He whips his own Back to chase after a Ghost

Can you imagine a spoof in which a clumsy changeling that believes he sees a ghost, whipping himself in the back to run faster and catch-up with the object of his delusion? A spectacle such as this would be funny, of course, but it could also be revealing. And that's what is happening to Dennis Prager.

The man wrote an article under a title that reads: “Criticizing Israel is fine, but anti-Zionism is anti-Semitic,” published on August 20, 2019 in the New York Post. To make his point, Prager began by making a false analogy and then built on it. He wanted the readers to think of Israel as being like Italy. The two are so much alike, he said, if you think of Israel as being illegitimate, you must think of Italy as being illegitimate as well … and so would be many other countries.

The problem with this analogy is that Italy and Israel are nowhere near being alike. In fact, no country in the world except two –– Rhodesia and South Africa –– have ever resembled Israel. As to the abominable regimes that used to govern those countries, they are defunct now. This is what humanity is trying to do to the equally abominable Zionist regime governing Israel.

In fact, it happens that Rhodesia-cum-Zimbabwe and South Africa are now moving-on like normal countries where their citizens, who are of every origin you can imagine, practice their version of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Think about it: What better development could happen to the populations of Israel and the region if a similar situation were to be fashioned for them?

But why can't Dennis Prager and those like him see that reality? They can't see it because the propaganda to which they are exposed, subjects them to a hypnotic spell from the moment they get a first taste of their mothers' milk to the day when they exhale their last breath. This mental atrocity deprives them of the ability to see the similarities or differences that may exist between two or more situations.

Such ability is written into our DNA at conception but yanked out of the Jews and their gentile sycophants who get recruited by them. In lieu of that ability, which is an essential component that serves to upgrade our level of intelligence, the Jewish propaganda machine plants a demonic mechanism into the thinking process of the unsuspecting victims.

We can see how that mechanism operates when we examine Dennis Prager's inability to see the abomination that's inherent to the Zionist regime of Israel, as it imports people of the Jewish religion from around the world and uses them to replace the Palestinian indigenous population which happens to be composed of other religions. And we are horrified by Prager's inability to see that Israel's policy is closer to the former apartheid regimes of Rhodesia and South Africa than it is to any other regime around the globe … and certainly not to that of Italy.

As well, we are stupefied to realize that even then, it would be insulting to apartheid Rhodesia and South Africa to equate them with Israel. That's because those regimes imported people from abroad, not to replace the indigenous population, but to work with it in a supervisory capacity. This is in contrast to Zionism which imports Jews from abroad to displace and take the place of the indigenous Palestinians.

And then, when we hear or read Dennis Prager say that Israel is like Italy, we feel a jolt of disgust similar to what we would if someone had said that Jeff Epstein's female recruiting madams are the same as Mother Theresa. This alone, ought to tell the authorities in the district where Prager lives, they have a nutcase on the loose that should be locked up for his own good and that of society.

It is not surprising, therefore, that someone who is this screwed up, would think that: “Anti-Zionism is opposition to Israel's existence.” Well, it must be said that the people who first came up with that idea, explained that to oppose Zionism was to oppose the creation of a religion-based apartheid regime.

And so, they concluded that the intent of those who oppose Zionism, must be that they want to see a “democratic” Israel replace the existing neofascist regime. They figured that such move would be unacceptable to the Jewish settlers and to the leaders of Israel who believe they are implementing God's orders … that Almighty who operates in mysterious ways and must never be questioned.

But when this kind of argument did not go well with the rest of the world, the people that came up with the screwy idea, changed their tune and made it sound like they meant to say that to oppose Zionism, was to seek the destruction of Israel in the sense of razing it the way that Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were razed. And this is the falsehood that Dennis Prager is now peddling in his article.

Yanked of the ability to detect differences between situations, Dennis Prager has spent a lifetime chasing the ghost of antisemitism, and still does. The more he approaches the thing, the farther it gets away from him, and the harder he whips himself to run faster still.

Poor Dennis Prager, Sisyphus had an easier time rolling that stone up the hill.

A strategic Decision is needed not a new Plan

Thomas L. Friedman, a columnist with the New York Times, has written a piece, showing conclusively that Democracy has been severely if not mortally wounded in America thanks to the doings of the Jewish lobby, which includes the mob of Jewish pundits, of which Thomas Friedman is a prominent member.

