Monday, January 15, 2024

The difference between a failed democracy and a benevolent autocracy

 

Shortly after the end of the Second World War, the idea of the world being divided into a half that’s led by democratic America that won the war, and a dictatorship half that’s led by the Soviet Union that may have lost the war (sort of) but remained as dangerous as ever.

 

People such as Winston Churchill and many other warmongers saw in this occurrence the opportunity to lead the democratic half of the world by engaging in a brand of demagoguery that made those who experienced the war, drink from the Churchillian cup of poison with passion. They feared the Soviet Union and its allies, the nations whom Churchill labelled dictators.

 

The result of this development has been a Cold War that lasted about half a century between America and its “Western allies,” and the Soviet Union with its “Eastern Allies.” The Cold War quieted down for a while, but then flared up again – played out this time by both the same old players and new ones.

 

What we have today is a reformed Soviet Union that took up the name Russia. Though one of the two pre-war superpowers, it is ceding its top position to its old ally China, thus allowing the world to be dominated by a rising old ally, and by America, its now fading old rival.

 

Because we live in “interesting times” as the Chinese would remark, people around the globe have their attention taken by the new drama that’s unfolding as they see it with their own eyes on television and the screens of the newly invented social media. And lost in this hullabaloo is the reality that there existed, and still exists a sizeable majority of countries whose political system remains non-aligned, refusing to dwell in the orbit of any superpower.

 

It is among these nations that you find the non-fanatic populations and leaders who just want to lead a normal life; one that may not reflect the exact image of a dictatorship or a democracy but remains pleasant to those who have adopted it. And yet, it is among these nations that the superpowers are exerting great effort, aiming to recruit into their own political systems if not their way of life as well.

 

For a while, America and its Western Allies seemed to win the heart and soul of the those countries, but then something changed. It is not that they flipped and endorsed the rival system. It is that they reverted back to their non-aligned status having tried and rejected the Western approach. In so doing, these countries are showing the rest of humanity how countries can adopt a system that neither fears the other nations nor scares them.

 

Even more than being ideal in their interaction with other nations, these countries provide a model as to how a governing body should deal with its own population. A contentious Area where the value of a system is gauged, happens to be the Human Rights field. In fact, where the West used to hammer the East using Human Rights as a weapon, the East is now responding by pointing out the failings which are displayed at every level of life in the Western countries, especially the United States of America.

 

Where permissiveness used to count as a triumph of the Western system of governance, it is now seen as the scourge for which the political leaders cannot even begin to postulate a possible solution. In fact, killing others and committing suicide have made America look like a slow burning but expanded civil war in which even the children are killing their classmates.

 

And when it comes to committing everyday sort of crimes, the situation has gone so far out of hand that store owners now punish their own employees for trying to stop the looters, than help in this endeavor by calling the police who may engage in a shoot out that has the potential to ruin the reputation of the store.

 

It is important to  note that this new culture of America is so contagious, it spread not only throughout the United States, but also across the border to Canada. From being keen at projecting the image of the sinless virgin, Canada now insists on being treated with respect despite its shortcomings.

 

And whereas the Eastern countries that used to govern with a tight fist to protect the country, they have gained enough confidence in themselves that they are now loosening their grip on the population. Not only that, but they feel they owe the West a taste of its old medicine. And so the Easterners are interfering with the Western system, so much so that it is the West which now cries uncle.

 

The trouble with Canada in this melee is that it fails to realise how short its shortcomings are, especially in the Human Rights field where it used to preach to the world what an ideal treatment of their citizens would look like, now seen to treat its own citizens like a magot that joined other magots in a criminal syndicate that kills and feasts on the rotting cadavers of its citizens.