When TV reporters turn advocates for one side

 I spent a good part of the day watching American television to see and assess how the media covers the unfolding events in the Middle East. I could not divorce what I was absorbing from what I had learned about American television decades ago.

 

I must say in this regard that on the whole, the comparison yielded a positive result in the sense that most of the media showed signs indicating they want to present the events in a balanced way. Whether or not they fully succeeded is another matter.

 

Despite those signs, however, someone that watches American television for the first time, and sees its coverage of the war on Gaza, will come to believe that the broadcasts emanate in Israel, more specifically in the ministry of military propaganda of that faraway entity.

 

In fact, seeing Israelis in uniform, who speak in perfect America accent, “explain” what Israel is doing and hopes to accomplish, no one can escape the conclusion that in this case, the Judeo-Zionists of the world owned and operated the America media outlets. It is that not one television channel, and not one show that I watched was rid of Americans in Israeli uniform, who pretended to be full-blooded Israelis fighting for the survival of an imagined people at risk of being made to disappear.

 

Amid the repetitive deliveries of this kind of programing, one outlet stood then and stands now as the exception. It is not an exception to welcome, let alone to cheer about; it is an exception to weep about for, it alone seems capable of dragging America into the house of moral prostitution. That outlet is Fox News which became so desperate trying to reverse the trend of a growing antisemitism in America and the world, it committed an act that sent journalism back to the Dark Ages.

 

What the Fox News network did was force all its reporters to stop reporting on the events as they unfold, and speak instead in the language of the spin doctors whose training has given them the power to make anyone believe that an Israeli soldier who is taken prisoner by Hamas, is an act of terrorism whereas a Palestinian family that is blown to kingdom come by an Israel bomb, is an act of Jewish heroism that the world needs to learn about and emulate.

 

In fact, a lamentable example is that of a correspondent, stationed in Israel who used to give the news in a straightforward manner, you see him now and hear him perform like a cog would when placed in the massive Judeo-Israeli propaganda machine, and made to spin like a dog that’s trying to catch its tail. He spews the spun lies that misinform and disinform the audiences that trust Fox News.

 

But there again, you find the exception that makes the rule. In fact, there are more than one exception working for that network. They try everyday to render unto Cezar what is Cezar’s to remain faithful to their profession while being loyal to an employer that is more fanatic about the need to kill Palestinians than Hamas is fanatic about beating the Israeli military machine.

 

Among those exceptions, one anchor at Fox News, who is a lawyer by training, stands out as remarkable. She is Shannon Bream who is animated by a disciplined mind and a logic that’s enjoyable to follow. If I have an advice to give her, it is that her polemics are so dense, she needs to slow down when speaking to give the listeners time to savour what she is saying.

Imagine life in Hiroshima underground

 The beauty about the human mind is that it can imagine a setting that never happened, put humans in that setting and watch them navigate their way through the vagaries of the situation that’s surrounding them to stay alive, and if possible even thrive.

 

Science fiction writers are among the most imaginative of all. Some among them play the role of futurists when they imagine a future for humankind that is sometimes pleasant, but often predicts dire consequences for humanity. This can happen, they warn, due to an abrupt change that would have come about naturally or come about in the aftermath of a nuclear exchange between the nations.

 

Well, my friend, we have a situation on Planet Earth that is unfolding in such a grotesque manner at this moment, you don’t need to have the imaginative power of a science fiction writer to picture the situation as it is now for the people who must live with it, and what might develop for the future of the human race if things are not corrected immediately.

 

All that you need to begin with is recall the history of World War Two. More specifically recall the name of two cities: Hiroshima and Dresden. The first was destroyed by a nuclear bomb, the second by a relentless carpet bombing that turned it into a pile of rubble. Both times, the mass destroyer was America — the same America that is now supplying the Jews with enough bombs to begin the process of planetary destruction which they believe is God’s command for them to accomplish before He’ll take the trouble of saving them and rewarding them with the ownership deed of Planet Earth.

 

Ground zero for the start of that operation was chosen by the Jews of America and Israel to be Gaza, a province of now occupied Palestine. Lacking the fantasized about nuclear bomb, Israel resorted to the use of carpet bombing, a policy that forced the inhabitants of Gaza to live underground. To make this possible, Gazans built a city underground that is not different in layout from the above ground cities.

 

That is, in the same way that a normal city needs streets and highways to connect its parts, the underground city of Gaza has tunnels that connect its parts. Also, in the same way that the subway tunnels of a normal city are made to run under buildings such as hospitals and schools by necessity, the tunnels of underground Gaza run under hospitals and schools.

