There is no Capitulation where there is no War

 Playing the game of rival against rival always starts innocently. It is meant to give the players a necessary experience for survival while joyfully experiencing the winning of one round while knowing that you will inevitably lose another round at another time.

 

We, members of the human species, have inherited a trait from the carnivores that hunt for food. It is the playing of physical games that serve as training to prepare us for when we must fight a defensive war, or one of premeditated aggression. The moment that the young carnivores can stand on their legs, they engage in playful games that help them sharpen their reflexes, strengthen their muscles, and help them develop techniques to overpower the prey.

 

Left to themselves, human children tend to engage in similar activities among siblings and with other children. When they see them play rough, the adults intervene to make sure that the children do not go as far as hurt each other. Whereas the carnivores instinctively know there is a demarcation line between the training game and the actual hunt, children of the human species are taught that sportsman-like games and training for war, are not meant to harm the opponent.

 

As in all human endeavors, the rules and principles of physical interactions, have analogues in human non-physical interactions. In the way that children play to train for the battles of the future, adults engage in battles of wit. They do it for training purposes, but also to win a prize that can be as pricey as a multi-million-dollar court case or getting elected president of the nation. In fact, life for some people, is a continuous engagement in battles of the wit with rivals.

 

Like everywhere else in the world, Americans used to treat court cases as a forum where the dispensation of justice was paramount. Justice was reached via the battles of the wit, and did not cross the line separating the sportsman-like combat from the kind of confrontation that seeks to win the case at any cost. But then the Jews came along and reversed that order. They made it so that winning the case for his client was paramount to a litigation lawyer, which result he must attain by hook or by crook. And it was from this courtroom approach, acting like a poison pill, that the Jewish style adversarial system was swallowed by every aspect of American culture.

 

Despite the protestations that Jews are being used as scapegoats yet again, you can be certain that it was the Jewish poison pill which led to the current cancel culture, the sharp divisions between the political factions, and the riots that gave American streets the look of a Third World. “Tikkun Olam” is the Hebrew command that supposedly gives the Jews the right to burn the world so as to rebuild it in a way that will serve them better. And the Jews take that command very seriously.

 

Now that they succeeded doing it to America, the Jews want to use America to do it to the world. You can see an example of that when you study the article which came under the title: “Europe capitulates to China's rulers,” and the subtitle: “The EU undermines its own interests and those of its ally across the pond.” It was written by Clifford D. May, and published on January 5, 2021 in The Washington Times.

 

Like every aggressor that wants to be thought of as the savior of humanity, Clifford May spoke in the name of all Jews without first obtaining their permission. He laid out the reasons why Europe must not get cozy with China or Russia or Iran. But first, he had to introduce the subject to his readers, and so he offered the following preamble:

 

“Authoritarians are increasingly assertive and audacious. Americans and Europeans should be working more cooperatively than ever before. They're not. It is in the European Union's interest to defend its members from the machinations of authoritarians. Give me a few moments to make the case clearly”.

 

This done, Clifford May went on to tell how evil China, Russia and Iran have been. The following is the condensed form of what he said about them:

 

“The world's leading authoritarians are in Beijing. They are oppressing minorities within the borders of the people's Republic of China, which is a thief of intellectual property. Its spies are everywhere. It manipulates the World Health Organization. It clashes with India, builds islands in the South China Sea and disputes Japan's possession of the Senkaku Islands. It bullies Australia and threatens Taiwan. The Kremlin has appropriated territory from the neighbors, and been implicated in assassinations and assassination attempts in Europe and on Russian soil. The Islamic Republic of Iran conducted missile attacks against Saudi Arabian oil facilities and has executed the journalist Ruhollah Zam. It violates the nuclear deal”.

 

What Clifford May deliberately and foolishly rejects, is that the Europeans are telling America they are not playing this game anymore.

 

Save for the excesses of America’s darkest chapters, the Europeans are conscious of their own colonial past. They see in it the kind of evil that must never be duplicated or exceeded.

 

And they recognize that anything legitimately attributable to China or Russia or Iran, is trivial compared to what they have themselves committed.

