To debunk yet again what has been debunked

 In the Jewish tradition of never letting a debunked lie rest in peace at its final resting place, the Jews have resuscitated several old lies by which they tried to distort the unfolding of the ongoing war between Hamas and the Israeli military.

 

And from the looks of it, it seems that while many of the personalities appearing in the media, do not believe what they were told, some did believe the Jews and repeated what was whispered in their ears. Thus, I felt it necessary to take up the subject again and shed even more light on a least one of the many subjects which the Jews have been trying to distort yet again.

 

The case I take up this time is that of the Iron Dome hoax. To be clear, there is not now, and there has never been an Israeli designed or manufactured system of Surface to Air Missile (SAM) called Iron Dome or any other name. What existed was an invented hoax designed to launch a new stream of money-transfer from America to Israel. It was named Iron Dome and deceptively described as a functioning SAM.

 

And so, every time that Hamas launches Surface to Surface Missiles (SSM) in Isael’s directions, the people who were deceived into believing that the Iron Dome was real, continue to believe they are seeing the Dome in action. What these people do not realize is that every explosion they see in the sky is not an intercept. The truth is that not a single intercept was ever shown in any of the video clips that Israel supplied to the media.

 

To understand that part, people need to know that rockets and missiles are designed to do a job. If they miss their mark, they are programmed to self-destruct rather than fall to the ground and hurt people. Thus, an attacking or a defending missile that pursues its trajectory and does not malfunction, will explode in the air when it runs out of fuel. But what happens when the weapon malfunctions?

 

Well, it must be said that the record shows a malfunctioning missile never hurt someone to this day. That’s because there are critical points at which these devices can malfunction, neither point representing danger to human life. In fact, the earliest critical point comes during the first few seconds of the launch procedure, a time when people sit behind walls that protect them from a possible explosion.

 

The other points come when it is time for the stages to separate. Thus, a three-stage missile could malfunction and explode when it is time for the first or second stage to separate. Nobody gets hurt at these times because they come when the devices are up in the air and away from people. Another reason for the missile to explode in the air, comes when it is deliberately sent a signal by a pulse coming to it from the ground, instructing it to self-destruct.

 

Not grasping much of this but seeing explosions in the sky, the people who were confused, wanted to know more and were told by the Jews that they were seeing the Iron Dome intercept the Hamas missiles. To convince the skeptics who wanted to know still more about the self-destruct rockets and missiles, the Jews gave out a monstrous lie. Instead of clarifying things, the lie was design to confuse the people even more. It is that the Jews said the Hamas missiles malfunctioned in midair and fell on their own people.

 

The Jews said so despite the reality that the Hamas missiles are made of one stage only where no separation between stages happens. Thus, you can take it for granted that once the weapon leaves the launcher or the pad, it will not explode till it reaches its destination or till it runs out of fuel or is sent a signal from the ground by a human operator instructing it to self-destruct.

 

As a last resort the Jews of Israel tried to use the American supplied SAMs given to them since the time when Saddam Hussein hit Israel with the SS called Skud. But when Hussein was removed from the scene, the American idea was that Israel should use those missiles to protect against possible Iranian attacks by chemical or nuclear SSMs.

 

Eventually, even the Jews found the practice of using near-million dollar missiles to shoot down homemade rockets whose worth does not exceed a handful of dollars — too expensive and too impractical and so, they dropped the idea.

 

They also dropped another laughable idea, and did so just as fast. It was that they were once able to shoot down a bullet with a bullet using the Iron Dome that never was.

 

Ironic to the end, the American supplied system is what the Jews are now calling the Iron Dome even though its price is too prohibitive to use, and they are not using it to protect against the Hamas rockets.

Sordid saga of the Iron Dome that never was and the Iron Curtain that never vanished

 First, the Jews convinced the dudes of Western Civilization that because the arrangement of their civilization rests on human judgment, and because humans are evil, they too are individually and collectively evil, doomed to suffer for an eternity. But their salvation can come from the outside, promised the Jews who are willing, even eager to help bring about a happy outcome. That’s because every Jew on Earth wishes to participate in the transformation of the world into a place as perfect as it can get.

 

The Western dudes believed the Jews and took their advice near the end of the nineteenth century. The trouble was that the Jews were making false promises to the two main factions that did not see eye to eye as to the right way by which to organize their societies, let alone organize all of humanity. This gave the Jews the opportunity to play the game they have been playing since the beginning of time.

