The Zionists who speak for Israel never cease to repeat the point that whenever Israel offered a deal to the Palestinians, the latter refused to take it and the consequence has been that the Palestinians lost more land. These Zionists are also the ones who appointed themselves educators to the World and the lesson they are conveying here is that if you plan to deal with them, take whatever offer they make and never dream of negotiating for more because you will end up receiving less, if not suffer worse consequences.
This situation is so unique in the annals of human interaction, we can only ask: Why do things always get so complicated with these people? To answer the question we must first distinguish between those who do the talking and those in whose name they pretend to speak. The latter are people who adhere to the Jewish religion and want to lead normal lives like everyone else. Those who pretend to speak in their name are mostly protection racketeers who use every trick in the book to make life difficult for ordinary Jews so as to give the illusion they need the protection of the racketeers.
With this in mind, we return to the subject of negotiation. The word itself implies that there ought to be equality between the parties so as to prevent one side from dictating to the other as this would contradict the principle of negotiation. The playing field may not be totally leveled at the start of the negotiation but the presumption is that there exists at least a theoretical equality. This being the case, only the merit of the various arguments will be allowed to tip the balance to one side or the other by the end of the negotiation.
Thus, by repeating the statement that whenever the Palestinians tried to negotiate they ended up receiving less and suffering bad consequences, the Zionists deliberately remind the World that they are in the business of creating illusions. To them negotiation does not mean there is a real or a theoretical equality between the parties but that there exists a façade behind which the terms of surrender are dictated by them to any party that attempts to negotiate with them.
In fact, this view of the racketeers must not come as a surprise to anyone because the effect of their lesson has existed for a long time and can be seen everywhere. The most notable example being that when they set out to "educate" members of the United States Congress, the Zionist absolute rejection of dissention made it so that the "greatest deliberative body in history" was transformed into a theatre of string-puppets staging the sickly farce with the humiliating title: "How unanimous is a unanimous vote?"
This reality is so obvious to everyone by now that no one who is sane can deny it but where people differ is in the importance that each attaches to the phenomenon. We thus need to put things in perspective, and to do so we turn to science and technology. Here people easily understand that a single invention such as the transistor has led to numerous applications, among them the modern television set, the cellular telephone, the computer, the various toys and so on. What is analogous but is not always clear is that a philosophy, an ideology or germ of an idea can just as easily lead to many applications. And this brings us to the question: If left unchecked, can the Zionist ideological transistor lead very far?
To answer the question we must tackle yet another reality which is that the Zionists believe the Jews are the chosen children of God therefore have the same rights as God. They will argue with God and fight him as equals but when they tell ordinary mortals like you and me what to do, they want immediate compliance and no attempt at negotiation, let alone at engagement in a dialogue or an argument.
Some people such as members of both houses in the US Congress have accepted these dictates which leads to yet another question: How were these magnificent legislators brought down to such a low level of moral servitude so easily? The answer is that the Zionists have developed a whole bag of tricks - a tool kit as they call it - which they use to implement their schemes and accomplish incredible feats.
To understand this part, we return to the analogy of the transistor. This is basically an amplifying device at the heart of which is a contraption called the diode which itself is a one-directional conductor of power. In fact, the diode lets the current go in one direction, called the positive direction but blocks it when it tries to go in the opposite direction, called negative direction. Similarly, it is the one directional approach to dealing with Jewish matters that is the trick by which the Jewish ideological amplifier is made to work miracles.
This is how things happen in practice. People such as you and me are allowed to describe what the Jews do but we must be careful how we frame the thing. We can describe an event using positive terms such as praise the Jews and tell how good they are but we cannot describe the same event using negative terms because this will raise the specter of some old document called the Protocol of the Elders of Zion. And this document, say the Zionists, is what caused the hatred for Jews to flourish in Europe which then led to the pogroms and the holocausts that followed.
In the same way that the transistor amplifies a signal, the invocation of that Protocol is the leverage by which the Zionists amplify the one-directional tribute to Jews they have mandated on everyone in the first place. Through the use of that leverage, the Zionists produce a large output for their causes with the little effort that they bring at the input. And this is how a handful of them has managed to mobilize a superpower the size of the United States and make it work for the glory of Israel to the detriment of the American people and their interests.
But what seems to elude these people is that there is a negative side to all of this. In the same way that something can go wrong with the amplifier resulting in the heat runaway effect that will fry the transistor, something can go wrong with heaping too much false praises on the Jews because it can result in lighting up the fires of the pogroms and the holocausts that are falsely blamed on the Protocol of the Elders of Zion.
To understand this part, we go back to the scientific analogy and visualize the transistor as having an input where a small signal is entered, and an output from which the amplified signal exits. Given that too much amplification can distort the signal and result in a bad sound, a good design of the amplifier necessitates that a tiny sample of the output is fed back to the input to serve as an electronic break. But for this to work, the polarity of the sample from the output must be the reverse of the signal at the input. And this is why the process is called negative feedback.
If the polarity of the sample is not reversed, you will have a positive feedback which is something that can happen inadvertently. For example, if you find yourself on a stage where there is an amplifying system and you bring the microphone too close to the speaker, you will hear the speaker squeal. This is because a sample of what comes out of the speaker is fed back to the input of the transistor without being reversed. Thus, instead of acting as a break, the sample adds power to the input which generates a bigger output which adds more to the input and so on until the transistor is pushed to the limit. If the situation persists the transistor will get hot, will experience a heat runaway affect and will fry. This is why positive feedback is bad for an amplifier.
We see something like this happen all the time in human interactions. For example, we all agree that it is a good thing to be positive and to encourage a child that does well in school, an employee that does well at work, a politician that does well on the political stage and so on. But the moment that the child, the employee or the politician exhibit signs of a swelling head, we apply the breaks by going negative on them in order to bring them back to earth.
But the Zionists will have none of that when it comes to Jewish matters. They will raise the specter of the Protocol of the Elders of Zion if you criticize the achievements attained by the Jews who use questionable methods to getting there. In this, the Zionists act like the diode which lets the positive power go in one direction and blocks the negative criticism from acting as the break that would put a check on a swelling head. In the end, this attitude leads to the heat runaway effect such as the insane voting pattern you see in the US Congress in favor of Jewish and Israeli matters.
Another nefarious application of the Zionist ideological transistor can be seen in what happened to America not long ago. That country was loved by the whole World right after the Second World War precisely because she was the most powerful she could be yet was generous, helpful and humble. Then came the Jewish lobby and told America what to do to change all that and earn the contempt of the World.
When America began to change for the worse and the World started to caution her, the Jewish lobby responded that it was a good thing to be hated because it proves that the country is doing well. America is hated, said the Zionists, not because of what she does but because of what she is which is big, beautiful and powerful. The advice was meant to tell the country that she ought to keep doing more of the same.
And more of the same is what America continued to output which was fed back to the World which added to the contempt for America and so on. Like the wrong kind of positive feedback, the situation reached the point where America and Israel became equal pariahs on the international stage championing Israel's right to commit murder and mayhem in Palestine, and disgusting audiences everywhere.
Is there a way out of this mess for the American nation? Yes there is and the model - not surprisingly - comes from Palestine. Like the Palestinians, the American legislators must learn to say no to the Jewish lobby. Just say no, you cannot dictate to us anymore because the Congress of this magnificent nation is sick of itself being transformed from a great house of democratic deliberation into a small house of ill repute.
"We are no longer the escorts you can take with you everywhere you go. We want to be free, independent and proud like the other 190 nations on this planet and more importantly, like the Palestinians who have become a thousand times more worthy of respect than you and us put together. So, go away Jewish lobby and practice your tricks away from here."
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Friday, March 7, 2008
The Day The Foxman Dropped The Mask
There is that old saying about someone being his own worst enemy. Everyone in life must have encountered someone like that at one time or another. But if you ever wondered what the worst example of this may look like, imagine someone disguising himself as a saintly old lady and going through the maternity wards of the city hospitals where he assaults the babies when no one is watching.
That sicko follows up by making a video in which he shows how he disguises himself and how he enters the maternity wards undetected. He then runs the video on the internet for the whole world to marvel at his ingenuity. The reader may recall that a sex tourist from Canada was caught in Thailand doing something similar to that except that this sicko distorted his face electronically which is why it took the police a little time to catch him.
In the example of the saintly old lady, the sicko is so sick he does not distort his face on the internet because he believes he has the divine right to do what he does. To tell him otherwise is to show bias against his religion, his ethnicity or both and he threatens to turn your life into a living hell if you do not stop questioning that right. But the funny part is that he likes to wear a mask on some occasions just to play games and have fun.
Is there such a character on this planet? Yes, there is. If you can visualize a metaphor where all the people of the World are regarded as the children of God and where the Earth itself is a giant maternity ward, you will recognize Abe Foxman as being one such character.
Abe Foxman is head of the American Anti-Defamation League. Like his counterparts everywhere, he goes around spinning the news when he can, warning the people of the consequences of listening to the news he cannot spin and threatening the people who do not heed his warnings. In this capacity, he is part of the Jewish Lobby that has shaped the American scene during the past few decades.
But the power of the lobby is now weakening and this prompted Foxman to take a trip to Israel where he told the folks down there of the changes that are happening in North America. Undoubtedly he wanted to deliver the message that the art of spinning, warning and threatening was becoming less of a cakewalk for the Jewish organizations and thus dampen the hope that the Israelis may have in the ability of those organizations to deliver for Israel as much as before.
Foxman first warned the Israelis that the American people are becoming suspicious of the Jewish loyalty to America because Jews appear to be overly fanatic when it comes to defending the interests of Israel even when it is obvious that such defense can only come at the expense of America. He attributed the awakening among the American people to the wake up call sounded by such writers, academics and thinkers as Mearsheimer, Walt and former President Jimmy Carter.
Foxman then expressed distress that Jews are viewed as being too powerful when it comes to the influence they exert on the conduct of America's foreign policy even though their numbers are miniscule. He called this phenomenon the conspiracy thesis but did not spell out who he believes was conspiring with whom to do what. In doing this, Foxman hid from view the fact that the self-appointed leaders of the Jews managed to portray an attack leveled against their activities sound like a physical attack directed against the Jewish people. And this meant that a debater who scores a point against them becomes a threat to the existence of all the Jews. Consequently, you must never try to win an argument when debating a self-appointed leader of the Jews because this will make of you an anti-Semite bent on exterminating the Jewish people.