The Friedman column came under the title: “How the Palestinian-Israeli Peace Process Became a Farce,” and the subtitle: “We have peace plans with no partners and movements with no peace plans.” It was published on August 20, 2019 in the New York Times.

The writer described the existing situation as follows: “The Palestinian-Israeli peace process has become a pathetic festival of magical thinking, performance art, reality denial, political fund-raising and outright political fraud,” which is an accurate description of the observable facts. But the problem is that Thomas Friedman has no clue how the situation developed to become what it is, or how to fix it.

You can tell that is the case from what Friedman went on to say, which is this: “[The peace process] has become about everything except what it needs to succeed: courageous, fair-minded, creative diplomacy and leadership.” And this is the kind of bubble-haggle that leads to nowhere because it means nothing. In fact, when you go over the article, you discover that there is nothing in it which goes beyond the rehashing of the same old talking points that formed the original bubble-haggle that led to nowhere.

To begin developing a vision for a possible solution that is real, we first need to understand what the problem is. Simply put, the problem is that the Jews in America and Israel drove their thinking process into a box from which they cannot exit. They run back and forth inside the box looking for something that isn't there, not realizing that there is space outside the box, which is a million times larger and more accommodating than the interior of the box. What follows is a condensed version of how Thomas Friedman sees a possible solution which, in reality, has already proven to be a failed attempt at a solution:

“The only hope is for an Israeli leader to make a unilateral separation from the West bank. The Israeli army would retain overall security control of the West Bank but cede much more day-to-day economic and political control to Palestinians, and curb Jewish settlement deep in the West Bank. There are currently about 105,000 Jewish settlers living right in the heart of where any Palestinian state in a two-state solution would be located. If that settlement process is not halted immediately –– and incentives created for those settlers to move –– there will be no hope ever for a two-states-for-two-people peace deal. The only option left will be one state for two people, a recipe for permanent strife”.

The Jews have been saying this much for half a century, and it hasn't worked. They pretended to go through several peace plans during that time but delivered nothing. It's because they constructed a monumental narrative with imaginary components that bear no resemblance to what's real, and then used that narrative to march into the box of no-exit. In fact, even if what they claim were real and true, they still would have no right to what they took by force of arms, helped as they were by the old colonial powers of France and Britain, and now by an America that is as wise as when Rome was governed by Caesar's horse.

That is, even if today's Jews were the direct descendants of the Hebrew tribes that imposed themselves on the indigenous Palestinians for a short period of time in antiquity, they still would have no right to displace the Palestinians who never left the place, but lived there continuously generation after generation. If this erroneous privilege is granted to the Jews, the two billion souls of European ancestry that now live in the Americas, Australia, New Zealand and other places around the globe, would have the right to displace the current population of Europe, and take over the entire continent. And I would have the right to displace an Egyptian family that lives in Cairo, and take over the house where I spent the first year and a half of my life.

This is so demented, so primitive, so backward and so beastly, I would feel like a cockroach for thinking I might have that right. And yet, look what Friedman says about the so-called Jews who proudly call themselves non-Middle Eastern Jews: “BDS demands the return of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to their villages while making no mention of the rights of the Jews to a state in their historical homeland.” What kind of history is that? No. Palestine was never the homeland of these impostors. But even if they were for real, they have no more the right to be in Palestine than a cockroach has the right to be in your pantry infesting your food with its droppings.

And that tells you where the thinking about a solution to the Middle East problem ought to start. It ought to start by ending the tsunami of Jewish lies, and by making a strategic decision. After telling the truth, the Jews must ask for forgiveness. They should then ask for mercy and pity. And they should beg to be accepted in the crucible where Civilization was born and raised to a mature age.

If the Jews do all that, they will find the Arabs to be as accommodating as the Africans have been toward the White Rhodesians and South Africans. End of story.

Bare Concept buried under Tons of haggling Trash

We should consider calling Clifford D. May a gift that keeps on giving for, he just demonstrated how a simple concept can be buried under tons of haggling trash, thus transform a situation that can be solved in a day into one that goes on for half a century, and ends up stalemated.

Clifford May wrote an article under the title: “The anti-Israel lobby,” that also came under the subtitle: “Reps. Tlaib and Omar are on a mission to defame and de-legitimize the Jewish state.” It was published on August 20, 2019 in The Washington Times.