 

Instead of giving good advice to one side or the other, or giving it to both sides, the Jews fabricated an advice that suited each faction. They based the fabrications on what they had learned will disgust and/or terrorize the targeted faction. And when, as a result, the factions started fighting each other, the Jews were there telling them what to do so that when the ongoing World War ends, it will have put down the basis for the eruption of the next World War.

 

The Jewish advice to what came to be called the Eastern Bloc, was that the evil Fascists of the West were planning to complete the colonization of the world as they had already been doing for a century or more. If this happens, said the Jews, the Westerners will accumulate enough power to  thoroughly subjugate the Easterners, even turn them into slaves.

 

The Easterners naively bought the Jewish argument, and wanted to know what to do to protect themselves. They were told that the best way to do so was to erect a kind of Iron Curtain that will prevent the Westerners from reaching out to their people, and prevent their people from being enticed to move to the west — an occurrence that, if it happened, will deplete their countries of population.

 

As to the Jewish advice to what came to be called the Western Bloc, it was to the effect that the Easterners were planning to conquer all of humanity and bring it to their side – not by force of arms where they are deficient – but by the persuasive force of the argument which says that every human has the right to live decently, therefore all that can produce wealth should do so, and all that have needs should be helped to acquire them.

 

But guess what, my friend, while appearing to be busy giving good or bad advice to others, the Jews were working on something deeper and more consequential than was meeting the eye at the time. The Jews were working on establishing Israel, a base of operations for themselves, one that would become the headquarter of Jewish Central. From this place, all operations pertaining to the disruption of normal human life were conducted and continue to be in favor of reorganizing things in such a way as to serve the Jewish causes regardless of the potential fallouts.

 

However, as time moved on and people became more sophisticated, especially when it came to seeing through the arguments of con artists, things began to change for the Jews as well. Instead of the leaders of nations and their populations gobbling every idea presented by the Jews, the populations began to break away from the Jewish influence on them whereas the leaders of the West (now called Western Democracies) were falling deeper into the hypnotic morass of the Jews, surrendering to them all powers of governance and all vestiges of self-respect.

 

Of the countless examples that can be cited to demonstrate the validity of that last statement, two were chosen for discussion here. It is that they show in the most stark of ways, how a Jew, any Jew, worthy or unworthy, smart or dumb, knowledgeable or ignorant, can get the braindead of America’s politics to plan the destruction of America by making a simple statement that is false.

 

The first example was that of Israel being ahead of everyone where it sists at the leading edge of high technology. One Jew came up with the lie to create a new stream that will siphon off a never-ending stream of money to flow to Israel from America. The journalists, the experts and the charlatans picked it up from there and created a fictitious ecosystem in which, for years, all that made Taiwan’s high-tech glory was described as being achieved in Israel.

 

The result was that America’s politicians, generals, admirals and even academics believed so much in the illusion they were made to see, they did not think of the possibility that a crunch such as that which disrupted the Supply Chain could cripple much of America’s high tech industries and military. They did not bother to verify the Jewish claim that Israel will protect America because the latter needs Israel more than Israel needs America.

 

As to the second example, it was that of an Iron Dome that was said will protect American lives in the fields of combat where America could not protect them. The Jews described it as a system of defense of a kind that only Israeli genius can devise. For these reasons, America that has already financed this sordid lie, must continue to finance it with a never-ending stream of money going from America to Israel. And then the war in Eurasia happened.

 

The Ukrainians asked for the Iron Dome, but there was no Iron Dome to be had. Just like the high-tech of Israel, the Iron Dome turned out to be a hoax designed to rely on the mental retardation of America’s leaders to rob the country of its people’s money.

Yes, Virginia, there is an Aether

 There was a time at the end of the nineteenth century and the start of the twentieth century when people – young and old just like today – were skeptical about everything they saw and everything they were told. The youngsters among them questioned the existence of Santa Claus whereas the older folks, some of them scientists, questioned the existence of an aether engulfing all of space.

 

In the firm belief that science must accurately represent the laws of nature, giants in the caliber of Maxwell, Michelson and Morley left no stone unturned trying to resolve the question of the aether. While doing that, editors of newspapers, delved into the question preoccupying their young readers at the time. They worked on making the little ones see Santa Claus as a real entity who lives in their heats as well as the hearts of all the good people that harbor “love, generosity and devotion”.

