Joe Biden, beware those who come to whisper in your ear

 We all have a worldview concerning our immediate surroundings as well as what lies beyond them.

 

The probability is very high that each of us got some things right and some things wrong. In this context, 'wrong' can be anywhere between ‘barely’ at one end of the spectrum, to ‘absolutely’ at the other end.

 

We all live with a mixed bag of perceptions that can also fall anywhere on the spectrum. What can be said, however, is that most of us sit at the top of the Bell Curve because most of us are average and normal. But we recognize that a few of us sit at either extreme of the curve.

 

Seen through the lens of what's considered normal among humans, the Jews had centuries of abnormal stay since they came into existence as a group. This reality can only point to one thing: The worldview the Jews have of their immediate surroundings, as well as what lies beyond them –– has always been incorrect most of the time, and outright false some of the time. Why is that?

 

Whichever way we treat that question as we try to answer it, we discover that there can only be two possibilities from which we must choose one. Either humanity has the correct worldview whereas the Jews are out of step with reality. Or the Jews have the correct worldview of a humanity that is out of step with its own reality.

 

What this boils down to is that by taking the stance they do, the Jews are forcing humanity to choose between seeing itself as correct, and the Jews as incorrect ... or accept that our perception of reality is upside down. Well, so far most of humanity has chosen to see itself as correct, and the Jews incorrect. Only a small fraction of humanity has at any time, in one place of the globe or another, chosen to look at reality as being upside down. How can that be? What are the Jews doing to convince a fraction of humanity, however small it may be, that they are correct and everyone else incorrect?

 

You might find an answer to this question when you read the article that came under the title: “Biden must heal the nation and show world adversaries a unified America,” written by Clifford D. May and published on January 12, 2021 in The Washington Times. As if to help you see what you're looking for, Clifford May gives it away in the first two sentences of the first paragraph. Here is what he wrote: “What a marvelous time to be America's enemy! Despots, dictators and other assorted villains are gloating”.

 

May gave examples as to how the “despots, dictators and villains” are gloating. He said that Ali Khamenei tweeted a question asking his followers if they saw the situation in the US. This done, Khamenei commented that this was their (America's) democracy, their election fiasco. And he added that these were values ridiculed even by America's friends.

 

So then, to gloat in that fashion is what's villainous in the eyes of Clifford May. But if this is the case, what does he think of someone saying the following: “a shameful episode that President Trump recklessly and irresponsibly encouraged”? If Clifford May is consistent, he must believe this is more villainous than to call Trump’s performance a fiasco. So, we ask, who was it that spoke of a reckless and irresponsible episode? Surprise, surprise! It was none other than Clifford May himself.

 

The man said those words when he introduced Khamenei's tweet––that which he characterized as villainous. In other words, Clifford May has just admitted that if Khamenei is a villain, he and the rest of the Jews, are more villainous than Khamenei.  And this should be proof enough to convince anyone that when it comes to worldview, humanity has the correct view, whereas the Jews have the incorrect view.

 

Doing a thorough analysis of Clifford May's first paragraph, has yielded this much insight. And so, you can imagine how much more there is to discover in the rest of the article. For the record, the full article is about 12 times as long as the first paragraph. Read it and see what you'll come up with.

 

Meanwhile, think of the worldview which says that no one has mounted a serious attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor. Yes, there was 9/11, but by comparison, this was a small act carried out by kids who felt stabbed in the back by an America that exploited them, then abandoned them.

 

On the other hand, when you look at America's record before 9/11 and after it, you'll find that it has always been the belligerent actor that attacked others. It did so, not because it was provoked by those it attacked, but because it was advised by people like Clifford May whose hidden agenda is hidden no more.

 

In fact, everyone knows by now that these people wish to use America to conquer the world and hand it to the Jews.

 

Let us hope that Joe Biden is wise enough to tell these people to beat it when they come to whisper destructive behavior in his ear.

He offers one more Cup of the same old Evil

 Imagine yourself a writer of movie scripts, and a director hires you to write a scene for a film.

 

The story is about inmates taking over the asylum. You write the scene he likes, but he says it is too sad. You say that's the nature of the situation. He says you're correct, keep it the way it is, but add a touch of comical relief to it. What do you do?

