A dull Shout in the Wilderness nobody will hear

Aside from adhering to a couple of taboos that no Jewish pundit can contradict when writing about Israel, Robert Kagan wrote what amounts to an open letter to whichever group of leaders will win the upcoming election in Israel ... telling it like it is. He is warning those leaders, as delicately as he can, not to abandon the appearance of standing in the camp of liberalism.

The open letter came in the form of an article written under the title: “Israel and the decline of the liberal order,” and the subtitle: “The rise of nationalism around the globe may be reflected in the outcome of Israeli elections on Tuesday.” It was published on September 12, 2019 in The Washington Post.

The pitch that Kagan is making to the leaders of Israel is that the authoritarian world leaders Netanyahu has been meeting and taking pictures with, will prove valueless when push comes to shove as it is bound to happen now that anti-Semitism is rising throughout the world. Kagan is reminding those leaders that Israel was born in an age of liberalism and has maintained that posture ever since. The posture harmonized very well with the American tendency to favor liberal norms thus, it would be foolish for Israel to change posture.

Robert Kagan also went into great detail, reminding those leaders that Israel could not have survived the length of time that it did, were it not for the uninterrupted financial, diplomatic and military support it has been receiving from America during the decades. He also cautioned that there was never a compelling reason for America to be this generous. To emphasize this last point, he reminded the Israelis of how much American opposition to supporting Israel there was in the past. It is opposition that might come to life again if Israel were to upset America by choosing a path that appears incompatible with American interests.

What is missing in the Kagan advice to Israel's leaders is what concrete steps they must take to guarantee the continued survival of Israel. He did the right thing warning them of the reality that no matter what posture they take, the world will never be safe for Israel. He also did the right thing acknowledging that a rightwing posture will damage Israel's relation with “liberal” America. But he did not explain why a liberal posture will guarantee continued American support, given that a new generation of Jewish Americans is turning its back on Israel, not only because of its posture but because of the continued occupation of Palestine.

There is no doubt that Israeli leaders of every stripe are aware of everything that Robert Kagan has included in his open letter to them and yet, they do not seem eager to change course. So, what could he have said that would have brought them to change the current condition of paralysis in which they live, replacing it with one that has the chance of turning things around? This, would have promised a stable future for Israel's inhabitants, and satisfaction for Jews around the globe.

Well, it is simple. Since the occupation of Palestine is the source of Israel's continued anxiety about its own survival, the occupation must end. This is not happening, however, because the Jews have many false excuses as to why the occupation must continue. They also have no incentive or compelling reason to make the end happen. In fact, a good incentive would have been the certainty that Israel will survive, even exist as a normal country. Well, the truth is that such offer was made to them in the initiative of the Arab League that gave them everything they said they wanted in return for ending the occupation.

It was made more than a decade ago but so far, the Jews have not accepted the offer because they want the land of Palestine more than anything else. And this is where Kagan could have made a difference. He can still explain to the Israelis that they will never get a greater incentive to end the occupation than what the Arabs have offered. They will not get it from America, from the world or from anyone else. This done, he should also explain to them that as a member of the American liberal crowd, he can report with authority that America is turning its back on Israel because the liberals and the moderates are losing patience with them.

In addition, because the Israelis do not care about losing the American public as long as they continue to have the support of the politicians, Robert Kagan can update them, explaining that they are losing support even among the politicians who can no longer go against the wishes of the electorate. He should be telling the leaders of Israel that sooner or later, the Jewish lobby in America will have been reduced to a dog that may still bark but will have lost his bite.

When this happens, the opposition to Israel will grow in America more than they see it operate anywhere else in the world. And anything can happen after that.

If this is not incentive enough for the Israeli leaders to change course, they should buckle-up and prepare for what's coming because we’ve reached that point in the cycle once again.

Behold the Fifth Column now in full Swing

Think about it. What could the early patriots of the American colonies, be wishing to accomplish when they were contemplating the start of a revolution?

Well, here are two ideas. First, they wanted to be independent of Britain, their colonial master at the time. Second, they wanted to establish a Republic in which the people will be absolutely free to choose those who will represent them in government.

Now think about something else. What would someone do a century or two later, if they were an organization that wants to turn America back into a colony –– not of Britain this time but –– of another foreign power, however small and insignificant it may be?

