worldwide Jewish Establishment put out a story that is dismissed off-hand by those who know the region. The mutilators said that the exodus of the Jews from the Arab lands happened in the decade of the 1950s, following the 1956 tripartite aggression on Egypt in which Israel participated.

Those who dismiss this claim do so because they know that the animosity between the Jews and their fellow Christian and Muslim Arabs was greater earlier in the century when the armed and illegal immigration of the Jews into Palestine was in full swing. This was a time when the Jews were slaughtering the unarmed Palestinians wholesale, and were robbing them of their possessions – land, properties and all. It was an episode that came to an end in 1948 when all that the Arab countries – themselves under British or Ottoman occupation could do – was prevent the Jewish hordes from totally annihilating Palestinian families fleeing the Jewish bloodthirsty savages who were shooting them in the back.

Still, no Jewish exodus happened then despite all that animosity. But what happened a decade later was that the rulers of now-established Israel decided to prod the Jews of the world to go live in Israel where the rulers dreamed of creating a Jewish empire to rival the existing Christian and Muslim empires. They found that a large concentration of Jews existed in the Arab countries, Ethiopia and the old Soviet Union. This is where the worldwide Jewish Establishment began to agitate, and from where it received different responses.

The Arabs and the Ethiopians let the Jews go, but not the Soviet Union which insisted on the Jews paying for the free education they received in the country at the expense of the taxpayers, before they leave and go benefit someone else with that education. This is when the Jewish Establishment organized the campaign of “let my people go” against the Soviet Union … something they did not have to do against the Arabs or the Ethiopians.

What this says is that things do not happen to Jews because they sit quietly and try to live normal lives while the evil others seek to do them in – which is what they falsely claim is the case. No. The truth is that the Jewish leaders are the ones who always try something new and in the process, do it to what they call their people.

This being the history that the mutilators are trying to mutilate and convince the world of their version, takes on a live form, and shown to be animated by the kind of Jewish hatred that alone is capable of fueling it. What is happening is that history is repeating itself … this time not in the Arab countries or Ethiopia or the old Soviet Union but in America.

The Jewish hate you can see and touch is expressed in two columns. One was written by Marc A. Thiessen under the title: “Obama's offensive against Netanyahu backfires,” published in the Washington Post on February 2, 2015. The other was written by Bret Stephens under the title: “A Speech Netanyahu Must Give” and the subtitle: “Barack Obama collects hard favors from allies and repays them with neglect and derision,” published in the Wall Street Journal on February 3, 2015.

In fact, I see no need to analyze these columns because they speak for themselves. Regardless as to the merit of the arguments they carry, the Jewish mentality that is capable of generating this much hate against the country of your birth, says that no matter where these people go to live, they will always work to put the foundation for their own pogrom or holocaust, and will keep pushing till it happens.

Unlike most of the European nations in which they were burned alive, gassed or incinerated, the Jews got out of the Arab countries, Ethiopia and the old Soviet Union in one piece despite all that they did to provoke the locals. And the question is this: How will they get out of America when the time will come?

Self-serving Worldview that leads nowhere

What more effective way is there to get someone to die for you than to tell them the world is at peril and they can save it. This is how master terrorists recruit young and immature minds to become suicide bombers; it is how they recruit older and mentally deficient volunteers; it is how the Jews have been recruiting the fanatics who started wars for them throughout history, and it is how Josef Joffe is trying to incite America to continue the tradition of setting the world on fire in the hope of triggering the Armageddon of Jewish desires.

To contribute to the effort of doing just that, Joffe wrote: “The Unreality of Obama's Realpolitik,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “With the president unwilling to project U.S. might, Iran and other bad actors rush to exploit the power vacuum.” It was published on February 3, 2015 in the Wall Street Journal.

Well, having exhausted the old means by which he could have nudged America to die for the Jews, Joffe came up with a new approach. Being the intellectual lightweight that he is, however, he shot himself in the foot before he even started the presentation. Here is what he did: He first described what great powers do to maintain order in the world. He then asserted that the description applies to the situation between America and Iran. But having forgotten that this situation has been around for a long time, he described Obama's imagined response to it during the six and a half years that he has been in office, by something that happened less than a year ago.

Here is how Joffe put it: “The retort from Mr. Obama might go like this: Iran is No.1 in the region, and we need its help against Islamic State … So let's be good realpolitikers, especially since it's time for a little nation-building at home.” Well, Josef Joffe my not-so-dear friend, Obama's view about nation building is something he brought to the office since the moment he set foot in it. But the rise of the Islamic State did not happen till very recently. Thus, Obama could not have accommodated Iran to combat the Islamic State way back then when there was no Islamic State. You just shot yourself in the foot, Josef; find someone to care for it before it gets infected.

With this fumble hanging around his neck like an albatross, Joffe starts to make his presentation. It consists of drawing a distinction between what he calls a “revisionist” power that only wants more, and a “revolutionary” power that wants it all. You can accommodate the first, he says, but not the second. He gives the example of Napoleon, the early Soviet Union and Hitler “all of [whom] had to be defeated or contained for decades on end.”