 

This is where the spin doctors of the America-Israel propaganda machine see ample opportunities to lie; to uninform and disinform the public. They did so not long ago when they said they discovered an entrance to the Gaza underground city that was only a few hundred meters away from a hospital. Big deal; this is like complaining about the existence of a subway station a few hundred meters away from a hospital or a university it was specifically built to serve.

 

That propaganda act must be seen as a sign that was waved inadvertently by the genocidal Jewish evildoers who are willing to kill those that refuse to bow to them. They tell false stories about the noble Hamas freedom fighters who are willing to die if this will give their own people the freedom that is the human right of everyone everywhere.

 

And so, what we must expect to see from now on, is the American-Jewish spin doctors who will use everything and anything they discover to make a big deal about it and paint false pictures of the situation in Gaza, but failing to fool the masses in America or anywhere else, yet managing to fool the braindead zombies of the American congressional cesspool, a once venerated institution that turned itself under Jewish tutelage into a disgusting thing — so disgusting in fact, it is beginning to repulse away from it the close friends it used to rely on for its military and economic securities.

 

The situation in Gaza continues to unfold unabated as America continues to supply Israel with the ammunition it says it needs to kill Palestinians. The world is watching while tranced by the incredulous horror it sees unfolding under its nose. And the future that will result from all this, is being etched on the tablet that will be handed to posterity so as to pass the judgments that will separate the evildoers from the nobles and put everyone in its place either in the pantheon of fame or that of the infamous.

 

Where do you want to go, America?

The below hospital war room that never was

 The French expression “coup de grace” was adopted by the English language without modification, and often used to convey the same meaning. The closest translation of that expression into English, using a purely English approach, would reference the expression “putting someone out of their misery”.

 

In fact, speaking in physical terms as opposed to moral terms, whether someone had an accident and was severely injured, or decided to end their own life yet managed only to injure themselves, they might want to have a coup de grace administered to them so as to end the suffering.

 

As to the use of that expression in moral terms, it conveys the image of a stumbling culture that is so clumsy, it does the equivalent of shooting itself in the foot by planting a visible contradiction at the end of the discourse – thus shuts itself off in the manner of the coup de grace – each time that it tries to have it both ways.

 

Which culture is that, you ask? It is the artificially concocted so-called Jewish culture. In fact, time after time after time, the mouthpieces who took up the Jewish and/or Israeli causes, put themselves into a bind while trying to squeeze more of a situation than it could yield. In so doing, the mouthpieces blew their cases and delivered nothing to their masters.

 

More recently, the Jews did it to the most important of their causes, thus shot themselves – not with a hand gun this time – but a cannon. It is that they falsely accused Hamas of building a war room under Gaza’s biggest hospital; a war room, they said, that was complete with command and control facilities as well as a warehouse that the freedom fighters filled with sophisticated weapons.

 

When the accusation proved to be a lie, it had the effect of administering a coup de grace, not only to the Jewish causes, but also begged to end the misery that has been causing repeated injuries and suffering among the immoral prostitutes of the American politico-journalistic bordello.

 

This happened because in building a false case against Hamas, the Jews spent years inventing false narratives, and lining up the mouthpieces that would carry them to both the elites of the nation who live off the taxpayers money, as well as to the commoners who create the nation’s wealth by working and paying those taxes. But whereas the commoners rejected the Jewish false narratives, the elites gobbled them hook, line and sinker.

 

Needless to say that all this has had the effect of diminishing America’s credibility and honor in the eyes of a world that could not, and still cannot wrap its head around a superpower that knows what goes on in every nook and cranny around the planet, yet deliberately lent its voice to support the horrific lies that came out the decomposing mouths of a long dead culture. This begs the question: What’s the real story behind that mind boggling history?

 

Could it be that the American elites found themselves so badly ensnared by the Jews they once tried to help—only to find themselves incapable of exiting the quicksand into which the Jews dragged them—they decided to pull the dirtiest trick they have in their “Liberal Democratic” tool box of hypocrisies and slap it on the Jews once and for all?

 

If such is the case, we must assume that America’s elites are now looking forward to the day when the unbecoming responses they have been displaying to appease the demands of Jews, will cause the public patience to boil over and trigger a rebellion that will not be contained.