 

This story was told because 8-year old Virginia O’Hanlon wrote a letter to the editor of the Sun, then a publication of New York City. She asked whether or not there was a Santa Claus. And on September 21, 1897, editor Francis Church responded with an editorial that, in turn, asked: “Is there a Santa Claus?” to which he responded: “Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus”.

 

So, here we are at the start of the twenty-first century, living in an era so similar to that of Virginia O’Hanlon and  Francis Church, we wonder whether the situation is that of “the more things change, the more they are the same?” Or is it that Francis Church was hit with a Santa Clause sort of clairvoyance that made him see the future so accurately? We may never answer these questions, and we may never pull today’s younger generation from its skeptical habits, but we now have an answer to the question: Is there an aether?

 

Here is that answer: Were Virginia O’Hanlon and Francis Church alive today, they would most likely have had conversations similar to what they had in the past … this time, however, tailor-made to the demands of the modern era. And so, she would have asked whether or not there was an aether, and he would have responded: Yes, Virginia, there is an aether.

 

And he would have gone on to explain that the aether engulfs the entire universe. In fact, whether we call it Dark Energy or Dark Matter or something else, the stuff we may think of as aether, is more prevalent throughout the universe than anything else. Incidentally, mention of that “something else” refers to a theory of the universe devised by yours truly. It is that of a placid lake filled with self-duplicating particles that generate De Broglie matter-waves and other combinations that still need to be identified.

 

One combination that was identified and described with a mechanical model by James Maxwell, is the electromagnetic wave, better known as light. The theory of the universe being a placid lake has added further clarifications to Maxwell’s model.

 

Due to the fact that extensive use of mathematical equations and their resolutions will be required to describe those clarifications, such work will have to wait before it can be published on these pages. Meanwhile, I shall endeavor to work on the simplification of both the explanations of the model, and the mathematics that lead to it.

Enemies and adversaries created for convenience

 Clifford D. May says he is puzzled because many Americans do not see that when Iran says “Death to America,” it considers itself the enemy of America, not just its adversary.

 

He expressed this idea, after suggesting the weird notion that if you see the UN General Assembly as being a great deliberative body, you need to consult a competent ophthalmologist.

 

He argued those points in his latest column; one that came under the title: “U.S. enemies and adversaries reveal intentions at United Nations General Assembly,” and was published on September 26, 2023 in the Washington Times.

 

Obviously, it is unknown to Clifford May with any adequate level of clarity, that he naïvely put himself squarely at odds with the American public which believes otherwise. May fell behind, having revealed how wide is the intellectual gulf that separates him from what he considers to be his American kinfolks.

 

Moreover, having trashed most of those folks in what looks like a habitual and mechanical fashion, Clifford May went on to associate them with a world he says is full of adversaries and enemies of America. In fact, he believes that most if not all that make up the United Nations, threaten the security of America as demonstrated by the word salads which they served during the General Assembly meetings, he went on to explain.

 

Holding on to such beliefs with the firmness that he does, and declaring that dictators and elected leaders from around the world have descended upon New York City to deliver what he calls “mind-numbing speeches replete with misinformation and disinformation,” Clifford May revealed another aspect of his character. It is that he believes he is the sole custodian of truth, thus placed himself above the world and above his fellow Americans.

 

There can be no denying that Clifford May’s description of himself clearly indicates that he believes he is paranoid, being so fearful of the world by his own observations and by constantly admitting that life terrified him no end. Whether or not he is also schizophrenic (which would make a dangerous mix,) depends on the level of delusion he experiences when left alone to ruminate over his thoughts.

 

For his own good, therefore, he who recommended that those who do not see things eye to eye with him, should consult a competent ophthalmologist, must now take his own advice and consult a competent shrink — if only to ascertain that he is stable enough where he stands at this point in time, and will not deteriorate any further, at least not anytime soon.

 

The importance of taking such a decision will be appreciated when it is realized that Clifford May’s outfit known as Foundation for Defense of Democracies, has some influence among both the legislators and executives of the superpower known as America. If he goes totally bananas, so will heavily armed America because he’ll drag it down with him. And no one knows what will happen next.

 

For those reasons, it is important that we make a serious effort to understand the undercurrents which are viewed by him and viewed by those like him whenever such undercurrents play out between America and the rest of the world. Here, in condensed form, is a compilation of passages written by Clifford May on this subject:

 

“Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi flew to New York. His speech to the General Assembly was triumphalist. ‘The endeavors to universalize American ideals throughout the world have proven to be failures,’ he asserted. Translation: A growing number of regimes are rejecting the idea of fundamental rights and freedoms. The import of Mr. Raisi’s remarks is that a new international community is becoming dominant. He called it an emerging order of non-Western states. Expect more dictators to sign up in the years ahead. This developing axis of enemies and adversaries poses a serious threat to America’s national security. But until Washington policymakers and legislators connect the dots and take a hard look at the portrait that appears, they can’t begin to formulate a coherent strategy in response”.

