There was a time when Jews were excluded from enlisting in American universities.
Citing the need to uphold the principles of diversity,
equity and inclusion, the Jews beat their chests, blew their entrails out of
the bellies howling antisemitism, sued everyone left and right, protested loudly
and did all that was necessary to have America treat them like everyone else … and
they won the day.
Now that the Jews have marched into the system of higher education
with their head high, they are doing things in opposition to the principles
that got them into the system when they were out looking in. It is now clear
that their intent is to exclude others from the places they once were
themselves excluded.
Aron Ravin who is both a student at Yale University and a
contributor to National Review Online, wholeheartedly embraces that Jewish
“philosophical” reversal. To do his part at realizing it, he wrote an article which
adds to the weight of evidence that he is promoting Jewish supremacy. To that
end, he says that ‘Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)’ which was the battle-cry
of the Jewish warriors in an earlier era, must now be considered toxic because
the principle seeks to deliver justice to all other groups. He gives an example
of what he sees as being the disgrace that’s plaguing the current woke era. He
does that by citing what happened to a professor. Reproduced verbatim, here is that
passage:
“Just this past November, at Coastal Carolina University, Steven Earnest
was, at the behest of the school’s DEI committee, temporarily removed from
teaching duties for uttering the following heresy (***Content Warning***):
“I’m just sad people get their feelings hurt so easily”.
We ask: What was the professor referring to when he said,
it saddens him that people feel hurt? Well, take your pick, my friend. It could
have been use of the N word, or making a degrading reference about the Asians,
or about the Native Americans or what have you. That’s of little consequence,
says Aron Ravin. Little consequence? Wait a minute, what’s this guy talking
about? What would he be saying now had the professor uttered words to this
effect: Holocaust? What Holocaust? I don’t give a shit what happened to someone
almost a century ago far away from here. I have my hands full as it is, having
to cope with people suffering here in my community. They regularly get bullets
lodged in their backs for doing nothing worse than drive a car with a
malfunctioning tail light. So, here is the question that applies to the analog
situation: Would Ravin have mocked that incident, and called it a heresy that
people should be warned about?
Of course not. Instead, he and people like him would have
resumed beating their chests, blowing their entrails out of their bellies,
howling antisemitism, suing people left and right, protesting and doing all
that’s necessary to see to it that Jews are treated with dignity.
But things are what they are, and they mean something. Granted,
they mean something, but what is it? Well, given the information that we have, it
is easy to see what they mean. Jews see themselves as entitled to privileges
that no one else can have. The absolutely most important privilege bestowed equally
on everyone in a democratic society, is the right to petition the authority in
power. This is the privilege that the Jews fought hard to gain in America, but
it is also what they are fighting hard to monopolize by excluding others.
Why do they do this? They do it because they feel that
they alone are worthy of being endowed with that privilege. In fact, they are
raised in the belief that they have attained a level that is so advanced, no
one can be compared to them. When they complain about something, everybody
should freeze and listen. But when someone else complains about something, these
people should be told to stop annoying the public, take it on the chin like an
adult, and move on with their lives.
The bottom line, according to the Jews, is that they can
complain all they want, even if someone only looked at them askance, but no one
else has the right to whisper a complaint even if they get shot in the back for
driving with a malfunctioning tail light.
But is this sufficient proof that the Jews seek to
establish their supremacy over everyone else? Well, it might not have been sufficient
were it an isolated case. But the reality is that the Jewish quest to have what
is denied to others, is a widespread phenomenon that’s played out at all levels
of life; and it has serious consequences.
Consider the case of the Jewish so-called specialists
whose job is to take every newly elected member of Congress behind closed doors
and woke-educate them on Jewish sensitivities. They do this so that the new
members learn to behave woke-like and avoid committing the gaffs that make the
Jews feel discomfort. And while the Jews grant this privilege to themselves,
look what Aaron Ravin says about a similar situation:
“Unfortunately, this minority is not
confined to academia. Its aims have spread elsewhere, including to the legal
sector, helped in part by its proximity to academia in the form of law school.
As Aaron Sibarium has written, the American Bar Association has recently
acquiesced to the woke aims of a petition from 176 law-school deans, including
the likes of UChicago and Yale. Now, the ABA requires students to receive ‘education
on bias, cross-cultural competency, and racism’ for accreditation purposes”.
This is the newest of the Jewish battle cries. They
insist they are supreme, and demand being so recognized by the human race. Needless
to say what it is that they get instead.