Well, here are two ideas. First, that someone will send Fifth Columnists who will infiltrate the American government, and work to advance the agenda of the foreign power while pretending to work for America. Second, they will interfere with the electoral system to deny the American people the freedom to choose those who will represent them in government so that they remain singularly in charge of the government.

Is this happening to America at this time? Have the strategic institutions of the country, such as the State Department, the White House, the Pentagon, the Treasury and others been infiltrated by Jews of dual loyalties or Jews who are singularly loyal to Israel? The answer to these questions is an emphatic yes.

In fact, dozens of these Jews had their works reviewed on this blog over the last decade. The inescapable conclusion has been that these works point to the reality that most of the authors spent their time, as they continue to spend it now, doing one thing only: advance Israel's interests whether they coincide with those of America or they contradict them.

There are more than 3,000 articles on this site, each reviewing between one and four pieces written by Jews, by their disciples or their sycophants. If anything, they show conclusively how the traitors of the Fifth Column work almost openly for Israel, sometimes to the detriment of America, while being paid by America. This is like paying a monster to come to your house and rape your wife and children. Nowhere can this happen but in America, and no one would do such a thing but a Jew.

This is how the Jews, who are foreigners-at-heart, yet carry American citizenship papers, infiltrate the American government and work from the inside to advance Israel's agenda while pretending to work for America, and getting an American paycheck for their troubles.

As to the way that the Jews interfere with the electoral system to deny the American public the freedom to choose their representatives, a recent article shows how the Jews pull this stunt in the open, and get away with it.

The article came under the title: “Warren Mimics Bernie's Promotion Of Anti-Semite Linda Sarsour To Campaign Surrogate,” and the subtitle: “Given Linda Sarsour's record, her claim that she supports Bernie Sanders because of rising anti-Semitism in America is irony thick enough to cut with a chainsaw.” It was written by Warren Henry and published on September 11, 2019 in The Federalist.

The following is a condensed version of what the author is saying:

“It is troubling that Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are empowering people who support the BDS movement. Sanders identified Linda Sarsour as a campaign surrogate. She supports a one-state solution. She tweeted that nothing is creepier than Zionism. She was one of the first to meet with Rep. Ilhan Omar when the latter was sworn into office. For a candidate to make Sarsour a campaign surrogate represents a new low. Unfortunately, his chief rival is not doing much better. Elizabeth Warren has made Max Berger her campaign director. Berger was the co-founder of a group called If Not Now. He tweeted: 'Sometimes I feel the biggest obstacle to peace in Israel-Palestine is the bigotry of American Jews … I dare anyone to visit Hebron and tell me what's happening there doesn't look an awful lot like apartheid.' Berger also defended Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Linda Sarsour. The Progressive Zionists of California have written two letters to Warren's campaign asking that Berger step down from his position”.

Here you see Warren Henry, who is a cog in the gigantic Jewish propaganda machine, attack two candidates running to be President, because they hired outstanding American citizens to help them with their campaigns. Henry says he is disturbed because Sanders hired Linda Sarsour who supports a one-state solution in occupied Palestine. And he laments that she also met with the duly elected Rep. Ilhan Omar who supports BDS.

Warren Henry also says he is disturbed because Elizabeth Warren hired Max Berger who admits feeling at times that the biggest obstacle to peace in the Middle East is the bigotry of American Jews. Apparently, it is a crime to have such feelings.

For these reasons, the Jewish Fifth Column in America wants Linda Sarsour and Max Berger fired from their positions, or else Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren will have to be considered candidates unfit to run for the presidency.

Well, you may or may not remember this, my friend, but there was a time when people in North America were not afraid to speak freely. And one of the things they were saying was that the Jews put themselves on a path to make it mandatory that you get permission from the office of the Jewish commissar before you can make love to your wife.

We're getting there, my friend. We're getting there.

They work hard trying to reconquer America

If you want to conquer America but don't know how to do it, there is a lesson for you. It was given by Clifford D. May. It is an article he wrote pretending to accomplish one thing, but accomplishing something else.

The article came under the title: “Another unhappy September 11 anniversary,” and the subtitle: “The United States continues to fight erratically and without a coherent strategy.” The article was published on September 10, 2019 in The Washington Times.

Clifford May's point is that a big event (later named 9/11) took place 18 years ago on September 11, 2001, and all those who were born in that year or thereafter, should know about it. But considering that in his eyes, the American system of education is so bad it will not teach the history of that event, he volunteered to give the lesson to America's young all by himself.

