Friday, October 7, 2016

Foreign Policy dictated by the Swarm

Half a century ago, when the Jewish leaders – who were the rabbis – decided that the time had come to make their move on America (and by extension on Canada,) they mobilized their synagogue attendees to help them do the work they could not by themselves.

They formed them into squads of foot soldiers and trained them to use the art of writing sharp rebuking letters to the media editors, and write soft politically oriented missives to the legislators at the federal, State and Provincial levels ... nudging them all to shape the foreign policy of the country in a way that would serve the interests of Israel, always Israel and no one but Israel.

The rabbis groomed and cultivated a swarm of young Jews to take the baton from them and run with it. The latter grew up to become journalists and legislators, and they carried on with the work of their elders. As journalists, they were now in a position to address the public directly; as legislators, they were now wielding the power they once petitioned as mere supplicants.

Out of that group, rose a new crop of Jewish leaders who managed to place themselves in key positions in the media, the legislatures and in most other institutions. When they felt solidly entrenched in their positions, they started hiring only Jews and obedient lackeys. And they pushed out the non-Jews who refused to toe the line.

This is where things stand at this time. If you look around, you'll see that the Jews have almost total ownership of the media, and tight control over America's legislatures. Assisting the leaders are Jewish juniors who learn from them and prepare to take over when the time will come. Also assisting them are the non-Jewish old-timers who toed the line as instructed. They were kept in their positions but allowed to do one thing only: to bark the daily Jewish refrain that the masters stuff in their mouths every morning.

You can see how the swarm of Jews and their non-Jewish lackeys operate when you study 5 articles that were published in the span of four days. They all discuss the topic of Syria, each tackling the subject from a different angle. But the thing to note is that the cumulative effect of their work resembles that of a squad that's operating with military precision, aiming to achieve one and the same goal. Here are the articles:

(1) Richard Cohen, a Jew, wrote: “Obama's hallucinatory excuses on Syria,” published on October 3, 2016 in the Washington Post.

(2) John McCain, a non-Jewish obedient lackey wrote: “Stop Assad Now – Or Expect Years of War,” a piece that also came under the subtitle: “Ground the regime's air force, create safe zones for Syrian civilians, and arm the opposition. It was published on October 4, 2016 in the Wall Street Journal.

(3) The editors of the New York Daily News wrote a piece under the title: “The price of Obama's fecklessness,” and the subtitle: “How Washington fiddled while Syria burned,” published on October 5, 2016 in the Daily News.

(4) The editors of the Wall Street Journal wrote a piece under the title: “John Kerry Sends Regrets,” and the subtitle: “Obama officials start to wash their hands of the Syrian catastrophe,” published on October 7, 2016 in the Journal.

(5) Daniel Henninger who is a columnist with the Wall Street Journal wrote: “Aleppo Is Obama's Sarajevo,” which also came under the subtitle: “The very least America can do is arm the people who are willing to defend themselves,” published on October 7, 2016 in the Journal.

What these articles have in common is that their authors hide behind the suffering of the innocent civilians – not to call for a doubling of the effort to work out a cease-fire and end the conflict – but to intensify the civil war by pouring in more weapons.

Their goal is not the welfare of the Syrian people but the satisfaction of the Israelis who always called for the toppling of the Assad regime, as they did of all the regimes in the neighborhood.

This has always been Israel's foreign policy. Thanks to the swarm, it has also become America's foreign policy.