Of course, what has been happening lately that rattled people like Foxman is that something unexpected resulted when the Jewish organizations went too far trying to muzzle and demonize the people who summoned the courage to say enough is enough; America is not the infinitely massive cow you can incessantly milk without killing it. What happened that surprised many observers was that for the first time, people who never spoke out previously came to the fore and helped to push back against the excesses of the Jewish organizations.
Furthermore, the stand taken by those people brought to the surface the reality that every choice you make in life has not only a benefit associated with it but also a cost. From this perspective the cost of supporting Israel at the expense of everything else was becoming too prohibitive even for superpower America to pay without contemplating how to put an end to the insanity. For this reason, the Jewish organizations ceased to argue in terms of monetary benefits and began to talk in terms of political and cultural values.
No longer did the operatives of those organizations talk about Israel being an outpost that defends America's commercial interests in the Middle East or talk about Israel being the reason why Americans enjoy the luxury of having cheap oil to consume at home. The new buzz words became freedom, human rights, democracy and a system of governance for the Middle East that is free of corruption.
But looking at how things were done in Israel and how the Jewish organizations were behaving in America, such talk only deepened the cynicism that Americans had about everything Israeli and everything said to be Jewish. Israel was glaringly the quintessential model of everything to be avoided by people who want to live together let alone call themselves a nation. And the Jewish organizations in America were glaringly the quintessential model of everything to be avoided by a nation of immigrants where all the citizens are supposed to be treated equally and no one is regarded as the privileged child of God.
Still, the number of people who had the courage to do what Mearsheimer, Walt and Carter did were few and their writings on the subject were limited. So, what was it that transformed the landscape in America so drastically and so suddenly according to Abe Foxman? The man explained to his Israeli audience that it was the advent of the Internet and the message of anti-Semitism that was propagated in cyberspace.
But the Internet has been around for some time now and people such as the White supremacists were dealt with a long time ago. Besides, Foxman himself gave statistics to the effect that the so-called incidents of anti-Semitism were on the wane in America, so why complain about the Internet now?
The fact is that the Jewish organizations never feared the anti-Semites who came along and made fools of themselves. In reality, the organizations gave maximum exposure to these fools so as to let them discredit themselves in public which they did. But the individuals that the organizations truly feared were those who could debunk their arguments because they made the distinction between the ordinary Jews who want to live like everyone else and the self appointed leaders who pretended to speak for them. And those were the individuals whom the Jewish organizations blacklisted and spared no resource to muzzle, to keep off the public stage and maintain out of sight.
Without a recognizable name such as President Jimmy Carter or Bishop Desmond Tutu, those people lived voiceless and in obscurity until the internet came along and gave them the means to speak out and be heard. This is when they took every argument made by the Jewish organizations, debunked them one by one and threw them into the trash heaps marked nonsensical, shallow, idiotic, absurd, self-contradictory and what have you. And this is what did real damage to the monumental fantasy that the Jewish organizations managed to put together over the decades.
And now comes the best part because this is when the sicko is caught and his face unmasked in full view of the public. What happened in response to the advent of the Internet was that Foxman stood in Israel and urged the Israelis to utilize their ingenuity to develop technologies that will differentiate between information, misinformation and disinformation, as he put it.
In effect, the man has cried out for the development of a mechanical method by which to censor from the information highway the information and the opinions that do not comply with the ideas designated as good thinking by the commissars of truth as they sit behind their desks to monitor what the people of the World are saying to each other and thinking to themselves. Wow! Man oh man! And you thought you had heard it all and seen everything!
In taking this stand, Abraham Foxman has dropped the mask and has admitted that his Nazi-like, fascistic views concerning freedom of speech and democracy were the policy pursued by his organization all along despite the denials, the charges of anti-Semitism, the bellyaching, the beating of the breasts, the banging of the heads, the pulling of the hair and the tearing of the entrails that were done to hide this fact.
The man further admitted that his organization has failed to win any serious argument against websites such as this and failed to blackmail people such as yours truly into letting the fake arguments go unchallenged. So now, Foxman wants a mechanical Gestapo-like thug to replace him and to help the Jewish Establishment revive and implement its revolting old agenda.
These were the bad old days when websites such as FrontPage Magazine and others like it stood shoulder to shoulder with Charles Krauthammer, Tom Friedman, Alan Dershowitz and a few others like them who have access to the mainstream media, and puke rivers of anti-Arab and anti-Islamic venom without someone forcing them to lick what they just puked and then eat crow.
Marshall McLuhan wrote about the Mechanical Bride, a visual trick by which the advertisers seduced people into buying what they did not need. What we have now is Abe Foxman standing as a Mechanical Nazi, an authentic tin pot wannabe dictator who aspires to prevent people from knowing what they need to know.
But the whole argument concerning the legitimacy of Israel and the right of the self designated Jewish organizations to demand so much from America and from the rest of us rested on the idea that they resembled the metaphoric saintly old lady who could do no wrong. These people portrayed themselves as the Mothers Theresa who were sent by God to comfort humanity and give it wise counsel.
And how were those fakes to accomplish this? By hanging on to the principles of human rights, freedom of speech, democratic values and all that jazz. But then Foxman came along and dropped the mask to reveal that these characters were not really saintly old ladies but the dreaded ones who have been raping the proverbial children of God since the beginning of recorded history and perhaps before. Get these sickos out of here, and get them out fast.
Already the American people were beginning to understand the difference between the Jews and those who lead them. And a few intellectuals began to reverse their reluctance to challenge the Jewish lobby, a reluctance that was prompted by what happened during the McCarthy era when some American officials went too far hunting the few Jews who professed to harbor left leanings.
The activities of Abe Foxman will now help to accelerate this reversal, and we all say amen to that because it is better to end this insanity than let the insanity end America.
That sicko follows up by making a video in which he shows how he disguises himself and how he enters the maternity wards undetected. He then runs the video on the internet for the whole world to marvel at his ingenuity. The reader may recall that a sex tourist from Canada was caught in Thailand doing something similar to that except that this sicko distorted his face electronically which is why it took the police a little time to catch him.
In the example of the saintly old lady, the sicko is so sick he does not distort his face on the internet because he believes he has the divine right to do what he does. To tell him otherwise is to show bias against his religion, his ethnicity or both and he threatens to turn your life into a living hell if you do not stop questioning that right. But the funny part is that he likes to wear a mask on some occasions just to play games and have fun.
Is there such a character on this planet? Yes, there is. If you can visualize a metaphor where all the people of the World are regarded as the children of God and where the Earth itself is a giant maternity ward, you will recognize Abe Foxman as being one such character.
Abe Foxman is head of the American Anti-Defamation League. Like his counterparts everywhere, he goes around spinning the news when he can, warning the people of the consequences of listening to the news he cannot spin and threatening the people who do not heed his warnings. In this capacity, he is part of the Jewish Lobby that has shaped the American scene during the past few decades.
But the power of the lobby is now weakening and this prompted Foxman to take a trip to Israel where he told the folks down there of the changes that are happening in North America. Undoubtedly he wanted to deliver the message that the art of spinning, warning and threatening was becoming less of a cakewalk for the Jewish organizations and thus dampen the hope that the Israelis may have in the ability of those organizations to deliver for Israel as much as before.
Foxman first warned the Israelis that the American people are becoming suspicious of the Jewish loyalty to America because Jews appear to be overly fanatic when it comes to defending the interests of Israel even when it is obvious that such defense can only come at the expense of America. He attributed the awakening among the American people to the wake up call sounded by such writers, academics and thinkers as Mearsheimer, Walt and former President Jimmy Carter.
Foxman then expressed distress that Jews are viewed as being too powerful when it comes to the influence they exert on the conduct of America's foreign policy even though their numbers are miniscule. He called this phenomenon the conspiracy thesis but did not spell out who he believes was conspiring with whom to do what. In doing this, Foxman hid from view the fact that the self-appointed leaders of the Jews managed to portray an attack leveled against their activities sound like a physical attack directed against the Jewish people. And this meant that a debater who scores a point against them becomes a threat to the existence of all the Jews. Consequently, you must never try to win an argument when debating a self-appointed leader of the Jews because this will make of you an anti-Semite bent on exterminating the Jewish people.
Of course, what has been happening lately that rattled people like Foxman is that something unexpected resulted when the Jewish organizations went too far trying to muzzle and demonize the people who summoned the courage to say enough is enough; America is not the infinitely massive cow you can incessantly milk without killing it. What happened that surprised many observers was that for the first time, people who never spoke out previously came to the fore and helped to push back against the excesses of the Jewish organizations.
Furthermore, the stand taken by those people brought to the surface the reality that every choice you make in life has not only a benefit associated with it but also a cost. From this perspective the cost of supporting Israel at the expense of everything else was becoming too prohibitive even for superpower America to pay without contemplating how to put an end to the insanity. For this reason, the Jewish organizations ceased to argue in terms of monetary benefits and began to talk in terms of political and cultural values.
No longer did the operatives of those organizations talk about Israel being an outpost that defends America's commercial interests in the Middle East or talk about Israel being the reason why Americans enjoy the luxury of having cheap oil to consume at home. The new buzz words became freedom, human rights, democracy and a system of governance for the Middle East that is free of corruption.
But looking at how things were done in Israel and how the Jewish organizations were behaving in America, such talk only deepened the cynicism that Americans had about everything Israeli and everything said to be Jewish. Israel was glaringly the quintessential model of everything to be avoided by people who want to live together let alone call themselves a nation. And the Jewish organizations in America were glaringly the quintessential model of everything to be avoided by a nation of immigrants where all the citizens are supposed to be treated equally and no one is regarded as the privileged child of God.
Still, the number of people who had the courage to do what Mearsheimer, Walt and Carter did were few and their writings on the subject were limited. So, what was it that transformed the landscape in America so drastically and so suddenly according to Abe Foxman? The man explained to his Israeli audience that it was the advent of the Internet and the message of anti-Semitism that was propagated in cyberspace.
