The petite Somali Woman that could

Assume for a moment that you want to outwit Lucifer, whose name means “Bearer of Light,” which is why he was appointed secretary of education in Satan's Kingdom known as Hell.

The game you have in mind is to pretend you sympathize a whole lot with the Satan-Lucifer agenda, and wish to become a militant in the service of the Kingdom. In response to your heart-felt plea, Lucifer assembles a dream team of instructors, and tells them to teach you the most devious tricks ever used by them since they were called Fallen Angels, were kicked out of Heaven, and were sent to spend all of eternity in a highly warmed-up residence specially created for them.

After getting your education, you return to Earth intending to put what you learned into effect. What you want to do, however, is not hurt someone, but create an opportunity to test the effectiveness of the education you received in the Kingdom of flames. Well then, here you are back on Earth, disoriented and having no idea where to start. But to your surprise, you feel someone tap on the back of your shoulder. You turn around and see, not a guardian angel, but a guardian devil who congratulates you on your new assignment.

Having gone through the customary exchange of pleasantries, your guardian devil says that even if you received the best education in demonic trickery that Satan's crack team could give you, consider it chicken little compared to what an outfit known as AIPAC is able to do. He explains that AIPAC is a lobbying organization whose job is to coordinate between all the Jewish lobbying activities in America. It has the enviable reputation of siphoning off billions of taxpayers’ dollars for Israel without spending a cent on the effort. And nothing can be more devilish than that.

Thus, if you want to know where to start, a good place would be to read a piece that was written by a lobbying member of the clan who goes by the name Jonathan S. Tobin. The piece he wrote came under the title: “Don't Accept [Ilhan] Omar's Phony Alibis for Hate,” which is an article that was published on February 13, 2019 in National Review Online.

Before getting into the Tobin article, you prepare yourself by reading up on the issues pertaining to the matter that's being debated at this time. When done, you make the preliminary observation that the group comprising the Tobins, the AIPACs, the Jewish pundits, etcetera … do not fear the buffoons that attack them because these people discredit themselves and flame-out in no time at all. Instead of diminishing AIPAC's ability to sucker America's taxpayers, the buffoons strengthen the Jewish hand.

By contrast, the Jews fear people like Representative Ilhan Omar because she knows what she is talking about when discussing the special treatment that Jews receive in America at the expense of unwary Americans, and the lives of innocent foreigners abroad. Her presence forces the Jews to shut up or engage in a debate they cannot win any more than a bank robber can justify murdering the employees of a bank and robbing it.

In fact, the incompetence of the buffoons is the secret that motivates Jonathan Tobin and those like him to support and encourage the many members of the newly elected administration whose early activities consisted of playing what the Jews call the anti-Semitic card. In their eyes, those clowns have been the best thing that happened to Jewish lobbying in America.

When you contrast that contentment with the state of apoplexy into which the entire Jewish propaganda machine worked itself trying to silence a petite Somali woman endowed with a mind as precise as that of Isaac Newton, a heart as fearless as that of Jeanne d'Arc and a tongue as eloquent as that of Cicero, you can tell this is the one pussy that Donald J. Trump will never grab because if he tries, he'll find himself amputated before he gets his hand under that skirt. Just imagine, if they can’t handle one Ilhan Omar, how will they handle an entire sisterhood?

Meanwhile, you can be certain that the reason why the Jewish sexual predators who were abusing the vulnerable women, are getting together to have Omar banished, is that they know if she remains on the scene much longer, they will be castrated figuratively by a sisterhood that's beginning to admire its new hero, and beginning to emulate her.

Having learned enough and seen enough of what's happening, you summon your guardian devil and tell him that the kitten caboodle comprising AIPAC, Tobin, and the Jewish propaganda machine is not what it’s cracked up to be.

He asks why you say that, and you explain that when Ilhan Omar invited those characters to debate her on the matter of their constant support for Israel no matter what the latter does, they soaked their pants, and went behind her back to ask the members of her party to banish her.

If not banish her altogether, they want her banished at least from the Foreign Relations Committee, the place from which the loaded gravy train used to begin its treasonous journey to Israel.