 

Except for the following lesson to America, they will not pretend to have the moral standing to give lessons to anyone: If you do not want to capitulate, do not start a war.

How Advice from the Fanatics ruined America

 There is lightweight wisdom, and there is heavyweight wisdom. There are those who expound wisdom with every speech they enunciate, and there are those who remain silent, keep their wisdom to themselves, and use it only to navigate the difficulties of daily life.

 

When someone is of both the lightweight and vocal kind, he can inflict a great deal of damage on the innocent who take what they hear at face value without doing critical analysis on what's dished out. At the start of the twentieth century, the American population was generally innocent and trusting of others. What made it even more so, was that times were good, and people were optimistic. They were easy to persuade.

 

This was also the time when the Jews of Europe were beginning to immigrate into America where they played the usual game of know-it-all, and claiming to do everything better than anyone. And the Americans were naive enough to believe them. In fact, what the Americans were hearing was lightweight wisdom of the kind that the Jews are using today to flood the media and political gatherings of all kind. The gamut spreads from the White House and State Department to the town-halls of the smallest municipalities.

 

What the Jews did a century ago, and continue to do today, is explain to anyone who would listen, how things are. They explain it by speculating on what people, be they near or far, think, as well as what they intend to do, and what the consequences of their actions will be. This kind of speculation is what makes the wisdom of Jews of the lightweight kind, especially when you compare it to the heavyweight kind, which is advice based on the observation of hard facts, followed by the deduction as to how those facts may play out among human beings.

 

You can see the destructive effect of lightweight wisdom when you go over the article that came under the title: “Why going back to Iran nuclear deal is folly,” and the subtitle: “Rejoining the Iran deal puts Middle East normalization and regional peace at risk.” It was written by James Jay Carafano and Adam Milstein, and was published on January 4, 2021 in The Washington Times.

 

What follow are the speculations that were bandied about for several years. Having nothing more intelligent to say regarding this matter, James Jay Carafano and Adam Milstein amassed them and then regurgitated what people got sick hearing over the years. Ranting about the possibility of the US returning to the Iran Nuclear deal, here is how the Jewish speculations sounded:

 

“The cascading consequences of that decision could destabilize the Middle East and trigger problems around the world. Tehran is more desperate now than it was in 2015. To hand the Iranian regime a new old deal would be interpreted as a sign of American weakness and humiliation. Such act would trigger a cascade of chaos. The moderate Arab nations would view the US as feckless and unreliable partner. The process of normalization between the Arab nations and Israel could die still-born. We could see rapid proliferation in the region. Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Egypt could seek nuclear weapons. The Arab nations will look to cut deals with China and Russia. North Korea and Iran observe closely how Washington treats others. Pyongyang will escalate and act aggressively”.

 

Imagine for a moment the naive and innocent era of a century ago, a time when people were jolly, optimistic and happy about their good fortune. Have you done this? Now imagine a bunch of Jews invading the space of these people and assuring them that because they are Jews, they can read the minds of other people, and can foretell the future. How do you think the innocent and naive Americans responded?

 

Did they ask to see their membership card in the tarot association? Did they ask to see their Ouija board? No, they did not. Instead, the Americans believed the Jewish braggadocios, confided in them, and worse of all, took their advice. And this is how the early Americans set themselves and their country on the road to Jewish ruination.

 

Well, my friend, that was a century ago. Did America change enough to be wiser today? Yes, most of ordinary people did change and have become wiser because they live in a universe of real people who learn from each other. But that's not the case with those who enter the universe of politico-journalism.

 

Those are the ones who still believe that the Jews are the chosen people whose advice is as good as the word of God. Do you know why this is happening even today? It is happening because the zipper-down perverts who call themselves televangelists are telling their prostituting evangelical sheep that the Jews are the apple of God's eye.

 

The televangelists go on to advise their naïve flocks that they and their children must worship the Jews, take their advice however outrageous it may sound, or be prepared to spend an eternity burning up in the hellish fires of Satan’s domain.

 

And this is what James Carafano and Adam Milstein are telling the incoming Joe Biden administration to continue taking as advice; to implement and feel good about ruining America.

