Study the symptoms, discover the deficiencies

 It can only be frustrating for the parents of a toddler as well as the doctors who seek to determine what ails someone that’s too young to tell where it feels the pain.

 

Most certainly therefore, this situation would drive the adults into thinking it would be a great help if they could establish contact with the mind of the child, and read what it is processing at the time. So then, can this be done? If yes, how? Well, the answer is that it can be done, but done in a roundabout way.

 

In fact, a situation is now unfolding on the world stage showing promise for the development of a method by which to establish what may be called an “Empathy Bank” where adults with the mentality of a child are tested for their viability, and if suitable, registered as a potential empath to the mind of children.

 

The need for a system that will operate in this fashion, and the evidence that the operation can be done, are demonstrated by what is unfolding these days on the world stage. And the candidate for our case study is none other than Justin Trudeau the mentally dwarfed Prime Minister of Canada.

 

This kid who grew into the body of an adult, has constantly failed to exhibit a maturity that would match the size of the body. It is, therefore, possible to study what keeps it mentally arrested, and go from there to develop approaches that will help the parents and the doctors survey the brain functions of children who are incapable of communicating, and give them the proper care.

 

So, we ask: what are the most common annoying traits we notice in the behavior of children? Well, there are two of them:

 

First, for a reason not yet understood, children seem to be genetically wired to the idea of stubbornly hanging on to the early instructions that were given to them by adults. And no amount of nudging will convince them to reject or modify what they believe they are doing correctly now.

 

Second, giving the silent treatment to parents; to teachers and to adults in authority, adds to the difficulties that grownups encounter when trying to interact with children.

 

And as it happens, we notice that Justin Trudeau is driven by those same traits, lending himself to being studied as easily as adults can be — but then go from there to corelate the responses of what we know is happening to him, with what we guess may be unfolding inside the minds of non-communicating children.

 

So, we ask the pertinent question: What is troubling Justin Trudeau?

 

Growing in an environment that allowed him to observe the exercise of raw power which nevertheless pretended to operate in the realm of the delicate “Fine Linen,” young Justin Trudeau learned early on that what he sees is not necessarily what happens in real life.

 

When you add to all that, the disposition of children to believe they have become the undisputed experts of anything and everything they learn once — you create a monster that’s a brat as well as brainless. Call him Justin Trudeau.

 

Well, we have one now, and he is so prominent on the world stage, we cannot miss connecting the dots on the map which he draws while taking marching orders from his Jewish masters, and shoving their desires down the throats of his own people.

 

Unfortunately, these are the desires that pertain to the continued destruction of Human Rights in the country and around the world, and the obliteration of what used to be a functioning Democracy.

Diving deep down the cesspool of no return

 We, human beings of Planet Earth, being the expression of the highest form of evolution ever attained on the planet, are endowed with a gift never attained by the other species. This would be the gift of the spoken language that allows us to communicate complex ideas among ourselves.

 

We came to this level of achievement by gradually shedding the more primitive form of communication that nature had induced in most other species. This would be the body language that we ourselves used as tool to approach others and socialize with them, or warn them of the danger in getting too close to us.

 

However, because our genetic code has kept a meticulous chronological history of our evolution, every step of our development has remained functional and active to this day. This would be the kind of behavior we often recognize as being the animal side of our humanity.

 

In fact, the body language is the most common set of expressions from among the medley that we exhibit when we feel that “damn human reason,” the time has come to set aside our lofty morality, and emphasize the hypered state of our mind and our emotions by returning to the use of the more primitive and injurious form of communication.

 

So here we are, tens of thousands of years since the start of our ascent to the level of verbally communicating organisms — and we discover that many of those who supposedly took charge of our lives by acquiring both the right and duty to organize us into a functional society — cannot do without resorting to the primitive body language while discharging their duties, especially when it comes to telling what future plans they have for us, or what premises motivated them to concoct such plans.

 

A notorious family of humans calling itself the Trudeaus, appearing in a place called Canada, became the symbol of what must have gone wrong during the trial and error phase that nature has used in the attempt to put together what we eventually became. It is that the foibles of this family left little or nothing to the imagination when it came to doing the wrong things while trying to reach the correct goals. The Trudeaus backtracked to try again and again but failed. Nature tried and finally produced us, “warts and all”.

 

Decades after Pierre Elliott Trudeau had messed up a Human Rights case, his son Justin Trudeau took up the tradition and added to the mess. But how did he do that? He did it by communicating the need for silence which he imposed on Western Civilization, having embraced the Jewish method of pretending to protect Democracy and Human Rights when, in reality, he and they spend their time raping Human Rights, killing them and feeding on the dead corpses like magots feed on a rotting cadaver.

