No, the Jews were not about to hang and FDR saved them; he
only refrained from giving them the rope with which to hang themselves,
something that others did gleefully – and the Jews hanged themselves with the
rope. It happened during the period of time that extended from the early part
of the Twentieth Century to its mid part, says Rafael Medoff who wrote an
article not to thank Franklin Delano Roosevelt for what he did or refrained
from doing but to chastise him for his attitude.
The article was published in the LA Times on April 7, 2013 under the title: “What
FDR said about Jews in private” and the subtitle: “His personal sentiments about Jews may help explain America 's tepid response to the
Holocaust.” To show that he did the research, Medoff writes the following: “In
Roosevelt's case, a pattern of private remarks about Jews, some of which I
recently discovered at the Central Zionist Archives in Jerusalem and from other sources, may be
significant.” Good for Medoff but he seems to have missed the memo which says
the approach to Jewish history must now emphasize the notion: “How did we get
ourselves in this mess yet again?” Rather than emphasize the notion: “Look what
the world did to us once more.”
In taking the wrong
approach, the author has managed to confirm what was demonstrated through the
centuries, mainly that the artificial culture adopted by the Jews is
incompatible with the natural culture adhered to by the rest of humanity. The
two will always clash, and one will always lose. Since humanity cannot lose,
the Jews will. This outcome will result each and every time, and the Jewish
survivors will ask for compensation, a move that is regarded by humanity as
asking for blood money. It will set the stage for another clash to happen; one
that will end in yet another Jewish defeat that will prompt yet another demand
for compensation. And the vicious cycle will go on and on as it has for
centuries.
The question now is
this: Can the Jews harmonize their culture with that of humanity thus avoid a
clash between the two and safeguard the Jewish existence? The answer is yes,
and we don't have to go too far to see how it can be done because the example
is right here in the Medoff article. The remarkable thing is that the approach
is spelled out in the last paragraph. Here it is: “This attitude dovetails
FDR's views regarding Asian immigrants in particular … he complained about
immigrants 'crowding' into the cities ... warned against granting citizenship
to 'non-assimilable immigrants' and opposed Japanese immigration ... He
recommended that future immigration should be limited to those who had 'blood
of the right sort.'”
Obviously, the passage of time has proven FDR's views on the
Asians to be unfounded since they have assimilated well in America as they
did everywhere else they went. But how did the Asians take FDR's indiscretions?
They took them in their stride because they understand that he is human and
fallible like they are. They moved on and did other things rather than dredge
up events that happened nearly a century ago as did the Jews who argued that
the FDR stance may have been responsible for “the American government's tepid
response to the Holocaust.” This being the eternally milkable cash cow upon
which the Jews feed and line their pockets, it sets the stage for yet another
clash to happen between the cultures.
What else did Rafael
Medoff do with his article that other Jewish writers did before but no Asian
writer ever did? Well, what Medoff and other Jewish writers did was skate on
thin ice to build a case whose ultimate aim would be to lay guilt on the
American government. Medoff framed the argument this way: “Why didn't the
president quietly tell his State Department to fill the quotas for Germany and
Axis-occupied countries to the legal limit? That alone could have saved 190,000
lives.” Whoa! You see that? He's talking about 190,000 lives. At a million
dollars a piece – that's a big chunk of money. Therefore, the response must be
yes indeed, who the hell knows why the president did not tell his State
Department. In reality, the question must not be why he did not tell? It must
be why should he have told?
The amazing part is
that Medoff answered his own question at least partially, not realizing that he
did. He says this: “It would not have required a fight with Congress or the
anti-immigration forces; it would have involved minimal political risk to the
president.” But seeing how the proverbial political sausage is made in the
Congress and elsewhere, you ask: How can he look back nearly a century and
assert that the president was wrong on something about which he had little or
no information?
To come now and say
that Roosevelt should have guessed how history was going to unfold decades
before it did, and determine from this that the Congress presented minimal risk
thus be motivated to tell his State Department to fill the quotas to the legal
limit, is to display the kind of insanity that the other cultures do not
display. Only the Jews seem to suffer from this condition, and only they end up
paying the ultimate price – which they do over and over again without ever
learning.
To get a sense of the gulf that separates the Jewish culture
from the rest of humanity, look at the following passage from the first
paragraph of the Medoff article: “At
one point ... FDR offered what he called 'the best way to settle the Jewish
question.'” This thought was not unique to FDR because the Jewish question has
been a regular topic of conversation in Europe
and elsewhere throughout the centuries. Like many others, FDR correctly
identified the Jewish troubles to emanate from a culture that does not allow
for the independent existence of the individual. Instead, everyone belongs to
the Jewish collective for which they must all work or be ostracized, even
attacked and destroyed.
Given that the
Jewish collective cannot survive by itself, it operates like a parasite that
infiltrates a productive body where it softens the internal organs by spoiling
them, and then sucks the goodness to nourish itself. Thus every member of the
collective must work to this end or be expelled because the parasitic
individual cannot be allowed to feed on the parasitic collective.
This must have been
the knowledge that prompted FDR to come up with the idea "to spread the
Jews thin all over the world." It would have kept them apart thus
prevented the formation of a collective parasite. The plan would have compelled
every individual Jew to work for a living as do everyone else in the world,
something that would have contributed to the salvation of all Jews, and earned
the gratitude of humanity.
In fact, it sounds
like FDR tried something like this on a small scale and made it work. As
reported in Medoff's article: “The president said he had tried this out in
[Meriwether] County , Georgia
[where Roosevelt lived in the 1920s] and at Hyde Park
on the basis of adding four or five Jewish families at each place. He claimed
that the local population would have no objection if there were no more than
that." And this could be the reason why the tragedy that happened in
Europe did not happen in America .
If so, it looks like FDR saved a few Jews from the rope that others gave them
to hang themselves.
According to the article, FDR had many complaints regarding
the Jews. But the fact remains that none was new and none disappeared with his
departure from the scene. The same complaints or similar ones existed
throughout the centuries before the great wars of the Twentieth Century, and
they persisted ever since. They were expressed by various individuals from a
variety of races living in all sorts of places around Europe
and around the rest of the world. This says that something is wrong with the
Jewish culture not with any one individual, any one race, any one place in Europe or any one place somewhere in the world.
The FDR solution was humane in that he tried to make it
harder for the Jews to coalesce into a collective. This would have saved them
from a process that never ended well as evidenced by the events of WW II. The
FDR plan was never attempted on a large scale, and may not work now. But there
is an alternative that better suits the time in which we live; a time in which
cowardice is the fiber from which democratic politics is woven.
The alternative is for the Jewish rank and file to tell
their leaders to go hang themselves with the rope that the cowardly Western
democracies are handing them because they – who are ordinary Jews – simply
refuse to hang on the altar of a Jewish takeover of the world. They definitely
have no use for this idea even if it were workable which it is not. And that's
final.
Then, the ordinary Jews must see to it that the complete
demise of the Jewish leaders happens before the end result ends up being
Hitler's Final Solution. Better have a humane solution now than be faced with a
Final version that will certainly not be humane.