But the Internet has been around for some time now and people such as the White supremacists were dealt with a long time ago. Besides, Foxman himself gave statistics to the effect that the so-called incidents of anti-Semitism were on the wane in America, so why complain about the Internet now?
The fact is that the Jewish organizations never feared the anti-Semites who came along and made fools of themselves. In reality, the organizations gave maximum exposure to these fools so as to let them discredit themselves in public which they did. But the individuals that the organizations truly feared were those who could debunk their arguments because they made the distinction between the ordinary Jews who want to live like everyone else and the self appointed leaders who pretended to speak for them. And those were the individuals whom the Jewish organizations blacklisted and spared no resource to muzzle, to keep off the public stage and maintain out of sight.
Without a recognizable name such as President Jimmy Carter or Bishop Desmond Tutu, those people lived voiceless and in obscurity until the internet came along and gave them the means to speak out and be heard. This is when they took every argument made by the Jewish organizations, debunked them one by one and threw them into the trash heaps marked nonsensical, shallow, idiotic, absurd, self-contradictory and what have you. And this is what did real damage to the monumental fantasy that the Jewish organizations managed to put together over the decades.
And now comes the best part because this is when the sicko is caught and his face unmasked in full view of the public. What happened in response to the advent of the Internet was that Foxman stood in Israel and urged the Israelis to utilize their ingenuity to develop technologies that will differentiate between information, misinformation and disinformation, as he put it.
In effect, the man has cried out for the development of a mechanical method by which to censor from the information highway the information and the opinions that do not comply with the ideas designated as good thinking by the commissars of truth as they sit behind their desks to monitor what the people of the World are saying to each other and thinking to themselves. Wow! Man oh man! And you thought you had heard it all and seen everything!
In taking this stand, Abraham Foxman has dropped the mask and has admitted that his Nazi-like, fascistic views concerning freedom of speech and democracy were the policy pursued by his organization all along despite the denials, the charges of anti-Semitism, the bellyaching, the beating of the breasts, the banging of the heads, the pulling of the hair and the tearing of the entrails that were done to hide this fact.
The man further admitted that his organization has failed to win any serious argument against websites such as this and failed to blackmail people such as yours truly into letting the fake arguments go unchallenged. So now, Foxman wants a mechanical Gestapo-like thug to replace him and to help the Jewish Establishment revive and implement its revolting old agenda.
These were the bad old days when websites such as FrontPage Magazine and others like it stood shoulder to shoulder with Charles Krauthammer, Tom Friedman, Alan Dershowitz and a few others like them who have access to the mainstream media, and puke rivers of anti-Arab and anti-Islamic venom without someone forcing them to lick what they just puked and then eat crow.
Marshall McLuhan wrote about the Mechanical Bride, a visual trick by which the advertisers seduced people into buying what they did not need. What we have now is Abe Foxman standing as a Mechanical Nazi, an authentic tin pot wannabe dictator who aspires to prevent people from knowing what they need to know.
But the whole argument concerning the legitimacy of Israel and the right of the self designated Jewish organizations to demand so much from America and from the rest of us rested on the idea that they resembled the metaphoric saintly old lady who could do no wrong. These people portrayed themselves as the Mothers Theresa who were sent by God to comfort humanity and give it wise counsel.
And how were those fakes to accomplish this? By hanging on to the principles of human rights, freedom of speech, democratic values and all that jazz. But then Foxman came along and dropped the mask to reveal that these characters were not really saintly old ladies but the dreaded ones who have been raping the proverbial children of God since the beginning of recorded history and perhaps before. Get these sickos out of here, and get them out fast.
Already the American people were beginning to understand the difference between the Jews and those who lead them. And a few intellectuals began to reverse their reluctance to challenge the Jewish lobby, a reluctance that was prompted by what happened during the McCarthy era when some American officials went too far hunting the few Jews who professed to harbor left leanings.
The activities of Abe Foxman will now help to accelerate this reversal, and we all say amen to that because it is better to end this insanity than let the insanity end America.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Those Whom God Intends To Destroy
Those whom God intends to destroy, He first renders them mad. Some people tell me this is a Yiddish saying but others tell me it is not. Either way, the saying applies to what the Israelis are doing in the Middle East these days. Look at them go mad as they destroy the lives of the Palestinians and in so doing destroy the arguments they have been making to legitimize the existence of Israel as a stand alone state.
Non-Zionist Jews have been warning all along that Jews cannot be organized into an independent state because they believe they are the chosen children of God. For this reason everyone of them wants to deal with God on a one to one basis. With a mentality like this, they cannot be organized into the voluntary hierarchy that is needed to be a nation. Consequently, the proposed two-state solution for Palestine can never be a viable one.
This being the case, Israel must go back to being Palestine where Jews are treated as ordinary citizens enjoying no special privileges over the other religions but treated as equals with their Christian and Muslim countrymen. This is what is known as the one state solution, and it is the South African model after the country where people of all races now live together under an authentic democratic regime, not the sham democracy that is Israel today.
But who are these Jews who flock to Israel from every corner of the Planet, anyway? Well, some are fakes even according to the Israeli law which says that to make "aliya" to Israel (return to Israel), you must be certified as an authentic Hebrew or a true convert to Judaism by a recognized rabbi. When caught, these people are prosecuted along with those who help them obtain the fake documents. However, the reality is that only a small fraction of these people are caught and no one is sent away.
Quackery of this kind is what happens nowadays, and this should give us an idea as to how things must have unfolded over the past two thousand years. There were the Hebrews tribes in Palestine, all right and they had distinct Semitic features like all those who lived in that land. But look at the Jews now; they are the blue eyed blondes who come from Northern Europe, the Blacks who come from the Horn of Africa and everyone else who come in all shades and every color.
Surely, all these people cannot be descendants of the same Semitic stock and legitimately claim that Palestine is their ancestral land. Even if they all belonged there two thousand years ago, they would have no more a right to Palestine than say, the Americans of Irish descent can displace the Irish who lived in Ireland all along and take the whole country.
Imagine what it would be like if a million or more American and Canadian Métis descended on Ireland claiming that they have a little Irish blood in them and have discovered an old document which someone interpreted as saying that God gave them the whole of Ireland. For this reason, they want the Irish people to go and live in the other European countries so as to leave Ireland to them where they can live as Reformed Catholics.
Aware that such concerns are circulating out there and wishing to respond to them, the Jewish Establishment tried something not long ago. I wrote about that history in a book whose publication was blocked by that same Establishment. Below is a reproduction of the passage which came under the subtitle: Hunting for Cohanim's Chromosome.
I then resume the current discussion under the subtitle Commentary.
Hunting for Cohanim’s Chromosome
Living in a fool’s paradise which gave them the illusion that they reached the Promised Land where they can kill anyone they wish to kill and be called victims of terrorism, and suppress anyone they wish to suppress and be called victims of anti-Semitism, the Jewish leaders tried to use science to prove once and for all that they are the children of God and the legitimate inheritors of the Land of Palestine. Here is what they tried.
Toward the end of the Twentieth Century, work on the genetic make-up of organisms had progressed well enough that scientists were able to establish relationships between individuals and between families of the same species by testing for markers in their DNA. The Jewish Establishment saw in this development an opportunity to prove definitively that all Jews are related and that they are the legitimate inheritors of the land of Palestine. They embarked on a worldwide program to test the DNA of Jewish males so as to establish that their Y chromosomes carry the Cohanimic traits which are supposed to represent the authentic Jew given that the name Cohanim means priest in Hebrew.
To the chagrin of the Establishment, it turned out that a Jew from a given country has a DNA that resembles more the DNA of his countrymen than anything resembling the preferred Cohanim markers. Worse for the Jewish leaders, it turned out that the Palestinian people, whether they are Christians, Muslims or Jews have more in common with the Cohanim markers than has a Jew from Russia, Ethiopia or anywhere else.
Thus, the exercise turned out to be more anemic than Cohanimic for the Jewish Establishment because the test, more than anything else, confirmed scientifically and definitively that Palestine belongs to the Palestinians and not the Jews who converted to the religion over the centuries.
The facts had already been established demographically for a long time though, and the DNA tests only confirmed them. It was known that before Islam had spread into the Middle East, the region was populated by pagans, Jews and Christians. When Islam came along, most of these people converted to it but some chose to stick with their religion. Thus, when we look at the current populations in the Middle Eastern countries, we find that the vast majority are Muslim, 3% to 6% in each country are Christian, less than 1% are Jewish and almost none are pagan. Except for the Jewish population which was somewhat larger than 1%, the same percentages prevailed in Palestine before the massive Jewish migration to it.
The conclusion drawn was that the Palestinian people are the authentic Hebrews. Therefore, if you believe the claim made by the current Jewish leadership that God gave the land of Israel to the Hebrews, then here they are. It is just that the Hebrews of the past converted to Islam and to a lesser extent Christianity. Thus, we must accept the scientific and demographic facts that the owners of Palestine are the Palestinians whatever their religion because they lived in Palestine since time immemorial.
Even if we hang on to the notion that God promised the land of milk and honey to the Jews, we must conclude that He already gave it to them 3,300 years ago when Moses took them there where they stayed. And if the Jews later converted to Islam or to Christianity, this is a matter between them and their God.
It is not the business of the World Jewish Congress to decide that the Palestinians ought to be stripped of their land, which land they want to give to new converts to a religion they newly invented and named Rabbinic Judaism. The people heading the World Jewish Congress are neither Jews nor Hebrews, and they are certainly not Semites. They can no more inherit Palestine or give it to their cohorts than I can inherit the fortune of Bill Gates if and when he dies before me.
When the results of the DNA tests came out, the whispers began inside the Jewish community to the effect that perhaps the Palestinians are, after all, the ten lost tribes of Israel given that only two of the known twelve Hebrew tribes are accounted for. Like they say, one part in six of a loaf is better than nothing. Would the Jewish leadership now settle for one sixth of the land of Israel?
Commentary
The natural impulse is to say that a huge crime has been committed against the Palestinians and the way to redress the situation is to send the Jews back to where they came from. But the fact is that many Jews were born in occupied Palestine and had nothing to do with the original crime. If only for this reason, a solution must be found that will not punish the innocent for the crimes of their parents.