 

But rest assured, dear friend reading this, that neither Trudeau nor the Jews are coming out of the experience unaffected. Being Jews or steeped deep into the Jewish tradition, they tried to pull themselves out of the corner in which they painted themselves previously. They did so by repeating the very Jewish thing that kept pushing them deeper into the cesspool of no return: they shot themselves in the foot.

 

It is that on the advice of his Master’s Voice, barking Justin Trudeau adopted the body language of running around and promising that he will block the Rights of every Canadian citizen who will dare to avoid the bandwagon of reciting a real or phony hatred for Hamas.

 

What the kid has not been told, is that the trick has been tried again and again but failed each time to win sympathy for the Jews, who remained as unpopular then as they are today. They failed when they started a program to impress the world by calling the Palestinians “Gorillas,” and sending tanks to blow up their homes in full view of the world.

 

They failed when a tragic incident happened in Montreal whereby a gunman massacred women at a university, and Leslie Stahl of CBS, who was stabbed in the back by her fellow Jew, Daniel Shorr,

tried to make a haystack out of the Montreal incident, pinning it on “terrorists” before that word had taken on the allure it has today. And so, she bombed like a dropping out of an elephant’s rear end.

Breaking men to repair a broken window

 Has Western Civilization been so debased, it can no longer see the folly in seeking to repair a broken window by trampling over the Rights of Humans?

 

This was shown to be the case twice by the Trudeau family and their entourage. The first time it happened, Jean Chretien was the one in charge of carrying the message to the public. The second time it happened, it was Justin Trudeau that rushed to confer the honor on himself.

 

Jean Chretien’s suggestion was to the effect that robbing a citizen of $20 million dollars — which the government and other entities owe him — was kosher. He offered that the money can be used to repair the broken windows at the Prime Minster’s residence.

 

As to Justin Trudeau’s suggestion, it seems to revolve around the idea that regardless of the principles which may be broken, shifting material gains from the hands of the few to those of many — was kosher. He seemed to suggest that grabbing what’s available in whatever fashion, and giving joy to a large number of people — was ethical therefore acceptable.

 

Yes, what’s involved here are principles, not least of which those pertaining to Human Rights. So, we must ask: What gives any principle the force it may have acquired? Well, as the name implies, the principle stands as the rock from which all laws, rules and regulations are derived. When you diminish or take away the principles by which a society is governed, replacing them with “feel good” notions, you invite lawlessness to reek havoc into that society. And the exchange always proves to be ill-advised in the long run if not the short run as well.

 

A real case of this kind engulfed me at the start of my adult life 56 years (more than 20,000 days ago.) It is that I dared to write to the editor of a Toronto newspaper saying that Egypt, where I was born, was a civilized country. Fearing that my telling the truth will expose the thousands of lies which the Jews had been propagating about Egypt at the time, the Canadian Jewish Congress sent me an envoy to warn that if I did not stop contacting the media — which they considered to be their monopoly — and trashed Egypt instead of praising it, the Jewish Congress promises to ruin my life. And they kept their promise when I refused to heed their warning.

 

What those realities demonstrate, is that the Jews — who used the Canadian Government and its institutions as weapons to silence me, thus maintain their anti-Egypt hatemongering — did nothing better than pit their feel-good robin hood-ish notions which advocate havoc, against my principles which advocate the orderly unfolding of life under the protection of Human Rights as formulated during several conventions held since at least the Second World War.

 

Well then, what is there which says adhering to Human Rights rather than the hastily and conveniently adopted feel-good notions put on the table by the Jews … the people whose speciality has always been to create the noise that distracts from the substance of the real issues under discussion?

 

The answer to that question is revealed when you realize that the way the Jews were able to maintain the horror they have been inflicting on me for more than half a century, is that they hypnotized the entire Western Civilization, and led it to believe that telling the truth will spark the next Holocaust.

 

Thus, according to them, Justin Trudeau should feel good because he robs me to give to others (including Jews) and he prevents the next Holocaust from happening.

How Canada’s Human Rights nakedness was exposed

 It usually takes a long time during which many people exercise great effort to bring it. But when the resolution comes, it brings with it a surprise. It proves that whereas the efforts were worth it, all that was necessary to bring about the resolution, was the single revelation that eventually cracked the case open, and exposed the horrors of the regime that broke Human Rights in the first place.

 

A scenario unfolding in that manner took place in Canada but with a twist. Because the situation is so complex as to have unfolded inside a wall of silence that is itself protected by a degenerating Democracy, the situation has not resolved itself completely despite the fact that all which needs to be known has been revealed, and no one denies or questions any part of it.

 

It was a violent act committed by an aging husband (Pierre Elliott Trudeau) against his young wife (Margaret) that started the ball rolling in favor of exposing the inherent hypocrisy which sits at the core of the democracies that say one thing but live by rules opposite to what they preach.