The right sentiments, but not fully expanded

 Jeffrey D. Sachs always had the right ideas and right sentiments. When you read him, you know you're only seeing the top layer of the massive reservoir of knowledge that's below what he is expressing at the time.

 

Because Sachs is also a refined gentleman, he holds back on digging deep into the reservoir lest he bring out negative aspects that could hurt someone. His criticism has always been directed at the easy-to-see, superficial deficiencies of the United States. He does that without naming names or describing how certain individuals or groups serve their own interests at the expense of others. This is why Sachs makes you wish he would mix a little realism with his idealism, and overcome his timidity about telling it like it is.

 

His latest article is about a rare moment when something went right during the bad year that 2020 has otherwise been. He described what went right in that year, and articulated his wishes for what the new year 2021 should be like. You can see all that in the article he wrote under the title: “Europe and China's Year-End Breakthrough,” published on December 31, 2020 in the online magazine, Project Syndicate. Here is how Sachs has described that moment:

 

“With the completion of an investment treaty between the EU and China, the new year begins on a promising footing. Now is the time for the world's powers to stop casting stones from glass houses, and start coming together to end the pandemic and set the stage for a green, digital global recovery”.

 

You can see, however, that for a moment, Jeffrey Sachs chided the world powers for “casting stones from glass houses,” urging them to stop doing that. Alas, he does not say who these powers are, or who might be the individuals or institutions in America that oppose them or collaborate with them. And he does not say what it is that they do, which they must not do. But even though Sachs does not name names, a passage in his article reveals a great deal about who these people and institutions are. Here is that passage:

 

“The aim of US policy is to constrain China's belligerence and human-rights violations, or so the US says. But it is worth noting that the policy is favored by a bipartisan establishment that maintains 800 overseas military bases, and has repeatedly launched illegal wars, imposed illegal unilateral sanctions, and refused to abide by the UN Charter, treaties, and Security Council decisions. It's certainly hard to argue that China is the belligerent party here”.

 

There can be no mistake about it. Jeffrey Sachs is talking about the neocons who would involve America in perpetual wars so as to implement the Pax Americana scheme they put together, thus serve the interests of Israel at the expense of American and foreign lives as well as oodles upon oodles of wasted wealth.

 

Had Jeffrey Sachs decided to tell it like it is, he would have explained in detail the role that lobby groups such as AIPAC are playing to reconfigure the Department of State. This is the department of foreign affairs where the people that used to run it, were serving American interests faithfully, but were purged and replaced by agents whose loyalty is suspect. In fact, these suspects would not even qualify as having dual loyalty because they are openly and singularly loyal to Israel.

 

The good news that prompted Jeffrey Sachs to write his article, has been the coming together of China and the European Union. But the truth is that this event is only a small part of a much bigger picture. What's happening in reality, is that the whole world has been coming together for some time now. And while this is unfolding, neocons of the John Bolton variety are trying to implement a demonic scheme that will have hellish ramifications if it were to succeed.

 

What Bolton and his comrades are working on at this time, is a jumbo-size Brexit that will pull the English-speaking world out of the Human Union of nations. Originally, Bolton and comrades wanted to group the so-called democracies and pull them out of the United Nations to form a rival organization. When nobody wanted to play their game, the comrades reduced their sights to encompass only what they viewed as the English-speaking democracies. They are still working on this scheme at this moment, but are having a difficult time convincing any of the potential members to join them.

 

The reasons why this is happening are as numerous as there are potential candidates. For example, India thinks of itself as a superpower that will form its own sphere of influence and need not a John Bolton telling it what to do. And there is an Australia that could not drop its two-way commerce with China to trade its abundant resources with God knows who. As to Canada, this is a trading nation that needs the whole world to trade with, and not just an America that is increasingly turning protectionist.

 

And there is the irony of all ironies. It is that Israel is getting orgasmic having visions of starting warm relations with its “kissing” cousins, the Arab neighbors. It will not drop this dream for a pot of golden munitions from America.

 

Do you know what else is ironic, my friend? Britain has come to realize that being a brexited island, it has only one place where it can turn to secure its economic salvation. The place is none other than its former colonies in Africa and Asia. Britain is now working on a new kind of British Commonwealth that has nothing to do with the neocons’ Pax Americana.