The first thing that Clifford May did after promising to give a history lesson on 9/11, is that he harked back to the year 1930 at which time a severe economic Depression was taking hold. He also harked back to the First World War that was supposed to end all wars but did not. Thus, instead of talking about 9/11 as promised, Clifford May went on a tangent, blaming the Depression of the 1930s, not on the undisciplined borrowing and wild speculation that took place in an era known to have fostered Savage Capitalism, but blamed the Depression on Socialism that was known then as well (or as badly) as Quantum Symmetry is known today.

But what is it that motivated Clifford May to do that? He did it because there is an ongoing political campaign in America where Socialism has become an issue that Clifford May and his kind are trying to denigrate. So, he used the occasion to play partisan politics. Only then, did he turn his attention to the 9/11 issue.

And this was the moment when Clifford May began to dig a grave for his own silliness. Like every student of history that's familiar with the interaction between Christianity and Islam –– knows, the way to bury yourself in a cesspool of frivolity, is to refer to the utterances of Bernard Lewis, the so-called Jewish historian. It is what Clifford May did, quoting Lewis as having said that “our enemies” are Islamic supremacists fighting a long war against the West, against Judeo-Christian civilization, against Crusaders and Zionists. But the truth is that the Jews played a role in the Christian/Islamic relationship only twice in history. These were the Medieval times and the modern times. Here is how it happened:

Centuries ago, after the fall of the Roman Empire, Europe started to slide into an epoch that came to be known as the Dark Ages. Shortly thereafter, a new and vibrant civilization named Islam, arose in the Arabian Peninsula. Imitating the ancient civilizations––including the Greek and the Roman––of conquering the known world, the Muslims conquered the Middle East and small parts of Christian Europe. What distinguished the relationship that the Arabs had with those they conquered, from the relationship that the Romans had with those they conquered, is that the Romans proved to be brute savages whereas the Arabs proved to be highly civilized and noble humanists.

Three separate developments took place almost simultaneously. One was the steady European descent into darkness, including a morbid hostility to the kind of knowledge that could threaten the authority of the Church. A second development was that the Muslim Arabs rehabilitated the classics of the ancient civilizations while encouraging the kind of research in physics and chemistry that have led to modern science. A third development was that the Jews asserted their kinship to the Semitic Arab race, and then attempted to impose Arab science (especially chemistry) on the Christians of Europe. This caused the Europeans to believe that the Jews brought “black magic” to destroy Christianity. It is how and why anti-Semitism, encompassing Arabs and Jews, flourished in Europe, as exemplified by the trials of the witches and the staging of the Spanish Inquisition.

As to modern times, the Jews played a role in the relationship between Christians and Muslims when they tried to play Sunni against Shia, siding with Shiite Iran against Sunni Arabs or vice-versa depending on the direction of the diplomatic wind. The Jews also invented the Judeo-Christian designation, and played to the hilt the game of motivating America's Christians to hate the Muslims. The Jewish goal was to mobilize the resources of the country, and have the Christians go after the Muslims at home and abroad.

And this is what the Clifford May article is still trying to accomplish. But after 18 years of Jewish inspired futility and staggering waste, America said enough was enough. Clifford May and those like him did not appreciate that rejection and so, they turned their attention to the generation that's in school and prone to being brainwashed. The trick that May and company are using, consists of enticing the young to love the Jews by hating both the Muslims and their own parents who, according to Clifford May, failed to start a hate-Islam campaign by associating Islam with terrorism. In fact, this is how May ended his article:

“One American administration after another has fought this conflict without a coherent global strategy to defeat or contain [Islam.] If you're 18, you must be sorely disappointed by how much your elders have not achieved since the year you were born”.

Knowing that the Jews never stop doing the wrong thing, did you think what might come next? If you didn’t here is a hint: They will unleash a full-blown propaganda campaign to take control of the schools so as to “educate” America’s youngsters the way that the rabbis educated the political elites of yesteryear, and had them turn the Congress into a graveyard for braindead zombies.

The moaning Voice of Defeat, Regret and Battle

If you're of an age that allows you to remember what the political situation was like half a century ago, and if you were attuned at the time to what the Arabs were saying to each other during those eventful years, you'll have to think that these people were a clairvoyant lot.

Those were the years when the political and diplomatic situations in the region engendered a great deal of what the locals saw as no more and no less than everyday balderdash, put out in the casual style of the Arab Street. But those who followed the discussions from afar, must have thought that the balderdash could have been prophesies with a real chance of coming true.