 

You go back to your study room, rack your brain thinking several possibilities, which range from cheap slapstick such as a doctor stepping on a banana peel and falling ... to something more sober like the nurse coming into the room and asking what happened to the pills she left on the table. A patient says they were nice tasting candy. Horrified, she explains these were not candy, they were laxative pills. At this point, you cut to a scene showing the patient running to the washroom.

 

You reject all of that, and opt instead to write a scene in which the asylum's Board of Crazies, is meeting in the boardroom. Chairman Jonathan is addressing the members, telling them the following:

 

“Friends and colleagues, we meet on this day of infamy to consider passing a resolution condemning Doctor Wendy for the effort she is making to name a counselor who will intervene each time that two or more of us have a fight. The counselor will help us resolve disputes amicably instead of doing what we love to do, which is bite each other, scratch one another's face, and pull each-others' hair … Now I ask you this: All those in favor, show your approval for passing the resolution”.

 

Attendees to the meeting grab everything they see on the table, and throw it at each other joyfully. Some readers may not think this is comical, but this is the nature of the situation.

 

What's that about? you ask. You'll know what it's about when you read the article that came under the title: “Joe Biden will do America right by following Trump, not Obama, on Iran,” written by Jonathan S. Tobin, and published on January 11, 2021 in the New York Post.

 

What got Jonathan roiled is that in the real and sane world that he detests, President-elect Joe Biden has picked Doctor Wendy Sherman to be deputy secretary of state in his upcoming administration. Chairman Jonathan of the Zionist crazies hates Doctor Sherman because she spent many distinguished years working to protect the world from the horrors of nuclear war. Because of this, Jonathan Tobin believes that he is sane and that the choice to appoint Wendy Sherman, is an act of insanity.

 

Here is how Jonathan Tobin expressed that view: “If repeating the same action again and again and expecting a different result is a definition of insanity, then Biden's choice of Sherman is one of the most insane nominations for office in American history.” Here, in condensed form, and stripped of editorializing adjectives which are meant to disparage, is what Tobin said about Wendy Sherman:

 

“Sherman is a living example of diplomatic experience. A veteran of both the Clinton and Obama State Departments, she can claim credit for two national-security negotiations conducted by a US envoy. Under Bill Clinton, Sherman was the architect of deals with North Korea. Obama hired her to negotiate a nuclear deal with the Tehran regime. She agreed to a sunset date on the agreement. By 2030, all its restrictions will expire. All new presidents want to change everything their immediate predecessor did. Biden's foreign-policy lineup is a Team Obama reunion with Sherman very much invited to party along. Yes, everything Trump-related is in bad odor”.

 

Despite being aware of these realities, Jonathan Tobin wants Joe Biden to follow in Trump's “bad odor” footsteps rather than President Obama's footsteps. Tobin is saying this to Biden, even though Biden was Obama's Vice-President when the steps that Tobin dislikes were taken. Have you ever seen shameless gall of this magnitude?

 

It is no wonder, therefore, that being the brew-master in America of every idea for a witches' brew that came out of Israel, Jonathan Tobin is now recommending that Joe Biden consult with Israel on how to handle the Iran nuclear deal. Considering that Tobin and those like him were pressuring the American negotiators to take a hard line before, during and after the negotiations, you can see the futility in Tobin continuing the pressure tactics.

 

Also, considering that such pressure may have the opposite effect of what is intended, it is not too difficult to conclude that Jonathan Tobin and his comrades are a bunch of wackos who need to be looked after.

 

It has been said, time and again, that elections have consequences. Biden ran on a platform with a plank that promised a return to the Iran nuclear deal. The people of America elected him to fulfill the promise. He indicated he’ll do just that, and his choice of Wendy Sherman to be deputy secretary of state, proves he is serious.

 

For Jonathan Tobin and the Jewish lobby to oppose the move as vehemently as they do, means they wish to overturn the result of the election. Someone needs to remind them what happened to the one before them who tried to overturn the result of the election.

What's required is seeing reality as it is

 It will do America no good to think in terms of soft power and hard power. It will do America a great deal of good to think in terms of propriety and world standing.