 

So the question to ask is this: Is America endangered by the likes of Clifford May, or will it happen that America will be preserved by him? In other words, is he the devil that will sink America? Or is he the Guardian Angel that will save America?

 

We find answers to these questions in the article. Here is Clifford May’s formulation, giving clues as to how he may comport himself in the future:

 

“Vice President Han Zheng declared China a natural member of the Global South and noted that China’s Belt and Road Initiative has over 3,000 projects in Asia, Africa and Latin America. He called for global governance in a multipolar world. I’ll let you guess who would sit atop the tallest pole in the multipolar world that China envisions”.

 

That is, for once Clifford May refrained from trashing a suggestion that wasn’t his own — more surprising is the fact that the suggestion came from one of his archenemy, the Chinese Vice President.

 

When we take this development into account and when we mix it with what Clifford May has been saying throughout the article, we come out with the conclusion that there are reasons for us to be both optimistic and pessimistic about the future comportment of this man.

 

We can only encourage him to stay on the path that will maintain him respectful of other people’s points of view.

Experiments that may lead to spaceship engine

First, I explain my use of nomenclature. Speaking of the field that a magnet produces around itself, I say it is made of de Broglie matter-waves that exit from the output of the magnet and re-enter it at the input.

 

I thus avoid making reference to the North or South poles of the magnet so as not to repeat the confusion that was caused about the direction of electricity when it was discovered that the electron (carrier of electricity) was negative and not positive as originally thought.

 

Now, what about that engine for future spaceships? All I have in my head are notions as to how such engine should be designed and built. But of course, we won’t know the result of it performance till it is built, tested and shown what it will and will not do. Therefore, the description below is not that of the engine itself, or even that of a prototype, but that of the experiments that need to be conducted in the lab so as to determine what will work and what will not.

 

Now my friend, recall that two magnetized bodies react toward each other by each sending some of its de Broglie matter-waves to enter the input of the other. Even though most of the waves – pointing in all directions – would have neutralized each other before leaving the magnet, some will have remained in-line and will have given the mass of the magnet a gravitational attraction in addition to its magnetic property.

 

It is that all bodies (magnetizable or not) produce a gravitational attraction by that same process. We can therefore think of the magnet’s mass in this experiment as representing the space engine of the future, seen here to interact gravitationally with the Earth.

 

Now, to leave the Earth and go anywhere in space without being hampered by the gravitational pull of the Earth and all massive celestial bodies surrounding us, we need to find a way to prevent the few de Broglie matter-waves which are attracted by the input of the engine, from reaching their destination. How to do that?

 

We can do it by adopting three approaches as outlined below:

 

Because the matter-waves of a body attract by the fact that enough of them are lined up in series as in output-to-input, we need to disrupt this arrangement to neutralize their effect. We do so by wrapping the magnet with eight (that’s 8) coils of copper wires laid on top of each other. Each being wrapped at a 45 degree-shift from the previous, they occupy the full 360 degrees of the circle.

 

Approach one: a generator of electricity will have its output controlled by the distribution of a random producing gadget. It will energize one or the other of the coils in an erratic fashion so as to disrupt the lining of the matter-waves. This alone should reduce the gravitational pull that the magnet is having on its surroundings—such as the Earth.

 

Approach two: to prevent the Earth’s matter-waves from being attracted by the magnet’s input — representing the spaceship in this experiment — we enclose the entire magnet in a non-magnetizable cylinder made of metal such as aluminum. It too will be randomly powered by the coils, and will thus disrupt the lining of the Earth’s matter-waves on their way to enter the spaceship’s engine.

 

Approach three: with those two steps shielding the magnet from being affected by gravity, we turn our attention to using magnetism — a trillion, trillion, trillion times stronger than gravity — to power the spaceship and propel it at high velocity throughout the galaxy.

 

The engineers can take these ideas, and whatever else will come from the experiments that succeed and those that fail, figure out the ways by which to build the space engine of the future and make it work.

 

This done, we’ll be on our way to cruising the galaxy. Well … if not us, our descendants will.