 

If this happens, it will be a self-administered coup de grace that the taxpaying commoners of America will not regret seeing applied to their country. That’s because they’ll reckon that to suffer big time once is better than suffer in slow motion for an indefinite period of time.

The day the savages received a valuable lesson

 On the day that Clifford D. May was writing a column, which ended up showing him to be utterly confused as to what makes good history and what makes a pile of garbage, his savage brethren were being given a lesson on how to behave in a civilized manner. May’s article came under the title: “Hamas supporters’ ignorance is appalling,” and the subtitle: “Don't know much about Middle Eastern history.” It was published on November 14, 2023. Here is what happened on that day:

 

In keeping with the tradition of trying to reproduce what the non-Jews do, the religious honchos of the Jews called on their American flocks to gather in the Washington Mall, and stage a rally which they hoped will demonstrate to the world the civilized (real or fake) nature of their culture.

 

The difference between what the Jews did, and what humanity had done a day or two previous, is that the non-Jews acted spontaneously and naturally whereas the Jews performed artificially. The result was that humanity’s call to address the ongoing Gaza War, was replicated as poorly as a child would replicate the Mona Lisa.

 

Moreover, the lesson that the Jews learned on that day pertained to the subject of free speech, and the effect it has on those who practice this mode of communication. More specifically, whereas the rallies that developed around the world by non-Jews were disrupted by the enemies of free speech – the savage Jews themselves – the rally that was developed by the Jews in Washington, was left alone by the non-Jews. It proceeded as planned by the organizers, thus demonstrated to these people that you’re not free because you pretend to be free, you’re free because you let others live their freedom the way they see fit.

 

When it comes to telling history, however, the way that Clifford May has tried to do, what goes into judging a piece of work is more complicated. That’ because viewing history and explain it, depend on ideas that were often gathered and absorbed at the same time that the telling historian was undergoing a personal experience that matched the unfolding of the events. Thus, history can become the expression of an opinion more than the description of what happened in real life.

 

Honestly speaking, from the description of Clifford May’s own intellectual journey — from way back then, to the set of beliefs he now brings to the table — I cannot make out what exactly motivates this man. All I can tell is that he accumulated and has stashed in his toolbox, a set of debating skills that look professional on the surface but do him in when closely scrutinized. One of those skills has to do with the point at which a self-described historian begins to tell history.

 

Consider the following example, taken from Clifford May’s article, which I am telling at the risk of causing Fox’s Bret Baier to blow thick smoke at the ears:

 

“Start with this observation by the late Charles Krauthammer: Israel ‘is the only nation on earth that inhabits the same land, bears the same name, speaks the same language, and worships the same God that it did 3,000 years ago.’”

 

I have known about the work of Krauthammer for decades. The first time I saw him was on a PBS program where he sat on a panel with three other journalists, one being African American. Even though I disliked the Jewish attitude of treating the Black Man as if he owned him for no good reason than a Jew once got hurt defending the right of Blacks, I detected a high level of intelligence in Krauthammer and said so. Then, years later, I saw Krauthammer on the Bret Baier news hour as he outshined the other panelists, and wrote something to this effect. This is when Bret Baier went gung ho on the Jew where he remained ever since.

 

Meanwhile, Krauthammer’s telling of history is more rubbish than it is real history. It’s because the self-described historian skipped a huge chunk of the Jewish early history, a time when—as described in their book of history known as “Old Testament”—the Jews were nomadic tribes that lived off the work of those they raided, terrorized, robbed and maybe even fed on the blood of their young like pitiful cannibals.

 

From that point on, Clifford May’s article, especially as it related to the ongoing events of that day, has been nothing more than a downhill free fall. It is a rehash of what the writer has been saying repetitively and monotonously for years. If you haven’t read him before, you may even enjoy his fantasy.

The fishy story that must be made to vanish

 A saying, which I believe originated in Italy and spread to other languages, goes something like this: “The fish rots at the head.” It means to convey the notion that the decomposition of the fish’s entire organic body begins at the brain and spreads from there to all the parts.

 

Meanwhile, the decomposition of an organism is a horrible sight to watch. Despite it however — and in the interest of understanding the perilous times in which we live — you need to imagine the role that a number of decomposing brains are playing in the governance of our human affairs.

 

I could pick any one example of the hundreds that crop up time and time again, and use it to show the pattern that all others follow. So, I choose to discuss the following example:

 

To cover for the fact that they have the religious duty to kill the babies of their foes as they did in ancient Egypt, modern Palestine and the times in-between all over Europe and Asia, the Jews came up with the lie that the Palestinians sacrifice their own babies by using them as a human shield. The Jews add that the Palestinians rejoice when the babies are killed and their photographs shown around the world, which is the propaganda that has served them well in America and around the globe, say the Jews.