 

To understand what that means in practical terms, we need to understand that as a species, humans are undergoing yet another transformation in the way that we live and interact with each other. We have gone through several of these during the last ten thousand years or so, and we're doing it again this time.

 

From hunters-gatherers we became an agrarian society. This has changed our lifestyle tremendously, as well as the way we used to interact with each other. We then transformed from agrarian to urban-industrial, and this caused us to change the way we live and interact once again. Now, we are transforming into something that is yet to be accurately defined, but one that foresees an important role for the digital –– in the way that we communicate with each other and operate our industries.

 

And there is one more detail that needs to be highlighted before going further with this discussion. It is that the transformation from agrarian to industrial brought with it the age of colonialism as well as the mass exploitation of human beings and their resources by other human beings. Fortunately, however, hanging on to that mentality has been rejected by most of today's humanity, except for a handful that continues to glorify an anachronism that has been universally relegated to oblivion.

 

While America has joined the rest of humanity in repudiating that kind of behavior, the language that America uses to carry on with normal communication, contains vestiges of that anachronistic time. To wit, when speaking of soft power and hard power, which are words commonly used in America, some people inadvertently demonstrate that they have not wiped the old vestiges off the slate where the new is supposed to go.

 

In fact, a recent article discussing these matters came under the title: “American Soft Power Will Survive Donald Trump,” written by Joseph S. Nye Jr., and published on January 9, 2021 in The National Interest. The article contains solid analysis and great ideas regarding the current situation in America. But this is where the shortcomings of the article become apparent. It is that the writer was so concentrated on America, he neglected to describe the world with which America is interacting. It is like clapping with one hand.

 

As it happens, this kind of neglect is so common to Americans in all walks of life, it has contributed mightily to the impairment of America's foreign policy during the last half century. What happened was that after the Second World War, most countries came to realize that the world had changed, and that people and nations were not going to live or interact with each other the same as before. And so, they began to experiment with, and develop new methods by which to interact and live their daily lives.

 

The situation with America was somewhat different in that the country took most of the credit for winning the Great War, and rightly so. But ever since that time, the image of Europe as a collection of inferior societies, and a world that is impoverished, have not changed in the minds of Americans. These people continue to hold in their heads, static snapshots of a world, including Europe –– which are nothing more than false stereotypes of what is no longer there.

 

As Europe and the rest of the world kept progressing, whereas America's view of them remained static, the good relations that America used to have with others, began to deteriorate. Knowing this, America must realize that it needs to get rid of the stereotypical images it has carried in the head since World War Two.

 

More specifically, America's politicians and diplomats must learn (if not relearn) how to interact with people and nations beyond America's borders. These are not entities that exist for the sole purpose of being influenced by America; they are creatures that contribute as much as America to the development of the civilization that humans must have to continue the journey we are destined to undertake.

 

This is why thoughtful people like Joseph Nye should stop thinking in terms of soft power and hard power. They must instead help develop a proper posture for America to take when dealing with individuals and nations outside the country's borders. Ultimately, those who write to advise America, must think in terms of what is proper behavior, and what should be their country's standing in the eyes of the world.

 

Ultimately, America must come to realize that the world of the twenty first century and beyond, no longer resembles that of the mid-twentieth century.

 

In addition, unlike the European nations that America has liberated, those like China and India, which are rising today, will eventually dominate the future. They owe nothing to America, but being treated like they exist to be influence by America, will turn America into a laughingstock for the whole world to laugh at.

 

This is reality. It must be seen as it is, and must factor into the thinking of those who enjoy doing just that.

They reject an appeasement that’s not there

 Consider this: Iran and America, along with others, reached an agreement pertaining to the development of Iran's nuclear science and technology.

 

Responsible Iran kept its part of the bargain whereas irresponsible America elected a madman who reneged on the agreement and went beyond that. At the urging of a demonic cult seeking to control the world, the madman punished Iran for not capitulating under his pressure to trash the agreement.

 

As it happens, members of the said demonic cult have a megaphone named, “New York Post.” They never developed the ability to form a sound opinion on anything, but here they are, frequently editorializing on matters about which they know little or nothing. And they publish the pieces of mediocrity they write in their Post of infamy, a privilege that unfortunately, earns them the title of editors.

