There must be a Way to deal with this Delusion

No, this is no longer an optical illusion; it is a full blown delusion.

For decades, the propaganda operators of the Jewish mob of pundits have been distorting reality, making Israel look like the heavenly home that God chose to give to his Jewish angels. In His infinite wisdom, goes the Jewish propaganda, God placed such home in the Middle East where the Arab and Muslim demons had turned the region into a hellish Garden of Eden since the beginning of time.

No, the Jews of America did not spread cheap propaganda to cave dwellers that were never exposed to current or historical realities about the Middle East; there were no cave dwellers in America. Rather, the Jews believed that repeating a lie often enough would create optical illusions in the mind's eyes of the listeners. And so they went ahead and lied often to create such illusions in the minds of the crews that came to man the American ship of state after each election cycle.

Propaganda that distorts reality to the limit is not new to our era. Material created near the end of the nineteenth century and the start of the twentieth told of enemies that urinated through their toes and others that ate through their noses, and other far-fetched idiocies. This kind of propaganda was later refined and made more subtle, but the idea of portraying the enemy as being different from the norm remained unchanged.

When it came to the Jewish propaganda that was done outside of America, it was clear that the Jews had more respect for their audiences, in contrast to the contempt they displayed toward their American audiences. For example, the Jews did not tell the foreigners that the Arabs were demons, they told them things that went something like this: You and us are so much alike, we are different from the Arabs. The Jews said it to the Turks and the Iranians when they were courting them in an effort to have them join an anti-Arab coalition.

What happened subsequent to those events, is that a younger generation of Jewish propagandists took over from the old generation, and was itself followed by yet another younger generation. Neither repeated the attempt to create new optical illusions because they had grown with the old illusions firmly planted in their psyche. However, something else happened. The old had morphed into something different: the optical illusions became full blown delusions.

Clifford D. May has provided a perfect example of what a full blown delusion looks like when called upon to nudge America into doing the things that never end well. He wrote an article under the title: “Pushing North Korea and Iran to the brink,” and had it published on June 5, 2018 in The Washington Times.

Reading the article, you realize early on that Clifford May is not describing a situation he suspects may be new to the reader. No. The feeling you get when reading the article is that Clifford May is so immersed in his delusional vision, it is as real to him as feeling the heat of the sun at high noon. Not only that, he also believes that the vision in his mind is seen by everyone as clearly as they see the light of the sun at high noon.

That's what makes his sentences sound like strange declarations. Here is a sample of that: “Mr. Obama's policy toward North Korea rested on the premise: That Pyongyang would not develop the means to annihilate American cities so long as he was in the White House.” We ask: What deluded image was constructed in the diseased mind of Clifford May, which makes him believe that as of January 21, 2017 Pyongyang had the means to annihilate American cities, and that the calamity can still happen at any time?

It is in that “matter of fact” tone of imminent doom that the entire article is written. It says that the author does not live in the world where the rest of us carry on with our lives. Ours is a place where each of us does his or her part to help raise a new generation of citizens ready to build a world that matches our scientific and technological achievements.

When you begin to get the sense that Clifford May is not the only Jew that's roaming in that delusional world, you come face to face with the inevitable conclusion that many like him are not in our world because they live in an imaginary place where they have one foot inside the gas chamber.

They are so imbued with stories about the Holocaust, their lives are consumed by the fear that calamity will happen to them unless they preempt it by inflicting it on others. They are sick people, and they make us suffer with them.

There must be something we can do to end the needless agony that has consumed several generations already. The human race deserves better than that.

A hard-nosed Weasel and the muscular Dummy

It happens all the time that the boy who grows up as a muscular athlete, grows too confident in his own ability to defend himself against any aggressor that would try to challenge him. While this may sound like a good attitude to live by, it prepares the boy in a manner that may not always be positive.