This said, he went on to do the very Jewish thing of exaggerating the way he described what he was seeing. To make an ironclad case against Iran, he said it was both a revisionist power and a revolutionary one too. He couldn't miss with that, could he? It is not like killing two birds with one stone; it is like killing the same bird twice using two stones. So very Jewish, so very Josef Joffe.

Being on the train to doing Jewish things, he now attributes to Muslim Iran what is known to apply to Jews, and to Jewish Israel. He says this: “How do you compromise with Allah?” This is the first time that someone said this thing. It is the bastardized version of the original saying: The Nazis thought of themselves as the master race because of what they accomplished. The Jews think of themselves as the master race because God chose them to be his favorite children. When someone did as well as the Nazis, their contention was compromised and they got off the master race train. But how do you compromise with the God that chose the Jews to be his favorite master race? You can't … and this is why the Jews try to live like a master race, but always die like the race that never made it.

Still on the train of exaggeration, Joffe first blames the rise of Iran on George W. Bush who removed Saddam from the scene, and then says that “Mr. Obama is going one worse.” How is that? Well, says Joffe, it is that Obama counted on diplomacy but reaped stalemate. The neighbors are not amused, and the Russians are eager to exploit the situation both in the Middle East and in Eastern Europe. Hey Josef, ignore the neighbors and the Russians, and please explain how Obama's stalemate (if indeed it is the case) is worse than Bush's removal of Saddam.

No, the author does not care to explain. Instead, he says something about supping with the devil, an analogy he admits is dusty but leads to the lesson that you must keep your powder dry … which is what the U.S. failed to do in the spring of 1945, resulting in the subjugation of Eastern Europe and the subversion of Greece. Turkey, France and Italy … Holy misery; what's that about, Josef? And he responds: “The point is that Mr. Obama is confusing revolutionary Iran with a reasonably revisionist power.”

He goes on: “Hasan Rouhani may be reasonable; Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is not” which is why “Tehran keeps pushing forward all over the Middle East – damn Western sanctions, no matter how hard they bite.”

Well then, what to do, Josef? He does not give a straight answer. Instead, he responds with a riddle: “Power is as power does. Iran knows this … Obama does not.”

Forget about working with your head, Josef … there isn't much there you can work with. Better look for someone who will take care of the foot you just shot.

Hear them say they have bigger Fish to fry

Here's a cry that comes not from the heart but from a belly that's on fire: “Put More Pressure on Iran.” It is vintage Judeo-Israeli, but was let out by their mouthpiece; the editors of National Review Online (NRO). It was presented in the form of an editorial, and printed in that infamous publication on January 30, 2015.

Ignore for a moment the merit or demerit of what they say, and tiptoe instead on the pads which are offered by their logic to see where they will lead you. (1) “Senator Menendez and nine other Democrats … don't want to send the bill to the President's desk until March.” (2) “The arms-control community and the elite foreign-policy class back the Obama administration's opposition to the sanctions bill.” (3) “They argue that the bill would move the goalpost of the sanctions regime and the existing negotiations.”

So the question: Where does that lead? The answer ought to be: Wait at least till March before considering the talked about bill. But that’s not what the editors of NRO conclude. Here is what they say: “It would be better to pass it [the bill] now.” And why is that? Because “the bill sets the goalposts where they ought to be.” How do they make this out? Here is how: “It is the position needed to ensure America's and Israel's security.”

Do the editors give an explanation that debunks the opinion of “The arms-control community and the elite foreign-policy class who say otherwise”? No they don't because they say they have something better than the opinion of those guys. Oh yeah! What's that? It is this: “Even members of his [Obama's] own party recognize the folly here.” What folly? Obama's saying that he can't reach a nuclear deal with Iran if Congress [passes the bill].” But that's not what the senators did. In fact, our number (1) item cited above reads as follows: “Senator Menendez and nine other Democrats … don't want to send the bill to the President's desk until March.” Oh, never mind, we have bigger fish to fry here at NRO.

So you ask: Can you elaborate on that? And they say, yes, they can elaborate because there is logic behind it all. The problem, however, is that every time the editors of NRO unfurl their logic, the bellies of friends and foes alike from around the country, crack wide open from the laughter that the logic provokes. Here is an example of that: “In fact, the logic of the bill suggests that any more negotiations without it will be pointless or dangerous.” Hey guys, here reprinted is the number (1) item that was cited above: “Senator Menendez and nine other Democrats … don't want to send the bill to the President's desk until March.” Does it mean that these senators are engaged in a pointless and dangerous game? Oh, never mind, we have bigger fish to fry here at NRO.