 

You see the hypocrisy when you learn that Pierre hit Margaret because, being young and loving life, she dared to spend more money on clothes than he budgeted for the purpose. Did Margaret respond to that act in a way that suggests retaliation? Well, it is impossible to tell if her subsequent behavior was meant to be a response, or that it was a show of determination on her part to live the life she chose for herself despite Pierre’s menace to resort to violence.

 

However, the one thing that cannot be ignored in what Margaret Trudeau did subsequent to him disciplining her violently, is that she chose a public place where she sat without wearing the underpants that would have covered her naked vagina.

 

Could this be her deliberate way of telling him that if he keeps restricting her access to money for buying clothes, she’ll end up going naked – exposing her genitalia to show the world what he has done to her, and what he is doing to the country he pretends to govern?

 

Well, instead of speculating on how the scenario may have unfolded decades ago, we would do better to see in what way Pierre’s son Justin Trudeau is now governing that same country of Canada.

 

It can be seen that the simple act of mistreating a woman—perhaps leading to her exposing her genitalia deliberately or subconsciously—has done more than turn the incident into a metaphor representing Canada’s nakedness in matters that have to do with Human Rights.

 

What Margaret’s move did was remind us of the saying that goes this way: “No man is indispensable.” Thus, when proven to be as useless as a rusty nail stuck in a  broken door, even the once powerful must be shown the door so as to restore the situation to normal again.

Modelling the West after his broken family

 “He gave me a shiner,” she cried out. And this was the cry — now echoing decades later — that’s about to tell us what we may be getting into, continuing as we do to neglect taking the necessary steps that would protect us from our follies and the scheming of others.

 

It happened that decades ago, two events materialized at about the same coincident time. They bifurcated and moved onto their merry ways for a time, but came back and sought to combine once again, giving us advice that may save Western Civilization from self-destruction.

 

One of the events to occur this long ago, was the ill-fated marriage between a man and the girl who was 30 years his junior. The other event to occur was a war that took place in accordance with an elaborate design that was imagined thousands of years previously, meant to negatively affect all of humanity.

 

That was the marriage of newly elected Prime Minister of Canada, then aging Pierre Elliott Trudeau—to the flower girl of the time, young Margaret who loved to live a full and jovial life despite the restrictions imposed on her by her newly acquired status.

 

Whereas the rumors that filled the atmosphere at the time was to the effect that Pierre Trudeau was the son of a wealthy businessman whose fortune he inherited, subsequent events cast doubt on that notion. It is that a disagreement about financial matters flaring between the married couple, was the reason that started a serious rift between Pierre and Margaret. From the description that was volunteered at the time, the disagreement escalated up to the man deciding to violently hitting his wife, giving her a “shiner,” as she pointed out herself.

 

That incident, more than anything else, is telling the world what it needs to know about the setting in which Justin Trudeau—son of Pierre and Margaret Trudeau—grew up and acquired the character that’s motivating him to think and act as he does, or neglect doing his duties where they are called for.

 

To observe Justin Trudeau navigate the vicissitudes of life, is to see someone who feels he was not given the chance to grab the reins of life sufficiently enough to have a normal family life. Bitter at the reality that this happened to him at an age when he was too young to push back against a situation that was unfair to him, he developed a style of life (more by habit than by reflection) that’s based on neglecting the needs of others even when those needs fall into the realm of his duties.

 

What’s happening now, is that the Canada which Justin Trudeau governs has fallen from the pedestal of the immaculate virgin, representing human rights, to the image of a cadaver that’s being consumed by the magots that killed it.

 

Trudeau has the power to rectify the situation, but his upbringing prevents him from doing the right thing. He is on a path of modelling Western Civilization after his own broken family, and there seems to be no one around willing to prevent him.

The many paradoxes of a declining superpower

 Nothing defies human logic as would a paradox. That’s because in trying to resolve one, a human being looks like the dog that’s trying to bite its tail. It goes round and round trying to get the mouth close to the tail, but the more it gets closer to its goal, the farther away the tail goes.

 

This lesson and a few others can be derived from the latest of Clifford D. May’s creation which came under the title: “No better enemy,” and the subtitle: “America continues to empower its adversaries.” It is a column that was published on January 23, 2024 in The Washington Times.

 

The first thing that the writer did to expand on his theories, is clobber the reader on the head using the dopiest sledge hammer he could get his hands on. Look what he did as he attempted to explain his stance regarding the Iran-America standoff: He first suggested – as seen in the title of his article – that you must not empower your enemy. This implies he means to say: what’s mine should remain with me, and what’s yours should remain with you.

 

But then, Clifford May went on to lament that the Obama administration transferred to Iran’s rulers the $150 billion that has been theirs for years, but was kept by the Americans and their allies in an act that could not be described as anything but theft. And this poses the paradoxical question: Can you rob someone, yet let him keep what’s his? A breakdown in human logic might let you get away with so shabby a performance, but that will look no better than the dog biting its tail after all.

