Chiding the Victim for not enjoying the Rape

Ruth R. Wisse has written many startling things over the years but this is the first time she came this close to unveiling a hitherto unseen aspect of the Jewish character. She is chiding the victim for not enjoying the rape, and castigating the relatives for not celebrating it.

Wisse does that in her article which came under the title: “Anti-Semitism Is Never Solely About the Jews” and the subtitle: “Radical Islamists attack Jews as the handiest target in a campaign to destroy the free societies that jihadists abhor.” It was published on January 16, 2015 in the Wall Street Journal.

After doing some fancy footwork to show that ideology sets terror in motion which is why the “attackers” come for someone such as the Jews before going after someone else such as the pastors in the 1940s or the cartoonists in the more recent times, she concludes that the unspecified “they” as she calls them, first target the Jews and then seek to subjugate the free and open society which is their ultimate foe. Okay, Ruth, whatever you say.

As if this were not confusing enough, however, she complicates the matter even more by suggesting that anti-Semitism is really not about the Jews. She goes on to say that if you mistakenly imagine such a thing, you fall into the trap that the anti-Semites set for you. And she explains why. She says this deflects attention from the perpetrators to the victims. Great! Now it is all clear; as clear as the famous Jewish moral clarity can make it.

But she did not take us by the hand and brought us to this point for nothing. She did all that to show us why she came to the conclusion that Jews stand “for the liberalizing aspects of individual freedom, democratic governance and modernity complete with its anxieties.” And this, in her view, explains why “Anti-Jewish politics aims at the tolerant societies in which Jews flourish.”

Aha! That's what it's all about. Do you see how she managed to reverse the narrative? It has always been known that the Jews migrate to the liberal societies that welcome them. Once established in those societies, they turn conservative as in “neocon,” and push the society to the right by first attacking free speech, and then destroying the legal system that ensures equal treatment for all. They corrupt the political system, and use what they make of it to climb to the top of the food chain. Once there, they rule with such tyrannical zeal that the masses revolt and take matters in their own hands, resulting in tragic outcomes for many – Jews and gentiles alike.

No, says Ruth Wisse, that's not how things happen. To illustrate her point, she gives the example of Palestine-cum-Israel. But instead of starting at the beginning of the actual historical narrative, she starts in 1964 when Israel was already established and the PLO was forming. She mentions the 1967 blitz by which the Jews brought the Palestinians under their military control, and says that this was the moment “the PLO focused its terror exclusively against the Jews.” And guess what upsets Wisse the most. It is this: “money began to flow to the organization from Arab states. A pure product of ideological anti-Semitism.” Hey Ruth, let me whisper something in your ear. The Arabs never gave as much money to the PLO as did America. Are you saying that the Americans are anti-Semitic?

As weak as this point has been to proving her point, she builds on it to eventually conclude that the Arab rejection of the Zionist ideology is akin to the European manifestation of anti-Semitism. And in her view, this explains why Arab leaders such as the Syrians and the Egyptians took in German scientists after the Great War. Hey Ruth, let me whisper something else in your ear: So did your heartthrob Uncle Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union, and your other Uncle Sam of the American Republic, neither of whom saw anything wrong in using the talent of those who overflowed with it.

But in her view, the Arabs made a poor choice. Instead of that, she wants to see the Arab leaders welcome the rape of Palestine, thus force the Palestinian people to accept the notion of Jewish style second class citizenship as being a splendid model of liberal democracy. This, of course, being the model for which the American Congress is bankrupting the Republic and killing scores of innocent foreigners as well as American soldiers to shove down the throat of humanity.

Why can't the stunted brains of non-Jewish so-called homo sapiens grasp something as simple as this? It is a deficiency that is incomprehensible even to the superior Jewish brain.

Thanks for the Sentiment but no thanks

You have an article written by John Bolton in which he praises the President of Egypt, suggesting that the man should be supported. This is flattering, and millions of Egyptians would probably want to say: thanks, John Bolton for the sentiment. But they will also want to add in the same breath: But no thanks. And you'll know why when you see what else Bolton has to say, and when you read the Rich Lowry article that was published on the same day.