In acting as they did, the predators admitted that having been a fraternity of sexual predators, the petite Somali has managed to turn them into a fraternity of eunuchs. And they want her punished for that.

Here is how Tobin formulated that thought: It is her attacks on the supporters of Israel … She doesn't deserve the forgiveness many members of her party are willing to give her.

Poor little thing. Hope mommy hears your agonized cry and comes to your rescue.

Neither Pattern Recognition nor Reciprocity

It was not long ago that National Review Online (NRO), together with the now defunct Weekly Standard and the still tricky Fox News Channel, turned themselves into hysteria machines sensationalizing and amplifying the mischief that may have been committed by the newly arrived young refugees into Europe.

The American publications falsely assumed that all the refugees were Muslim, and tried to paint them as naturally wicked characters who will destroy Europe's Western Civilization. The editors, columnists and contributors of said publications posited that the way to defend America against the menace of that phenomenon, was to point the finger directly at Islam and call it the calamity that's gathering over the horizon … and then denounce Islam in the strongest possible terms.

What happened next was that the newly elected Trump administration tried to capitalize on the media-driven burgeoning hysteria. It did it by using the power of the executive order to turn the hysterical speeches into injurious actions. To that end, it issued several orders aimed at hurting Muslims, not because of anything they did, but because of what the aforementioned publications said they might do in the future.

And like everything else, the actions of the Executive provoked reactions that proved so fundamental, they became icons representing a universal truth that no one could contradict. It is that the bigger the lie you put out, the shorter the shelf life of that lie. This truth imposed itself on the scene and sparkled like a bright star. It triumphed when massive rallies were held by the American people, and when the courts rose up to say no, this is not an accurate description of the Muslims we know. In fact, the attempt to defame Islam reflected negatively, not on Islam, but on the characters that were behind the dirty propaganda campaign.

Now, that same National Review Online is trying to accomplish a feat that is proving to be as impossible as restoring to a scrambled egg its natural form by returning it into its shell. You'll find NRO arguing that the more massive the truth you tell, the more it is rejected by an increasing number of people.

See for yourself. On February 11, 2019, National Review Online published an editorial attempting to do just that. So did Jonathan Goldberg, who is one of its editors, as he tackled the same subject in his regular column. The editorial came under the title: “A Shameful Tolerance.” The Goldberg column came under the title: “Ilhan Omar's Lazy and Anti-Semitic Tweets.” Together, the two pieces say something that is truly surprising about the Jewish character.

To understand that part, we need to recall that two characteristics are so ingrained into our human nature, it is stupefying and frightening to know that indoctrination can erase them as easily as hitting the “delete” button of a computer keyboard. Those characteristics are: pattern recognition and the principle of reciprocity. The Jewish leaders have developed a way to erase them in the people they recruit for the movement, turning the people into obedient foot soldiers who faithfully serve the Jewish causes, especially Israel.

You can see how the idea of recognizing a recurring pattern is mishandled in the NRO editorial. The natural thing being that when you hear an accusation leveled against someone by several people that never met, you tend to believe there is some truth to the accusation. To be certain, you try to get to the bottom of it. You investigate the accused who is the common element to all the stories. Well, believe it or not, that's not what the Jews do. Instead, they proudly list the accusations leveled against them, and say this is what proves all the accusers are wrong. That’s so staggeringly illogical, it gives the Jews the image of the recidivist who complains he is singled out unfairly for the crimes that he alone commits.

You'll sense that Jewish characteristic when you go over the editorial in which you see the writers damn Henry Ford, as well as the authors of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Louis Farrakhan, Donald Trump, Al Sharpton, African Americans and Muslim Americans. In fact, you'll discover that the Jews blame all this people for what they call anti-Semitism, but never blame themselves. They don't even question if there is something that they can do to alleviate the concerns other people may have about their conduct.

As to the principle of reciprocity, you'll sense that Jonathan Goldberg does not understand that “causality” may be a one-way street in the science of physics. But when it comes to human interactions, causality becomes a two-way street. It often alters itself to become, “reciprocal escalation.” In fact, what rules in human interactions is the principle of: You step on my foot and I'll step on both your feet.

Here is the passage that gives Goldberg away: They have the causality backward. The Israel Lobby exists precisely because people like Omar and her defenders make it necessary for it to exist.