 

This done, Clifford May transited to another aspect of his theories. He did so by asserting that: “Iran is not the only adversary of America that Americans have been empowering.” And so the writer took on Xi Jinping whom he views as being the powerful leader of China.

 

The paradoxes that emerge from the relationships that China has developed with America over the years, are so complex and intertwined, they make the Iran situation look like child play. In fact, it would be a good idea in this case to begin the conversation by reminding the readers it was the Americans who called themselves “Exceptional”.

 

They explained this was the case because they relied on their scientific and economic advancements on the immigrants they have been inviting to come into the country from around the world. And those immigrants, mostly of Chinese origin, do well in school, and do even better when they start new businesses in which they hire Americans by the thousands, paying them high salaries.

 

This means that the Chinese have more of what America needs than does America itself. This being the case, it cannot be claimed that the Chinese are stealing science and wealth from an America that has little or nothing which may be useful to them. But look what Clifford May says: “US companies and investment funds have helped to underwrite and modernize China’s military and intelligence apparatus.”

 

And this poses the paradoxical question: “Can America rely on the superior genius and enterprise of the Chinese, yet help modernize what is above its own level of comprehension and work ethic”?

 

Because paradoxes do not help resolve intricate questions, we must resort to the power of human logic when looking for solutions to hard questions. So we ask: What has gone wrong with America?

 

The first thing we notice when trying to answer that question, is that America suffers from two ailments. One has to do with the system of political governance (The Congress of infamy) which has been beaten to a complete paralysis by entities that transformed it into a tool meant to serve their own interests.

 

The other ailment is the system of education which has come to the attention of those same entities. They are doing to it what they did to the Congress using the powers of the Congress itself.

 

It’s a lamentable situation that may not have a satisfactory resolution.

Appetite of cannibals silencing Western Culture

 Way back during the decade of the 1960s when neither “political correctness” nor “woke culture” existed, the Jewish hate and propaganda machine had a field day describing the Arabs as being “sick dogs,” “wounded animals” and “cockroaches that must be exterminated” with the use of insecticide. The machine did all this on the pages of Jewish publications as well as the mainstream ones.

 

Taking a year of such abuse without protesting, I finally wrote a letter to the editor of Canada’s largest newspaper the Toronto Star, in which I asked the readers in very polite terms, not to believe that kind of propaganda because Egypt had always been and remained to that day a civilized country. And the unexpected happened.

 

It is that a representative of the Canadian Jewish Congress visited me at home during which time, he informed me that I must never again try to contact the publications of North America for the purpose of explaining the Arab point of view, or that of opposing the Jewish point of view – or for any other reason. Failing to comply with these instructions, he went on to warn, the Jewish Congress will implement the steps that will ruin my life now and well into the future. And the Jews kept the word that turned out to be the metaphoric expression of human cannibalism … as horrific as this may sound.

 

The Jews did it because I refused to comply with their savage instructions. In fact, instead of complying, I continued to express my opinions because I felt it was my right to do so, and because I reckoned that if I did not, I would be encouraging the Jews to establish in Canada a regime of Jewish dictatorship that will make the Nazi Regime of an earlier era look like a playground designed for children. Just think about it:

 

The Canadian Jewish Congress had the Canadian Government turn the Security Apparatus of the country (RCMP) to it …to do as it wishes with it. The latter put me under surveillance 24 hours a day – knowing, as they put it themselves – that I was “as clean as a whistle.” Their intent, however, was to gather the information that the Jews could use to drive the wedge between me and any employer, friend, associate or landlord I may have now and in the future. This is how the crime syndicate turned my entire adult life into the unmitigated hell, resulting in the creation of a body that needs assistance to function.

 

This is how I paid the price. It is that the Jews made use of their awesome hypnotic powers, and began to implement their multiple crimes by first convincing the leaders of Western Cultures that what they’ll see done to me, must not leak past the wall of silence which they are throwing to hide the case from the general public around the world. And so, nothing leaked, and no one knew what was happening despite the fact that I used every measure that was made available by the machinery of the Democratic System of Governance to help solve this kind of problems. The measures worked for others but not for me.

 

Fifty five years later, I had grown older by this many years. While the spirit remained as vigorous as before, the physical body was beginning to turn creaky. I knew it was time to start working on piercing the wall of silence standing between me and telling my story to the general public. Thus, on December 24, 2022, I published the story on my blog hoping that this act alone will be sufficient for someone out there to take the first step that will motivate others to do likewise, and put an end to Jewish cannibalistic savagery that’s eating not only on my body, but also that of the Western Civilization it is diminishing.

 

It has been more than a year now since I published that blog, and there seems to be no sign that the hunger of the cannibals has been satisfied. They are munching on my body and that of Western Civilization like there is no tomorrow.

 

How much longer will this situation last?