A two state solution would have been ideal. But given that Judaism has ceased to be a religion and has become an ideology that cannot govern itself, Israel cannot become a stand alone country. The logical solution left to consider is the South African model known as the one state solution. This is where the discussion concerning the future of Palestine ought to go now.
Non-Zionist Jews have been warning all along that Jews cannot be organized into an independent state because they believe they are the chosen children of God. For this reason everyone of them wants to deal with God on a one to one basis. With a mentality like this, they cannot be organized into the voluntary hierarchy that is needed to be a nation. Consequently, the proposed two-state solution for Palestine can never be a viable one.
This being the case, Israel must go back to being Palestine where Jews are treated as ordinary citizens enjoying no special privileges over the other religions but treated as equals with their Christian and Muslim countrymen. This is what is known as the one state solution, and it is the South African model after the country where people of all races now live together under an authentic democratic regime, not the sham democracy that is Israel today.
But who are these Jews who flock to Israel from every corner of the Planet, anyway? Well, some are fakes even according to the Israeli law which says that to make "aliya" to Israel (return to Israel), you must be certified as an authentic Hebrew or a true convert to Judaism by a recognized rabbi. When caught, these people are prosecuted along with those who help them obtain the fake documents. However, the reality is that only a small fraction of these people are caught and no one is sent away.
Quackery of this kind is what happens nowadays, and this should give us an idea as to how things must have unfolded over the past two thousand years. There were the Hebrews tribes in Palestine, all right and they had distinct Semitic features like all those who lived in that land. But look at the Jews now; they are the blue eyed blondes who come from Northern Europe, the Blacks who come from the Horn of Africa and everyone else who come in all shades and every color.
Surely, all these people cannot be descendants of the same Semitic stock and legitimately claim that Palestine is their ancestral land. Even if they all belonged there two thousand years ago, they would have no more a right to Palestine than say, the Americans of Irish descent can displace the Irish who lived in Ireland all along and take the whole country.
Imagine what it would be like if a million or more American and Canadian Métis descended on Ireland claiming that they have a little Irish blood in them and have discovered an old document which someone interpreted as saying that God gave them the whole of Ireland. For this reason, they want the Irish people to go and live in the other European countries so as to leave Ireland to them where they can live as Reformed Catholics.
Aware that such concerns are circulating out there and wishing to respond to them, the Jewish Establishment tried something not long ago. I wrote about that history in a book whose publication was blocked by that same Establishment. Below is a reproduction of the passage which came under the subtitle: Hunting for Cohanim's Chromosome.
I then resume the current discussion under the subtitle Commentary.
Hunting for Cohanim’s Chromosome
Living in a fool’s paradise which gave them the illusion that they reached the Promised Land where they can kill anyone they wish to kill and be called victims of terrorism, and suppress anyone they wish to suppress and be called victims of anti-Semitism, the Jewish leaders tried to use science to prove once and for all that they are the children of God and the legitimate inheritors of the Land of Palestine. Here is what they tried.
Toward the end of the Twentieth Century, work on the genetic make-up of organisms had progressed well enough that scientists were able to establish relationships between individuals and between families of the same species by testing for markers in their DNA. The Jewish Establishment saw in this development an opportunity to prove definitively that all Jews are related and that they are the legitimate inheritors of the land of Palestine. They embarked on a worldwide program to test the DNA of Jewish males so as to establish that their Y chromosomes carry the Cohanimic traits which are supposed to represent the authentic Jew given that the name Cohanim means priest in Hebrew.
To the chagrin of the Establishment, it turned out that a Jew from a given country has a DNA that resembles more the DNA of his countrymen than anything resembling the preferred Cohanim markers. Worse for the Jewish leaders, it turned out that the Palestinian people, whether they are Christians, Muslims or Jews have more in common with the Cohanim markers than has a Jew from Russia, Ethiopia or anywhere else.
Thus, the exercise turned out to be more anemic than Cohanimic for the Jewish Establishment because the test, more than anything else, confirmed scientifically and definitively that Palestine belongs to the Palestinians and not the Jews who converted to the religion over the centuries.
The facts had already been established demographically for a long time though, and the DNA tests only confirmed them. It was known that before Islam had spread into the Middle East, the region was populated by pagans, Jews and Christians. When Islam came along, most of these people converted to it but some chose to stick with their religion. Thus, when we look at the current populations in the Middle Eastern countries, we find that the vast majority are Muslim, 3% to 6% in each country are Christian, less than 1% are Jewish and almost none are pagan. Except for the Jewish population which was somewhat larger than 1%, the same percentages prevailed in Palestine before the massive Jewish migration to it.
The conclusion drawn was that the Palestinian people are the authentic Hebrews. Therefore, if you believe the claim made by the current Jewish leadership that God gave the land of Israel to the Hebrews, then here they are. It is just that the Hebrews of the past converted to Islam and to a lesser extent Christianity. Thus, we must accept the scientific and demographic facts that the owners of Palestine are the Palestinians whatever their religion because they lived in Palestine since time immemorial.
Even if we hang on to the notion that God promised the land of milk and honey to the Jews, we must conclude that He already gave it to them 3,300 years ago when Moses took them there where they stayed. And if the Jews later converted to Islam or to Christianity, this is a matter between them and their God.
It is not the business of the World Jewish Congress to decide that the Palestinians ought to be stripped of their land, which land they want to give to new converts to a religion they newly invented and named Rabbinic Judaism. The people heading the World Jewish Congress are neither Jews nor Hebrews, and they are certainly not Semites. They can no more inherit Palestine or give it to their cohorts than I can inherit the fortune of Bill Gates if and when he dies before me.
When the results of the DNA tests came out, the whispers began inside the Jewish community to the effect that perhaps the Palestinians are, after all, the ten lost tribes of Israel given that only two of the known twelve Hebrew tribes are accounted for. Like they say, one part in six of a loaf is better than nothing. Would the Jewish leadership now settle for one sixth of the land of Israel?
Commentary
The natural impulse is to say that a huge crime has been committed against the Palestinians and the way to redress the situation is to send the Jews back to where they came from. But the fact is that many Jews were born in occupied Palestine and had nothing to do with the original crime. If only for this reason, a solution must be found that will not punish the innocent for the crimes of their parents.
A two state solution would have been ideal. But given that Judaism has ceased to be a religion and has become an ideology that cannot govern itself, Israel cannot become a stand alone country. The logical solution left to consider is the South African model known as the one state solution. This is where the discussion concerning the future of Palestine ought to go now.
Saturday, March 1, 2008
Turning The Whimper Into A Roar
To win the game you must play it and you must beat your opponent. But if you don't have an opponent to play against, there is no game and there will be no winner. In fact without an opponent, you will not exist anymore than the Mujahedin existed before America brought them out of nowhere and made winners out of them.
America trained the Mujahedin, equipped them and gave them an opponent to beat. That was the Soviet Union which had invaded Afghanistan and was occupying it. America helped the Mujahedin to beat the former Soviet Union and thus helped to precipitate its demise which was America's aim in the first place.
Subsequent to that episode America behaved in a strange way. Like those who leave the scene of an accident, she abandoned Afghanistan and disappeared as if she had no responsibility to restore what she broke. But not everyone was disenchanted with America's behavior as some people in that part of the world were grateful for her myopic vision. It was, in fact, America's abandonment of Afghanistan after she got what she wanted that changed the status of the Mujahedin from non-existent to winners to potential rivals for the West.
But did the saga end here? Of course not. With a history this loaded and an America this myopic, the Jewish Establishment worldwide and more specifically the Zionist lobby in America could not resist playing the next round of the game. That lobby mobilized America to fight the Arabs and the Muslims as if they had suddenly become the evil that replaced the newly defunct Soviet Union.
The irony is that the Arabic word Mujahedin translates into English as those who practice the Jihad, and these were the Islamic Jihadists who were once America's protégés. They were the freedom fighters who won the confrontation against the Soviet Union but were now forced to confront America not just in Afghanistan but everywhere else in the World.
But did the Jewish Establishment really believe that America had the wherewithal to defeat Islam? Of course not. Had the Jews believed this, they would have prepared for the victory. Or at least they would have put down a plan to fall back on if the war hit a snag.
The fact is that none of the above was included in the original game plan because the Judeo-American war against Islam was conceived as a ballistic war. That is, it was aimed at the outset against a nebulous target that sat in the distance and was fired without a guidance system, a fail safe system or an intelligent oversight. The start of the war was the means to an end and the end was the start of the war. Period.
All this makes it clear that the aim of the Jewish Establishment in widening the war from Afghanistan to Iraq to the Middle East and beyond was to cause the destruction, the deaths and the ruin that would create bad blood between Christianity and Islam. Also, by engineering a war without end, the Zionists in the Jewish Establishment at long last pulled off their long held fantasy of creating a pool of dirty waters where they can go fish to their hearts' content.
And while these characters are fishing as they now do every day of the week, nobody is seeing what else is happening. And what is happening is that when you are a winner as were the Jihadists and you are pushed into a fight you cannot lose, you become stronger by the day while engaged in that fight. This is happening to the Mujahedin and to those who fight alongside them in the Arab World, the Muslim World and beyond.
Thus, instead of degrading the Jihadist capabilities, America is helping to make them stronger because she is making them win two new recruits for every one that perishes. An old adage that was followed by the wise but never expressed loudly by anyone went something like this: It is better not to fight than fight and loose. America is now learning this lesson the hard way but will she ever learn?
And what is it about the Jewish Establishment that makes it do such a thing? No one can answer this question definitively because an establishment is not one person but a multitude of people with different motivations coming together. What we can do, however, is briefly look at the history of that Establishment and hope to develop a few insights.
Given that those who come to America are not loyal to the land or to an existing ethnic group, they develop an ambition in one of two areas. There are those who want to blend with the folks they meet in their new home and lead a normal and quiet life. And there are those who dream of making it big thus turn to entrepreneurship where they get the opportunity to reward themselves handsomely while contributing marvelous things to their adopted country.
But there were also the Jews who stood as the odd man out because they hung on to a set of old dreams, legends and rituals they could not abandon. Because in this sense they looked and behaved somewhat differently from the rest of the immigrants and were not willing to blend with their new environment, they reasoned that if everyone else was different, their own differences will not stand them out so conspicuously.