What Goldberg does not understand is that the following can also be said: people like Omar and her defenders exist precisely because institutions like the Israel Lobby make it necessary for them to exist.

This is what causes the escalation in the game of mutual recrimination. Now think about this: when you have the Jews on one side, and you have humanity on the other side, guess who wins and who loses...

Well, tell that to the Jews because left to their devices, they will not evolve enough to understand that simple concept in a long time, if ever.

Pretense of moral Clarity by moral Prostitution

I begin this discussion by telling a true story that unfolded a long time ago. It happened when I was a tween attending a French school (Ecole Charles de Foucauld) run by Christian brothers in a French colony that used to be called French Somali Land, now a free nation known as Djibouti. In addition to the 3 Rs, I learned for the first time a lesson about race relations.

The school was part of a compound called the Mission, which also comprised a church, a building that housed the Christian brothers, a building that housed a Monseigneur and several priests, as well as quarters that sheltered Somali children who were orphaned or abandoned by their parents. The children were baptized and raised in the Christian faith.

On the first day of the school year (in the second or third grade,) we the children, were told to line up at the wicket in front of “Monsieur le procureur” who will hand us the book assigned for this class. We did as told and returned, each carrying a book, except for the handful of Somali children who were in the same class. One of them, named Barthélemy, started to cry. The reason was that Monsieur le procureur had decided that African children, which to him meant Black children, must first pay for the book before getting it. Everyone else would pay when their parents will have given them the money.

That procureur was new to the colony and didn't know that the Somali kids were from the mission, having no money of their own, and no parents to pay for the expenses they incur. And so, the teacher, Frère Félicien Paul, went to the procureur and came back with a book for each of the Somali children. Perhaps to console Barthélemy, he told us something, almost prophetically, that was confirmed decades later. The confirmation came when Somalia and Djibouti applied for membership in the Arab League and were accepted.

It is that without using the word Semite, but using Arab as a substitute, Frère Félicien said that the Somalis were dark skinned Arabs. And so, even if the Somali children were not of the Mission, they could still get the books and pay for them later. This was the lesson in race relations that was etched in my memory in the middle of the 1950s, and remained there during the decades since, always fresh as if it happened yesterday.

The reason I am telling this story now, is that I want David French to make whatever effort is necessary to wrap his head around the fact that when he asserts that Representative Ilhan Omar is anti-Semitic, he triggers an enormous explosion of contempt in the heads and hearts of those who cannot tolerate ignorance of the kind he spews all the time. Just think about it, you have authentic Semites being called anti-Semitic by criminal thugs who stole Palestine, and now work on stealing the Semitic identity from those they slander behind their backs. This is the combination of ignorance and criminal thuggery stretching itself beyond pornography.

Let it be known to David French and the primitives of his kind there are 400 million Semitic Arabs, among them the Blacks of Mauritania, Chad, Sudan, South Sudan, Eritrea, Djibouti, Somalia and the Comoros Island. And there are something like 20 million Jews who came into the so-called Jewish religion because they love being members of a criminal organization offering the chance to sucker the retards of the American legislators in this life, and the chance to inherit a piece of Haven in the afterlife.

To add insult to injury, David French wants everybody to believe that “America's Support for Israel Is a Matter of Morality, not Money.” Actually, this is the title of the article he wrote in which he accused Ilhan Omar of being anti-herself by being anti-Semitic. That piece of work was published on February 11, 2019 in National Review Online.

Whether or not David French has a sense of the size and gravity of his ignorance, he must have felt squeezed in a tight spot, which is why he invoked the Jewish escape clause that goes as follows: I only meant to add moral clarity to the discussion. As to the moral clarity he's talking about, it goes something like this:

Even the low-life officials in the American deep state know there is no such a thing as Jewish money. That's because to make money, you have to produce wealth, and the Jews do not produce wealth. What they do is rely on the hook and the crook to accumulate the wealth that's produced by others ... and they monetize the thing to have cash on hand with which they buy the soul of moral prostitutes.

Here is how the scheme works in America: Having collected dirt on every scoundrel in the various legislatures of America, the Jews blackmail them into passing the laws that favor those engaged in gambling, in so-called charitable organizations, in international trade, and in commerce. It is how the Jews accumulate lots of money without producing a thing.

