Let me tell you a true story before I tell you another true story.
Here in Canada we have a weekly lottery called 6/49.
That’s because when you buy a ticket to participate in the game, you choose 6
numbers out of 49. The choice for the 6 winning numbers is made by a machine
that drops numbered balls, and the whole thing is shown on television. If you
chose all 6 numbers correctly, you win millions of dollars. If you chose 5 or 4
or 3 correctly, you win lesser prizes.
Most people who participate in the game watch it play on
TV, and know whether they won or lost. But if they don’t watch, they can go to
any of the stores that sell tickets, and have the clerk verify if they won
anything. Most of the time the store clerk would check the number and say, no
luck this time, and throw the ticket in the trash can. This happened to a citizen
not knowing that he had the winning ticket but that the store clerk cheated
him.
Many things happened in the ensuing few days that alerted
the citizen to the fact he had been cheated by the former store clerk who now
lives in a luxury house and was leading an extravagant life. The citizen
alerted the lottery commission as well as the police. It took very little to
establish that the store clerk had stolen the winnings of the citizen. The
clerk was confronted with the evidence, he admitted to his crime, and the
authorities saw to it that justice was done.
Now, my friend, let me ask you this question: Would you
have believed me if I said that when the police showed up at the door of the former
store clerk, the latter admitted he stole the citizen’s money, admitted he now
lived the good life, but there was no logical reason why he should relinquish
the house or the remaining cash to the citizen because — get this
now, my friend — we don’t know what he’ll do with the house or the money. Does
that blow your mind or what?
But why am I telling you this story?
I’m telling it because something like it happened, and the thief behaved in the
manner you would agree is mind blowing. You can get the true story from the
horse’s mouth when you read the article that came under the title: “Three Tough
Questions About the Two State Solution,” written by the shamelessly mind blower
James Sinkinson, and published on June 12, 2022 in the despicable Jewish online
magazine Algemeiner.
Here is a condensed version of the
preamble with which Sinkinson started his discussion:
“Pundits and politicians have called
for a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. What would ‘Palestine’
look like? We don’t know who would negotiate a Palestinian state or who
would be in charge of it. We don’t know what the terms of that state would
be—like borders and peace agreements with Israel. We don’t know what the vision
would be for the new state’s political, military and economic structure. We
don’t know these characteristics of a future ‘State of Palestine’ because none
of its proponents reveal them. We don’t know what the United States or European
Union envision. Likewise, we don’t even know how the Palestinians imagine their
new state. Yet the answers to these questions—and many others—must be provided
before rational people can embrace the concept of a two-state solution”.
This is the first time in the history of colonialism that
the colonial power put down conditions for the occupied to fulfill before promises
are made to end the occupation. This should not have surprised anyone given
that the colonists are Jews, and these people are the only ones in history to
steal the land, and immediately go on a never ending spree to slander their
victims.
And if you think that’s bad beyond comprehension,
consider the following:
First, James Sinkinson says he is President of a
Jewish outfit calling itself, Facts and Logic About the Middle East (FLAME),
which offers educational messages to correct lies and misperceptions about
Israel and its relationship to the United States.
Second, this is the kind of logic that Jews wish to
impose on the schoolchildren of America. They are working relentlessly to take
over the schools at every level, and they are doing it in the same way that
they successfully took over the levers of decision making in the journalistic
and political arenas.
Let’s see what else that Jewish logic has produced. Here
is another condensed passage from the James Sinkinson article:
“While Abbas theoretically holds power
in the West Bank, he is currently serving the 17th year of a four-year term.
West Bank Palestinians have a bankrupt economy; they are propped up by
financial contributions from Western nations. Most analysts agree that if
Israel did not assist in the Palestinian areas, Hamas would take over. Did we
mention that Abbas is 87 years old and has no heir-apparent? Thus, it’s
entirely possible that when Abbas dies, Hamas will simply start ruling the West
Bank’s 2.7 million Palestinians as a thugocracy, just as in Gaza”.
The truth is that none of what
Sinkinson implies ought to be conditions that the Palestinians must fulfill
before Israel would consider ending the occupation — was asked of anyone else.
It wasn’t asked of the Mau Mau rebels in Kenya. Nor of the Algerian Resistance
that fought the French, nor of the African National Congress that struggled to
end apartheid in South Africa nor of the Zimbabwe African National Union who
fought the Ian Smith forces … and many more such examples around the globe.