What it does is rob him of the ability to imagine that being spared a physical attack by an individual up to now does not preclude being attacked by a group in the future or worse, being taken advantage of by a lesser someone. Consequently, the “big boy” becomes vulnerable to the schemes of the “little weasel” who will maneuver him in such manner as to have him do unethical acts that benefit the weasel.

While stories of this kind are common among human young men –– and increasingly young women –– they also happen among institutions and even nations. The most glaring example of an ongoing weird relationship, is that of a giant America that's constantly being taken advantage of by the little weasel they call Israel.

A good way to become familiar of what the weasel does to mesmerize the giant and steer him into acting unethically, is to read: “Standing up to the UN shows America's greatness,” an article that was written by Jonathan S. Tobin and published on June 4, 2018 in the New York Post. Being one of the most accomplished Jewish weasels acting on behalf of Israel; to study Tobin's tricks is to learn from the master himself.

Going through the article, you'll encounter two unmistakable trends. One is the flattering of America; an attempt to conjure up a fake pride that the country does not really need given that its accomplishments during the two great wars of the twentieth century, speak for themselves. The other trend is the shameless overworking of an artificial hatred for Barack Obama, a former president of the United States. In fact, Tobin invoked the President's name derisively 8 times because the latter worked to serve America and not Israel. What follows is a condensed version of the points that illustrate those two trends:

“Americans are asking whether fears are more important than pride in being alone. This isn't the only time the US has stood alone. The international community cheered as Barack Obama sought to put more 'daylight' between the US and Israel. The real objective of a nation's foreign policy is to advance its interests and values. By that standard, Obama was a failure. Trump's stands on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have reminded the world that America won't let Israel be isolated. Not every aspect of Trump's 'America first' policy is a good idea. On other issues, it's the critics who are wrongheaded. Being alone isn't easy but sometimes necessary. Far from abdicating America's position on Israel, Trump is protecting the vital interests of the West and US security. Haley's stand at the UN should make Americans proud”.

Flattery is something that very few people can resist. This is why every weasel worth his salt would have developed an arsenal of flattering approaches he uses to turn those bigger than himself into pushovers before working on them. This is why Jonathan Tobin flattered Donald Trump for preventing the international community from isolating Israel. He also told the American people they should be proud every time that their country stands by Israel against the world and the Palestinians at the Security Council of the United Nations.

While he placed a high value on his flattery of Donald Trump who is popular in Israel, Tobin chastised the international community for flattering former President Barack Obama who was popular most everywhere else abroad. To smooth over this apparent contradiction, Tobin came up with the idea that Trump served the interests of America whereas Obama did not.

But the reality is that Obama refused to serve Israel in order to dedicate all his time to the service of America. By contrast, when Trump said that he will be creating an “America first” policy, Tobin, who speaks for Israel, said this was the one bad thing Trump has done. But how can Tobin explain that ignoring Israel to serve America is bad for America, whereas ignoring America to serve Israel is good for America? Here is how Tobin explained it:

“Far from abdicating America's position on the world stage on Israel, Trump is protecting the vital interests of the West and US security”.

In other words, he says that the security and wellbeing of America and the entire Western Alliance depend on Israel; the lonely little fart that can neither feed itself nor defend itself. Go figure!

Trivializing the atrocious has become the Norm

How do you put a value on something tangible, say a pound of wild strawberries? Well, if it takes me a day to gather a pound of strawberries, and it takes you a day to catch a wild turkey, then my pound of strawberries is worth as much as your turkey. And if we agree that either one of these goodies is worth an IOU note we call a dollar, that's what all items of the two kinds are worth. We may go further and reason that since we have valued a day's work as worth a dollar, we created a method by which to price every tangible item. We do it by determining how long it takes to produce the item.

That's a great idea. But how do you put a value on something that's intangible? Perhaps something that's sentimental to you. Say, a love letter that your great grandfather wrote to your great grandmother, and that ended in the hands of a stranger? How much would you pay to have that letter? Well, if we assume that the letter has the same sentimental value to other members of the family, your bid for it will be determined by the depth of your pocket as compared to that of the other bidders. When all is said and done, the chances are that the wealthier among you will end up owning the letter. And his bid will be the picture's “fair value”.