Thus, in addition to the billions that Israel gets directly from Uncle Sam under the pretense of defending itself, the Jews benefit from the deliberate bastardization of America's laws by America's treasonous lawmakers.

And then, in a giant kickback scheme, some of the money that's meant to go to Israel, is diverted and sent to line the pockets and reelection coffers of the criminal legislators who keep the thieving scheme going.

And this, my friend, is the pretense of moral clarity by which the Jews get the likes of David French to swim in the cesspool of moral prostitution wherein he raises his head once in a while and shouts: How clear and pretty the sight of Sheldon Edelson buying the decomposing soul of Mitt Romney for a million dollars. What can be more excellent than this form of moral excellence!

If only the Palestinians could rise to this level of pornographic excellence, the world would be a better place.

America needs a new Orientation for a new Era

The problem with professional American historians writing about American history, is that circumstances forced them to be singularly provincial. By that I mean, except for foreign interventions (such as wars, blockades, threats and the like), whether America was invited in or was incited to act by others — the country interacted very little diplomatically with other countries.

And so, whereas America has an abundance of professional historians writing about “presidential” history, it has not a single one, born and raised in America, that can write intelligently about the diplomatic give-and-take, if any, that may have contributed to moving America's foreign policy forward. What the country has, however, is an abundance of amateur historians, of aspiring ones, and of students of history that relish writing about the history of America's non-diplomatic involvements abroad.

As it happens, most of these would-be historians are young, having come of age when America had already been taken over by the Judeo-Yiddish culture. Thus, they were raised in a climate that was dominated by the Jewish narrative which sees world history as nothing more than a footnote to Jewish history. And since Jewish history is but a series of predatory acts committed against other peoples, the nascent historians of America did not spend time looking for genuine American moments of high diplomacy. Besides, had they tried, they would have come out empty handed.

These people wrote articles and books in which they described what they believed was genuine American foreign policy when in fact, they were seeing Jewish style predatory interactions between America and the other nations. In fact, most of what they wrote under the guise of foreign policy, centered on the wars, blockades, threats and the like, which preoccupied America from the day of its independence to this day. Yes, America's deficiency in diplomatic interaction with the world was this widespread.

Worse, the deficiency turned into a tragedy because the novices who entered the foreign service, prepared themselves by reading those articles and those books. They absorbed what was in them not knowing there was more to foreign policy than to conquer someone lest you be conquered by them. And the result was dire. As unrefined as any “Ugly American” could ever get, most of the novices behaved abroad like peasants who badly needed a lesson in diplomatic etiquette. In the end, America paid a high price for that.

An article was published the other day in which a would-be historian that's interested in the relationships which exist between America and the rest of the world, describes what goes on inside the foreign service establishment where America's adventurous policies are hatched and let loose on the world.

The article came under the title: “Donald Trump's Real Foreign Policy Has Arrived,” and the subtitle: “Does Trump indeed mark the end of an era? Or will he prove a transitory figure who created a mere interregnum in America's quest for primacy after the Cold War?” The article was written by Jacob Heilbrunn and published on February 9, 2019 in The National Interest.

It is a long article that concentrates in the main on President Trump's vision for the future of America, and what he plans to do to realize that vision. But there is a paragraph in the article that brings together the elements which illustrate the thrust of this discussion. Here is a condensed version of that paragraph:

“Does Trump mark the end of an era? Or will he prove a transitory figure in America's quest for primacy after the Cold War? In speaking about America's purpose, Trump made clear that he seeks to overturn what he regards as the policies of the past. He repeatedly disparaged the notion that America is uniquely virtuous. He thus signaled that the era of American exceptionalism—the notion that America is an indispensable nation that can set wrong aright—was coming to an end. We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, said he”.

There is here a brief history of how America used to see itself. There is also the view of Donald Trump who believes that — given what America had to do to maintain that image — the country can no longer continue to go around the globe and set every wrong aright, or impose its way of life on others. He made clear that he is working to put an end to that era.