Consequently, the Jews embarked on a campaign to incite everyone to fight for the right to be different and yet be treated equally. In reality most of the newcomers did not think this was an important issue to them but a few were seduced by the idea and they responded positively to the Jewish call.
With time, the trickle of those seduced became a flood and before you know it, most everyone was chasing after rights they now felt they must have. They felt this way because experience convinced them that when they neglect to ask for the same rights as everyone else, they tend to fall behind while others pull ahead of them.
All the while, the Jews were making North America look less Christian and more Jewish to the point where they became the established mainstream. Thus, going in opposite directions, the Jews and the newcomers who once shared some similarities began to diverge and to look very differently from each other.
Before long the contrast between the two had become so sharp that the newcomers became the odd man out while the Jews were becoming the new Establishment. When the transformation was complete, the Jews changed their stand on issues that were once dear to them not long ago. They launched a ferocious but subtle campaign against granting the other races the right to be different or to live differently. More than that, they campaigned against immigration itself.
And the Jewish offensive did not stop at the races but extended to the religions as well. In fact, the Jews launched a campaign against Islam which was to be expected but they also fought to abolish the Christian celebration of Christmas and replace it with a Festival of Lights adorned with the Jewish Menorah. They also tried to replace Sunday with Saturday as the day of rest. And they denigrated all symbols of Christianity at the same time as they forced the media types to loudly revere every Jewish act even if this were the mere flushing of a toilet.
The Jews managed to score all these successes because they allied themselves with those who pretended to be Christian Evangelicals and whose services they engaged in return for a promise not to attack them in the media. It was suggested by a few learned people at the start of this abominable alliance that the Evangelicals wanted the Jews to fight the Palestinians in Palestine while the Jews wanted the Americans to fight the Arabs and the Muslims everywhere else for two diametrically opposed reasons.
The picture those learned people paint is that of a pair of scorpions engaged in the mating game where each is waiting for the other to falter so as to pounce on it and produce an offspring or devour it and look for another potential mate. Both the Jews and the Evangelicals make no secret of their belief that the World we know is about to end and that a new World is about to begin. The Jews believe that when this happens the Christians will accept them as their masters and bow to them. The Evangelicals believe that the Jews will recognize Jesus as the Messiah and convert to Christianity.
Looking at the American record of who is who in business and in politics, we see that no one person or group of people from any race or religion has done as much for a foreign country as the Jews have done for Israel. And this has prompted the people to express the view that to be generous to a foreign country is commendable; to be generous at the expense of another country is questionable; to be generous to the point of hurting one's own country is treason.
The Zionists in America have gone further than treason in that they mobilized the Legislative and Executive branches of government, the military and the press to do the bidding for them and for Israel. In the process, they ruined America beyond recovery yet there is no official recognition of this fact as yet and no mechanism by which to account for what happened so as to bring to justice those who are responsible.
This says volumes about the soundness of the system that has allowed all that insanity to take root in the first place. And maybe the time has come for the American people to roar and demand the overhauling of their increasingly irrelevant constitution. It is this or they will have to get used to the sight and sounds of their empire slowly fade away amid their whimper.
America trained the Mujahedin, equipped them and gave them an opponent to beat. That was the Soviet Union which had invaded Afghanistan and was occupying it. America helped the Mujahedin to beat the former Soviet Union and thus helped to precipitate its demise which was America's aim in the first place.
Subsequent to that episode America behaved in a strange way. Like those who leave the scene of an accident, she abandoned Afghanistan and disappeared as if she had no responsibility to restore what she broke. But not everyone was disenchanted with America's behavior as some people in that part of the world were grateful for her myopic vision. It was, in fact, America's abandonment of Afghanistan after she got what she wanted that changed the status of the Mujahedin from non-existent to winners to potential rivals for the West.
But did the saga end here? Of course not. With a history this loaded and an America this myopic, the Jewish Establishment worldwide and more specifically the Zionist lobby in America could not resist playing the next round of the game. That lobby mobilized America to fight the Arabs and the Muslims as if they had suddenly become the evil that replaced the newly defunct Soviet Union.
The irony is that the Arabic word Mujahedin translates into English as those who practice the Jihad, and these were the Islamic Jihadists who were once America's protégés. They were the freedom fighters who won the confrontation against the Soviet Union but were now forced to confront America not just in Afghanistan but everywhere else in the World.
But did the Jewish Establishment really believe that America had the wherewithal to defeat Islam? Of course not. Had the Jews believed this, they would have prepared for the victory. Or at least they would have put down a plan to fall back on if the war hit a snag.
The fact is that none of the above was included in the original game plan because the Judeo-American war against Islam was conceived as a ballistic war. That is, it was aimed at the outset against a nebulous target that sat in the distance and was fired without a guidance system, a fail safe system or an intelligent oversight. The start of the war was the means to an end and the end was the start of the war. Period.
All this makes it clear that the aim of the Jewish Establishment in widening the war from Afghanistan to Iraq to the Middle East and beyond was to cause the destruction, the deaths and the ruin that would create bad blood between Christianity and Islam. Also, by engineering a war without end, the Zionists in the Jewish Establishment at long last pulled off their long held fantasy of creating a pool of dirty waters where they can go fish to their hearts' content.
And while these characters are fishing as they now do every day of the week, nobody is seeing what else is happening. And what is happening is that when you are a winner as were the Jihadists and you are pushed into a fight you cannot lose, you become stronger by the day while engaged in that fight. This is happening to the Mujahedin and to those who fight alongside them in the Arab World, the Muslim World and beyond.
Thus, instead of degrading the Jihadist capabilities, America is helping to make them stronger because she is making them win two new recruits for every one that perishes. An old adage that was followed by the wise but never expressed loudly by anyone went something like this: It is better not to fight than fight and loose. America is now learning this lesson the hard way but will she ever learn?
And what is it about the Jewish Establishment that makes it do such a thing? No one can answer this question definitively because an establishment is not one person but a multitude of people with different motivations coming together. What we can do, however, is briefly look at the history of that Establishment and hope to develop a few insights.
Given that those who come to America are not loyal to the land or to an existing ethnic group, they develop an ambition in one of two areas. There are those who want to blend with the folks they meet in their new home and lead a normal and quiet life. And there are those who dream of making it big thus turn to entrepreneurship where they get the opportunity to reward themselves handsomely while contributing marvelous things to their adopted country.
But there were also the Jews who stood as the odd man out because they hung on to a set of old dreams, legends and rituals they could not abandon. Because in this sense they looked and behaved somewhat differently from the rest of the immigrants and were not willing to blend with their new environment, they reasoned that if everyone else was different, their own differences will not stand them out so conspicuously.
Consequently, the Jews embarked on a campaign to incite everyone to fight for the right to be different and yet be treated equally. In reality most of the newcomers did not think this was an important issue to them but a few were seduced by the idea and they responded positively to the Jewish call.
With time, the trickle of those seduced became a flood and before you know it, most everyone was chasing after rights they now felt they must have. They felt this way because experience convinced them that when they neglect to ask for the same rights as everyone else, they tend to fall behind while others pull ahead of them.
All the while, the Jews were making North America look less Christian and more Jewish to the point where they became the established mainstream. Thus, going in opposite directions, the Jews and the newcomers who once shared some similarities began to diverge and to look very differently from each other.
Before long the contrast between the two had become so sharp that the newcomers became the odd man out while the Jews were becoming the new Establishment. When the transformation was complete, the Jews changed their stand on issues that were once dear to them not long ago. They launched a ferocious but subtle campaign against granting the other races the right to be different or to live differently. More than that, they campaigned against immigration itself.
And the Jewish offensive did not stop at the races but extended to the religions as well. In fact, the Jews launched a campaign against Islam which was to be expected but they also fought to abolish the Christian celebration of Christmas and replace it with a Festival of Lights adorned with the Jewish Menorah. They also tried to replace Sunday with Saturday as the day of rest. And they denigrated all symbols of Christianity at the same time as they forced the media types to loudly revere every Jewish act even if this were the mere flushing of a toilet.
The Jews managed to score all these successes because they allied themselves with those who pretended to be Christian Evangelicals and whose services they engaged in return for a promise not to attack them in the media. It was suggested by a few learned people at the start of this abominable alliance that the Evangelicals wanted the Jews to fight the Palestinians in Palestine while the Jews wanted the Americans to fight the Arabs and the Muslims everywhere else for two diametrically opposed reasons.
The picture those learned people paint is that of a pair of scorpions engaged in the mating game where each is waiting for the other to falter so as to pounce on it and produce an offspring or devour it and look for another potential mate. Both the Jews and the Evangelicals make no secret of their belief that the World we know is about to end and that a new World is about to begin. The Jews believe that when this happens the Christians will accept them as their masters and bow to them. The Evangelicals believe that the Jews will recognize Jesus as the Messiah and convert to Christianity.
Looking at the American record of who is who in business and in politics, we see that no one person or group of people from any race or religion has done as much for a foreign country as the Jews have done for Israel. And this has prompted the people to express the view that to be generous to a foreign country is commendable; to be generous at the expense of another country is questionable; to be generous to the point of hurting one's own country is treason.
The Zionists in America have gone further than treason in that they mobilized the Legislative and Executive branches of government, the military and the press to do the bidding for them and for Israel. In the process, they ruined America beyond recovery yet there is no official recognition of this fact as yet and no mechanism by which to account for what happened so as to bring to justice those who are responsible.
This says volumes about the soundness of the system that has allowed all that insanity to take root in the first place. And maybe the time has come for the American people to roar and demand the overhauling of their increasingly irrelevant constitution. It is this or they will have to get used to the sight and sounds of their empire slowly fade away amid their whimper.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
The Roots Of Irrational Thought
As head teacher working at a private school, I thought that to do the rational thing meant to do what was good for the students. At least this is how I saw things in the privacy of my thoughts. Consequently, when a problem came up, I searched for a solution that would deliver a better service to the students. That is, I tried to improve on the learning environment, the curriculum and the way that the teachers delivered a lesson.