We're getting somewhere. Now think how much it pained you the last time you heard that you lost an acquaintance, a friend or a loved one who departed unexpectedly. You must admit that a good part of the pain you felt was generated by the realization that you'll be deprived of the person's companionship. Call it a case of legitimate selfishness. But what about the children of the departed? Won't you feel for their loss? Of course, you will. You'll feel for their loss a great deal more than you will for yours. Why is that? Because there is something unique to the human species called empathy. To be accurate, it must be said that you might find traces of empathy in other species as well, but no way do they experience it as intensely as we do.

Empathy makes you react the way you do when you hear of people that died in an accident or died by a criminal act or died in a war situation. You hope death came to them quickly, and that they were spared a long agony. You also feel for those they left behind, especially the young who will be deprived of the love and care that's so necessary for the development of a child.

Now you're thinking, why is it that despite our empathy, we still have wars? Worse, not only do we have wars; we go out of our way to justify them, even decades after they have occurred. The truth is, we quarrel, engage in skirmishes and launch wars against each other because we are also a competitive species. When nature is bountiful and there is enough to satisfy everyone, we stay calm. But when shortages occur, we become restless and compete for what's there. We begin by having small quarrels and they grow to become savage wars.

Okay! But why do we keep justifying the horrors that were committed during a war centuries after the fact? Well, we do that because we believe that the war has not ended. We like to think that the final score has not been settled, and that the war will flare up again to do just that. And while we're waiting for the hot war to explode, we engage in a cold war of sort.

There is the Cold War that's familiar to those who know the history of the late Twentieth Century. But there is also the cold war that goes on between those who want to keep the memory of the Holocaust alive for ever and those who will do anything to put it behind them … even if they feel they must deny it.

But the human character is such that when you start something, the tendency is for the thing to develop a life of its own and grow in unexpected directions. That's what happened when people that had little to do with the denial of the Holocaust came up with ways to trivialize the Holocaust. Needless to say that the Jews complained about this trend as can be found in the archives of the 60s, 70s and 80s. This happened to the Holocaust that the Nazis inflicted on the Jews. What we now see rear its ugly head, is a version of that same trend, except that it pertains to the Holocaust that the Jews are inflicting on the Palestinians.

An example of such ugliness came under the title: “Numbers Versus Narratives in Israel-Palestine,” written by Neri Zilber and published on June 1, 2018 on the website of The Washington Institute. The attempt to trivialize the suffering of the Palestinians is so stark and naked, it does not require further comment from me.

Read that article, my friend, and see for yourself that yesterday's victims have become today's offenders.

The Parasite that's never satisfied

Like the parasite that's always hungry for something, the Jews of America are at it again telling Uncle Sam to immolate himself on the altar of a fake narrative to give the Jews of Israel yet another gift and make them look bigger than they are, thus enhance their chance at dominating the Middle East and fulfilling an ancient dream.

This time, Kenneth M. Pollack was chosen to make the case for the Jews of Israel. To fulfill his task, Pollack wrote: “To Minimize the Mullahs,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “An American Strategy for the Middle East.” It was published on May 24, 2018 in National Review Online.

Pollack started out by laying the background that led him to the description of the Judeo-Israeli seven point strategy he promises will do the job of minimizing Iran, and by the same token, maximizing what he says are America's allies in the region. But be careful, dear reader, because when a Jew says America's allies in the region, he means: Israel, always Israel and no one but Israel.