Like what? Please explain your thinking. And they answer; we know something you don't know. Again, you cry out: elaborate, please elaborate. And they respond: Oh yeah, you want us to elaborate? Here is elaboration you will not find anywhere else. We can tell you something that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans will admit to. What's that, you ask? And they respond: “The supportive Democrats, plus the Republicans involved recognize a principle that the president does not: You need leverage, not trust-building exercises, to get the result you want.” But if this is true, then how come: “Senator Menendez and nine other Democrats … don't want to send the bill to the President's desk until March.” Oh, never mind, we have bigger fish to fry here at NRO.

You keep talking about bigger fish. What's that about? You really want to know what's that about? We'll tell you what it's about. It is this: “Iran's government budget is once again in tatters, thanks to falling oil prices.” That's it? That's what is getting you orgasmic? Of course, we're getting orgasmic. There is a time for ecstasy and this is it. You don't even have to ask for an explanation because we're giving you one for free. Read and rejoice:

“There was a time when the West had gathered the inventions of the East, and used them to make weapons with which to conquer these people and keep them underdeveloped. Thus, we stayed ahead of them for a while. But the current thinking is that we cannot grow economically unless they too grow with us. This is why many in the West want to do away with the economic sanctions that served us well in the past. But thanks to the Jews, America continues to throw its economic weight around, keeping the others down. We may yet prevail and succeed at reviving the good old days. It'll be exciting to see the Iranians come close to starvation.”

Question: Don't you think there may come a time when the table will be turned, and America will find itself standing alone, suffering economic sanctions imposed on it by the rest of the world? Answer: Oh, never mind, we have bigger fish to fry here at NRO.

Heckling 'low Life Scums' who kill the Virtuous

The other day John McCain called a heckler “low life scum” because he was expressing the view that Henry Kissinger is a war criminal who ought to be arrested and tried for his crimes. Of course, John McCain has the right to his views as does the heckler who may even have committed an ethical offense by violating a rule which forbids the carrying of handcuffs inside certain federal buildings.

That, however, is the sort of civil disobedience which is allowed in a democratic society. It is an act that the dissidents commit in the knowledge they may have to pay a price for what they do; a burden that is costly at times and less so at other times. In contrast, there is another kind of heckling which is done by characters that may not seem to dissent from current norms, but violate a tradition that remains noble in the eyes of many.

These are the fifth columnists that disguise themselves as patriots and play by the rules while they slide into the system of the institution they work to take control of. When they reach the point where they can participate in the governance of that institution, or when they take complete control of it, they begin to show their true colors. They do so by pushing their treasonous agenda on the gullible people that allowed them in and that let them grow into the grave menace which is now dismantling the country piece by piece.

While pretending to play by the current rules, these characters often employ a method that destroys the existing system because their intent is to replace it with one that is shaped in their image. They do so by using media outlets of their stripe to heckle and to drive away individuals of impeccable credentials who come forward to serve the country as best they can with honor and dedication.

One such individual is Chuck Hagel who was viciously heckled in the Wall Street Journal and elsewhere by a low life, treasonous scum named Tom Cotton. Every allegation, accusation and insult that the Jewish motivated maggot leveled against Hagel turned out to be a disgusting trait that best describes the accuser himself. As for Hagel, he proved to be the most honorable human to have graced Washington by his presence in a long time. After serving with distinction for while, he resigned his post and talked openly about the reason why with clarity so intense, it could have killed maggots the way that sunshine kills the germs of deadly diseases.

So here again is Tom Cotton, writing in the same Wall Street Journal, to express the desire of his Jewish masters for mobilizing America's human and financial resources, and for placing them at the disposal of Israel and World Jewry. But mobilize America to what end? To kill the innocent people who did nothing worse than acquire the knowledge which can improve life for them and their descendents. To discuss this situation, Cotton wrote an article under the title: “As the Iranian Nuclear Talks Drag on, Congress Must Act” and the subtitle: “Two essential requirements: congressional approval of any deal and new sanctions if the negotiations fail.” It was published in the Journal of infamy on January 30, 2015.

Here is what Tom Cotton said to himself when he looked in the mirror one morning not long ago: “Israel is not a rational or peaceful actor; it is a radical, Jewish tyranny whose Old Testament explicitly calls for Armageddon. Israel's Netanyahu has honored the call: Israel has been killing people and inciting America to kill alongside it for nearly half a century.”

But instead of writing those words in his article, Cotton wrote the following: “Iran is not a rational or peaceful actor; it is a radical, Islamist tyranny whose constitution explicitly calls for Jihad. Iran's ayatollahs have honored the call: Iran has been killing Americans for more than three decades.” What he did, in effect, is transpose the Iranian and Israeli actors and reverse their activities. It is a typical performance of the brains which are mounted upside-down in the skulls that house them.

Well, the time has come for this young man to acknowledge the mistakes he made when opposing the nomination of Chuck Hagel. He should beg his forgiveness, and also promise the people who voted for him to be senator that he will never again commit an act designed by the Judeo-Satanic cult. And he must warn that in trying to grind down the nations which Israel chooses to be the enemy of the day; America is made to lose its young lives, and made to bleed of its wealth.

This is how a low life scum can redeem himself and be in good standing in the eyes of history.