But this was not the best way to do things according to the owner of the school. Instead, he wanted to hear about plans that would beat the competition and strategies that would make our school look good compared to the others. He wanted all of us, teachers and administrators, to dabble with ideas on the adoption of visual attractions such as making the teachers wear a uniform. And he wanted ideas on how to invite students from the other schools to come and visit our school so as to compare them and hopefully switch to our side.
When I probed him as to the possible negative effects that his proposed activities may have on our ability to deliver a good education, he did not show any concern. He did not say it to my face but he acted as if I were irrational for suggesting it was better to beat the competition by improving on the delivery of our service than playing games.
Believing I only met one bad employer, I quit my job and went looking for peace of mind at another school and then another only to discover that the situation was not better at any school. So I started my own school, and to my horror discovered that the ministry of education itself was powered by the same mentality. The bureaucrats at the ministry did not say it to my face but they acted as if I were irrational because I would not do something for myself.
Baffled by this last remark, it took me a long time before I understood what was meant by doing something for myself. It dawned on me one day that the people at the ministry were saying I had it in my hand to become rich if only I abandoned the idea of working to improve the service I was delivering to the students and concentrated on becoming part of the team. The idea was that if I embraced the games they were playing, they would shower me with referrals to come out of my ears and cash subsidies to fall off my wallet.
What the people at the ministry did that appalled me most were two things. First, they manipulated the part of the system under their control not as their turf which it was but as their backyard which it was not. In this regard they established contact with a handful of highly placed employees in each school and played them against each other. They also played one school against another, played the students against their schools and played everyone against the elected Minister of Education and his staff.
Second, they used the power to grant subsidies not to influence the quality of education but to implement a political agenda of their own. For example, the federal government was preparing to privatize the post office which meant that people were going to be laid off. This prompted the provincial bureaucrats, including those at the ministry of education, to work for the expansion of the employment ranks everywhere they could. And so, there came to the private schools the unofficial directive which said that there were subsidies to be had if we hired people even if we had nothing for them to do.
This is when I began to understand the cynicism that made the students behave as oddly as they did. To take one example, I had a student who was hanging around a group of guys even though he did not like their company. After some probing into his thinking, he revealed that he will not sever his relation with the guys because his father did not like them either. Thus, the student stayed with the group just to annoy his father whom he did not really dislike but wanted to see annoyed because it made him feel good to know he can annoy his father.
The word empowerment had not yet been abused by that time and so, the people who wanted to appeal to a segment of society did not run around the media promising to empower this group or that one. But the idea of empowerment was already here and everyone sought to be empowered which meant to have the power to annoy someone just for the sake of being able to do so.
I began to think of the possible implications that this mentality may have on the wider world but discovered that the mentality was already prevalent and that it was reflected everywhere because the culture was swimming in it. One example would be the critics of the Arabs who praise the Zionists even though they hate them more than they hate the Arabs.
A little probing into the thinking of these people reveals that they do the praising because they believe it would annoy the Arabs, an experience that apparently rewards them a great deal. But when these people discover that the Arabs could not care less what they are doing, they feel dejected and thus hate the Arabs a little more than they would have liked to.
But what was it that created this situation in the first place? It was the daily humiliation of having to knuckle under the unreasonable demands of their Jewish bosses. Then as now those dejected people believe that the Arabs possess the means to neutralize the power of the Jews but are not doing it. Consequently they feel justified to hate the Arabs openly which, some will admit, is a disguise to hating the Jews which they do silently anyway.
Somewhere in this muddled maze there is supposed to be a definition of rationalism. True or not, to my mind rationalism depends on the perspective of each individual. And to tie rationalism to the notion of individualism, I see things this way: Individualism means to take the initiative and do something positive for the community. When I was teaching, my community was the student body and that is where I concentrated my effort.
To some other people, however, individualism means to do something for the self even if that comes at the expense of everyone in the community. Thus, what was rational to me was irrational to the owner of the school where I worked because he only cared about his interest. I was also irrational to the bureaucrats at the ministry of education because I did not care enough about my interest to be interested in the bribe they called subsidies.
But this is only a static snapshot of reality when in fact, reality is a moving target therefore a dynamic and complicated thing. This is illustrated by the fact that the folks at the ministry of education wanted me to conform in order to receive more of what the individualists cherish the most which is wealth. Given that conformity is the opposite of individualism, there is here a huge contradiction. How to explain this logic?
Well, if you begin with the notion that being rational means to look after the self, you will do whatever it takes to satisfy your needs including the redefinition of the words. Thus if the word individualism is good and in vogue today, you call yourself individualist. If conformity is the good word then you are a conformist. But if the two words are good and in vogue simultaneously, you attribute them both to yourself even if they contradict each other. But don't worry because there is a way out of this dilemma.
Here is how you do it. Define an individualist as one who chooses to conform because he or she has the free will to do so. Contrast this with the definition of the conformist who lacks the free will to make an individual choice and so, he or she conforms to the norm. More succinctly, you are a good individualist because you are free to conform and he or she is a bad conformist because he or she is not free to make an individual choice.
There it is. I believe I got it airtight now because it seems I have managed to show that hypocrisy is at the root of irrational thought. But did I? Because if I did I should be able to answer this question: Is hypocrisy practiced out of individual choice or out of conformist habit? Never mind; there will be another time to think about that.
But this was not the best way to do things according to the owner of the school. Instead, he wanted to hear about plans that would beat the competition and strategies that would make our school look good compared to the others. He wanted all of us, teachers and administrators, to dabble with ideas on the adoption of visual attractions such as making the teachers wear a uniform. And he wanted ideas on how to invite students from the other schools to come and visit our school so as to compare them and hopefully switch to our side.
When I probed him as to the possible negative effects that his proposed activities may have on our ability to deliver a good education, he did not show any concern. He did not say it to my face but he acted as if I were irrational for suggesting it was better to beat the competition by improving on the delivery of our service than playing games.
Believing I only met one bad employer, I quit my job and went looking for peace of mind at another school and then another only to discover that the situation was not better at any school. So I started my own school, and to my horror discovered that the ministry of education itself was powered by the same mentality. The bureaucrats at the ministry did not say it to my face but they acted as if I were irrational because I would not do something for myself.
Baffled by this last remark, it took me a long time before I understood what was meant by doing something for myself. It dawned on me one day that the people at the ministry were saying I had it in my hand to become rich if only I abandoned the idea of working to improve the service I was delivering to the students and concentrated on becoming part of the team. The idea was that if I embraced the games they were playing, they would shower me with referrals to come out of my ears and cash subsidies to fall off my wallet.
What the people at the ministry did that appalled me most were two things. First, they manipulated the part of the system under their control not as their turf which it was but as their backyard which it was not. In this regard they established contact with a handful of highly placed employees in each school and played them against each other. They also played one school against another, played the students against their schools and played everyone against the elected Minister of Education and his staff.
Second, they used the power to grant subsidies not to influence the quality of education but to implement a political agenda of their own. For example, the federal government was preparing to privatize the post office which meant that people were going to be laid off. This prompted the provincial bureaucrats, including those at the ministry of education, to work for the expansion of the employment ranks everywhere they could. And so, there came to the private schools the unofficial directive which said that there were subsidies to be had if we hired people even if we had nothing for them to do.
This is when I began to understand the cynicism that made the students behave as oddly as they did. To take one example, I had a student who was hanging around a group of guys even though he did not like their company. After some probing into his thinking, he revealed that he will not sever his relation with the guys because his father did not like them either. Thus, the student stayed with the group just to annoy his father whom he did not really dislike but wanted to see annoyed because it made him feel good to know he can annoy his father.
The word empowerment had not yet been abused by that time and so, the people who wanted to appeal to a segment of society did not run around the media promising to empower this group or that one. But the idea of empowerment was already here and everyone sought to be empowered which meant to have the power to annoy someone just for the sake of being able to do so.
I began to think of the possible implications that this mentality may have on the wider world but discovered that the mentality was already prevalent and that it was reflected everywhere because the culture was swimming in it. One example would be the critics of the Arabs who praise the Zionists even though they hate them more than they hate the Arabs.
A little probing into the thinking of these people reveals that they do the praising because they believe it would annoy the Arabs, an experience that apparently rewards them a great deal. But when these people discover that the Arabs could not care less what they are doing, they feel dejected and thus hate the Arabs a little more than they would have liked to.
But what was it that created this situation in the first place? It was the daily humiliation of having to knuckle under the unreasonable demands of their Jewish bosses. Then as now those dejected people believe that the Arabs possess the means to neutralize the power of the Jews but are not doing it. Consequently they feel justified to hate the Arabs openly which, some will admit, is a disguise to hating the Jews which they do silently anyway.
Somewhere in this muddled maze there is supposed to be a definition of rationalism. True or not, to my mind rationalism depends on the perspective of each individual. And to tie rationalism to the notion of individualism, I see things this way: Individualism means to take the initiative and do something positive for the community. When I was teaching, my community was the student body and that is where I concentrated my effort.
To some other people, however, individualism means to do something for the self even if that comes at the expense of everyone in the community. Thus, what was rational to me was irrational to the owner of the school where I worked because he only cared about his interest. I was also irrational to the bureaucrats at the ministry of education because I did not care enough about my interest to be interested in the bribe they called subsidies.
But this is only a static snapshot of reality when in fact, reality is a moving target therefore a dynamic and complicated thing. This is illustrated by the fact that the folks at the ministry of education wanted me to conform in order to receive more of what the individualists cherish the most which is wealth. Given that conformity is the opposite of individualism, there is here a huge contradiction. How to explain this logic?
Well, if you begin with the notion that being rational means to look after the self, you will do whatever it takes to satisfy your needs including the redefinition of the words. Thus if the word individualism is good and in vogue today, you call yourself individualist. If conformity is the good word then you are a conformist. But if the two words are good and in vogue simultaneously, you attribute them both to yourself even if they contradict each other. But don't worry because there is a way out of this dilemma.
Here is how you do it. Define an individualist as one who chooses to conform because he or she has the free will to do so. Contrast this with the definition of the conformist who lacks the free will to make an individual choice and so, he or she conforms to the norm. More succinctly, you are a good individualist because you are free to conform and he or she is a bad conformist because he or she is not free to make an individual choice.