Still, America will continue to maintain diplomatic relations with the countries of the world. It must therefore develop a cadre of diplomats that can stand with, and rub shoulders with the sophisticates of other nations. These are the classiest men and women in their countries, individuals who will interact with their American counterparts, and judge America by what they see in those diplomats and what they hear them say.

Illegal Inquisition by a vicious Mob of Pundits

Like a double-edged sword, everything in life can be used to accomplish good things, or used to commit bad things. It can be used as medicine to heal the sick, or used as poison to kill the healthy. It can be used as food to nourish the hungry or used as bait to lure and vanquish the curious.

Free speech is an instrument of communication considered a human right that will be granted to one, or called a gift that will be denied to another. Some of the people allowed to express themselves freely, use the privilege to excess, thus dilute the high value that's intrinsic to speech. Other people subscribe to the adage that says there comes a time when silence is golden, thus turn the gift of speech into a precious rarity.

The gift to communicate complex thoughts is unique to our species. It is used to help us explore ourselves as we seek to establish who we are or what we are. It is also used to explore the universe and our place in it. Unfortunately, the advanced gift of communication with which we alone are endowed, is also used to produce the most horrific scenes the human mind can ever imagine.

Physical horror needs no introduction to be spurned; we instinctively recoil when we see it, endowed as we are with the advanced mind that's capable of producing complex thoughts. But just as horrifying is the spectacle of people under duress saying the things which are contrary to the facts as they know them, and saying the things that run contrary to their deeply held beliefs.

This kind of horror is produced every time that a tyranny manages to install itself in a jurisdiction. No, this would not be the tyranny that says you must not partner with a foreign power to effectuate regime change at home. In fact, this tyranny often produces the best kind of artistic expressions: biting satire aimed at exposing the nakedness of those who invent nonsensical and impossible to monitor or enforce proclamations.

Rather, it would be the kind of tyranny that says, you must love us with the full force of your thoughts, love us from the deepest part of your heart, and love us through the vast expanse of your soul. You must love us unconditionally when we do you good, and love us when we break your bones deservedly or not. You must love us when we praise you in your face, or when we slander you behind your back as we often do when engaging in our natural tendency to be cowardly, savage and beastly.

This is the tyranny that's designed to fill you with the foreboding sense of fear; the kind you carry inside. It is what you take with you everywhere you go, even to the places where you'd be alone, immersed in your most private thoughts. It is the kind of fear with which you become imbued when living in a culture like that of North America; a culture that was taken over by the Jews and turned into one of perpetual inner terror.

The Jews created this situation by using the gift of free speech to kill everyone else's right to free speech while reserving for themselves the exclusive right to engage in free speech. The way they installed this system of terror was by implementing a perpetual system to ambush people. You can see an example of that in the article that came under the title: “Rep. Ilhan Omar Dodges Antisemitism Question at Center for American Progress,” written by John Rossomando and published on February 6, 2019 in Algemeiner.

In brief, the article says the following:

“Yesterday, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar dodged a question about her comments on Israel during a discussion on religious freedom. Last week, Omar said that hearing Israel described as a democracy made her almost chuckle. Winnie Stachelberg tried to set the table for Omar, noting that she had acknowledge she might have inadvertently echoed stereotypes against Jews. Omar did not take questions from reporters. She endorsed the BDS movement after her election”.

What we see in that passage is the harassment effect of the Jewish mentality, and how the Jews begin the process of killing the free speech of others. It’s an inquisition that goes on till they manage to silence their target. But more importantly, they demonstrate to everyone what will happen to them if they don’t love the Jews with their heads, hearts and souls … or at least pretend to.

Unlike the two Brits of Irish descent Jonathan Swift and George Bernard Shaw who produced protest masterpieces knowing who was the authority censoring them and confronting it, the cowardly and savage Jews (1) hide behind so-called journalists who pretend to do journalism, and (2) hide behind so-called legislators, such as Marco Rubio, who pretend to legislate for America.

The combined effect of these activities, creates a climate of intellectual, moral and social terror. Its result is that you don’t have a clear target you can address, or a clear act of censorship you can analyze and criticize. You are left to live in fear.

With that, the Jews have succeeded to muzzle criticism of them beyond what any dictator did to his people. But in so doing, they also revealed why the masses around the globe developed the desire to exterminate them; seeing them as the source of endless terror.