Wall of silence makes the police state horrific

 You probably remember the saying about the fellow who asked his friend: “How’s your wife,” and the friend replied: “Compared to whom or what?” That’s because a question of this kind does not have an absolute answer. To be appreciated, it must therefore be given a context, which is done by asking how the wife may be in relation to another situation.                                                                                                                                              

But does this settle every question of that nature? Far from it. In fact, it has opened the door for a whole new cottage industry to rise in the field of statistics manipulation, giving the Jews a modern kind of manna from the sky with which to shower themselves and claim a flood of compensation. Here are two examples on how the Jews manipulate the statistics to make false points and get paid.

 

In the first example, the Jews exaggerate the relevance of what financial aid America gives the Palestinians by comparing the aid on a per capita basis with what the Europeans received from America after the Second World War. Of course, what the Jews ignore is the inflated value of money today compared to what it was after the Second World War.

 

In the second example, the Jews understate the relevance of what financial aid America gives Israel by comparing it with the size of America’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) or the Federal budget or the Pentagon budget or what have you — and the list of grotesque comparisons goes on.

 

It is therefore proper to ask that the real and false claims made by Jews concerning the Human Rights record of Israel’s nemeses should be compared with the record of third parties. And there is no better way to do that than to compare the Human Rights record of the jurisdictions in which the Jews live and have a strong influence, where they never relent pressuring the local governments from punishing those whom they designate as offending players.

 

In fact, this is the subject that Clifford D. May chose to discuss in his current article, titled: “Newsmen Jimmy Lai and Dmitry Muratov put their lives on the line for freedom,” published on September 19, 2023 in The Washington Times.

 

And this is to which I shall respond by making the relevant comparisons with my case — that which is hidden behind a wall of murderous Liberal Democratic silence as opposed to what has been unfolding in broad daylight under the benevolent patriarchal regimes of China, Russia and other similar regimes. Clifford May began telling the story he has on his mind with this introduction:

 

“I think plenty of people don’t give a fig about their own freedom, and certainly not anyone else’s. And I think there are those whose desire is to eradicate the freedom of others. But there is a moral elite so devoted to freedom they are willing to martyr themselves to prevent the future from becoming the Orwell nightmare: a boot stamping on a human face. Two such heroes — Jimmy Lai and Dmitry Muratov — are profiled in two documentary films. I recommend them’”.

 

And so, Clifford May told the story of Jimmy Lai with a narrative that went as follows:

 

“He endured an extraordinary struggle. As a child in China, he carried luggage at a railway station. One day, a passenger gave him a bar of chocolate. He asked the passenger where it came from. The man replied: Hong Kong. The boy knew that city must be heaven. Before long, a 12-year-old stowaway found work in a Hong Kong garment factory. Eight years later, he became the factory’s manager. He went on to launch Giordano, a Chinese clothing company. It became a spectacular success. He founded Apple Daily, which reported the news without fear, and in which he editorialized in favor of freedom and criticized China’s rulers. It soon became Hong Kong’s most popular newspaper”.

 

Clifford May thinks this is extraordinary struggle. Well, if this is not the expression of an intellectual dishonesty as massive as the combined masses of Saturn and Jupiter — given that Clifford May knows what happened to me in so-called Liberal Democratic Canada — it must be that he has as much humanity in him as there is in a swarm of magots feeding on the dead corpse of a victim it ganged up on together with other magots and killed for the pursuit of pleasure and plagiarisms.

 

But what is it that happened to me?

 

It all began when in the aftermath of the 1967 Middle East War, the Jewish owned, Jewish influenced and everyone else’s publications started to represent the Arabs (especially the Egyptians) as sick dogs, wounded animals and cockroaches worthy of being exterminated with the leading insecticide of the time called “RAID”.

 

After a year of this kind of abuse, I wrote an innocuous letter to the editor of the Toronto Star which they published under the title: “Don’t listen to propaganda, Egypt is a civilized country.” The Canadian Jewish Congress responded by sending me a representative who warned me in my own home that if I do not stop talking to the press, the Jews will ruin my life. And that’s what they have been doing ever since, having recruited to their side the Canadian Government, the RCMP and everyone else that’s powered by the sick desire to engage in the moral gangrape of the innocent.

 

Done with the story of Jimmy Lai, Clifford May turned his attention to Dmitry Muratov. He told his story starting like this: “Mr. Lai has a kindred spirit in Moscow. He is Dmitry Muratov who founded Novaya Gazeta in a last-ditch battle to defend freedom in Russia teaming with former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev who donated some of his Nobel Peace Prize money to get the publication up and running”.