The day was January 14, 2015. John Bolton published in the New York Daily News under the title: “Egypt's president is a courageous warrior who has the guts to confront radical Islam” and the subtitle: “Abdul Fattah Al-Sisi followed directly in Anwar Sadat's footsteps with his speech on New Year's Day that went forcefully against today's Western conventional wisdom regarding Islam and terrorism.” As to Rich Lowry, he published in Politico Magazine under the title: “Of course It Is Islam.”

No one that knows Egypt and its people can be surprised by its newly elected President carrying out his electoral promise to the people of Egypt, and his subsequent promise to the world – which he did in a speech to the General Assembly of the UN – that he will work to build an Egypt based on equality and modern precepts. Thus, his attending the Christmas mass to wish the Christians a merry holiday, and his attending a gathering of Muslim clerics to say they must temper their flocks despite the attempts to provoke them … is seen by Egyptians as just another day in which the universe has unfolded as it should.

The best thing that can happen now is that everyone outside of Egypt just shut up. Yes, I say it as forcefully as I can: Just shut up. Things are unfolding normally as they have been during the good times for thousands of years, and any outside interference will only serve to delay what the Egyptians are trying to do for themselves. Thus, a meddling that comes with political overtones could impose strains on the country, forcing a course alteration and possibly other destructive consequences.

You can see how politics could be woven into the tapestry of relations that Egypt has with America when you analyze what Bolton is trying to do with the following montage of passages: “Sadat's trip to Israel followed his decision to expel Moscow's military advisers … by breaking the prohibitions against acknowledging Israel's existence, he made possible changes throughout the Middle East … The [current] president of the Arab world's most populous nation has taken bold steps. He needs U.S. and broader Western support.” Well, let us say that Egypt needs no more than normal, arms-length commercial and political relations with the rest of the world – relations that come with mutual respect and non-interference in the internal affairs of the other.

As to the Rich Lowry article, you can see how the magnificent information machine that used to be the pride of America's democracy, has been transformed into a network of echoing megaphones now owned and operated by a Jewish propaganda machine that is in the business of spinning and twisting all occurrences in such a way as to serve only the interests of the Jews and of Israel.

Two characteristics can help you identify an article as being vintage Jewish, therefore a waste of time and mental energy. One characteristic is the endless back and forth between parties as to whether something should be called this or called that. The other characteristic is the throwing of statistics which are plucked out of thin air to lend credence to claims that have nothing to do with reality. This is what fills the Rich Lowry article because this is all that Rich Lowry can do.

The trouble is that when it comes to pompous ignorance and destructive backwardness, monstrous media outlets such as National Review Online (edited by Rich Lowry) have counterparts in the American legislative body known as the Congress. These are the people who preside over America's wealth and military power yet can do nothing without taking their cues from the likes of Lowry. This is why much of the world is in such a mess today, and why it is waking up to the reality that it must avoid America like the plague and like Israel.

The Sorcerer's Apprentice says he has a Potion

Those who thought of themselves as gods of the universe sat together one day in New York and the District of Columbia to remind each other that Iraq was a rising power that was neither Jewish nor Jewish influenced. They decided that America will have to destroy the country as soon as an excuse will present itself, and so they put together a plan to attack and destroy Iraq when the time will come.

The plan sat on the shelf for something like a decade till a false excuse presented itself and America set out to destroy Iraq. The outcome has been that the false gods were shown to be mediocre sorcerers who got everything wrong. We now have the apprentice of those sorcerers telling us how much America has lost for taking the advice of charlatans. He put it like this: “We have clearly failed. After more than 13 years of war, with thousands of Americans dead, tens of thousands of Americans wounded, and several trillion dollars spent, the U.S. and its allies are losing the war.”

The apprentice is Newt Gingrich, telling the part of the story he knows, and a few other things. He does that in an article he wrote under the title: “Why We're losing to Radical Islam” and the subtitle: “Fourteen years after 9/11, we still lack a strategy. Congress should lead with hearings on the enemy and how to prevail.” It was published on January 15, 2015 in the Wall Street Journal. And guess what, my friend. The apprentice is following in the footsteps of his masters in that he put together a plan that will duplicate the failures of the past. If taken up, it will lead America into another adventure that will turn out to be as disastrous as the previous.