It is that the ordinary people of the Arab and Muslim Worlds were discussing America's decision to replace the old colonial powers for doing mischief in the Middle East. America did it to support the Jewish scheme of reviving and pushing forward the colonial project of slicing the Arab World, aiming to dominate its parts separately. Out of this line of Arab thinking, came the suggestion that the defeat of the Zionist scheme, as planned by the Jews, will happen only when America itself will have been diminished.

Little did these people know at the time, that they were foretelling what will happen half a century later. More than that, little did they know the reality that it will be the Jews themselves who will diminish America. In fact, this is what happened when the Jews sucked more out of America than America was equipped to give them.

You can get a glimpse as to how that sordid history developed over the decades when you read the article that came under the title: “Iran gives Hezbollah precision-guided terrorism,” written by Jed Babbin, and published on September 8, 2019 in The Washington Times. It is worth mentioning that Babbin was undersecretary of Defense in the Bush (41) administration, a time when the Jews were hard at work implementing their demonic scheme.

The best way to look at Babbin's article is through the lens of lamentations. Having done little to curtail the Jewish exploitation of America when he was in government, Jed Babbin looks back at those years when America was arming Israel to be more powerful than “all its neighbors put together.” Now my friend, try to imagine the man looking at the result of that policy, and asking himself: What were we thinking?

There is only one thing for him to think about now. It is to regret that America was hypnotized by the Jews so deeply, he and the rest of the American brass could not foresee that the Arabs and the Muslims will respond to America's moves of escalating the armament of Israel by accelerating their own armament. Not only did the Arabs and the Muslims buy the weapons where they could find them, they started to produce and develop the kind of weapons that would meet their specifications and fill their needs.

And that's what the Jed Babbin article is about. What follows is a condensed version of his lamentations:

“The war between Israel and Hezbollah is continuous. Israel has never succeeded in deterring Hezbollah, which has accelerated the conversion of its missiles into precision-guided munitions (PGMs), thus converting its arsenal to more effective weapons. It possesses at least 130,000 rockets, missiles and hundreds of short-range missiles that can be targeted with accuracy. Israel relies on two anti-missile systems that can be overwhelmed if the enemy launches large numbers of rockets and missiles at once. Hezbollah has shifted to a tactic aimed to do that. With PGMs, Hezbollah could destroy Israeli government buildings, inflict great casualties on Israeli reserves and damage on Israel's air force. [Hezbollah] may be betting that Trump will be defeated in 2020 and that a Democrat successor would be weaker on Israel's defense. If Hezbollah launches another war, the casualties and damage will be enormous. Hezbollah moves weapons around, and Israel can't locate them to prevent the mass launch of rockets and missiles”.

After a litany of this length and complexity, Jed Babbin could do nothing better than repeat the usual Jewish advice that––in fact––did more than anything else to diminish America in the first place. He recommended that America bomb Iran to deter Hezbollah, thus protect Israel.

But because the Jews know that the American people no longer tolerate someone advising their military to commit one more act of savagery to protect Israel, Babbin made his recommendation in the most subtle of manners. Here is how he did it:

“It's maddening that we have no way to influence Iran's decisions other than increasing economic sanctions against it. At some point, perhaps when Iran orders Hezbollah to war, we will have to conclude that economic sanctions just aren't enough”.

Translation: Bomb not only Hezbollah, but Iran as well.

And this is another chapter in the long history of the Jews––a history that's written in hundreds of chapters, each of them narrating the story of Jewish misery, but each telling it as a different version of the one and same story.

Rumbling from the deep warning of imminent Doom

America should know by now that nothing the Jews do or ask for, can be an isolated undertaking.

Even when one of them says or does something on a whim, a pundit of the mob will come up with a way to tie that whim to the ongoing debate. And he'll make the utterance sound like it was an expression of someone's stream of consciousness that just decided to burst out at the time that it did.

For this reason, it is important for the rest of us to read every article that's written by a Jew or a lackey thereof, as being indicative of the mosaic that the Jews are putting together with the aim of achieving whatever goal they happen to work on at the time. Their goal at this moment, being to take control of the American system of education from kindergarten to college, an article that was written by Chrissy Clark should sound the alarm among those who will read it.