The Mouse that grew to the Size of King Kong

 It was almost four decades ago when the world awoke to the reality that electronic surveillance was done by more than the inept and cowardly security apparatuses of the so-called liberal democracies which spied on their own people by tapping their telephone lines on behalf of the Jewish masters they were serving. It turned out that those democracies were also spying wireless on other nations via the medium of the ether.

 

The proof of this, came out as a result of a tragedy. It happened when a South Korean airliner strayed into Soviet airspace and was shot down by a warplane. When the airliner proved to be a civilian flight, the Soviets said they would not have shot it had they known it was civilian. But then the United States surprised the world when it played a recording of the conversation that took place between the military pilot and the ground command during which it was decided to shoot the plane whether it was civilian or military. America was shown to spy on Soviet military communications that long ago.

 

The need to know what other individuals, institutions and countries are thinking and doing, turned out to be a very big concern for which big budgets were and continue to be allocated. And while most of the operations were done in a clandestine manner, the Americans thought they had a system of governance so divine, they could go to other countries, teach them how to run their affairs and ask their citizens to report on what their governments were doing. In fact, when the Egyptians discovered that the Americans were running this kind of bordello in Egypt, they kicked the Americans out, and angered them no end.

 

As science and technology advanced, cyber-spying and cyber-influencing, propelled the dirty business to a much higher and much deadlier level than before. And as usual, the Americans thought they had the best system of governance and the most advanced technological innovations, to act as masters of the universe. But then, they woke up one day to the reality that they were well behind their big and small rivals.

 

Stunned by this development, America's politicos started to point fingers at each other, which prompted pundits of every stripe to come out their hiding places and give the usual two-bit advice that will most likely do nothing to advance the cause of America. The latest two such articles were published a day apart in The Washington Times.

 

One article came under the title: “Cyberattack on US government is just part of a vast and ignored Russian threat.” It was written by Rebekah Koffler and published on December 31, 2020. The other article came under the title: “SolarWinds cyberattack demands US enact a long-overdue deterrent strategy.” It was published on January 1, 2021.

 

The contribution to the debate of Russian-speaking Rebekah Koffler, has been to say: I told you so! In fact, she had been warning for years that Russia was preparing for war against America. The revelation of the latest cyberattack on America's institutions, gave her the perfect excuse to claim vindication. And so, she repeated the old warnings, even elaborated on them this time.

 

Not only did she draw on her knowledge of Russia's mode of operations in such matters to make her point, she also relied on what highly placed Americans in the security apparatus have been warning. Here is a sample of what she reported in this regard:

 

“A close reading of unclassified, Russian-language sources has convinced me that Russia expects war with the US and is preparing for it. We heard a lot from US leaders about Russia's cyber warfare prowess. Former CIA and NSA Director Michael Hayden called Putin's intervention in 2016 presidential elections the 'most successful covert influence campaign in the history of covert influence campaigns.' General Philip Breedlove, referring to Moscow's employment of cyber operations during the invasion of Ukraine, marveled at the most amazing information warfare blitzkrieg … in the history of information warfare'”.

 

And so, while Rebekah Koffler is saying that America and Russia will sooner or later be in a hot war, you have Jed Babbin saying that those two nations are already in a Cold War. He went on to explain his thinking as follows:

 

“Some equate cyberattacks with acts of war. That's not right. Acts of war take lives or cause damage to infrastructure. The Russian attack was intended to intimidate, conduct espionage, steal intellectual property but not kill or damage infrastructure upon which we depend”.

 

Being in a Cold War, says Jed Babbin, America ought to deal with the situation the way it did the previous Cold War. That is, America must create a system of deterrence to revive the concept of the Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) that kept the peace for several decades.

 

To that end, he proposed a regime of deterrence in four steps that would go as follows:

 

First, we counterattack the network the attacker used and those on which we can inflict greater harm.

 

Second, we should extend our retaliation in behalf of essential commercial activities.

 

Third, the president should publicly state our doctrine of retaliation.