What Clifford May did, thinking he was adding to the pile of haggling trash, is that he highlighted some important facts. What comes out from reading his article is that the Jews are entitled to a homeland given to them by the united Nations in Palestine. The size of the land they have title to, is contained within the 1948 borders, which is equal to less than 10 percent what the Jews occupy right now.

What they occupy at this time comprises, among other pieces of land, what's known as the 1967 border, also referred to as Israel proper. These are lands annexed by Israel during the period between 1948 and 1967 by a method known as “fait accompli,” which means accomplished fact in French.

What happened in the interim was that Israel got into a series of skirmishes with Lebanon, Syria and Jordan, trying to steal their water resources. It occupied small parcels of lands but got kicked out of them eventually. This prompted the Jews to plan the 1967 massive attack on its neighbors. The adventure was so well planned, Israel increased its size to something like 5 or 6 times what it was. It asked the neighbors to negotiate but they said no … not until it withdraws to the 1967 borders. Israel refused and a 6-year war of attrition ensued. Egypt and Syria finally counterattacked with force in 1973. The Syrians got back most but not all of the Golan Heights. Egypt got back all of the Sinai.

Jordan did not participate in the 1973 counterattack because it had not lost territory to Israel. All that the Jews had accumulated were Palestinian lands, known as Gaza and the West bank. When Anwar Sadat of Egypt agreed to the American proposal for the ceasefire that allowed Israel to withdraw in an orderly fashion, Manachem Begin of Israel tried to hand Gaza to Egypt. But Sadat would not take what belonged to the Palestinians, and urged Begin to negotiate with the Palestinians directly. Years later, Jordan did the same thing with regard to the West Bank.

Right now, the world, the UN, the Arab nations and the Palestinian people consider that the Jews (Israel) are only entitled to the 1948 borders ... but could get up to the 1967 border if they negotiated in good faith. As a bonus, the Arab League, speaking for 350 million Arabs in 22 countries, would agree to recognize Israel, to welcome it into the Middle East instead of seeing it masquerade as “European Semites,” and establish full diplomatic, commercial and cultural exchanges.

But the Jews rejected all that because what they wanted from the start was all of Palestine and what else they could snatch from the neighbors. They were able to con the American political class, and get the help they needed to pursue the twin tracks of siphoning America's blood while sabotaging the peace process and blaming the wreckage on the Palestinians.

The Jews used the power of the haggle to achieve all that. It is a process that Clifford May took pain to show how it unfolds. He wrote a 1,000-word article that contains many of the techniques used by the Jewish pundits to portray themselves as victims. They distort the truth, accuse others of the sins they see in themselves, and attribute to themselves the virtues they see in others. They understate some issues, and exaggerate others when it suits them, then reverse their position when the wind blows in the other direction.

Because it would take volumes to analyze May's article in its entirety, I shall only discuss one aspect of it. With the backgrounder given above and the analysis given below, the reader should be able to see the full range of what the Jews do to make “antisemitism” happen, then complain about it and ask for compensation as well as special protection not given to anyone else. Now look at the following passage in May's article:

“The goal of BDS, as stated by its founder and leader, Omar Barghouti, is Israel's extermination. 'Definitely, most definitely we oppose a Jewish state in any part of Palestine,' he has said on video. 'No Palestinian, rational Palestinian, not a sell-out Palestinian, will ever accept a Jewish state in Palestine'”.

Clifford May started the paragraph with the accusation that Barghouti stated his goal was to exterminate Israel. May was careful not to say exterminate the Israelis or the Jews, because if he did, he would have been caught with his pants down, and looked like the naked emperor. But May counted on the use of the word “exterminate” to give the impression that Barghouti meant extermination in the sense of a Holocaust. Having used that word, Clifford May then quoted what Barghouti had said in a somewhat mangled English.

The issue that's treated in that quote is one that came up long before the advent of the BDS movement. It happened that after a successful round of Peace negotiations, and before signing the agreement to seal it, the Israeli negotiators did what they always do, which was to come up with a new demand they knew the Palestinians could not accept. They asked that the Palestinians recognize Israel as being a Jewish state.

Because the legal ramifications of such recognition would be humongous, the Palestinians said no. They told the Jews they can call Israel anything they want, but they cannot demand that the Palestinians –– or anyone else, for that matter –– agree with the ideas that lurk behind such nomenclature. And that's how the Jews torpedoed the talks one more time on that day.