The article came under the title: “Rashida Tlaib Poses For Pictures With Anti-Israel Group That Endorses Terrorism,” and was published on September 7, 2019 in The Federalist. Let it be known that Rashida Tlaib is an American of Palestinian descent that was elected to represent a district of some three quarter of a million Americans in their federal House of Representatives. And let it be known that the group which Chrissy Clark accuses of endorsing terrorism, is none other than the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM).

But the thing is that when you go over the Clark article looking for an explanation as to why she accuses PYM of endorsing terrorism, you find no more than a single regurgitation that's so disgusting, it would sicken even the stray dogs and alley cats of the neighborhood. See for yourself. This is how the Clark regurgitation went: “PYM, a group that has voiced support for terrorism, reported the Washington Free Beacon earlier today.” That's it, my friend. This is all that's needed in Jewish circles to convince the primitive mob of pundits and editors of rag-like yellow journalism, that something is true and fit to print.

But checking your sources and ascertaining the veracity of what you're saying, especially when it comes to accusing someone of terrorism, is such a fundamental requirement of journalism in civilized societies, you wonder how it happened that American journalism sank to that level of mediocrity. In fact, the situation is so bad now, a new term must be added to the English language: criminal mediocrity.

What happened to American journalism is so drastic a development, the baffling question is this: how did it happen to America? Well, it was the Jews who brought the tendency to America at a time when the country was so naive, it did not realize what the Jews were doing to it. And you don't have to be a historian to ponder that question. The dirty tricks of the trade are all there, in Chrissy Clark's article, and you can go over them yourself. It is that Clark seems to believe the American public continues to be as naive as it was half a century ago. And so, she dumped her verbal manure into the lap of that public the same way that the rabbis used to do things half a century ago.

You'll find that Clark has revived the dirty tricks which served the rabbis well in times past. She did so by duplicating their method of insidiously permeating the marketplace of ideas with concepts that have the effect of sneaking into the vault where the advanced concepts of Civilization are preserved, and setting the place on fire. Here are a couple of examples:

When two groups are fighting –– be they two armies, two militias or one army and one militia –– the worst that can happen is the killing of a soldier that has surrendered. By contrast, the highest form of civilized conduct is to advocate taking enemy soldiers as prisoners rather than killing them. But instead of citing this article of Civilization to praise members of the PYM, Chrissy Clark chided the Palestinian youngsters for advocating what she called “kidnapping” Israeli soldiers rather than killing them. This woman is so backward, she qualifies being categorized as criminally mediocre.

Look what else she wrote: “A pole of Palestinians found that half believe the goal of intifada is to end the existence of Israel, publicly recognized as the homeland of the Jews.” The truth is that no such pole exists. But you'll find poles that say the racist regime calling itself Zionist is unsustainable. It will be a good thing if the intifada defeated it and replaced it with a more civilized form of government.

And look what else she did. She said that Israel was publicly recognized as the homeland of the Jews. If you're puzzled as to how a homeland can be recognized publicly, don't be hard on yourself believing that you're missing something. You're not. It is the Jews who are missing something. These people don't just bite the hand that feeds them, they chomp the head that saves them. But guess what. In so doing, they chomp their own heads as well.

Here is what's behind that satanic form of Jewish communication. The United Nations (UN) is the only world body that has the power to legally give the Jews a homeland, and it did. But the moment that the Jews got there, they armed themselves and went after the disarmed indigenous Palestinians, and robbed them of their lands.

Now the Jews occupy more than ten times what the UN had given them, and no one at the UN likes it. So the Jews developed the habit of attacking the UN, denying that it gave them a homeland. Imagine the people that blow their entrails out of their bellies crying “holocaust denier,” when someone questions a story about the Holocaust, turning around and denying that the UN gave them a homeland in Palestine. Whose head will they chomp next?

The Jews believe they are the smartest thing in the Universe for being the “only” ones capable of pulling a stunt like that. But you know what, my friend? They have proven themselves to be the dumbest thing in the Universe. And here is why:

The Jewish homeland that's confined within the 1948 border is owned by the Jews legally. Thus, no matter what happens, they can always count on the world to stand with them if someone tried to push them out of it. But now that the Jews are denying that the UN gave them that piece of property, they are forfeiting their legal right to it. This being the case, the next time that Israel gets into a serious fight with a neighbor, and America does not come to the rescue, the enemy will have the right to end not only the Zionist regime, but the entire Jewish experiment in Arab Palestine.