 

Read the rest of the story as written by Clifford May in the Washington Times, and marvel at the power of religious fanaticism that would turn a Cinderella story into a Pandora story … and turn the story of a stolen Palestine into a Jewish fairytale that’s drifting into the gutter toward the sewer of no return.

We need a better strategy for space conquest

 We, the human race inhabiting Planet Earth, have a looming problem that’s hanging over our heads but we choose to neglect addressing it with the required urgency because we have priorities that make no logical sense.

 

We live with a population that’s constantly increasing on a planet whose resources are being depleted just as fast. For this reason, we incomprehensibly devote much of our mental energies to forcefully and deceitfully grab what we can from each other, and do so at the same time that we protect what we hoard, which we keep in reserve to use on a rainy day.

 

This destructive tendency is the modern manifestation of the competition for food we inherited at the beginning of time and by which we ascertained our continued survival. Unfortunately, we saw the tendency write itself into our DNA, never to leave the core of what we’re made of despite the dazzling advancements we managed to score in other areas of knowledge — such as the discoveries we made in science, the designs we perfected in technology and the philosophical stances we developed to regulate our daily comportment.

 

Whereas silly kind of competitions are already maintaining us in a precarious state of existence on the one planet that’s capable of sustaining human life, the superpower states in our midst are thoughtlessly engaged in a mad competition to be first at reaching Planet Mars, a neighboring planet that may take a thousand years before it can be adapted to provide the resources that will sustain human life.

 

What is wrong about the competition for Mars is that it entails sending humans to that planet, and the promise to bring them back alive — all of that being a prelude to building permanent bases in a distant world. To be sure, the accomplishment is expected to add tremendous prestige to the superpower that will be first to get there. But what will be the cost of all this, not just to the winning and losing competitors, but to all of humanity?

 

The reality is that human beings are natives of Planet Earth. They came into being in a place that provides them with the necessities of life, among these water, food and a reasonably moderate temperature to live comfortably and develop the ability to work, produce more of what they need and thrive. When one or more of these ingredients is diminished, human life cannot be sustained for long, yet this is what the travellers to Mars will encounter and live with while travelling there, and what they must get used to when they get there.

 

To make sure those travellers will stay alive and be productive long enough to gather valuable information and send it to Earth, extra efforts will be mounted to provide them with the comfort to which they were used when living on Earth. And this is when the cost-and-benefit question pops up, injecting a dose of reality in the viability of that whole enterprise. Here is the biting question: What useful information can humans gather on Mars to send back to Earth that modern instruments cannot do cheaply, more efficiently and more precisely?

 

The answer to that question is: nothing. Thus, we must conclude that the reason why there is a stampede among the big powers to go to Mars, is for the prestige effect they expect will accrue to them by accomplishing such a feat. But the reality is that while they will gain something small, humanity as a whole, will lose a great deal. That’s because such efforts will put a strain on the resources of the Earth, diminish them at a time when the exploration of space could be refashioned to yield tremendous benefits for the entire human race.

 

What the big powers are missing is the fact that they have it within their scientific and engineering knowledge to bestow exponentially more useful benefits on humanity than they do competing to be first at reaching Mars and win the race. The reality is that the proof is already ln to the effect that our galaxy is filled with solar systems containing planets that can potentially be inhabited by us.

 

The problem is that these systems are lightyears away from us. Thus, to get there just to do as little as explore the neighborhood and send the information to Earth, will be impossible to accomplish in any reasonable amount of time, the way that things stand at this moment. And so we must think up solutions that now seem too difficult to pull off in space travel—all the more reason why we must start working on them as soon as possible—especially when we consider that the resources of Planet Earth are dwindling at a relentless pace.

 

What we need to do is concentrate on speeding up the kind of research that aims to invent and build a propulsion engine for the spaceships of the future. It’ll be an engine that will deliver speed, doing so using the resources it gathers from space itself wherever the ship will find itself.

 

The ship will travel at a speed that will reach at least one tenth that of light which should take it to our neighboring solar system Alpha Centauri in about 43 years, explore it for about 2 or 3 years, and send the information back to Earth in 4.3 years for a total of about 50 years. This alone should convince you there is no time to waste.

 

Thus, rather than engage in a cutthroat competition outdoing each other, the powers of Planet Earth (big and small) should get together and work at finding ways to go to the planets, all of which are out there begging us to visit them, colonize them and inhabit them.