 

Their latest piece of work came under the title: “Iran is pushing for more appeasement from Joe Biden,” a piece they published in the January 9, 2021 edition of their megaphone. But despite that title, they did not prove there was solicitation for appeasement, let alone “more of it,” and certainly not the promise or the actual granting of such by Joe Biden. This being the case, what's their editorial about?

 

This new editorial by the Post is the rephrasing of the tired old narrative that got the American people turned off as they listened to the lies that came together with speculations and the promise of a triumph at the end of the endless wars to which the Jewish lobby has incessantly pushed America. Here is the last paragraph (actually a single sentence) of the editorial that serves as bottom line for the editorial:

 

“At the very least, Biden should let Iran keep suffering under existing sanctions –– and wait for it to offer a deal that actually serves the interest of America, its allies and peace”.

 

As can be seen, most of the old Jewish talking points are crammed into that sentence. What it says basically, is that Biden should keep the Trump sanctions which failed to deliver, but will deliver eventually if we wait long enough. And we'll know that the delivery has happened when Iran will have suffered enough to finally offer a deal that will serve the interest of America (euphemism for Israel,) as well as serve the interest of the Jewish style peace, better known as peace of the grave.

 

Rather than bore their readers by offering the same old wine in the same old bottle, the editors of the New York Post did away with the wine altogether. What they did instead, is offer their readers the same old bottle, but filled this time with a Netanyahu style KOOL AID. Here is how the thing looks and sounds:

 

“Iran's foreign minister explained that the uranium decision is 'fully reversible' if other nations comply with the agreement –– a clear sign that it wants the United States to pay a hefty added price if Team Biden moves to undo Trump's exit from the deal”.

 

A Netanyahu style KOOL AID indeed. All that the Iranian foreign minister did, was to say that in response to the Americans pulling out of the deal and slapping sanctions on his country, Iran has decided to increase its production of refined uranium. But if the Americans would return to the agreement, Iran will go back to the refinement levels stipulated in the agreement.

 

This is the kind of superior logic you regularly see come out the highly civilized cultures of the ancient world. And this is the kind of logic that motivates inferior demons of the Netanyahu caliber, to run to the trusting Americans and whisper in their ears something like this: Iran's foreign minister is trying to con you. He wants the United States to pay a hefty added price if Team Biden moves to undo Trump's exit from the deal.” And that, my friend, is the deadliest KOOL AID anyone has seen this side of Jonestown.

 

So, you ask: Who is on this side of Jonestown? And the obvious answer is that the editors of the New York Post among others, are on this side of Jonestown. Collaborating with the Jewish lobby, with the mob of Jewish pundits and with Netanyahu's transatlantic axis of demons, they relentlessly try to push America into an adventure they call Pax Americana. 

 

It is a delusional fantasy based on what they believe is an ancient prophecy according to which the Jews will inherit the earth and everything in it. But for this to happen, the Jews must set the world on fire, and destroy it to then rebuild it in a manner that will serve them better.

 

Because the Jews alone cannot destroy the world, they need someone with the destructive potential of a great power. They approached a number of candidates who went along with them for a while but quickly split when they discovered what the Jews wanted them to do.

 

Finally, like a made-to-order sucker, America's elites embraced the Jewish scheme. The hug lasted long enough to fill the ordinary citizens with the kind of explosive anger that turned the German people into “Hitler's Executioners”.

 

This is where things stand in America at this time. It is a place that tells any intelligent human being that a small spark can and probably will set the thing off with a force like this planet has never seen before.

 

And so, while the Netanyahu gang and the retarded elites of America, are using the Iran angle to work on implementing the Pax Americana that will never happen, the destructive potential of America will most likely go off, not overseas, but in America itself.

You said you want Proof? Here is your Proof

 Here is the proof that indoctrination in so-called Jewish studies, leads to the reduction of human intelligence down to the level of subhuman or worse.