To get to the discussion about the Jewish strategy, Ken Pollack described a Middle Eastern situation that relates to the reality on the ground, the way that a picture of today's Aleppo relates to that of Amman or Riyadh; of Dubai, Cairo or Algiers. It is worse than a distorted picture; it is a false image in which reality is turned upside-down. The Jewish narrative is not just spin-doctored and meant to provoke a momentary impression; it is contradictory and meant to project a confused lie, thus pave the way for profound negative consequences to ensue. What follows is a sample of that:

“Iran's gains come at a time when the Middle East is changing in dramatic ways. The political, economic, and social systems that governed the predominantly Muslim states of the region during the late 20th century are falling apart. While a few states, such as Egypt, Algeria and Bahrain, try to cling to the old, dysfunctional order, most know that they must change or perish, although they do not know the way. The middle East is transforming itself; it is not clear what it is turning into. The dominant trend is still the end of the old order and not yet the emergence of the new. There are many possible futures for the Middle East, some good for the United States, other harmful”.

This is a clear attack on the emerging consensus, which is that America's Jewish-inspired interference in the affairs of the Arab World – from Iraq to Libya to Yemen to Sudan to Syria – brought nothing but calamity to these places. The tragedies hit, one after the other, at a time when the countries were about to transform naturally to a more splendid version of themselves … but that was not to be.

By contrast, the countries that managed to keep America at bay proceeded with their transformation. They advanced so much in a short period of time, the economic experts are marveling at what they see. The World Bank, the IMF and the private investment bankers around the globe are praising them for their achievements. They are telling other emerging nations to learn from the Arab experience.

These miracles of modernization are Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the other Gulf States. They have become places where institutions of higher learning from around the globe, as well as manufacturers of the most advanced technologies, and thinkers of the ideas that will nourish the world of tomorrow, are pouring like pilgrims heading toward the mecca of a New Age of Enlightenment.

But having described what the Jews wish to see happen to the Middle East rather than what they see is happening, Kenneth Pollack went on to add insult to injury by suggesting that these countries, “tremble wondering whether Iran will expand its influence and destabilize Jordan, Kuwait the UAE, Bahrain, or even Saudi Arabia … for these reasons, it has become imperative that the United States lead in an effort to push back on Iran.” In other words, the little demon that is Ken Pollack, is telling America: Don't do it for us, Jews. Do it for the sake of the Arabs who need you more than we do.

And what the Jews wish to see America do to the Middle East, is explained under 7 rubrics in Pollack's article. They go like this: Bleed Iran in Syria. Challenge Iran in Iraq. Get Iran out of Yemen. Stand up to Iran in the Gulf. Don't make the split over the nuclear deal any worse. Treat Lebanon with care. Hold regime change in reserve.

That is, they want America to continue its engagement in the wars of Syria, Iraq and Yemen. They also want America to provoke a clash in the Gulf. And they want America to see the folly in the advice they gave earlier about the Iran nuclear deal, and reverse what it did.

The Jews also want America to reject the advice they gave it concerning Lebanon, and want it to start dealing with that country in a more civilized manner. Finally, they want America to hold off on the idea of regime change, the demonic concept they harped on for decades, causing countless calamities.

And they expect Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America to stand in attention, salute and pledge: Yes, Master Jew; I hear and I obey. Because your wish is my command, it shall be done as ordered.

When the Defense proves the Charge against it

Robert Morgenthau, who used to be Manhattan's district attorney, is supposed to be an experienced lawyer. He wrote an article in response to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan who accused the Israelis of engaging in genocide when they murdered 62 unarmed Palestinians not long ago.

These people were annihilated, not because of what they did – which was nothing serious – but because of who they were, and what the Jews said they were thinking. So said the Israelis in defense of their murderous activity. And they were seconded by Robert Morgenthau whose experience must have been on vacation when he made the incomprehensible remark. With that, not only did the lawyer do himself in, he did it in spades in that he also invoked a saying that was uttered by Golda Meir, a Prime Minister of Israel whose mouth outsized her brain.

