Let's say 99.9 percent of the Planet's population is more
preoccupied with its condition here on Earth than what's out there in empty
space. And so, when we speak of the universe, we usually refer to what we go
through as we live our daily lives in the here and now.
This gives the term “Alternate Universe” a meaning all its
own, and there are many examples that define it. You'll find that from time to
time, people who disagree with the way that the cultural or artistic prizes are
awarded, create alternative awards to established prizes like the Oscars, the
Pulitzer and the Nobel, for example. Such conceptions are meant to draw
attention to what their creators believe has gone wrong with the existing
setup.
Most of these moves are considered to be protest activities
that have a limited life cycle. In fact, they are maintained for as long as
they make waves, and then allowed to whither away, having left a lasting mark
or having failed to change a thing. But could it happen that someone who joined
a protest movement, have a change of heart and flip to join the setup against
which he was protesting? The answer is yes; it happens all the time.
It happens but the one thing that does not happen is for
someone to be in both places at the same time. That is, be for something and
against it simultaneously. This is like trying to have it both ways, which is
something that nobody does. What? Wait a minute. What was that again? Nobody
tries to have it both ways? You wouldn't say that if you knew how the Jews
operate. Wait till you see what they do in the field of human rights.
When it comes to human rights, there is no document on this
planet or anywhere in the universe that is as vile, savage and perverted as the
Jewish Old Testament. And yet, this is the bible that the Jews spend a lifetime
studying to live by and treat others accordingly. Every word in it being the
antithesis of a Bill of Rights that's attached to a Constitution anywhere in
the world, it is horrifying to learn that the Jews stand with one foot in the
text of the Old Testament, and one foot in the principles of human rights
enunciated by the United Nations.
The result of that ambiguous Jewish reality has been a
proliferation of Jewish organizations that whitewash the savage treatment of
Palestinians in occupied Palestine ,
and urge the personal destruction of people everywhere else in the world who
disagree with them, treating them according to the hellish tenets of the Old
Testament.
At the same time as that, the Jews demand that they and
Israel be treated according to the most liberal interpretation of the most
liberal Bill of Rights you'll find anywhere in the world. If this sounds like
trying to have it both ways, it's because it is. In fact, it is the approach
that the Jews seek to incorporate in everything they do.
You'll find an example of this insanity in the article that
came under the title: “China ,
Cuba , Egypt , Iraq ,
Malaysia , Russia , Rwanda , and Saudi Arabia Should Not
Sit on the U.N. Human Rights Council [HRC],” written by Javier El-Hage &
Roberto Gonzales – both lawyers representing the New York-based Human Rights
Foundation – and published on October 28, 2016 in National Review Online.
The lawyers begin the discussion by making an error of logic
that would shame a twelve-year old kid. Here it is: “history repeats itself at
the United Nations, as abusive regimes work to hide their own records.” If
these two characters know there is an abusive record, it means the record is
not hidden. And if it is not hidden today, it will not be hidden tomorrow or
the day after. What happens, in fact, is that the countries they mention hide
nothing but explain what they do to balance the need for security on one hand,
and the rights of the citizens on the other.
Unlike the Jews whose biblical ideology made it impossible
for them to develop well enough to have a nation of their own (were thus given
an artificial one by the UN,) the countries said by the authors not to deserve
sitting on the Human Rights Council, lived by ideologies that guided them
through thousands of years to where they are today. The way they operate has
evolved with them, was legitimate all the time, and remains legitimate today.
Unlike the Jews, these countries do not see the necessity to
establish outfits that tell others how to respect human rights, and they do not
incite the big powers to meddle in the affairs of others. That's because unlike
the Jews, they do what they do knowing that their actions are justified. Being
reasonable people, however, they are willing to debate their stance and modify
it if convinced they should do so. This is how and why their cultures withstood
the test of time.
By contrast, the Jews who remain as infamous as ever by the
murderous activities they undertake in Palestine ,
and by the criminal harassment they practice against anyone that disagrees with
them anywhere in the world – are the ones who suffer the disease of trying to
hide what they do.