 

Adept at starting a lie and spreading it among the politico-journalistic crowd of America, the Jews stuffed the lie in many a mouth that is animated by a decomposing brain. In addition, because in any and every conversation you may have with the Jews, they will not give-and-take normally as do the rest of us—but repeat the complaint that Jews suffered in the past, thus owed money and protection today—you will not get an explanation from them regarding the contradiction that’s inherent to the claim about the Palestinians rejoicing when their children get killed.

 

Blinded by what motivates them and ascribing that motivation to the Palestinians, the Jews fail to see the difference that exists between them killing the children of others, and the others allowing their own children to get killed by Jews. Just think about it and apply simple commonsense. Even if the Palestinians were this heartless, a child to them that grows and becomes a freedom fighter is more valuable to the cause than the propaganda that’s generated by a dead body. If only for this reason, the Palestinians will want the child to live, to grow and take up the struggle baton to achieve freedom for the entire population. Thus, the parents will protect the child with all they got.

 

Beside that unresolved contradiction, the Jews are making the mistake which puts them firmly in the camp of the decomposing brains. It is that the whole world can see they are the ones killing Palestinian babies today in Gaza, using American bombs. The Jews may not say it loudly, but when they accuse the Palestinian parents of letting the Jews do such a horrible act, they shift the blame onto what they must believe are sneaky parents that make the Jews look bad in the eyes of the world by not shielding their children from the murderous hands of the Jews.

 

As always, these cockamamie accusations of Palestinians were generated by the Jews who tried to cover for the activities they undertook previously without thought, but ended up churning the stomachs of ordinary human beings around the Planet. This being the case, you would think that no one sane would want to associate with or support the Jews by repeating what the latter have been saying, let alone finance what they have been doing. But that’s exactly what happened among the brain degenerating zombies of America’s politico-journalistic crowd.

 

It is that the decomposition proved contagious and started to spread among the American body politics, proving once more that the threat of the Jewish culture to the advancement of the human species is real and comparable to the worst that the species has experienced in the past.

 

We need to know this, and need to work diligently on making the Jewish experience the last that the human race will be forced to endure. The Jews must never again be allowed to spread insulting or fishy stories about the Palestinians whom they already injured like no human can ever be treated.

It takes a so-so to believe the dodo

 The bird known as turkey is thought to be a dumb bird. It is therefore used to analogize dumb humans. The now extinct dodo bird which used to live on the Island of Mauritius, was thought to be even dumber. It too is used to analogize dumb humans. Thus, it can be said that if someone believes the human dodo who tells him fantastic stories, that someone’s mental competence can only be rated as a so-so.

 

It happened that during the past three-quarter-century, the dodo operatives populating Jewish Central succeeded in transforming the American politico-journalistic crowd into a swarm of mental so-sos. And nothing is more representative of that crowd than the Congress. It is that every half-baked idea that was put forward by the dodos, was taken to heart and adhered to by the mentally enfeebled legislators. Two of those ideas are discussed here.

 

First, there is the idea of the influence which the donors of money have on the recipients of that money. To come out in an age when election time, looks more like feeding time at the zoo, and claim as do the Jews, that their money has no influence on the receiving politicians, is to play the role of dodo that’s taking advantage of the mentally incapacitated so-sos.

 

Not only do the Jews reject the idea that they donate to political campaigns with the intent to extract concessions that favor Israel, they go beyond it and accuse those who make the suggestion of virulent antisemitism. They explain that they donate because they love what the campaign is advancing, and further explain that the recipient votes the way that he/she does because they love Israel. It is how the dodo and the so-so fall into each other’s embrace.

 

Whereas it is easy for anyone sane to see the glaring link which exists between the Jewish money and the ensuing legislation that favors Israel, the Jews have a difficult time showing the link which they say connects the decisions taken by the administrators, faculty and students of a university with the money that’s donated by a foreign government – not to them personally but to the university.

 

So my friend, what do you think the never-relenting Jews are doing now? I’ll tell you what they are trying to do. They went to the soft underbelly of the American Democracy, which is none other than the Congressional swarm of so-sos, and started to work on those things. The Jews envisage that for valid or invalid reasons, the swarm will eventually destroy the universities of America, at which time Jewish Central will move in and feed on the spoils.