Now that America knows how and why its journalism became debased to the extent that it did, it should be able to work out a way to get it back in shape. Not only that, but neglecting to oppose the rabbis “educating” the American public about Jewish sensitivities having led to mediocrity, America will never want to hand the Jews control of its educational system where they plan to “educate” America’s children all about the Holocaust so as to produce backward primitives of the Chrissy Clark variety.

Their ballistic Fanaticism diminishes America

To go ballistic is to be like a bullet that's fired from a gun. You aim in one direction, you pull the trigger, and once the bullet is gone, you have no control over it. Gravity and the atmospheric conditions determine how far the bullet will go, how much it will deviate from the straight path, and what or where it will impact.

And so, to go ballistic in the exercise of human interaction, has come to mean the start of a project that sounds good in theory but without envisaging a potential development for it. Thus, you do not prepare a plan B in case the project begins to falter. And you do not build into it a way to abort the mission if and when it proves harmful to your goal or detrimental to society.

This kind of behavior is common at the individual level, especially among the people who live a hectic life, and remain so absorbed in what they do, they judge the validity of everything they see in terms of how it can or cannot be useful to them. But once these people leave the realm of the self, and do something that involves the company of others, they come under scrutiny. They are called out by their colleagues when they misbehave and told to mend their ways. If they ignore the advice, they find themselves ostracized first by those close to them, and then by society as a whole.

This has been the pattern of Jewish existence for thousands of years. While individual Jews are as selfish as anyone can be, they go ballistic when it comes to developing and protecting the interests of the group. Thus, you see them judge the validity of an occurrence by asking and answering the question, “Is it good for the Jews?” In addition, it happened that since the creation of Israel, that question has spawned a progeny which goes like this: “Is it good for Israel?”

This behavior might have been dismissed as irrelevant were it not for the fact that those questions imply an interest in what is good for the Jews or for Israel right now, regardless of the possible consequences that the occurrence or the project might have on society in the long run. And so, it happened that when a new generation of Jews and non-Jews began to realize what the outgoing generation of Jews was sneakily creating for them, it rebelled.

That rebellion is ongoing in America at this time. The young are agitating on the campuses and elsewhere, demanding that communal approach to human interactions be brought back to society. At the same time, however, the old guard is using its monopoly of the media to distort what the young are doing. In addition, the most fanatic of the old guard have upgraded their ballistic interaction with others, from the proverbial single bullet of the handgun to the spraying of the machine gun. The old guard took that step believing it will answer the question: What is good for the Jews or for Israel right now if you’ll just ignore the consequences that might follow?

However misguided this is, it is what's unfolding in the Israeli media and the Jewish controlled American media these days. A good example to study came under the title: “What American Jews just don't get about Israel,” an article that was written by the Israeli Daniel Gordis and published on September 7, 2019 in the American publication, The New York Post. What follows is a condensed version of what Gordis is saying:

“Most American Jews hope that Netanyahu will be defeated. They are Liberals, and claim that his 2018 law declaring Israel the nation-state of the Jewish people has eroded democracy, and blame him for the lack of progress on the Palestinian front. There is a chance that he'll win. If not, the victor will come from the center, and Israeli policies will not change. Some candidates have declared they would hammer Gaza and be resolute toward Iran. The US and Israel are different projects. America was created to be a haven to huddled masses; Israel was intended to be a home for the Jews. American Jews chant, 'end the occupation.' Israelis have no idea how to end it. There is much that Israel must do differently. A relationship between American Jews and Israel is critical. It is important for all to understand that America and Israel are different. One was meant to embrace all of humanity; the other was intended to [embrace the so-called] Jewish people”.

As can be seen, Daniel Gordis admits that no matter who rules Israel, the current policy –– especially the one regarding the occupation of Palestine –– will not change because those who put it together meant it to be an irreversible ballistic endeavor. This is why despite the pressure that's coming from the Jews of America, who are the most important benefactors of Israel, the beneficiaries say they wouldn't know how comply with the demand to end the occupation.

Gordis further admits that Israel is not now and never was a democracy given that it was meant to exist exclusively for one kind of people: those who convert to a religion they call Judaism, and by some kind of sorcery, acquire a racial ethnicity that puts them above everyone else. Imagine the self-delusion!

In the mind of these people, the magical transformation exempts them from having to obey the laws of man … making them responsible only for obeying the laws of God, which is their responsibility to write down, and America’s responsibility to enforce. Imagine the self-delusion!