Time to put the Foot down and say enough of that

Like the fish that is spawned in one spot on the globe and spends a lifetime roaming the seas and oceans of the Earth only to come back to its birthplace and spawn the next generation of the species, the Jews feel the urge to return to their designated point of departure when it is time to reiterate their fidelity to obnoxiousness.

Nearly 4,000 years into the odyssey aimed at subjugating the human race and ruling over it, renewal for present-day Jews has come to mean keeping a tight grip on the levers of power in the United States of America. They sense they are losing that grip, and are getting feverish about refueling the mechanism by which they maintain a tight grip on the power centers of America.

Like salmon which lets no barrier, no waterfall and no hungry bear stand in the way of the journey to its birthplace, the Jew becomes so fevered by the urge to impose his views on America, he lets no absurdity, no trivial talk and no sense of shame stand in the way of spewing what he thinks will work on government officials that have a hand on the levers of power. He wiggles his tail like a salmon on steroid to convince the officials that their first concern can only be how best to serve Israel, always Israel and no one but Israel.

The one development the Jews fear more than getting caught in the jaws of a hungry bear, is detecting a change in the American support for the idea that the Jews must be singled out for a treatment that's more luxurious than anyone else can ever receive. More than that, they feel that such treatment must carry with it the unmistakable message that it is exclusive to the Jews because they are special.

All of that is meant to accomplish two things. First, it affirms the Jewish belief that they were chosen by God to stand above everyone else. Second, it is the Jewish way to get back at a humanity that sought to humiliate them by forcing them to wear a yellow Star of David. Now, the Jews want the leaders of America to humiliate their own people as a way to atone for what the Nazis did to the Jews almost a century ago in a faraway place.

Bret Stephens has joined the latest Jewish battle for renewal, doing his part in a way he never did before. He wrote a two-thousand-word article in which he stated the Jewish position. In so doing, he made the fatal mistake of resting the full weight of his argument on a single absurdity that could not carry the weight of a fly. The poor thing, he spent much effort doing something, and it was gulped not by a bear, but the salmon he is promoting.

To get a better understanding of what Stephens did, we need to look at this analogy: A thief who is also a killer and a rapist, robs a bank. He is surrounded by law enforcement and questioned before he could get away. He admits he robbed the bank and committed the other offenses, but says he has a valid defense. It is that he tried to return the money to the bank twice, but the manager refused to take it both times because he felt more comfortable not having the money than taking it back. Well, everybody that hears this story feels this guy is a devious rascal and should be locked up for the rest of his life … not once, not twice but several times over.

The Bret Stephens article came under the title: “The Progressive Assault on Israel,” and published on February 9, 2019 in the New York Times. Here is the passage that drove a stake into the heart of the Stephens argument:

“The occupation of Palestine is an injustice that cannot be ignored, especially given America's financial support for Israel. Continued settlement expansion proves that Israel has no interest in making peace. The endless occupation makes Israel's rule less about Jewish self-determination than about ethnic subjugation. There's more to the indictment, but that's the nub of it. It would be damning if it were true, or even half-true. It's not. The Jewish truth is that Israeli prime ministers offered a Palestinian state in 2000 and 2008, they were refused both times”.

This is the argument that renders the two-thousand-word Bret Stephens article dead on arrival. The fact remains that the indictment against Israel is true, at least once for every day that the occupation of Palestine is maintained … and it has been maintained for close to 20,000 days. Anyone that tries to sugarcoat this transgression is a devious rascal that should never be consulted.

Members of the Jewish mob of pundits can spew all the justifications they want, to rationalize the Jewish theft, murder and rape of Palestine. But the mob must not be allowed to continue using the likes of Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Tom Cotton and Lindsey Graham to worsen the situation more than it is already. They are piles of rotting meat made to look like human beings, and they should be sent into a black hole outside the Galaxy.

The Acrobat is adroit, the high Wire failing

What good is it for an acrobat to train so well at maintaining his balance, he becomes adroit on the high wire as much as a monkey proves to be when jumping from branch to branch on a tree — if the acrobat knows that the high wire, he'll be walking on will break the moment that he steps on it?