Ever since that time, the Jewish propaganda machine has been deceiving the American political class as well as the public by portraying the refusal of the Palestinians to drink from the cup of poison the Jews are handing them, as being proof that they want to exterminate the Jewish people.

That is, the Jews asked the Palestinians to drop dead, so that the Jews can be certain they'll survive. And the Palestinians protested: Who do you take us for? Americans? We're smarter than that!

The smart Aleck locutions that keep backfiring

Poor David Harsanyi, mindful that he'll have a hard time proving that Rashida Tlaib or Ilhan Omar lied, he avoided using that word. Instead, he used the word “untrue.” That's because you can say something that's contrary to the truth believing it is true … and that's not a lie. But when you say something that's contrary to the truth knowing it isn't so, you tell a lie. That's the difference between telling an untruth and telling a lie.

So, Harsanyi writes an article about the two Muslim Congresswomen, carefully avoiding the use of words that sound hurtful or insulting … and submits the piece to the editor who chooses a title for it. The thing gets published, and horror of horror, what does Harsanyi see? He sees a title that says: “Don't fall For Omar And Tlaib's Lies About Israel.” The editor made it sound like David Harsanyi is accusing the women of lying. He feels like being stabbed in the back by his own editor.

The article was published on August 19, 2019 in The Federalist. It is the writer's commentary on the press conference that the two women held on that day concerning the controversy that erupted when their trip to Palestine/Israel was canceled. It is clear that Harsanyi's objective in writing the article has been to minimize the damaging effect that the conference had on Israel's image.

David Harsanyi set out to show that what the women announced they were trying to accomplish, was at odds with what they actually did to bring about that accomplishment. To strengthen his argument, Harsanyi told of an alternative path that the congresswomen could have taken to succeed in what they were doing –– but a path they did not take. Here is how the writer put it all together:

“Omar and Tlaib could easily have joined a group of 70 of their colleagues and met with Israeli officials––if it's supposedly part of their duties, as they assert, to learn about the situation on the ground. Instead, they planned a separate trip to Palestine with an itinerary designed by Miftah”.

What's bizarre about this suggestion is that it mirrors the bizarre nature of the situation which Harsanyi is trying to whitewash. To understand this part, we need to acquaint ourselves with the situation on the ground in Palestine, which the two women said they wanted to see and assess for themselves. What they would have seen is a Jewish army of occupation that is armed to the teeth, in total and absolute control of a Palestinian population that is totally and absolutely disarmed.

For decades, America, which has been arming the Jews and disarming the Palestinians, has had Jewish AIPAC organize trips for America's legislators to go to Israel on guided tours aimed at brainwashing the Americans into believing they must continue arming the Jews and disarming the Palestinians to protect America and save the world.

And so, the two Congresswomen, one of whom is of Palestinian origin, said enough of this nonsense. They decided to start working on establishing some equity in this horrible situation by injecting a modicum of balance into it. Upon learning of this plan, the entire mob of Jewish bellyaching punditry, including David Harsanyi, responded by erupting in the usual ritual of lamentations and accusations of antisemitism.

Like Harsanyi, those pundits relied on the use of the one-word, one-term, one-expression and one-liner to throw accusations willy-nilly at their opponents––accusations of sin they did not try to prove because they had no proof that would back their accusations. What these people sought to do was pin on their opponents the accusation of being Holocaust deniers, anti-Semites or terrorists who are out to destroy Israel economically via the promotion of BDS, and the use of kites to battle against Israel's F-16 warplanes and helicopter gunships. As well, the Jews accused their opponents of a relentless campaign to delegitimize Israel by reviving old tropes, they said were effective at hurting the Jews in the past.

And of course, the corollary to denigrating the other side is to praise one's own side. And that's what David Harsanyi has attempted to do while badmouthing Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar. But in so doing, he repeated one of the smart Aleck sayings that the Israeli leaders are famous for. This one had come out the mouth of Golda Meier, doing considerable damage to Israel's image instead of enhancing it.

In fact, David Harsanyi seems aware there was something louche about that locution; the reason why he did not quote Golda Meier directly but only paraphrased her. This is what he wrote: “To paraphrase (perhaps) Golda Meir, the fact that Tlaib is more invested in hating Jews than seeing her grandmother...” What Golda Meier made reference to, was Palestinians hating the Jews more than they loved their children.

