Clifford D. May wants you to believe that the relationship which exists between Iran and the Houthis of Yemen, poses the greatest threat to peace on Earth.
The reason why he wants you to adopt such thinking, is
that in so doing, you’ll inadvertently hide the reality that the Jews conned
the United States of America into believing similar lies, causing the
superpower to lavishly fund and arm Israel’s cultural genocide of its neighbors.
The writer put his thoughts in an article that came under
the title: “Iran’s arsenal of tyranny,” and the subtitle: “Country arms
jihadis, terrorists and neoimperialists.” It was published on February 7, 2023
in The Washington Times.
Reading the article, you’ll discover that Clifford May
has much to say about many people and institutions, but the one thing he does
not mention is the fact that the struggle in Yemen is between the proxies of
Iran and those of Saudi Arabia, two equal powers in terms of the wealth and
armaments they possess. In contrast, the struggle in the Middle East is between
Israel which is a proxy of a generous superpower, and the Palestinians that
have no one to protect them but world opinion.
It was in 1953 that the Iranians learned a bitter lesson
to the effect that the has-been and the wannabe colonial powers would not leave
it alone to develop in its own way, at its own pace. They did so by interfering
in Iran’s electoral process, choosing for it a form of government that would
serve their purpose instead of serving the Iranian people’s interests.
And it was in the 1980s that the Iranians learned of the
even more bitter lesson to the effect that the has-been and the wannabe
colonial powers would not leave them alone — doing so by arming Iraq’s Saddam
Hussein with the chemical weapons he used on their people. Unarmed and unable
to defend themselves, the Iranians vowed to develop the means to do so as fast
as possible. They started several programs in this direction, and scored
successes in many fields where they exceeded their wildest dreams.
In competition against America that is the biggest
trafficker of locally-made weapons in the world, and in competition against
Israel that has become a big trafficker of American-made weapons in the world,
the Iranians were forced to become the suppliers of last resort to the
downtrodden in the Middle East whose necks continue to be crushed under the boots
of the has-been and the wannabe colonial powers, now using Israel as proxy to
do mischievous work for them and get paid handsomely.
And yet, despite these realities, Clifford May begins his
discussion of the role that Iran plays in its region by making this
declaration: “The Islamic Republic has become the Arsenal
of Tyranny.” He goes on to list the groups and organizations that supposedly
benefit from Iran’s largess. To give the readers a false sense of security, he
hastens to add that, “Israel does its best to destroy such weapons caches
either en route or upon arrival.” What he omits, however, is mention that both
the quantity and quality of weapons reaching their destinations, increase month
after month.
As usual, Clifford May looked for and found an excuse,
however flimsy it may be, upon which to call on the United States to abandon
the quest of trying to forge a deal that will delay or prohibit Iran from ever
developing nuclear weapons. The following, in condensed form, is what he said
in this regard:
“Most recently, Tehran has
been sending drones to Russia to be used by Vladimir Putin. Over the weekend,
it was revealed that Moscow and Tehran are building a drone factory in
Russia. That should be the last nail in the coffin of the Iran deal that
former President Barack Obama concluded”.
Also as usual, Clifford May the Jew
cited a Jewish method to deal with the situation. Briefly, this is what he said
to the Americans and their allies: Steal Iran’s money that’s now under your
control, and keep it for an indefinite period of time. And these are his words,
shown here in condensed form:
“The Iranians would receive hundreds of
billions of dollars they could use to better arm their cronies, make more
sophisticated missiles, and continue imprisoning dissidents at home”.
How seriously should we take May’s
presentation? The answer is: Not very. That’s because the article as written by
Clifford May lacks coherence. And the history he cited points to an incoherent
Jewish approach to foreign policy.
First of all, without alluding to a miserable
series of Israeli failures, the writer asserts that Israel does its best to
destroy Iranian weapons sent to its clients. He then tells about Iran’s
spectacular success at lining up Russia to be its newest client. He abandons
that line of thought to delve into his favorite subject; that of urging America
not to get into a nuclear deal with Iran. And finally, he betrays the premise
of his bragging by begging America to do “all it can to prevent Tehran’s
weapons from reaching its proxies.” What happened to Israel’s effort in that
regard?
Second of all, without alluding to a Jewish relentless
campaign to drive the wedge between America and the Arab World, Clifford May
discussed the bond that kept Saudi Arabia and America friends during the
decades. These are the words he used:
“The Saudis, an American strategic partner since President Franklin
Roosevelt met with King Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud on Valentine’s Day 1945. The tacit
understanding since: The US will provide security and the Saudis will keep the
oil flowing at reasonable levels and prices to fuel international economic
growth”.