There it is. I believe I got it airtight now because it seems I have managed to show that hypocrisy is at the root of irrational thought. But did I? Because if I did I should be able to answer this question: Is hypocrisy practiced out of individual choice or out of conformist habit? Never mind; there will be another time to think about that.
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Cheer Up, Hillary Clinton !
Cheer up my fair lady; it is not as bad as it appears. I do not know exactly what it is that Barrack Obama lifted from your speeches because I have more important things to do these days than investigate this sort of thing but whatever it was, it cannot be as bad as you make it sound. In fact, if there is any truth in what you are saying, Hillary, you should be flattered that someone saw fit to imitate you.
Let me remind you of something that has to do with a speechwriter and organizer to your husband's campaign in the early 1990s. I forget his name but he is the one who came up with the phrase: "It's the economy, stupid!" By all accounts the phrase had a huge impact on Bill Clinton's campaign and contributed enormously to his election as President of the United States even though the US economy had not yet deteriorated a great deal when all this took place.
Let us now switch to Canada and recall what was going on here concurrently with those events. Brian Mulroney was Prime Minister of Canada and the country was in the middle of a campaign of its own as we were inching forward to a referendum on a new constitution which would have brought the Province of Quebec into the fold. By far the most intellectually honest politician to grace this land, Prime Minister Mulroney wrote me a letter asking me to join the debate and I responded positively.
Things went well as we approached the day of the vote and the consensus was that we were going to win this thing. In fact, the Prime Minister was so certain of such outcome he intimated to someone in the press gallery that he rolled the dice and was confident of victory.
Since our economy was in a worse shape than yours and was sliding fast towards a recession thus threatening to add to the problem of unemployment, I thought I could take time off from discussing the cultural and constitutional issues related to the referendum and do something for the economy.
Another of our problems was that our dollar was losing value because your country and the rest of the World were not buying as much of our resources which included gold. Not only that, but the International Monetary Fund was talking about selling some of its gold reserves to help the poor nations alleviate their debt. In addition, some gold producing countries such as South Africa, Australia and Russia were selling huge amounts of gold to smooth over the cash crunch they were experiencing.
The net result was that the price of gold was depressed to such an extent that it threatened not only gold mining in this country but the entire mining industry which comprises the precious metals and the base metals.
I came up with a plan to help both the currency and the employment situation. I wrote a letter to then Minister of Finance, Don Mazankowski suggesting that the Government of Canada keep the gold mines of this country from laying off people by buying the gold they cannot sell on the World markets at a reasonable price.
Turning that gold into reserve at the central bank would maintain the value of our dollar if not help it rise. In the meantime the gold miners will be spared the pink slip, something that was going to ripple through the rest of the mining industry and the economy as a whole thus shoring up the employment picture in all the sectors.
But little did I know that the letter was going to be leaked to the press. Even though I had tried to avoid making a link between the issue of "keeping Quebec inside the Federation" and something as crass as making money, the discussion that ensued overshadowed the cultural and constitutional incentives to Quebec and replaced them with the economic incentives for staying inside the Federation.
Even though no one here put it in those words, it sounded like people were saying to each other: "It's the economy, stupid!" And guess what, Hillary, the next day someone in your husband's campaign put it succinctly and said the magic words: "It's the economy, stupid!"
The words came at a time when no one was confronting the economic issues in your country but the words acted as a catalyst to spark the economic debate both in the United States and here in Canada.
No one here or in your country doubted where that had come from but no one said it was plagiarism ether because there is a difference between being influenced by something and using the thing without giving proper credit to its source.
Taking this into account and applying it to the present situation, since you and Barrack are locked in an open campaign where the public is aware of everything that he and you are saying, you may point to where you believe he copied you but you cannot call it plagiarism. Instead of complaining, I am of the opinion that you should thank your opponent for flattering you and maybe take the opportunity to brag about it. I am sure it will make you feel better.
As for me, you may think it is a little too late to do this now, but I thank you, I thank your husband and I thank the speechwriter in the first Clinton campaign who felt there was enough merit in the letter I wrote some 15 years ago to be inspired by it.
Cheer up, Hillary, it's a good day when someone says you're good at what you're doing.
Let me remind you of something that has to do with a speechwriter and organizer to your husband's campaign in the early 1990s. I forget his name but he is the one who came up with the phrase: "It's the economy, stupid!" By all accounts the phrase had a huge impact on Bill Clinton's campaign and contributed enormously to his election as President of the United States even though the US economy had not yet deteriorated a great deal when all this took place.
Let us now switch to Canada and recall what was going on here concurrently with those events. Brian Mulroney was Prime Minister of Canada and the country was in the middle of a campaign of its own as we were inching forward to a referendum on a new constitution which would have brought the Province of Quebec into the fold. By far the most intellectually honest politician to grace this land, Prime Minister Mulroney wrote me a letter asking me to join the debate and I responded positively.
Things went well as we approached the day of the vote and the consensus was that we were going to win this thing. In fact, the Prime Minister was so certain of such outcome he intimated to someone in the press gallery that he rolled the dice and was confident of victory.
Since our economy was in a worse shape than yours and was sliding fast towards a recession thus threatening to add to the problem of unemployment, I thought I could take time off from discussing the cultural and constitutional issues related to the referendum and do something for the economy.
Another of our problems was that our dollar was losing value because your country and the rest of the World were not buying as much of our resources which included gold. Not only that, but the International Monetary Fund was talking about selling some of its gold reserves to help the poor nations alleviate their debt. In addition, some gold producing countries such as South Africa, Australia and Russia were selling huge amounts of gold to smooth over the cash crunch they were experiencing.
The net result was that the price of gold was depressed to such an extent that it threatened not only gold mining in this country but the entire mining industry which comprises the precious metals and the base metals.
I came up with a plan to help both the currency and the employment situation. I wrote a letter to then Minister of Finance, Don Mazankowski suggesting that the Government of Canada keep the gold mines of this country from laying off people by buying the gold they cannot sell on the World markets at a reasonable price.
Turning that gold into reserve at the central bank would maintain the value of our dollar if not help it rise. In the meantime the gold miners will be spared the pink slip, something that was going to ripple through the rest of the mining industry and the economy as a whole thus shoring up the employment picture in all the sectors.
But little did I know that the letter was going to be leaked to the press. Even though I had tried to avoid making a link between the issue of "keeping Quebec inside the Federation" and something as crass as making money, the discussion that ensued overshadowed the cultural and constitutional incentives to Quebec and replaced them with the economic incentives for staying inside the Federation.
Even though no one here put it in those words, it sounded like people were saying to each other: "It's the economy, stupid!" And guess what, Hillary, the next day someone in your husband's campaign put it succinctly and said the magic words: "It's the economy, stupid!"
The words came at a time when no one was confronting the economic issues in your country but the words acted as a catalyst to spark the economic debate both in the United States and here in Canada.
No one here or in your country doubted where that had come from but no one said it was plagiarism ether because there is a difference between being influenced by something and using the thing without giving proper credit to its source.
Taking this into account and applying it to the present situation, since you and Barrack are locked in an open campaign where the public is aware of everything that he and you are saying, you may point to where you believe he copied you but you cannot call it plagiarism. Instead of complaining, I am of the opinion that you should thank your opponent for flattering you and maybe take the opportunity to brag about it. I am sure it will make you feel better.
As for me, you may think it is a little too late to do this now, but I thank you, I thank your husband and I thank the speechwriter in the first Clinton campaign who felt there was enough merit in the letter I wrote some 15 years ago to be inspired by it.
Cheer up, Hillary, it's a good day when someone says you're good at what you're doing.
Friday, February 22, 2008
How The Amerisrael Monster Was Bred
Aside from the writings of some supremacist nuts, I never came across the view of a biologist who advocated racial purity as a way to breed a superior race of humans. On the contrary, it is now universally accepted that inbreeding produces deficient offsprings. Examples abound as to what happened to royal families from antiquity to recent times when in order to keep the power and the wealth in their hands, the royals married in the family.
The trouble was that this practice resulted in the production of children who were physically handicapped, mentally deficient or both. It was therefore concluded that since the goal of a matrimonial union was to produce healthy offsprings, inbreeding was to be avoided. Of course, the corollary of this is that cross-breeding produces strong and healthy offsprings which is something that is now regarded as a universal truth.
Another universal truth is that the continued existence of the Cosmos depends on the maintenance of a balance between the forces of nature. In fact, the Cosmos is still here after fifteen billion years or so because nature adjusts itself in such a way as to alleviated the stresses that randomly generate within it. If not for this, the Cosmos would have disappeared in the first fraction of a second of its existence. Consequently, we may define balance as the absence of stress and consider it a good thing to have, but only if it does not hide a stress which unfortunately is something that can happen from time to time.
Now, if you combine those two ideas and use cross-fertilization to breed stress, you will have put together a creature that can deliver a punch of unprecedented destructive force. And if you find a way to use this creature as a weapon against your neighbors, you will have discovered the means to disrupt their lives in a way that surpasses the wildest imagination.
Let us now look at an example of balance that may or may not be what it seems. The Jewish rule which says: "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth," is supposed to represent a concept of balance. But if you tell a shifty Jew that Christianity is a better religion because it is based on the concept of forgiveness which is one of imbalance, he will want to know more about the subject. When you illustrate the point by giving the example of the Christian saying: "If someone slaps you on the left cheek show him your right cheek," the shifty Jew will respond that the Jewish rule means exactly the same thing or close to.
Even if you do not ask, he will want to elaborate that an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth does not necessarily mean you must restore things to an absolute balance. He will go on to say that the rule sets the maximum limit as to what you can exact from someone who has done you wrong. That is, he will claim that if someone gouges the eye of a Jew, the latter will react by cursing the gouger, by kicking him or by gouging his eye but this is the most that a Jew will do and never go beyond that.
So you look at Israel's actions in Palestine, you consider the almost universal expression of support that comes from Jews everywhere for such actions and you realize that you have been lied to. You conclude that what you see is not civilized balance but a savage imbalance where Israel repeatedly exacts thousands of times as much from the Palestinians as the Palestinians will ever exact from the Israelis.