The Morgenthau article came under the title: “The dangerous perversion of 'genocide': Israel's critics distort a crucial term.” published on May 31, 2018 in the New York Daily News. It's an effort which attempts to show that the murders committed by Israel did not amount to genocide if we go by the definitions which Morgenthau took pain to quote. But it is precisely in so doing that the lawyer for the defense botched the attempt to exonerate his client. He thus proved that the murders – which he does not dispute were committed by Israel – were committed with genocidal intent. Here are his quotes:

“Erdogan claimed that Israel engaged in 'genocide.' While I acknowledge the suffering of the Gazan people, I recognize the unfairness of the charge. Genocide is a legal concept with a legal meaning. The word 'genocide' emerged near the end of World War II in response to the Nazis murdering the Jews as a people. The crime of genocide has a narrow legal meaning. One of the requirements is the following mental element: the 'intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.' It is spurious to theorize that Israel had or has any intent to destroy Palestinians as a national, ethnical, racial or religious group as such”.

To make his point, Robert Morgenthau began the article by quoting a Golda Meir utterance that went like this: “We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children. We cannot forgive them for forcing us to kill their children.” She thus admitted killing Arab children. In addition, there is what Morgenthau kept hidden from his readers. It is that Golda Meir was the first to utter the false assertion that the Palestinians were not a people.

In fact, her utterance was picked up by those who tried to capitalize on the victimization of the Palestinians. This was propagated in America and used by at least one degenerate beast harboring presidential aspirations. In addition, look what else Morgenthau did. When discussing the definition of genocide, he spoke of the “Gazan people” to avoid calling them Palestinians. This was a flagrant attempt to separate the crimes committed in Gaza from the people-hood issue concerning all Palestinians. The supposedly experienced lawyer then went ahead and denied that Israel was destroying the Palestinians as a people. And that's how he did his client in.

The only thing that was standing in the way of each Israeli crime against the Palestinians from being classified as a genocide, was proof that the Palestinians were a people. Time after time, the Jews and their Evangelical patsies, tried to argue that individuals plucked from every national, ethnical, racial and religious group, and converted to Judaism constituted a people whereas the Palestinians who lived together in the same place since the beginning of time were not.

The forceful and persistent repetition of what's false convinced the brain dead zombies of the Congress as well as some aspirants to the presidency of the United States that falsehood was truth, and that truth was falsehood.

But the Jews and their patsies failed to impress the rest of the world of their demonic illusions. Now, Robert Morgenthau – in his failure to prove that the Palestinians are not a people – has established a legal basis to what the world has known since the days of Golda Meir. It is that Israel is engaged in genocide against the Palestinian people.

It is normal at this point to ask: How can the Jews make gains distorting reality to such a grotesque level? Well, the way to answer this question is to show how the Jews operate. Look what Morgenthau says near the end of his article: “The false charge of genocide harms Palestinian innocents. By making it, Hamas fans the flames of hatred and violence. This will result in more deaths on both sides, and will make the task of peacemaking all the more difficult”.

Notice that he started the article by quoting Golda Meir and by saying that the charge of genocide was made by Erdogan of Turkey. He ended up reminding the audience of the Golda Meir utterance, but added that it was Hamas – not Erdogan – which made the charge of genocide. Morgenthau then pulled the old Jewish trick, which is to say that telling the truth has the deleterious effect of increasing violence and of getting in the way of the peace process. Confusion is the sea the Jews create in which they swim with delightful leisure.

All in all, what the Jews have achieved in 50 years of harnessing the Americans, and making them slave to promote the causes of the Jews, is the following: First, Golda Meir admitted killing Palestinian kids but blamed Israel's action on the parents. She denied them Palestinian people-hood; robbed them of their Semitic identity and bestowed it on a collection of individuals from every national, ethnical, racial and religious group around the world.

Like beasts of burden, the Americans were made to do the work. When finished, the Jews toasted each other and celebrated while throwing a bushel of hay at the beasts, inviting them to join the celebration.

Meir and other charlatans convinced the Americans of something – you never know what – and suckered them into helping advance the Jewish scheme of genocide. This is where the matter rests at this point in time.

