Consider the following three relationships you may someday forge with someone:
First: You are neighbors, and his young family seems to have
much in common with yours. You have a car which you take everyday to go to
work. He does not have a car but rides with you to his. You do him a favor by
taking a detour to drop him off at the door of his workplace. At the end of the
day, you retrace your trajectory to get you both to your homes.
Second: You’re the office manager of a multinational
conglomerate’s chairman of the board. You have a number of assistants working
for you — keeping track, organizing, recording and filing all that you do. As
if possessed by the spirit of a busy beaver, one young assistant begins to
leave mark of his work in places that should not concern him. The other
assistants do not complain and neither do you.
Third: You’re getting on with age, thus pay for a companion
to be with you most of the time. He is there to help you do the things you
cannot do for yourself alone.
But wait a minute. The reality being that you’re a science
researcher doing experiments on the nature of the universe, you discover that
you were not just thinking about those situations, you actually lived them in
three alternative universes. And so, eager to find out how each situation
ended, you revisit those places where, to your chagrin discover that you ended
up betrayed each time.
In the first case, your friend’s wife had been freeloading
on your wife as if your home was a foodbank dedicated to aiding a poor
neighbor. In the second case, the busy aid in your office turned out to be a
spy planted there by a rival conglomerate to sabotage your work and improve
theirs. In the third case, it turned out that despite getting on with age, you
were neither deaf nor blind, and certainly not in need of a companion. But a
sneaky conman had managed to intrude into your life, and dominate it by telling
lies and pulling tricks that built on your old fears, hangups and demons. He
took over your estate by feeding you drugs that caused you to see and hear what
was not there to be seen or heard — telling you what it was that you must be seeing
and hearing.
And so, here is the question that must be asked: Which of
the three situations would fill you with so powerful and so visceral a
sentiment of hate, you will be motivated to respond in ways that you’ll most
likely regret later? The answer is that the third situation leads the pack.
That’s because the conman relied on your weaknesses to exploit you. And nothing
can be more cowardly or vicious than that.
You know what, my friend? A situation analogous to that is
unfolding America. It is where the politico-journalistic and other elites want
the public to engage in self-deception by pretending they do not believe what
they see with their own eyes — namely that the Jews (1) have dual loyalties, (2)
use money to hypnotize politicians and get them to serve Israel instead of
America, and (3) forge relationships with others for the sole purpose of
exploiting them, sponging on the suckers who listen to the Jews and respond
warmly to their flattery.
Now that the public has had enough of this nonsense, and
says as much in every forum it is allowed to freely express the people’s
thinking, Jonathan Tobin rushed to start working on maintaining the system of
deception by which the Jews turned America into a Jewish plantation. To that
end, Tobin wrote an article under the title: “Israel’s
Critics Continue to Hold the Jewish State Responsible for Palestinian Terror,”
published on January 29, 2023 in the Jewish News Syndicate.
So then, what’s Tobin doing to maintain the old system?
To start with, he spoke of a “Palestinian
century-long war on Zionism.” Pity Jonathan Tobin for, nobody told him it was
the Zionists who declared war on the Palestinians, not the other way around. It
is so because it was the Zionists — led by terrorists Begin and Shamir, and having
made a mess of their lives in Europe — who invaded the Palestinian homeland
armed to the teeth with modern weapons. They started shooting at everything
that moved, including the Brits who were the ones to promise them an enclave in
Palestine in the first place.
Tobin ignored that reality because if
he didn’t, he would have admitted that the portion of Palestine which the UN
never gave to the Jews, continues to suffer the weight of occupation — the
ultimate and most definitive form of cannibalistic terrorism. This being the
case, every part of occupied Palestine is by definition a war zone in which the
occupied population has the duty to resist the occupation, whereas the
occupying power is deemed to commit war crimes, and crimes against humanity
with every response it conducts to oppose the resistance. It is that justice is
rightfully, heavily and shamelessly biased in favor of the victims. Period.
Still, wanting to get around that, Tobin added two arguments
to his explanation, one of which boils down to whining about the following
point: “Much
of the press claimed a moral equivalence between the war on Israel, and the IDF
operation earlier in the week to [kill] Palestinians in Jenin, during which
nine people were eliminated”, said Tobin.
Note that he whined using the Nazi-formulated trope “eliminate” to
cement the view that a savage Netanyahu will be good for Israel. Unfortunately
for him, however, this did not overcome the bias that justice has for naturally
favoring the Palestinian victims.
The other argument, used by Tobin to explain himself, boils
down to the following:
“Palestinians have repeatedly rejected peace offers and compromises with
Israel regardless of where its borders might be drawn. And this puts a lie to
the concept of a two-state solution being the answer to Israel’s problems”.
This is a straightforward statement that’s made of two parts, and
expressed in a single breath. The first part suggests that the Palestinians are
the ones who continually reject the formation of a Palestinian state. The
second part is a firm assertion by Tobin that it is the Jews who oppose
advancing the principle of a two-state solution.
Jonathan Tobin is such a disgrace, he needs help because his brain is
screwed up so badly, it holds two high-stake contradictory opinions
simultaneously.