And the farce goes on, and the tug of war between the old guard and the rising generation intensifies, while America keeps sinking into the abyss of a Jewish created irrelevance. Imagine the self-inflicted wound!

The Alpha and the Omega of a failed Doctrine

When an event proves to be of epic dimensions and impossible to remember in all of its details all at once, the natural human tendency is to retain its Alpha and its Omega, which means retain the beginning and the ending of the event while letting the in-between occurrences fade away with time.

This truism is becoming clearer by the day to those who followed the Jewish inspired American war against Islam. Even if the war did not start officially until the year 2003 with the invasion of Iraq, its preamble goes back to shortly after the 1967 Pearl Harbor style Israeli attack on its neighbors. It was this attack that convinced the Americans they can erase the shame of their defeat in Vietnam by joining the Judeo-Israeli campaign to “kick Arab asses” and score a few winning points.

What's happening now, half a century later, is that America is beginning to feel the necessity to dissociate itself from the Judeo-Israeli Middle Eastern campaign, and try to forget what happened during the decades that proved utterly fruitless if not detrimental to the country's security. America knows it needs to do this now to curtail its overstretched posture and prepare to face new and serious challenges emanating from several sources around the globe. Thus, it can be said that the American decision to disengage from its involvement in Afghanistan marks the Omega of its ill-advised decades-long adventure.

But that's not the case with the Jews whose religion is synonymous with the term “perpetual war” as can be determined from reading their Old Testament where page after page, from cover to cover, there is nothing to read about but wars, blood, mayhem, treachery and misery. So, while the Americans are retrenching and redeploying their military and financial assets, the Jewish leaders are developing a two-pronged strategy to exude fake optimism from one side of the mouth, while using the other side of the mouth to rationalize the wish of the now deterred Israeli military to pursue a policy of keeping a low-profile.

That is, Israel has signaled that it will continue to live by the sword as dictated by religion, but will not do anything that might trigger an all-out war with a neighbor, fearing that such move will end the Zionist regime and replace it with a South African style Democracy. In fact, two recently published articles––one on America and one on Israel––offer a wealth of insights on all these matters.

The article on America, marking the Omega of the expansive doctrine, came under the title: “Why America Doesn't Want to Admit That it Failed in Afghanistan,” and the subtitle: “While nobody in a position of power likes to admit it, the United States has done all it can for Afghanistan.” It was written by the American pundit, Daniel R. DePetris and published on September 3, 2019 in the national Interest. Here is what DePetris had to say about America's involvement in a foreign war:

“The United States and the Taliban have reached an agreement in principle. President Donald Trump would be on his way toward extricating the United States from the longest conflict in its history. He would have public opinion on his side. Americans are tired of the war and find the whole thing absurd. Adults and veterans no longer see the war as being worth the effort. This is the end result of an experiment that has cost a trillion dollars and defined by troop deployments that go on and on and on. Stretching out Washington's participation in a never-ending civil war is foolish. One could even call it a dereliction of duty”.

As to the article on Israel, marking the start of a new Alpha cycle, it came under the title: “The Campaign between wars,” and the subtitle: “How Israel Rethought Its Strategy to Counter Iran's Malign Regional Influence.” It was written by two Israeli pundits, Gadi Eisenkot and Gabi Siboni, and published on September 4, 2019 on the website of the Washington Institute. Here is what the two authors had to say about Israel's new propaganda campaign:

“The Israeli military activities were characterized by two interlinked phases. The first was preparation for wars. The second phase concerned the use of force during war. The nature of the threats to Israel's security were changing profoundly. The rise of new challenges and the destruction wrought by the 2006 war spurred the IDF to develop a concept of integrated, low-intensity, preemptive warfare: The Campaign Between Wars (CBW). The CBW constitutes a fundamental change in the pattern of Israeli security operations. Deviating from the binary approach of either preparing for war or openly waging it, the CBW strives for proactive, offensive actions based on clandestine efforts. The CBW's development led to the authoring of a new military doctrine––defend Israel's security interests without escalating to war”.

But given the Jewish pattern of never to give up on the exploitation of those who listened to them previously, the expectation is that the Jewish leaders will use the “unfinished business of Iraq” as excuse to work on a new scheme for dragging America back into the adventures that will take the country down to the level of a second rate power this time. If it happens, the Americans will have no one to blame but themselves.