 

Fourth, we should publicly name which foreign agencies and individuals are responsible for such attacks.

 

The moral of this true story is that when the Jew asks the government of a liberal democracy to do him a favor the size of a mousy finger, he is already thinking how to turn the mouse into a King Kong.

My Cousin isn't a Cousin, he's an Impostor

 A massive con job is in the making, and it can only end badly for those who got themselves involved in it.

 

It is the story of Jews that have gone through the full cycle of trying to team up with someone, anyone at all, inciting them to hate the Arabs, claiming that they were the true Semites whereas the Jews were no longer connected to the Semitic ethnicity.

 

In fact, for a time, the Jews had it that, by virtue of having lived with, and been diluted by their interbreeding with the Aryans of Europe, they had overwhelmingly become carriers of European blood, more so than Middle Eastern blood. Their message to the Caucasian people as well as the Turks and the Iranians, was that they were so similar to them, and so different from the Semitic Arabs, they should all want to be friends with the Jews and be anti-Semitic toward the Arabs who were the only Semites left in the world.

 

However, when none of their cockamamie schemes worked as planned, the Jews found themselves at a loss as to what to do next; a situation that lasted a number of years. Then one day, the situation that Donald Trump did not expect to see, did happen: The polls were indicating that he'll lose the bid to get reelected President of the United States. He panicked, and while in that state, called on Israel's Netanyahu to send him a lifeline by accepting the Arab League initiative that had been sitting on the table for nearly two decades.

 

Netanyahu had no choice but to knuckle under what sounded like a serious threat. He hoped that once Trump gets elected, the Jews will go back to relying on America supporting them while they play the game of constantly scheming to have it both ways. This time, it would have been gaining Arab recognition of Israel, and having all to themselves, the land of Palestine without its Palestinian inhabitants. However, little did Netanyahu or Trump know that the American voters had a better idea. They voted for “sleepy” Joe Biden rather that Donald Trump, to be the next President of the United States.

 

Netanyahu and the clique which passes for government in charge of the entity they call Israel, responded as they always do. They played the wild card of deception they call election. It was the fourth time they resorted to this trick during this round, prompted by the need to mark time and see how the American electoral campaign will unfold, and how the government, whichever it will be, will decide to treat the Middle East.

 

Meanwhile the Jews turned on the propaganda machine and programmed it to undo everything it concocted previously. This time, they made it so that the Jews are not Caucasians or even diluted Semites but full-blooded Semites from hair to toe, and certified by DNA testing as being cousins of the very Semitic Arabs. You can see such false presentation when you read the article that came under the title: “An Abrahamic family reunion,” and the subtitle: “Israel is in the process of moving closer to its natural roots in the East.” It was written by Gary Schiff, and published on December 30, 2020 in the Jewish News Syndicate.

 

Gary Schiff began his presentation with this false assertion: “US President Donald Trump orchestrated the peace agreements between Israel and its Arab neighbors.” Of course, none of this is true because what Trump was trying to orchestrate was giving Palestine to the Jews, and having the wealthy Arab nations pay the Jews for being so good as to lap the Palestinians for breakfast and have them for lunch too. The Arabs took one look at the Jewish offer and said: No thanks, we have enough toilet paper as it is.

 

True to form, the Jews then turned their fantasy into an illusion that has the sound of reality. They did so by calling on their mob of pundits in the media, and their moral prostitutes in the American Congress, and telling them to speak and act as if what did not happen, had in fact happened ... and everything was hunky-dory.

 

But real or fake, what is it that can happen to spoil this illusion or turn it into tragedy? We find two revealing passages in the Gary Schiff article that point to the mentality of Jews which makes them their own worst enemies. It is what has been leading them to tragedy, while believing they were on their way to a cool and pleasant nirvana. What they found instead at the end of the line was death like no one should experience.

 

Here is the first revealing statement, “We have direct discussions about what can be done to stop the incitement that breeds terror attacks.” And here is the second statement, “...moving the Jewish nation back to its traditional moorings by helping us connect with our traditional neighbors”.