Meier stirred a worldwide uproar when she said those words because mixing Meier and children at the time, was like mixing a Weinstein-Epstein pair with a harem of young women. What happened was that Israel was going through a difficult economic period and Meier desperately wanted to see an increase in the number of tourists visiting Israel.

She popped in front of a camera and appealed to the world to come visit Israel, promising that the place had much to offer to tourists, and specifying: including very attractive young women. This coincided with a report that had unveiled a situation never seen before in Israel. It was the prostitution of young and attractive Jewish women from Eastern Europe that had gone to Israel believing it was a heavenly oasis full of milk and honey.

But instead of sweetness, the young women faced the bitter reality that to survive, they had to sell their bodies to tourists. For a time, people around the world talked about the pimping madam of Israel.

Harbinger of the Haggling that is to come

Recall the centuries-long history of the wandering Jews who went from empire to empire trying to seize control of the one that would succumb to their machinations and become their fiefdom. Now that you've done this, consider the situation of the Jews in this day and age.

Whereas they succeeded in taking near absolute control of America's ruling class as well as its institutions and levers of power, the Jews have failed to convince the general public they represent the paragon of governance that the country will ever achieve. And so, their request to be loved and adopted as the eternal rulers of the superpower, has been dismissed as a sick joke by the public. Refusing to accept this answer, the Jews pushed back, causing the tolerance of the American people to turn into resentment. And so, the American street as well as its college campuses turned hostile.

Now that the Jews have learned they have no choice but to repeat their history and turn to someone else, they discovered there was no one new, they could turn to, having exhausted the list of potential empires that can be conquered. Fearing for the future of the artificial concoction they patched together and called Israel, the Jews decided to sell their soul to Russia, a country that was once in dire straits and they took advantage of its weakness. They beat up on it while making unreasonable demands that the Russians never met, and the Jews never retracted. But now that the Russians are rising again, the Jews want them to forget the pool of bad blood they created between them. They want Russia to be friendly to an Israel that made such a mess of its situation in the Middle East, it found itself facing an uncertain future.

Sensing that the Russians may not turn out to be the protectors of Israel they would like them to be, the Jews decided to think of the Chinese as partners of Israel and potential protectors. But the Jews are aware of the one thing to keep in mind when dealing with China: They must not play silly games with the country that does not tolerate such games for more than a minute. That is, the Jews will have to behave in accordance with the laws regulating international relations. And they must respect to the letter, the protocols that were created to facilitate all transactions between nations and other entities.

And so, the question is this: What will happen when the umbilical cord connecting America and Israel will be severed? The answer is that the Jews will forget what America has done for them before the UN created Israel, and what America has done to keep Israel afloat during the decades that came after. So now, guess how the Jews will behave. If you're having difficulty guessing, there is an article that will give you an inkling as to how the Jews will behave. The article came under the title: “No, the United Nations Didn't Create Israel,” written by Ken Cohen and published on August 15, 2019 in the Jewish publication Algemeiner.

The paragraph that follows this one, is a condensed version of the argument that Ken Cohen put together to deny that the United Nations created Israel. It is a display of the ingratitude that the Jews habitually throw at those who do them good. Reading that passage, be mindful that Israel is only legally entitled to the UN-determined 1948 border. However, the UN has shown willingness to legalize Israel's claims up to the 1967 border if the latter would accept implementing Resolution 242. But the fact is that Israel has been violating that Resolution for half a century. And with people like Ken Cohen producing insane arguments for Israel to defy the UN, Israel risks losing the right to the 1948 border, and certainly what else the UN is prepared to give it. Here is the essence of Cohen's insane argument:

“Hanan Ashrawi stated a falsehood about the creation of Israel, one that's advanced by Israel's supporters and enemies ... holding that Israel was created by the UN in 1948. The partition is of merely symbolic value in explaining Israel's creation. The UN's Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) recommended the partition of Palestine into a Jewish state and an Arab state. UNSCOP's proposed borders for the two states were utterly impractical, and bear little relation to the frontiers Israel achieved after its War [on the Arabs.] The UN's partition lent endorsement to the Zionist cause as did European guilt over the Holocaust. In fact, the partition plan was never implemented. So, beware of the canard that Israel should respect the UN to whom it owes its existence”.