The essence of the mistake that the old sorcerers made was to have picked a country (Iraq) for destruction because it was a rising power that would stand in the way of Israel having a free hand to live off its Middle Eastern neighbors the way that Jews have lived for centuries in that neighborhood and in other neighborhoods. This is how Gingrich started his article: “The United States has been at war with radical Islamist terrorism for at least 35 years, starting with the 1979 seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.” Instead of Iraq, it is Iran that is the rising power now, the one that will have to be destroyed when all will have been said and done.

To make his point, the apprentice begins with a message of extreme incitement. It is this: “The U.S. and its allies must now design a strategy to match a global movement of radical Islamists who sincerely want to destroy Western Civilization … Congress should lead the way.” And he tells the Congress to do its thing in three steps. The first is to hold hearings and investigate seven areas of the enemy's characteristics, among which would be the Iranian funding of the Islamist movement, and the possible Iranian retaliation against the cyber attack that America and Israel unleashed on Iran's nuclear installations.

The second step would be to decipher the “enemies' strategic thinking and doctrine,” he says. To show how important a step this would be, he cites an example that took place seven decades ago when George Kennan outlined the nature of Soviet communism; an analysis that shaped America's policy toward the Soviet Union during the decades that followed. Likewise, Gingrich wants the Congress to investigate what “historic patterns, doctrines and principles drive the radical Islmists” because, he says, they dream of “slaughtering us.”

The third step would be to “hold hearings on strategies for achieving victory.” To this end, he suggests that the Congress should form a commission of the wisest witnesses it heard, and charge them with designing a national strategy for winning the war.” If necessary, that strategy will have to become part of the 2016 presidential campaign. Well, nothing of what Gingrich has suggested is complete or definitive therefore can be taken one way or the other.

Nevertheless, the trouble with Newt Gingrich is that he is the guy who said something to this effect: Palestine? What Palestine? I see no real Palestine; only an invented Palestine. It was judged at the time that he could not see what was there because he was seeing what was not there. He just proved this theory by describing a world that exists only in his sick mind.

That's a sorcerer's apprentice who is crying out for help. He does not need a den in which to experiment with another: thousands of dead Americans, tens of thousands of wounded Americans, and several trillion wasted dollars. He needs a green pasture on which to retire and fade away with whatever dignity he has left.

They kill Victims and cry at their Funerals

Here is a cartoon worthy of the centerfold in the French satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo. In frame 1, there is a Jew who looks very much like the American Joseph Lieberman, depicted in the act of savagely cutting the heart out of Freedom of Expression. In frame 2, there is the funeral of Freedom of Expression where the Jew is depicted as shedding tears profusely.

This is the image you develop mentally as you read: “A Global War on Radical Islam,” an article that Joseph Lieberman wrote. It also came under the subtitle: “Atrocities like those in Paris won't stop until the civilized world mobilizes to wipe out the forces of violent jihad.” It was published on January 13, 2014 in the Wall Street Journal. Lieberman wants you to believe that radical Islam is dangerous to civilization when the reality is that it is only the symptom of a ravaging disease called the Jewish Establishment.

Freedom of Expression began to develop as a concept about 4,000 years ago in Egypt when the artists revolted and began to reject the old style of depicting life rigidly the way they used to do in their paintings and their sculptures. After the revolt, they started to express themselves in their works, showing life around them, not abstractly like they were told to do, but the way that they saw it with their own eyes, and their minds' eyes. And then, the concept of freely expressing oneself migrated from Egypt to Greece where it flourished for a while.

But as the Roman culture started to mature – being inspired by Greece – the Jews who lived in it became terrified of the Greek influence. Having a system based on theocratic rigidity being threatened by Greek permissiveness, prompted the Jews to do all that they could to suppress the Greek influence, and shield the burgeoning Roman culture from it. They succeeded to a large extent which is why the Romans spent more time and energy building roads and bridges than painting or sculpting.