What we can say with certainty is that Robert Morgenthau isn't a fair-minded lawyer trying to explain his client's position to the world. He is a large cog and a lynchpin in the Jewish propaganda machine. Everything he says should be taken with a grain of salt.

The Backlash to McCarthyism is hurting America

There is a saying which goes like this: It's tough to be young. This is true for individual organisms such as human children, as well as institutions and even nations. One nation that's going through the pain of growing –– and will most likely for hundreds more years –– is the United States of America.

Living in an age where events are galloping at speeds never seen before, each event represents an ocean of uncharted waters that America must navigate. It is something the country is forced to do blindly, and do it amid unrelenting deafening noise. The consequence is that America fails to digest such events, and never learns from them. And no matter how many years pile up, America's ability to comprehend the world that's surrounding it, remains at the same primitive level.

The country has lived through a McCarthy era that did not go well. It's because America overreacted to an event that should have been handled differently. The consequence is that a backlash ensued which caused the country to swing into the opposite direction. But here too America overreacted, causing it to feel uneasy after the fact. At this time, the country appears to be fighting a nagging backlash to a backlash that's trying to explode into a full blown controversy. America has no idea where to go from here, or how to proceed otherwise. Like they say: it is tough to remain young forever.

Look at one example of what's unfolding in America these days. Joe Wilson is a member of the House of Representatives. He is in the Congress today, and was there when former President Barrack Obama was unveiling his healthcare plan. Wilson did something that was never done before or after. During a speech given to a joint session of Congress by Obama, the lowlife that is Joe Wilson, shouted “liar” to his President.

He later explained that Obama was plotting to extend healthcare to the children of foreign laborers entering the country to work for meager wages and cannot pay to have their children looked after when they fall sick, as children often do. Wilson's dislike of children is not restricted to the Latinos that enter the United States from South of the border. When it was pointed out during a debate that America had given Saddam Hussein the chemical weapons that killed many children during the Iraq-Iran war, Wilson made a remark to the effect that disapproving of such actions is tantamount to hating America.

That was then. Look now what this lowlife named Joe Wilson has done. He was handed a piece of work that could have been written only by a high level committee of the Jewish propaganda machine. He signed it, thus pretended to have written it. He sent it to The Washington Times, and they published it under his name. It was titled: “The inhumanity of Hamas' human shields,” and was published on May 31, 2018.

Look what was stuffed in that piece of work. In their attempt to blame the Palestinian victims of the crimes against humanity that Israel has committed, the writers of the article spoke not of what the Palestinians did – which was not extreme in any sense – but spoke of what lingers in the hearts of the Palestinians who demonstrated at the border with Israel. The writers said that the demonstrators attempted to:

“break in, wreak havoc and murder innocent civilians … After the siege, Hamas used the tragic deaths of children along the border as a propaganda tool to further its anti-Semitic cause. The bottom line is Hamas does not want Israel to exist. That is Hamas' goal and every action they take should be evaluated with this in mind”.

But the fact remains that dozens of articles were written to whitewash Israel's side of the story whereas not a single article was written to give the Palestinian side. Do you know why, my friend? Because the guns and the propaganda tools are owned and operated by the Jews, whereas the Palestinians have only the truth on their side. And this is why they don't have to do a thing to win the PR battle.

It was a novelty half a century ago when the Jews first told the Americans: Don't go by what you see; go instead by what we tell you lingers in the hearts of the evil people we choose to be our enemies for the day. This was such a cute thing to hear, the Americans swallowed it hook, line and sinker, believing that something mysteriously delicious will materialize at the end of the day.

When nothing of the sort materialized, the American people realized they were taken for a ride by people that came into the life of their nation to scheme odious plots and commit horrible crimes. That's what the Jews did when they hired Israeli outfits to gather dirt on people like Joe Wilson and have them sabotage America from the inside while enriching the Jews of Israel.