 

What this says, is that when getting together with the Arabs for a friendly chat, the Jews will want to establish that the Jews are such saintly creatures, God is making an effort to bring them to their ancient homeland. But while this is happening, say the Jews, the evil Arabs incite their young to commit acts of terrorism against the Jews so as to frustrate the will of God.

 

Well, my friend, take it from me: The Arabs will tolerate a certain amount of this garbage. Meanwhile, seeing no objection from the Arabs, the Jews will escalate their vile rhetoric. The Arabs will reach a boiling point, and without saying a word, will cut every connection they had established with the Jews, thinking of them as incapable of rising to a human level of decency.

 

And the Arabs will cry out: Never again will we make the mistake of befriending the Jews. Never again.

When the fake is made to look real, many come to believe

 The editors of the Washington Examiner are telling their readers they must hate the United Nations (UN) because the UN does not hate China. They said so in a piece they wrote under the title: “On its 75th anniversary, the UN soils itself,” which they published on December 31, 2020.

 

The point the editors of the Examiner are making boils down to this: The UN must love Israel, which it does not, and must hate China, which it does not. This is bad, they explain, because things should be the other way around. As to the reasons why the editors are saying this –– they contend that Israel is nifty because it occupies Palestine democratically, and because it legitimately duplicates the work of Adolf Hitler's Nazi regime by annexing the neighbors' lands. What would make a more potent combination than this!

 

And while this is happening in Western Asia, say the editors of the Examiner, something terribly awful is happening in Eastern Asia. They explain that in China, the Cultural Revolution of the 1950s –– which took a peasant nation, considered to be the poorest of the poor on Planet Earth, and turned it into the foremost advanced nation –– is continuing its excellent work among one of the last ethnic groups in need to go through the revolutionary experience, and join the march towards a new world in the making.

 

Of course, the editors are not telling the whole truth, least of all that however painful the Cultural Revolution may have been to the groups that experienced it decades ago, it is now administered a hundred times more humanely on the newest groups. It is no worse than giving a crash course in modern living to people who prefer to hang on to their old and primitive way of life. They'll get used to modernity eventually.

 

Coincidentally, this group happens to adhere to the Muslim faith, a reality that got the Muslim countries to inquire as to what's going on in China's Muslim population. The government of China allowed those nations to investigate, and when they did, gave China their stamp of approval. They liked what they saw, because they now see the opportunity opening for Muslim Chinese to participate in the science, technology and discoveries that propelled China ahead of everyone on Earth. And they are proud of their coreligionists.

 

This brings us to asking the following question: Why is it that the editors of the Washington Examiner, as well as other people like them, have suddenly discovered that the Cultural Revolution is continuing in China, and that the country must be hated all of a sudden?

 

These people hate China because a number of events have converged to point out that China is getting ahead of them, and going at a speed they'll never match. Sooner rather than later, China's example of adhering to the rules of conduct, written down over the centuries, will make it so that everyone –– individuals, organizations and nations –– will learn from China’s example; will respect the rules and abide by them. This will reveal that the so-called rule of law which others have attributed to themselves were neither theirs, nor were they adhered to. The truth is that the worst violators of the rule of law have been America and Israel.

 

Not only that, but pretending to be lovers of the law, these people invented the rule that suited them at every occasion, and tried to enforce it on others. As discovered by analysts, every rule these people made on the fly, turned out to be designed for the purpose of kneecapping the other players. In fact, this is exactly what the editorial of the Washington Examiner is about. It is an attempt to slander China, which is improving the lot of its people, by accusing it of the horrible things that Israel commits on a daily basis in the Middle East while imitating Hitler's Nazi regime.

 

And because China has been able to withstand their blows, and has survived long enough and strong enough to play the role of the new sheriff in the global village, the bandits that wanted to enforce their own rules, feared taking on China directly. Instead of doing that, they chose to pick on the UN, hoping to persuade some people to jump the global ship and come aboard with them.

 

These people long abandoned the illusion that they can regain control of the UN. And so, what they try to do now, is create a parallel organization that will rival the UN, and from that vantage point, they wish to create the illusion that they are policing the world.