Eventually Greece faded and Rome fell, leaving the march of human Civilization in the hands of the Arab Muslims who revived the old Greco-Egyptian concept of free expression, and injected it into Western Europe – an act that sparked a magnificent Renaissance on the Continent. And it was this European rebirth that provided fertile ground for giants like Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo to be nurtured spiritually, to rise to great heights and to set humanity on a course that has the sky as the starting point, and the stars as the limit.

However, whether you study ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome, the Arab empire or the European Renaissance, you'll find that there were always people who refused to march with modernity. They vehemently fought against change, and tried to sabotage every effort that would have let the artists express themselves free of the rigid codes they were obligated to follow. And the Jews were always at the forefront of those who resisted change.

In the modern era, the Jews came to the new world of North America centuries after several other groups had come to it, and had established a society that was freer than anything they left behind. Thus, the Jews worked on turning the clock back in an effort to make the North American society more compatible with their backward looking views and primitive inclinations.

The first thing they did was to kill the freedom of expression that would have exposed them in the act of reversing the principles of freedom embedded in the constitution of the new world. This done, the Jews worked on eroding the rule of law, something they achieved by taking advantage of the inevitable weaknesses and contradictions that exist in every body of laws.

Now, when you consider that Lieberman opined the following: “The rule of law and the freedom of expression that were attacked in France should be championed and spread,” you cannot help but see that his article exactly represents what Charlie Hebdo satirizes.

It was the influence of people like Joseph Lieberman that killed Free Expression and the Rule of Law in North America. It is people like Joseph Lieberman who now cry at the funeral of Free Expression and the rule of Law.

How ironic! How ripe for an attack by Charlie Hebdo!

Avoiding America's Kiss of Death

Jesus was betrayed with a single kiss from a Jew, and look how horribly he died. The people of Palestine have been kissed thousands of times by Jewish America, and try to imagine how horribly they have been made to suffer. The confession is now in to the effect that the promise of independence at the end of negotiations was nothing more than a series of Jewish lies injected – when necessary – like puffs of paralyzing gas by America's mouth into the kissable mouth of Palestine. It has been several decades of betrayal at a scale no less horrible than the plagues of biblical times.

On January 10, 2015, Bret Stephens published in the Wall Street Journal: “Israel's Minister Without Apologies,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “A rising conservative star says the old formulas for pursuing peace with the Palestinians are obsolete. The two-state solution? Not anytime soon.” It is the result of an interview he conducted with Naftali Bennett, a minister in the current government of Israel.

Stephens sets the stage for the confession to come by suggesting that: “For 25 years, every Israeli government had categorically rejected the idea of a Palestinian state.” In the opinion of Bennett, this would have been a bad model to implement. Instead, he says he has a good model called Judea and Samaria. He admits it is a continuation of the “current policy [which] gives Jewish settlers privileged access to the land while consigning nearly two million Palestinians to Bantustan-like enclaves.” And he seems to shrug the criticism leveled against this situation by insisting that “the Palestinians bear the blame for proving themselves unworthy of statehood.” Blaming the victim for the pain inflicted on them is Jewish enough, blaming the victim for being unworthy of a better treatment merits treating the Jews as less than human. Now you know why the world has always wanted to treat the Jews like animals; they begged for it.

As to the Israeli leaders who participated in the engineering and the playing of a charade by which America pretended to play the role of an honest broker while pursuing the goal of restoring the right of self-determination to the Palestinians, Bennett had this to say: “successive Israeli leaders [went] along with a commitment to a two-state solution, even as few of them believe it's possible to achieve. As a result, Israeli leaders can fairly be accused of insincerity.” Yes, it is insincerity. Tell that to the Palestinians who suffered for decades due to the insincerity of the Jews, and the complicity of the Americans.

So much for what is brewing in occupied Palestine. We now look at what is unfolding on the American stage and the international arena. To get a sense of this, we review the article that was written by Michael Mukasey and published in the Wall Street Journal on January 12, 2015. It came under the title: “The Global Court as Political Weapon” and the subtitle: “The International Criminal Court has a dismal record and appears to hold an animus toward the U.S. and Israel.”