 

So much for the first idea. As to the second, it has to do with a cannibalistic horror that lasted more than half a century; a horror that the Jews inflicted on me, and maintained relentlessly during all that time. Here is what they advanced as excuse, arguing that they had no choice but to do what they did given the reality that I represented an existential threat to them.

 

But when confronted with the reality that I was alone in this world, possessing neither an army nor presiding over an empire, they said: so was Hitler before he managed to build the mighty empire that almost exterminated the Jews in a fiery Holocaust. But why is it important that I tell this true story?

 

It is important because the ideas and doings that go into its execution are not unique to this one case. They represent a game which the Jews play again and again when they have no good argument to advance. That is, they push forward a chain of false links that extend from a saying or an event, however harmless it may be, to the inevitable Holocaust.

 

The event and saying this time, consist of the Palestinians expressing the desire to live freely on their property from the “River to the Sea.” Because freedom for the Palestinians means Holocaust for the Jews, say the latter, it is antisemitic to utter the phrase: From the River to the Sea.

Bestowing grandeur where grandeur is not due

 Eric Severeid once reminded his listeners of the saying that goes something like this: when a small man casts a long shadow, you know that the sun is setting on someone’s radiance.

 

Well then, based on what Clifford D. May is saying, we can now report that because an impoverished population of two million crushed-to-the-ground paupers are casting a long shadow over Western Civilization, you must conclude that the Civilization is declining.

 

Clifford May made his comments in an article that came under the title: “Hamas vs. Western Civilization” and the subtitle: “Gaza is a significant battleground.” The article was published on November 7, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

You got to feel sorry for people of the Clifford May caliber who lack the intellect and/or integrity to tell the truth, or at least a bastardized version of it, and defend what they put out for others to consume. Here is what Clifford May did that sent him this time to the doghouse of feeble mental prowess:

 

“On Oct. 7, Hamas one of Tehran’s several pit bulls, demonstrated what such a policy looks like in practice: mass murder, rape, decapitation of infants. Hamas terrorists proudly recorded their barbarism on GoPro cameras (a Western invention) and posted the images on the internet (a Western invention)”.

 

Consider this now, my friend. Whereas Moses instructed the Jews to adhere to the command: “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth,” the Jews stuck with the old habit of going for ten eyes or more, and going for ten teeth or more. When criticized for doing this, they lied saying that they consider one eye and one tooth as being the limits of how much they can extract from their foes.

 

This has been Israel’s policy in occupied Palestine for decades, and the number of killed and wounded victims on both sides speak for themselves—all the more so because Israel habitually assures it rank-and-file that it is doing well by bragging about the number of Palestinians it has killed in every clash.

 

And while this is the truth which can be verified by everyone, people like Clifford May and thousands more, repeat the lie that terrorism is conducted by the Palestinians and not the Jews. And when speaking in abstract terms, they can no longer sustain the lie, they think up incidents that never happened and attribute them to the Palestinians. That’s how the poisoned Jewish inventions of mass murder, rape and decapitation of infants, slipped into the current debate.

 

Another trick that the Jews pull off to confuse the audience, is that they play what can be termed the single-leg dialogue. That is, instead of letting the two sides of a give-and-take come through their description of how an incident unfolded or an idea developed, they only tell the one side that favors their argument. With that, they falsely let it be understood that the other side is not pushing back because he has no valid argument with which to push.

 

That trick is one that modern Jews inherited from their predecessors. It was used so openly and so shamelessly by them during the decades of the sixties and seventies when they had complete control of the media, you could get sick watching a panel of half a dozen Jews and not a single Arab, tell the audience both the Jewish side of the story, and the Arab side of the story as they saw it. So, you ask: What do we get from the Jews now? Well, this is what we get:

 

“Ghazi Hamad, a senior member of Hamas’ politburo, told a Lebanese television interviewer: ‘We will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again, until Israel is annihilated.’”

 

What’s missing here is the mention and understanding of the principle that when you give the other side a take-it-or-leave it proposition to choose from, you make the choice for yourself and make it for your opponent as well. This is what Israel has been offering the Palestinians for decades. It was to choose from total occupation and the pretense of independence.

 

This being the case, the people of Palestine chose to work on liberating their country rather than give it away while under duress. It is what Ghazi Hamad was echoing during the interview.

 

What he said, in effect, is that in the choice between Palestine or Israel being annihilated, they choose to annihilate Israel.