 

All of this is put together by professional propagandists, thus too subtle to unmask by those who are not trained to decipher this kind of games. But ordinary people will get the chance to see it play out in a way that's simple even for ordinary people to grasp.

 

What will happen is that at the noon hour, on January 20, 2021, Donald Trump will stage a mock inauguration of himself as the reelected president of the United States. And there will be many who will believe they are seeing the real thing. Such is the power of mass hypnosis.

They seek to destroy what they can't control

 A nature that humans inherited from the lower primates, is that we fight members of our own species if they stand in our way getting what we want. But having evolved beyond the level of the other primates, we took that nature to a higher level in the sense of being deadly.

 

The reason we are motivated to proceed goes something like this: “If I can't have it, you can't have it either, and I'll make sure you'll not have it by destroying the thing before I get out of here and leave it to you.” Not all individuals are the same, of course, and neither are the cultures. You'll find the moderate, the average and the extreme in every case, but when it comes to jealousy-driven destruction of life and property, the Jews are in a league all by themselves.

 

Because the fires of jealousy have been burning in the Jewish hearts and bellies for thousands of years, and despite the fact that, out of pity, they were given an enclave in which to live like Jews without inflicting their sight on others; it turns out that this was not enough to dampen the centuries-old desire of Jews to steal what belongs to others and make it their own by hook or by crook.

 

The Jews got the enclave they coveted in Palestine but this was not enough for them, so they kept expanding it ever since. They were allowed to seek alliances with other peoples, but they abused the goodwill of those they befriended so badly, the people changed the relationship into one that kept them at “arms-length.” And then, they were allowed to go to the United States where they became citizens, and that's when the real character of the Jews reared its horrifically delinquent head.

 

It took a number of decades for the truth to be revealed, and it did eventually. But that's when it scared those that allowed it to lay dormant for all these years without taming it before it reached what seems like the point of no return. In fact, what's becoming clearer by the day, is that the Jews see no difference when they look at Palestine as being a prey to hunt and bring down, and when they look at America as being a prey to hunt and bring down. They'll hunt and devour anyone that looks edible to them.

 

And now that they have it in their thinking, they are close to completing the conquest of America and turn it into another Palestine, they began to plan the steps that will take them beyond that. In fact, their new moniker goes like this: Yesterday we went for Palestine, today we're going for America, tomorrow we'll be going for the world. Two recent articles show how they are planning to pull off this scheme.

 

One article came under the title: “To fight anti-Semitism, the UN must first define it,” written by David May and Haley Weinischle, and published on December 22, 2020 in The Washington Examiner. The other article came under the title: “Universities can't be trusted to shape the future of the country,” Written by Zachary Faria, and published on December 29, 2020, also in the Washington Examiner.

 

Harking back to the old days when their forefathers began the conquest of America by bulldozing everyone that stood in their way, David May and Haley Weinischle thought of employing the same technique to conquer the world by conquering the United Nations. They started bulldozing the UN agencies that did not exhibit philo-Semitic tendencies, accusing them of antisemitic behavior.

 

To remedy the situation, May and Weinischle suggested imposing on the UN, adaptation of the definition that the European Jews came up with for what constitutes antisemitism. It is a definition that will allow every group of Jews to sit as judge, jury and dispenser of every case that will grab public attention. And of course, they will proceed by employing the old trick of convicting those they do not like of being antisemitic for saying A instead of B and for saying B instead of A. Mark this moment as being the era when the Jews began the conquest of the world.

 

But the fact that the Jews started the conquest of the world does not mean they are one hundred percent satisfied they completely conquered the United States of America. In fact, they have been complaining that the universities are such a tough nut to crack, they called on their moral prostitutes in the American Congress to help them destroy what they cannot reform or make to look like themselves.

 

Except for one of the two Cuban super-prostitutes in the Senate who embraced their cause, the Jews discovered that most of the legislators having graduated from a university, were reluctant to go after their alma maters. The Jews discovered this reality despite the established norm to slavishly respond to the call for pleasing the Jews by destroying a piece of America.

 

And this is why the Jews turned-on their media propaganda machine, and programmed it to go after the universities such as you see in the article of Zachary Faria. Read it again and judge for yourself.