Convinced that America is the hopeless pushover that is forever pushed around by the lying and deceiving Jews, the Palestinians decided to look elsewhere for the kind of mediation that would have a better chance at bringing to them the independence that Jewish America never intended to bring to them. The Palestinians went to the United Nations (UN) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) where they asked for relief from a situation so savage it differs little from the Stone Age of biblical times.

That was the move that prompted Michael Mukasey to pull the Jewish trick of badmouthing those at the UN and the ICC who promised to look into the case as impartially as honest mediators do, rather than praise the Jews and curse their enemies of the day like the Americans have been programmed to do each and every time.

Citing old cases taken up by the ICC that did not result in outcomes which he says should have been different, Michael Mukasey calls the ICC record a dismal one, and goes on to say: “the current chief prosecutor, Gambian lawyer Fatou Bensouda, appears hostile to both Israel and the U.S.” Thus, with the stroke of a pen, he denigrated the world, placed America on a pedestal above it and brought Israel to stand beside America. He did all this because Ms. Bensouda dared to conclude that Comoros Islands had a case against Israel which fell within the jurisdiction of the Court. Imagine how unfair to Israel this has been!

Well, it is time for the world to work together and bring Palestine down from the cross. It will be good for the people who suffered so much for so long. And it will be good for a human race that needs to be exorcised of the Jewish demon possessing it since time immemorial.

Strategy of the Murdoch Terror Machine

When you hear and see clowns come out their hiding places to publicly tell the American media and politicians what to say that will deal with Muslim kids who – in their mind – are defending themselves, their families and their homes against attacks brought to their doorsteps by the Jewish run American military, you must wonder. You wonder what strategy the clowns are pursuing.

Certainly the kids will not be persuaded to stop fighting because the clowns are saying so. And they will not be defeated because the more of them you kill, the more will come forward to take their places. This leaves only one strategy that has a chance to yield results, and it happens to be a two pronged strategy. On the immediate side, you try not to give those kids a reason to retaliate. On the long term side, you seek to eliminate what it is that attracts these kids to such movements in the first place.

Regardless as to how the current confrontation started, nothing that America or its allies have done succeeded in diminishing the intensity of the fight. On the contrary, the damage that each side is inflicting on the other has steadily escalated … and promising not to abate anytime soon. This says that the strategy America has been pursuing did not work; and the question is why?

For one thing, many of the kids being recruited by those movements are homegrown, which means they were born, and they grew up in places like Britain, France and the United States where they felt – however little they have so far lived – that the Establishment has been denigrating them personally using subtle and insidious means. It has also been denigrating them publicly by trashing the ethnic or the religious group from which they came. To be told you are worthless as an individual, and worthless for being the offspring of a useless stock, is incentive enough to fill a young man with anger and the desire to retaliate. A movement that promises the means to do so looks to him like the perfect vehicle on which to jump and ride into a worthwhile existence.

But how does a kid grow up feeling doubly denigrated? It happens every time that someone in public life – like a politician or a media type – utters insulting words when describing someone or something related to the kid’s race or religion. One despicable habit that the Jewish propaganda machine has drummed into the heads, and has stuffed into the mouths of politicians and media types, was the automatic blurting of things like: instead of getting oil from the (blank) sheiks in the Middle East.

A savage habit that the Jewish propaganda machine has also popularized on the television screens of America is the frequent showing of buildings, cars and individuals being blown up by missiles launched from warplanes, helicopters and drones. This is the mass scale equivalent of showing a hostage having his head cut-off. The savagery in showing such footage is exceeded only by the inhumanity of those who program these things. And kids watching them from when they are toddlers to when they feel they can fight for their honor, will not hesitate to kill someone in cold blood when they will have the opportunity.

And killing in cold blood on both sides is what the Jews have always wanted to see come about in the confrontation they have been trying to engineer for several decades between Christianity and Islam. They are failing miserably and they know it, which is why you hear their voices and those of their lackeys reach the highest pitch that hysterical men and women can attain as they call for war, war, war.

The truth is that the Jewish propaganda machine has become the quintessential terror apparatus now using the American military and the capabilities of NATO to terrorize the world under the guise of maintaining order. This, despite the fact that humanity has come to realize, and has advised both America and Israel, that what they are doing only serves to create disorder, chaos and mayhem everywhere they go … every place where they poke their noses. But they are not listening.

