Did you ever wonder what happens when a dyslexic looks at a
left handed person? Does he see him as right handed? This is not meant as a
joke; it is a metaphor for the puzzle that is created when a publication with a
strong Jewish bent takes up the subject of moral equivalence. It happened this
time when the editors of the Wall Street Journal came up with an editorial they
titled: “Puttin's Got a List” and subtitled: “Vladimir's idea of moral
equivalence.” The piece was published on April 16, 2013 in the Journal.
The first time that I remember someone high up speak of
moral equivalence happened in the 1970s when President Jimmy Carter spoke of
the effort to overcome the energy crisis as being the moral equivalent to fighting
a war. It was at this point in time that I estimate the Jewish propaganda
masters and their echo barking dogs spirited the expression and made it an
integral part of their lexicon.
What they did, however, was not to see a moral equivalence
everywhere, but reject any hint of it existing between an Israeli concern and
that of someone else – anyone else. The rejection came automatically where an
equivalence was made, and where it was not. The aim was to set Israel apart
from any human activity that would lump the Jewish entity with the rest of the
human race thus take away the distinctiveness they attributed to it. The
braying of the rabbis went like this: “You can't compaaaare, you can't
compaaaare,” and the barking of the echo dogs went like this: “There is no
moral equivalence here” even when no equivalence was pointed to.
And while placing Israel and everything Jewish at the
highest point on the totem pole of existence, the rabbis and their echo
repeaters placed the enemy they chose for the day at the lowest point on that
pole. Thus, with a three tiers system where the Jews occupied the place of
honor, humanity was given the middle part, and the enemy of the day the bottom
part. Having achieved this construct, the rabbis and their barking dogs set out
to interpret God's creation and all current events to those of us in the middle
who noticed that the old Soviet Union was made a frequent occupant of the lower
part.
Believe it or not, the Arabs and the Muslims, especially the
Shia Muslims of Iran were not placed near the bottom part of the pole while
Christianity – especially the scenes of the nativity that were displayed in
public – were permanently nailed near the bottom, even below ground. Needless
to say that a war raged between the Christians and the Jews in America at a
time when the Christians were calling the Jews killers of Jesus, and the Jews
were calling Jesus the illegitimate son of Mary. To them, she was a prostitute
nicknamed Virgin who lived and worked in a bordello where another Mary (Magdalene)
also lived and worked until Jesus grew up, and she became his mistress as well
as disciple.
Conducting the war in the manner that they always do, the
Jews gathered the dirt on the Christian pastors and blackmailed them into
submission. Those that refused to submit were exposed and removed from the
scene; those that submitted were given the task of preaching the new gospel to
the American people. It was to the effect that God is not in Heaven but here on
Earth, living as a Jew and walking among us. Yes it is true, my friend, the
pastors were telling the American people that they must worship the Jew like a
God – any and every Jew, that is. Thus while the Muslims were saying that there
is no God but God, the Christians in America, especially the young among them,
were taught that there was no God but the Jew.
And this is where Karl Rove saw the opportunity to have his
puppet the W win the election and become the forty-third President of the
United States. He converted him to the worship of the Jew at a time when the
Soviet Union was crumbling. At the end of this process, the Berlin wall fell,
the Soviet Union became Russia, the world changed and the Muslims became the
automatic occupants of the lower tier on the totem pole of existence. As to
Russia, it was left in limbo pending a decision with regard to its new place.
All this happened not only in the eyes of the Jews and those of Karl Rove's
White House but also the eyes of the American media – left, right and center.
Where to from here? Well, given that America won the cold
war against Communism and became sole superpower, the logical thing to do was
to unleash a cold war against Islam and defeat it so that the new religion in
America, now called Judeo-Christian, may triumph. This done, the Jewish groups
that were huddled under an umbrella called Neocon, will come out in force and
implement the agenda they secretly developed over the centuries to take over
the world. They will ride a policy they temporarily called Pax Americana but
whose ultimate aim was to become a Pax Judaica.
One unexpected snag after another began to develop, however,
and the whole Jewish scheme started to crumble. The miserable China of
Tienanmen Square turned out to be not so miserable, the Russia of docile Boris
Yeltsin was handed over to feisty Vladimir Putin, and the hibernating Arab
world turned out to be awake and welcoming a new Spring in a world where it
lived for thousands of years alternating between seasons of deep chill and
uplifting warmth. As to China, it was instrumental in shifting the center of
economic power to the Orient while Putin was making it clear that Russia was
still a worthy pole in the multi-polar world that is shaping, and not a
satellite in the orbit of America.
What this did to America was reduce its aura from one that
used to command reverence to one that commands little more than scorn,
especially when it comes to the stance it takes on matters relating to Israel's
non-stop criminal behavior. And this was the reversal that caused the Jewish
doctors of spin to reverse their approach from that of latching onto glorious
America to that of spitting it out. They also changed their tune from one of
“you can't compaaaare” to one of “you can't single Israel out.” The dyslexic,
as you can see, is no longer looking at the right-handed write; he is looking
at the left-handed and thinking he writes from right to left.
You see this American confusion when you start reading the
editorial of the Wall Street Journal and keep reading it while wondering when
the punch line will hit you. It does eventually hit in this form: “This is Mr. Putin's idea of establishing
moral equivalence between U.S. and Russian justice, but no one outside the
Kremlin will fall for that.” No, no, no, you cry out, this does not sound like
a moral equivalence. Putin could not care less about establishing a moral
equivalence with American justice; what he did was respond with a tit for a tat
to show that Russia is equal to America not inferior to it.
But why did the
Americans think of the Putin response as something else? They did because they
lost confidence that their country remains the great power it used to be.
Rather than sail majestically the way it used to while enjoying the sight of
everyone else scrambling to move close and get caught in its draft, America now
demands that the world follow it. When this does not happen, the Americans
fantasize about it happening to satisfy a deep psychological reason.
The fact is that
when someone follows you, he cannot get ahead of you. When you are confident of
your abilities, you do not worry about someone trying to go his own way. But
when you lose confidence in yourself, and you catch someone break away from the
line behind you, this is when you begin to worry he may get ahead of you. You
respond by demanding that everyone follow you, and if they defy the order, you
fantasize that they are complying and convince yourself of same. And this is
what the editors of the Journal have done not only in telling themselves that
this is what Putin did, but also that “no one will fall for that.” They need a
psychiatrist and they need one now.
With all this in the
background, you look for a sign in the editorial to the effect that the people
who wrote it have an idea as to what is unfolding around them but find nothing
of substance. Instead, you see this: "Rumsfeld and Cheney must wonder what they did to merit exclusion from this club. We also like Mr. Yoo's response, which was to say there goes his judo match with
Putin.” How trivial can someone get?
When you ask: What would lead the editors of a major
American publication to stoop this low, you find the answer in this: “the failure of
Moscow to hold anyone to account, led Congress to pass the Act with an
overwhelming bipartisan vote.” The mention of a bipartisan vote is euphemism to
mean that the exercise was Jewish through and through. This is why it could not
rise above the trivial.
Then comes the ultimate in child play: "Our recommendation would be that as long as these U.S. officials are banned in Russia, no American [of consequence] should accept invitation to visit Russia."
Is this a tit for tat or is it moral equivalence?