Ken Cohen has it all over his article that the work of the United Nations regarding the partition of Palestine, and the European guilt over the Holocaust, were instrumental in the creation of Israel. But he insists that Israel should have no respect for the United Nations because the Jews grabbed more than the land allocated to them in 1948. They achieved success, says Cohen, by launching a war against the Arabs.

And that's what the Jews will do if and when they find a protector to replace the United States. They will urge people around the globe not to respect America because they alone, kept Israel afloat during the decades.

Protecting Country from Treason is not idiotic

In the not too distant past, the murmur that did not get out in the open, used to sound as follows in a hush-hush level of voice: If it is kosher for the Jews, it should be kosher for us too.

Fortunately, it happened that after a long agonizing wait, a shift in paradigm has taken place. A trend has started among those deeply concerned about morality, to tell at a loud enough voice, what used to be said in whispers.

The shift has resulted in the shedding of light on the reality that most of the privileges, which the Jews had managed to secure for themselves, using bribes and/or blackmail, were later demanded by other groups and got it –– or if denied, created resentment among the general public.

For example, a number of privileges in the field of early education were first granted to Jews and then given reluctantly to other groups. But some municipal privileges as well as those granted to Jews at the state level in America, or the provincial level in Canada, were denied to others. This is how and why resentment began to build-up, leading some people to feel that the Jews were replacing them.

The lesson to draw from these examples is that whatever the Jews do, will inevitably have unintended and mostly nefarious consequences. It happens because the way that the authorities respond to the Jewish machinations does not remain hidden forever. When the truth comes out, as it always does, the sense of justice requires that private privilege become universal privilege. Failing this, the sense of injustice builds-up, and often creates a dangerously explosive situation.

With this in mind, read the article that came under the title: “Rep. Ted Lieu isn't an anti-Semite, he's just an idiot,” and the subtitle: “The education of Rep. Ted Lieu continues apace.” It was written by Becket Adams, and published on August 16, 2019 in The Washington Examiner.

Here is the issue: When a controversy flared-up about two American Congresswomen being blocked from visiting occupied Palestine to see for themselves what's going on in there, the supposedly American ambassador to Israel, did not keep quiet as diplomats are required to do. The Jewish ambassador, David Friedman spoke out in breach of protocol. Worse, he did not speak out in favor of America that pays his salary to defend it abroad, he spoke in favor of Israel that just insulted America and its Congress.

This prompted Congressman Ted Lieu to stand up and support his two colleagues. In so doing, he also defended the institution to which he belongs, and gave America the right to question what Israel is doing with the unlimited amount of money, weapons and diplomatic support it receives from America year after year after year. Here is how Becket Adams described what happened next:

“This did not sit well with Ted Lieu who appeared shortly thereafter on CNN to accuse Friedman of having dual loyalties. 'His allegiance is to America, not to a foreign power … It is outrageous that the US government is working against having an American go visit Israel,' Lieu added. I think he should resign”.

What Ted Lieu did not take into account, was that the forces of darkness, though challenged at this time, still commanded a strong presence in the struggle to keep America accepting life under Jewish tyranny and be happy. What happened was that the Jewish mob descended on Ted Lieu from above like a swarm of gluttonous locusts, and crawled up on him from below like an invasion of voracious termites, demanding that he eats his words or be eaten by a flaming Jewish rage that will vanquish him from public life now and forever. And so, Ted Lieu did as commanded to do: He ate his words.

There is no doubt, this is a defeat for those who wish to see a higher moral life take hold in America. But the consolation prize is that the case was cracked open, and the forces of the good have been engaged to do battle against the forces of darkness. And the expectation is that the good will triumph in the end.

But until this happens, and till evil has been crushed once and for all, we must guard against allowing potential traitors from other ethnic groups getting the idea of winding their way through the system and getting paid to serve a foreign country, protected by the kosher precedents that the Jews are establishing for themselves, and by the Jews silencing those who expose the immorality of the current system.

The way to prevent this from happening, is to raise our voices and speak loudly and clearly about the reality that characters of the David Friedman ilk should suffer more than being forced to resign; they should be tried for treason, and when convicted, thrown in jail where they should remain for the rest of their lives.