 

It is all there in an article that came under the title: “About that Auschwitz hoodie,” and the subtitle: “The lack of Holocaust education is not just an alt-right problem.” It was written by Rabbi Diana Fersko, and published on January 9, 2021 in the New York Daily News. Look what the scatterbrain of this rabbi has produced:

 

“Among the rioters who stormed the Capitol building, one intruder wore a Camp Auschwitz hoodie. Another intruder dressed himself in a shirt that reads: 6 million was not enough. 75 years after the Shoah, Holocaust education in our country is wildly insufficient. The time to course-correct is long overdue. That means the man in the Camp Auschwitz sweatshirt is actually more educated than the average American and significantly more educated than the average millennial when it comes to the Holocaust. He can name a concentration camp, whereas a staggering number of Americans cannot. Holocaust education in our country is wildly insufficient. The time to course-correct is long overdue”.

 

The woman is saying that the more we educate the American people about the Holocaust, the more they become rioting anti-Semites, therefore we must correct to a course that will educate more of them because Holocaust education in America is wildly insufficient. Well then, this says one of two things about the mental state of the rabbi. Either she has devolved back to the pre-chimpanzee level, or she is fully human but that the Jews have run out of money and they are begging for a new Holocaust that will guarantee them another 75 years of embezzled compensation.

 

There you have it, my friend. The rabbi is calling for the education of the American people, especially the new millennials and those that came after them, because the hatred exhibited by the Capitol rioters shows that it is not restricted to the far-right fringes of society. The need for education is therefore urgent, she says, because a Claims Conference survey found that 45% cannot name a single concentration camp. And she asserts that the percentage is even higher among the millennials.

 

But what does that mean in terms of educating the American people, beginning with the younger generation? The rabbi seems to say it means that America must be made to know all there is to know about the 40,000 concentration camps that existed during a time when 6,000,000 Jews were exterminated. Well then, does that mean she wants America's kids to drop math, science, English and American history to instead memorize the names of those six million Jews and the forty thousand camps? Not exactly, she says but she has an idea, and she explains it as follows:

 

“Learning about the Holocaust was once an in-depth, laborious effort. It involved listening to painstaking eyewitness accounts from survivors, long days in Holocaust museums, or spending hours pouring through page after page after page of Holocaust-related memoirs”.

 

Is that what she wants to impose on America's children? Yes, she says, because no one should be surprised that the Anti-Defamation League describes current anti-Semitism as the worst it's been in 40 years. She goes on to lament that Holocaust education is slipping even among Jews. She tells of a personal experience she had in this regard. Here is how she tells that story: “I recently asked a Jewish teen what he knew about the Holocaust. He responded, 'Holla-what?' I hope he was joking”.

 

Would it not be worse if he were joking? Imagine a non-Jew that was given a thorough Holocaust education and grew up to wear a sweatshirt that says: “I was made to memorize the names of 6 million dead Jews, and I feel I was terrorized. Impose no more holocaust shmolocaust stuff on the children of America! Enough of this garbage!” Would a scene such as this, please Rabbi Diana Fersko?

 

Speaking of scenes, here is one that could play-out in a cryogenics establishment. A woman was cured of a mysterious illness that nearly killed her more than a century ago, and was just revived. She is talking with the doctor that brought her to life:

 

WOMAN: What am I doing here? What's this place, anyway?

 

DOCTOR: You were close to death and I revived you.

 

WOMAN: Why would you do that? Are you Jewish?

 

DOCTOR: No, I'm not Jewish, but I'm a doctor, and that's what I do.

 

WOMAN: I remember, I am Jewish.

 

DOCTOR: So what?

 

WOMAN: I am Jewish, and you're not. How did they kill me anyway?

 

DOCTOR: Nobody killed you. You nearly died of a disease that was not known in your time.

 

WOMAN: My time? How long ago was that?

 

DOCTOR: More than a century ago.

 

WOMAN: Do you know of the riot that happened a century ago in America?

 

DOCTOR: I'm sorry but history was never my cup of tea.

 

WOMAN: You mean you don't know about America's Crystal Night in which scores of Jews were killed?

 

DOCTOR: I'm sorry. I don't.

 

WOMAN: So, you don't know how much compensation the Jews received?

 

DOCTOR: I'm sorry. I don't.

 

WOMAN: More like nothing, I would say. Well, let me tell you this, doctor. I am Rabbi Diana Fersko, and I shall pursue the matter to the end of time.