Worse, encouraged by the fact that the American Congress has reached its most treasonous and most whorish level so far, the massive Rupert Murdoch machine has now made available all its assets to the effort aimed at triggering the war of the religions.

Dark days are ahead, and as usual, the Jews are behind it all.

The Jewish Quest for a War of the Religions

Up to now the Rupert Murdoch empire had restricted itself to using only the audio-visual outlets of its publishing division to advocate the eruption of a war of religions between Christianity and Islam. But this is changing with the entry of the Wall Street Journal into the fray. An example of the new regime is the editorial piece that came under the title: “The Next Islamist Rampage” and the subtitle: “The West has to reinforce its terror defenses, including surveillance.” It was published in the Journal on January 10, 2015.

Before anything, let it be said that no government or recognized institution in the Arab or Muslim Worlds is advocating what the word jihad has come to mean. In fact, jihad was called upon to perform only once in the modern era, and the caller was none other than the highly esteem American President Ronald Reagan. He called for a Muslim jihad to be unleashed against a Soviet Union that had invaded Afghanistan, and he personally saw to it that the practitioners of Jihad (Mujahedeen in Arabic) were well equipped and well financed in their fight to liberate the Asian nation.

What happened after the successful liberation of Afghanistan was that the Mujahedeen felt betrayed by the Americans who broke their promise to help modernize the country but abandoned it, leaving the inhabitants in a state that looked as primitive as ever. Feeling scorned and dejected, the Mujahedeen and their supporters decided to get back at America, relying in their struggle on the lessons that the Americans had taught them, and in some cases the weapons that the Americans had given them. They went after American interests anywhere in the world they could find them, causing as much damage as they could – not because of religion but because they wanted the sweet taste of revenge to replace the bitter taste that America had created in their mouths.

Rejoicing at this turn of the events, the ever opportunistic Jews did not watch from the sidelines and salivate for long. They jumped into the fray in the blink of an eye, and geared their formidable propaganda machine to make the new battle seem like a war between a Christian establishment and a Muslim one. But despite a non-stop effort by the likes of Fox News and National Review Online to inflame the passions, neither of the religious establishments was motivated to view the battle as anything but a nuisance caused by Muslim kids having nothing better to do. In the interim, however, they gave the contributors to those publications something to talk and write about, thus look useful and get paid. Still, the publications insisted that this was a war between the two religions, therefore advocated responses that would, in effect, turn the nuisance into a religious war.

And now that the Wall Street Journal has joined the fray, you see the same trend emerge in its editorial. For example, you see in the opening paragraph how the editors advise Europe to reinforce its “moral and military” defenses. Next, they argue that despite the differences between Europe and America, the latter is just as prone to being attacked, therefore must reinforce its own defenses. But they don't stop here because what the Jews really want is to plant the American military permanently into the Middle East.

To this end, the editors of Murdoch's Journal accuse Obama's America of having abdicated the Syrian civil war, and so they counsel that the country “accelerate and intensify the campaign against Islamic State.” But because this will not be sufficient to give the war a religious overtone, they advocate that the West – which includes America – must play a harder game. Here is how they put it: “The West also needs to cease its political campaign against the most effective antiterror tools. This means surveillance in particular.” The editors wish to go even further than that, so they advocate the playing of the trump car: “The West will have to consider more aggressive interventions, including arrest or exile for citizens.” Thus, you have a Rupert Murdoch who is an Australian Jew, telling America it must consider arresting its citizens, even send them into exile.

To close the argument the editors get back to the business of accusing Obama of failure to provide leadership and of being naïve, which is why they call on members of the Congress and the pool of presidential candidates to intervene if not by legislative means, by speaking “clearly about how they define the Islamist threat and how the West can defeat it.”

Bear in mind that the Congress and the pool of presidential candidates is where the wealth of Rupert Murdoch has its heyday. This is where the pimps and the prostitutes, the madams and the gigolos gather to be inspected, bought and sent for a sojourn in the Jewish-Israeli whorehouse where they learn to suckle the Jewish moral syphilis, and feast on it to their hearts' content.