The noble Ashrawi vs. the deceitful Dershowitz

Thanks to David French, we can now endeavor to point out the nobility of Hanan Ashrawi, the Palestinian woman that's known for her sharp intellect and high integrity. We can do it by comparing the clarity of her thoughts against those of the confused and dishonest Alan Dershowitz.

What David French did to make the endeavor possible, is that he wrote an article which came under the title: “Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib Partnered with Vicious Anti-Semites to Plan Their Trip to Israel,” and the subtitle: “This should be a national scandal.” The article was published on August 16, 2019 in National Review Online (NRO).

Alan Dershowitz began the effort of turning himself into a national figure by enunciating what came to be known as the Dershowitz doctrine. The way he put it at the time, went something like this: “You cannot blame Israel for doing to the Palestinians what [fascist] regimes have always done to people under their control.” Ever since that time, his idea has been used to justify Israel's slow-motion genocide of the Palestinian people; activities that range from starving the Palestinians by ransacking their farms and stealing their food and water ... to carpet bombing their schools and residential districts, killing them by the thousands.

Years later, when the third generation of Palestinians, born and raised under Jewish occupation, found itself with nothing to live for, it reacted the way that other peoples did when they found themselves in a similar situation. From Spartacus in the Roman Empire to Charles De Gaulle under the Nazi occupation of France, they joined a resistance movement or formed their own. When this happened in occupied Palestine, the Jewish organizations around the world responded by parading a stream of professional whiners who lamented that the Palestinians were fighting back instead of feeling honored to live under Jewish control.

Hoping to trick Hanan Ashrawi by asking her a question that would make her say something they can use against her, or use to deflect attention from Israel's genocidal activities in Palestine, the tricksters of the Jewish propaganda machine asked Ashrawi to comment on the Palestinian resistance movement. Here is how she responded, according to David French's article: “You cannot somehow adopt the language of either the international community or the occupier by describing anybody who resists as terrorist.” That is, neither Spartacus nor De Gaulle were terrorists … but the Roman legions, the Nazi goons and the butchers of Zion proved to be the incarnation of terror itself.

Well then, when you compare the Hanan Ashrawi answer to that of Alan Dershowitz, you realize how ignoble the Jewish man has been to defend the indefensible, and how noble the Palestinian woman has been to defend the innocent. You know what else, my friend? Now that the Jewish lawyer has been relegated to the trash heap of history, an Evangelical lawyer named David French, is vowing to fill his shoes and carry on with the same kind of confused and dishonest message. What did French do to earn that honor? He did this:

“The Washington Post said that Omar and Tlaib's trip was planned by Miftah, a nonprofit organization headed by Hanan Ashrawi, a group that promotes global awareness of Palestinian realities. I started looking at the Miftah website, and it was like peeling an onion of evil. There was layer upon layer of anti-Semitism. First, the group published blood libel. When the article was condemned, Miftah minimized the reference as merely briefly addressed, then issued an apology. It also published an American neo-Nazi treatise called 'Who Rules America: The Alien Grip on Our News and Entertainment Media Must Be Broken.' And of course Miftah published an article asking whether Israel was a proper homeland for the Jewish people”.

David French says he started looking at the Miftah website, and it was like peeling an onion of evil. But he made the mistake of giving a link to that website. So, anyone that reads his words and checks the website, will see neither onion nor evil. The only thing that's noteworthy on that otherwise mundane site, is an apology for a mistake that was made inadvertently, that was quickly corrected and that was apologized for.

For the writer to claim that he saw layer upon layer of anti-Semitism, is to engage in intellectual dishonesty of the kind that Evangelical fanatics commit before asking for a donation to maintain the demonic faith and spread the satanic message. I don't know if David French or NRO will ask for donations, but if asked to justify his accusation of Miftah for publishing anti-Semitic tropes, David French will have nothing to say.

Or maybe he'll point to the white supremacist treatise that was printed in Miftah, a foreign non-white publication that, among other things, informs its readers of what goes on in America –– a perfectly legitimate thing to do for any publication. In fact, if David French believes it was a mistake for Miftah to publish that treatise, how does he justify quoting its two most “virulent” paragraphs in his own article?

Come to think of it, David French's latest piece, like all those he wrote over the years, is full of links that send the reader to all kinds of places.

And many of these places contain what David French characterizes as anti-Semitic tropes and yet, he doesn't call himself a layered anti-Semite. Why not? Does he not smell like an onion?