 

DOCTOR: I have no idea what you’re talking about, Rabbi. I never was Jewish.

 

WOMAN: Can you imagine dying and not getting compensation? What’s the world coming to? If this is the future, I want to go back to my time.

 

DOCTOR: It won’t be easy reversing the process that cured you. So for now, it is welcome into the future.

Let the Iran Nuclear Deal bloom again

 Imagine overhearing a conversation that goes something like this: “I won't say I'm sorry I broke your Humpty Dumpty, but let me tell you how you can put your Humpty together again.” Hearing this, you would think someone is off his rocker, won't you? After all, the hammer that shatters the glass window does not fix it.

 

And yet, this is what's attempted in America's Washington Beltway every day. It is that the incompetent operators who fail at everything they do, are the ones considered experienced enough to fix what they broke in the first-pace. What's worse, an operator with the reverse Midas Touch, does not even have to reside in the Washington Beltway to advise America how to double down on its losses.

 

A case that screams this asinine reality came under the title: “Wither the Iran nuclear deal?” and the subtitle: “In light of recent developments, it is difficult to see how US President-elect Joe Biden can turn his intention to return to the JCPOA into a reality when he assumes office.” The article was written by Raphael Ofek who is an intelligence officer working for the Israeli intelligence community. His article was published on January 6, 2021 in the online publication, Jewish News Syndicate.

 

Raphael Ofek first made the point that things have changed so much since the outgoing President Donald Trump pulled America out of the Iran Nuclear Deal, he cannot see how the incoming President Joe Biden will be able to return to the deal. To buttress his argument, Ofek quoted the words of Rafael Grossi who is Director-General of the IAEA.

 

This done, Raphael Ofek contrasted Grossi's words with those of Joe Biden, and then added his own. Here they are: “In light of recent developments such as the killing of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the architect of Iran's military nuclear program...” And that's supposed to convince the readers that Joe Biden will fail in the quest to return America to the Nuclear Deal even if modifications are introduced and accepted by all sides.

 

But unconvinced that he made a strong case from which he could draw conclusions one way or the other, Raphael Ofek changed his approach, arguing the case. While still neglecting to show how much damage Donald Trump has done to the cause of keeping Iran from developing nuclear weapons, Ofek chose to describe the thinking of each signatory to the Iran Nuclear Deal … and that included the various factions he believes make up the Iranian regime. Here is how Ofek put it:

 

“The European Union and the other signatories appear willing to return to the agreement as is. France takes the threat of Iranian violations more seriously than Germany and Britain. Europe's approach is thus the same as it was in 2015. Then and now, the EU was enthusiastic about reaching a deal. It was reported that if the nuclear deal does not return to its original state, Iran might consider itself released from all its commitments to the IAEA. Iran is thus in the middle of a triangle: One leg is the IAEA; another is the non-US signatories to the agreement; the third is the United States. The IAEA is constantly on guard against Iran's nuclear mischief. The EU's member states, as well as Russia and China, are less troubled by fear of an Iran in possession of nuclear weapons. Iran itself is divided between ultra-conservatives and pragmatists”.

 

Had Raphael Ofek not neglected to analyze the effect of Trump's decision to pull out of the Nuclear Deal, he would have reached the proper conclusions, which would have put him in line with the non-American signatories to the deal, some of whom are America's allies. Here, in brief is what Ofek would have observed; would have put in context with what else was happening in the world, parsed the situation intelligently, and drawn well-studied and enlightened conclusions:

 

“In the latest IAEA report, emphasis was placed on Iran's announcement that its nuclear program would no longer be subject to restrictions in the operational sphere. The declaration followed Iran's 2019 enrichment of uranium beyond 300 kilograms of UF6. Iran also increased the enrichment rate to 4.5 percent, beyond the agreed limit of 3.67 percent. According to the IAEA, the amount of uranium Iran has enriched since then exceeds 2.4 tons. The report contained references to Iran's violations of the nuclear agreement on the development and production of advanced centrifuges, as well as the start of its operations on an industrial scale, which could allow it to shorten the enrichment period and enrich uranium for nuclear weapons”.