And the reason why this situation exists at all is that the Jewish lobby in America has taught the political crowd in Washington a thing or two about balance Jewish style. The result has been that the Americans have agreed to supply Israel with the most lethal weapons ever built by their military industrial complex so that Israel may collectively punish and kill Palestinians at will.
All that inhumanity is allowed to happen even though the Americans are aware that the Palestinians possess nothing more than their bare hands, their bodies and the stones at their feet to defend themselves, their families and their homes against the ravages of those weapons.
If you try to discuss these realities with the Jewish leaders, you never get a straight talk from them. But in a roundabout way, they will reveal that they are the chosen children of God therefore have privileges that no one else has. And the Jews were granted these privileges, they say, for reasons that a non-Jew cannot begin to comprehend. But the bottom line is that the rule which says an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth applies only among disputing Jews and cannot be invoked when adjudicating a dispute between a Jew and a non-Jew.
And the authority for this logic is to be found in the parable of the Exodus. This is the story of an Egyptian who apparently was seen by Moses mistreat a Hebrew. The punishment that Moses decided to impose on the culprit was a collective punishment of the Jewish kind in that he inflicted a number of plagues on the whole country of Egypt, including the murder of the first born in every Egyptian family.
But even after that, Moses was still not satisfied with the balance he had achieved so he told the Hebrews to go ahead and loot the gold, the jewelry and all the valuables that they can grab from the homes of their Egyptian neighbors while the latter were busy burying their murdered children and mourning them. The moral of this story is that there is no balance like Jewish balance.
And this is still not the end of the story because Moses then took the whole kitten caboodle and ran with them in the direction of Palestine before the Egyptian police had the time to organize and to come after them. When the gang approached the land of Palestine, Moses sent in a few spies to see what was in there. When the spies returned with stories about a place that was full of milk and honey and a few other riches, Moses said let's have an encore right here and right now. But God had a better idea because He struck Moses dead before the man could set foot in the land of Palestine. And the moral of this story is that there is no balance like God's balance.
Thus, we clearly see that in the Hebrew-Jewish tradition what is labeled as balance is in reality an imbalance of biblical dimension. When the pretence is turned into a weapon which is often the case and when it is used against unsuspecting people, it has the power to disrupt their lives with the same devastating effect as the ancient plagues that were inflicted on Egypt and the modern plagues that are inflicted on Palestine.
But given that the modern World is a vast and complicated place, the energy that is required to power such weapon must be amplified by a corresponding amount lest it have a diminishing effect. To achieve this amplification, the method of cross-fertilization is added to the mix. And this, in fact, is what happened when the Jewish Defense League went mainstream because going mainstream is the way that all the mafia groups, the biker gangs and the like disappear into the community and seem to be a part of it.
To get from here to there, those groups begin by making money illicitly then use the money to buy their way into the various marketplaces of mainstream society. In fact, there was little or no distinction between the Italian mafia and the Jewish mafia at the beginning of the Twentieth Century in New York when the two co-operated to terrorize and to loot the place. But when the opportunity presented itself, the Jews double-crossed their Italian partners, denounced them to the authorities and went "legit" ever after.
Once in the mainstream, the Jews cross-fertilized with the existing establishment, first by injecting their insidious ideas into the debate, then by mixing socially and biologically with their hosts, and doing all this while slowly but surely taking control of the levers of power. The Jewish Defense League became the Jewish establishment and co-existed with mainstream America for a little while.
When they felt that their roots had become solid enough, the Jews crowded everyone out and almost monopolized the system. In the meantime they labored to turn America into a version of Israel which they did by first twinning the two nations then fusing them into a single entity that may be called Amerisrael.
Thus was born a monster which, by everyone's estimation, is a creature that has the powerful muscles of America, the cold heart of Moses and the evil mind of a demon. It is capable of committing such horrors as Abu Ghraib, Haditha, Guantanamo, waterboarding, the declaration that the United Nations is irrelevant, promote the idea of pre-emptive strikes and so on. In fact, America has become an inflated replica of Israel, a full blown caricature of everything that is grotesque about the human condition.
Only the American people can now change all that, but will they do it?
The trouble was that this practice resulted in the production of children who were physically handicapped, mentally deficient or both. It was therefore concluded that since the goal of a matrimonial union was to produce healthy offsprings, inbreeding was to be avoided. Of course, the corollary of this is that cross-breeding produces strong and healthy offsprings which is something that is now regarded as a universal truth.
Another universal truth is that the continued existence of the Cosmos depends on the maintenance of a balance between the forces of nature. In fact, the Cosmos is still here after fifteen billion years or so because nature adjusts itself in such a way as to alleviated the stresses that randomly generate within it. If not for this, the Cosmos would have disappeared in the first fraction of a second of its existence. Consequently, we may define balance as the absence of stress and consider it a good thing to have, but only if it does not hide a stress which unfortunately is something that can happen from time to time.
Now, if you combine those two ideas and use cross-fertilization to breed stress, you will have put together a creature that can deliver a punch of unprecedented destructive force. And if you find a way to use this creature as a weapon against your neighbors, you will have discovered the means to disrupt their lives in a way that surpasses the wildest imagination.
Let us now look at an example of balance that may or may not be what it seems. The Jewish rule which says: "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth," is supposed to represent a concept of balance. But if you tell a shifty Jew that Christianity is a better religion because it is based on the concept of forgiveness which is one of imbalance, he will want to know more about the subject. When you illustrate the point by giving the example of the Christian saying: "If someone slaps you on the left cheek show him your right cheek," the shifty Jew will respond that the Jewish rule means exactly the same thing or close to.
Even if you do not ask, he will want to elaborate that an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth does not necessarily mean you must restore things to an absolute balance. He will go on to say that the rule sets the maximum limit as to what you can exact from someone who has done you wrong. That is, he will claim that if someone gouges the eye of a Jew, the latter will react by cursing the gouger, by kicking him or by gouging his eye but this is the most that a Jew will do and never go beyond that.
So you look at Israel's actions in Palestine, you consider the almost universal expression of support that comes from Jews everywhere for such actions and you realize that you have been lied to. You conclude that what you see is not civilized balance but a savage imbalance where Israel repeatedly exacts thousands of times as much from the Palestinians as the Palestinians will ever exact from the Israelis.
And the reason why this situation exists at all is that the Jewish lobby in America has taught the political crowd in Washington a thing or two about balance Jewish style. The result has been that the Americans have agreed to supply Israel with the most lethal weapons ever built by their military industrial complex so that Israel may collectively punish and kill Palestinians at will.
All that inhumanity is allowed to happen even though the Americans are aware that the Palestinians possess nothing more than their bare hands, their bodies and the stones at their feet to defend themselves, their families and their homes against the ravages of those weapons.
If you try to discuss these realities with the Jewish leaders, you never get a straight talk from them. But in a roundabout way, they will reveal that they are the chosen children of God therefore have privileges that no one else has. And the Jews were granted these privileges, they say, for reasons that a non-Jew cannot begin to comprehend. But the bottom line is that the rule which says an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth applies only among disputing Jews and cannot be invoked when adjudicating a dispute between a Jew and a non-Jew.
And the authority for this logic is to be found in the parable of the Exodus. This is the story of an Egyptian who apparently was seen by Moses mistreat a Hebrew. The punishment that Moses decided to impose on the culprit was a collective punishment of the Jewish kind in that he inflicted a number of plagues on the whole country of Egypt, including the murder of the first born in every Egyptian family.
But even after that, Moses was still not satisfied with the balance he had achieved so he told the Hebrews to go ahead and loot the gold, the jewelry and all the valuables that they can grab from the homes of their Egyptian neighbors while the latter were busy burying their murdered children and mourning them. The moral of this story is that there is no balance like Jewish balance.
And this is still not the end of the story because Moses then took the whole kitten caboodle and ran with them in the direction of Palestine before the Egyptian police had the time to organize and to come after them. When the gang approached the land of Palestine, Moses sent in a few spies to see what was in there. When the spies returned with stories about a place that was full of milk and honey and a few other riches, Moses said let's have an encore right here and right now. But God had a better idea because He struck Moses dead before the man could set foot in the land of Palestine. And the moral of this story is that there is no balance like God's balance.
Thus, we clearly see that in the Hebrew-Jewish tradition what is labeled as balance is in reality an imbalance of biblical dimension. When the pretence is turned into a weapon which is often the case and when it is used against unsuspecting people, it has the power to disrupt their lives with the same devastating effect as the ancient plagues that were inflicted on Egypt and the modern plagues that are inflicted on Palestine.
But given that the modern World is a vast and complicated place, the energy that is required to power such weapon must be amplified by a corresponding amount lest it have a diminishing effect. To achieve this amplification, the method of cross-fertilization is added to the mix. And this, in fact, is what happened when the Jewish Defense League went mainstream because going mainstream is the way that all the mafia groups, the biker gangs and the like disappear into the community and seem to be a part of it.
To get from here to there, those groups begin by making money illicitly then use the money to buy their way into the various marketplaces of mainstream society. In fact, there was little or no distinction between the Italian mafia and the Jewish mafia at the beginning of the Twentieth Century in New York when the two co-operated to terrorize and to loot the place. But when the opportunity presented itself, the Jews double-crossed their Italian partners, denounced them to the authorities and went "legit" ever after.
Once in the mainstream, the Jews cross-fertilized with the existing establishment, first by injecting their insidious ideas into the debate, then by mixing socially and biologically with their hosts, and doing all this while slowly but surely taking control of the levers of power. The Jewish Defense League became the Jewish establishment and co-existed with mainstream America for a little while.
When they felt that their roots had become solid enough, the Jews crowded everyone out and almost monopolized the system. In the meantime they labored to turn America into a version of Israel which they did by first twinning the two nations then fusing them into a single entity that may be called Amerisrael.
Thus was born a monster which, by everyone's estimation, is a creature that has the powerful muscles of America, the cold heart of Moses and the evil mind of a demon. It is capable of committing such horrors as Abu Ghraib, Haditha, Guantanamo, waterboarding, the declaration that the United Nations is irrelevant, promote the idea of pre-emptive strikes and so on. In fact, America has become an inflated replica of Israel, a full blown caricature of everything that is grotesque about the human condition.
Only the American people can now change all that, but will they do it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)