The American people now ache for a new McCarthy to rise among them and start draining a Jewish swamp that's flooding every corner of America with filth, having plagued the planet during four thousand years already, and refusing to go away.

They want to see a new Joseph McCarthy come around and summon every Joe Wilson displaying a cosmic love for Israel, and ask them: Are you now or have you ever committed a horrific crime the Jews know about and are blackmailing you?

A World of Idealism fending off Jewish Bigotry

There are nearly 7.5 billion people on this planet, a third of them (2.5 billion in all) who are in their formative years, liable to grow up and become contributors to the advancement of civilization or contributors to a dark legacy we are not proud of as a species.

All these people live in nearly 200 sovereign jurisdictions, ranging from the small to the large, and from the poor to the wealthy. Despite the fact that the rich jurisdictions have the means to offer their youngsters a better environment in which to grow up and become a good contributor to society, no one can predict which youngster – be it from a rich jurisdiction or a poor one – will make what contribution to their society and to civilization.

This is a reality that's recognized around the world, so much so that rich nations and poor ones seek to give their children –– in the upscale communities and in the slums –– the education that will allow the youngsters to grow up and be all they can be. When youngsters grow up and serve their country with distinction, they are called upon to serve in international institutions; raging from the World Bank or the IMF to a lesser forum where they'll handle issues that deal with healthcare, science, sports, culture or whatever.

These realities are so ingrained into the kind of civilization humanity has forged over 10 thousand years of trial and error, no one has ever questioned their validity. And then it happened that a small swath of humanity –– people calling themselves Jews –– came along and tried to turn the world upside down.

You can see the effect of what they are pushing by reading the editorial that came under the title: “The U.N. Makes a Joke of Itself Again” and the subtitle: “The world body's leader on disarmament? Syria, of course.” It was published on May 31, 2018 in The Weekly Standard.

The United Nations (U.N.) is the world forum to which a group of people can apply to be recognized as a state, and where the behavior of every sovereign jurisdiction is scrutinized and judged for what it does or fails to do. Having behaved in a manner that's so repugnant to everyone on the planet since the beginning of time, the Jews were punished severely by almost everyone.

In fact, their last punishment was a holocaust so horrific, they asked the world to give them a place where they can live quietly as Jews and cause no one to desire holocausting them ever again. The world took pity on them and gave them a place they called Israel. But that's when the entire human race began to understand why the Jews have been punished as severely as they were right from the start. It's that these people adhere to a mode of behavior that is consistently, persistently and extremely repulsive.

This is how Israel has behaved since its inception; it is how it has institutionalized, nationalized and internationalized the repulsiveness that individual Jews used to inflict on their fellow man before they had a nation of their own they could use to spread the horror of their ways on a planetary scale.

An abhorrent trait in the Jewish character being to see weakness in those who help them, they turned against the United Nations immediately after it gave them a country they know they did nothing to deserve.

The U.N. being another global institution that is structured along the lines of the World Bank, the IMF and such forums as those that handle issues dealing with healthcare, science, sports, culture and whatever, it calls upon the individuals who distinguish themselves in their own countries, to come and serve in the various organizations that make up the United Nations, the largest of World forums

And that's when the Jewish disease bobbed up like a creature of horror coming out the depth of a hellish cesspool to spread its virulence over the entire landscape. That would be Planet Earth, a piece of real estate on which the human species is working hard to turn into an ideal home for the current generation to live in comfort, and future generations to transform into a true paradise.

No, no, no, said the Jews. We have infiltrated enough weakling democracies, including America that's the biggest and weakest of all, and we're having them chip away at the notion of running the U.N. as a meritocracy. We're not there yet, but we're getting there.

In short, we say, you do not get to lead a U.N. organization because you served your country with distinction, you get to lead a U.N. organization only if your country accepts the supremacy of the Jews, enshrining such notions into its body of laws the way that America is doing it.

That's that. Full stop. End of discussion.