 

What this says, is that withdrawing from the nuclear deal did the opposite of what the Jewish leaders who pushed for it, were predicting. It is that instead of capitulating, Iran got stronger because it was forced to rely on itself more than it would have under normal circumstances.

 

And having been treated very badly, Iran has now been given every excuse it may need to do what it never wanted to do based on religious grounds in the first place –– and that is to build a nuclear arsenal with which to make sure it will never again be treated as badly by anyone.

The strategy that could never deliver

 Do you remember the old saying: “All dressed up and nowhere to go”? It tells the story of something you took for granted, but has suddenly vanished. Now you stand there, prepared to receive it, but the thing is nowhere to be seen.

 

This leaves you in a lurch, angry and embarrassed. You are at a loss as to what you should do next. You wish you could go back in time and prevent yourself from getting all dressed up and ready for a thing that is no more. But you know you cannot go back in time, therefore must live with what is here today. All you can do now is make certain never to repeat the mistakes of the past.

 

Even though the previous passage was only a speech expressed in the abstract, it wrenches your heart as you read it because it makes you imagine the torment of someone living through such a moment. But you know what, my friend? That situation is real and is unfolding right now, except that those involved are so immersed in their delusion, they continue to believe that what's no longer there, is still there. And they relish the false thought that it is ready to be taken out on a date for a night that will be remembered by war historians well into the future.

 

This is the story of the American military that has hundreds of bases around the world, ready like Don Quixote to fight the windmills of evil authoritarians who are bent on destroying the United States of America and its liberal democratic friends and allies. The trouble is that the vision of such authoritarians is a delusion that was planted in the heads of America's planners by people who benefit from America being on a lurch all the time, and standing there in a state of total confusion.

 

A disinterested observer that has no skin in the game can sense America's confusion just by reading the analyses put out by politicians, pundits and opinion makers. If the observer waits long enough, he’ll detect the change in sentiment that has occurred among ordinary people. In fact, their expressions indicate that America is waking up to the reality that a new paradigm is in the making, and that America needs to adapt.

 

You can see signs of that when you go over the article that came under the title: “America Can Deter Iran Without an Indefinite Troop Presence Abroad,” and the subtitle: “The current approach of deterrence through a large US troop presence is ineffective at deterring Iran or its Iraqi militias.” It was written by Geoff LaMear, and published on January 5, 2021 in The National Interest.

 

Before going on to ask the question: “If deterrence is broken, how do we fix it?” Geoff LaMear has laid out an overall view of the current situation. Here, in condensed form, is how he described it:

 

“We need to acknowledge that the current policy isn't deterrence at all. General Kenneth McKenzie admitted that the US would have to tolerate a low level of proxy attacks in the Middle East. US leaders need to acknowledge the current strategy doesn't deter those attacks. The decision-makers continue our strategy even as rockets rain down on the US embassy”.

 

This said, Geoff LaMear went on to explain how the broken deterrence can be fixed. What follows is an abbreviated version of what he said in this regard:

 

“The solution is not doubling down on our presence in the Persian Gulf. More forces in the region means more chances an Iranian misreads the situation and strikes out. More at this point inflates fears that the US is posturing for an attack. If Iran decides a US attack is imminent, our naval presence gives it a slew of high-value targets. The immense casualties Iran could inflict are only possible because of how close US forces are. Deterring Iran with additional troops hasn't worked in the past. This is not a call to strike Iran. It is a call to the Biden administration to consider whether the costs of staying in the Middle East are worth the little benefit we derive from it. President-elect Biden shouldn't double down. He should draw down”.

 

Since it is impossible to imagine that most of the decision-makers in the American government have failed to see the situation concerning the deployment of American troops in the Middle East, the way that Geoff LaMear sees it, we must conclude that the decision to continue implementing the current failed strategy, is made by someone whose word overrides the entire American government. Who could that be?

 

Well, considering that the attempts to reduce America's military presence in the Middle East is opposed by the infamous “bipartisan” consensus in a Congress where nothing else is bipartisan, we realize there is only one overlord that has this kind of influence in America.

 

That overlord is the axis which groups the neocons, AIPAC and Israel. It is the band that decides what America's military posture can and must be to better defend Israel.

 

And this is another proof that America is governed, not like a free nation, but like a Jewish banana plantation.