This is the dilemma that the Tel-Aviv/New-York crime syndicate is facing as it watches its support in America evaporate like a bucket of water that's no longer being replenished. It took the Jews several decades to build support for their causes in America. By the time their bucket of good-luck was filled to the brim, they realized that the bucket was now losing its content by evaporation. This meant they were running out of luck, and that from this moment on, it will be downhill for them.

That didn't happen by accident. Having grabbed more than they could chew while relying solely on America's support, the Jews suddenly realized that such support was waning, and they had been walking on a high wire that's no longer as solid as it used to be. And so, they faced a problem. On the one hand, much of what they were doing, remained unfinished. To quit now was to let those projects collapse. On the other hand, going back on the high wire to complete the projects, would break the wire and send them to their doom. What to do?

What the Jews did was go back to doing what they always did when forced to start from scratch. They rebuilt the two pillars upon which they hope to someday restart and reconstruct the projects of their dream. Here are the pillars they rebuilt: (1) “Those who fight back when we try to rape them, are terrorists because they pretend to dislike being raped when, in reality, they fight us because they wish to see us bleed.” (2) Those who used to love us, but now love us no more, must have caught the virus of anti-Semitism. They should be forced to get treatment lest they precipitate another holocaust.

As to you, my friend, you can verify all of that by going over two articles that discuss those situations in detail. One article came under the title: “Documenting the BDS Movement's Undisputed Ties to Terrorism,” written by David Gerstman and published on February 6, 2019 on the website of Algemeiner. The other article came under the title: “When anti-Semitism pretends to be just anti-Israel,” written by Danny Danon, and published on February 7, 2019 in the New York Post.

Here is what David Gerstman, who edits The Israel Project, says:

“Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs released a study that says the BDS campaign is a network of NGOs hostile to Israel. The Foundation for Defense of Democracies found operatives involved in the BDS movement. Israel's Supreme Court described Jabari as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Testimony by Jonathan Schanzer showed that individuals who raised millions were leading the BDS efforts. He explained that members of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development joined the American Muslims for Palestine, described as a leading driver of the BDS campaign. The Jewish Policy Research Institute said that 58 percent believe Israel is an apartheid state. The definition of antisemitism developed by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, is requiring of Israel a behavior not demanded of any other nation. This is what BDS does. Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis identified this problem: the BDS movement has pursued a campaign of demonization. We must acknowledge that BDS is a bigoted, malevolent effort targeting the one Jewish state in the world”.

So there you have it. When Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs, The Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Israel's Supreme Court, Jonathan Schanzer, The Jewish Policy Research Institute, The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance and Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis agree on something, it must be true, according to Gerstman.

And here is what Danny Danon, who is Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, says:

“The world is witnessing a resurgence of anti-Semitism. Most Western leaders dismiss or justify Jew-hatred when it targets Jews in Israel. This neglect poses danger to diaspora Jews. In Europe, attitudes toward Jews have become commonplace. A thousand French Jews emigrated to Israel. In Britain, the leader of the opposition has described Hamas and Hezbollah as friends, and laid wreaths at the graves of Palestinians. Anti-Semitism also threatens the American Jewish community. Those like the leaders of the Women's March, are anti-Semites and endorse Louis Farrakhan. Others chant Jews will not replace us, or slaughter Jews at a Synagogue. Hamas doesn't recognize Israel. Mahmoud Abbas bankrolls the families of Palestinian commandos murdered by the forces of occupation. The world attributes antisemitism to a legitimate national struggle. Political, territorial or economic reasons are offered as alibis for what is anti-Semitism. Biased attitudes allow the BDS movement to conceal its goal of destroying the Jewish state. You can claim you find Zionism creepy when you detest Jews”.

So there you have it. You are an anti-Semite if you befriend Hamas or Hezbollah, lay a wreath at the grave of a dead Palestinian, endorse Louis Farrakhan, refuse to recognize Israel, financially help the families of dead Palestinian commandos, consider the Palestinian national struggle to be legitimate, hide behind the BDS movement to destroy the Jewish state, or detest the Jews by claiming that you find Zionism creepy.

Now that they have those two pillars rebuilt, the Jews will start working on regaining the unconditional support of America for the criminal projects they planned for the region and beyond.