If you ever doubted that the time had come to throw away the old relationship between Egypt and the United States, and either relaunch that relationship on a new path or part ways for good, a reading of an article written by Daniel Calingaert will convince you. The article comes under the title: “From Bad to Worse in Egypt” and was published on February 17, 2012 in the Wall Street Journal.
Calingaert is vice president of a Washington based outfit calling itself Freedom House that is no more free than the house of ill repute -- sometimes called the US Congress -- which is so thoroughly under the tyranny of Jewish rule, people the world over think of it as the private washroom of the Israeli leaders who make use of it when they visit the American capital. They use it the way that Netanyahu uses the rug at the White House, the one he transforms into a private urinal when he is not fighting over a turf with the dog of the first family.
The point of the Calingaert article is summed up in a subtitle that goes this way: “The repression of civil society is far worse than anything seen under Hosni Mubarak.” Bearing in mind that Freedom House is supposed to be some kind of a civil society, you wonder if the author is making a distinction between Egyptian civil society and the foreign groups that operate in the country. You go over the article and discover that he makes no distinction between the two except that – in his mind's eyes -- the Egyptian society is supposed to be subordinated to the foreign groups.
And the reason why Calingaert was prompted to write those words is that: “Egypt's military rulers have spent the last several months provoking U.S. and European ire with their crackdown on civil-society groups,” says the man. He later says that the “...assault on civil society [is] led by Ms. Naga and other holdovers of Hosni Mubarak's regime.” This part came just before he asserted that things were better under Hosni Mubarak, the notion that was echoed in the subtitle. Well, it looks to me that someone needs a lesson in coherent writing, in logic or in both.
But that is not the worst part because there is something even worse than that. Here it is: “Following a politically motivated investigation, 43 people … are about to face criminal charges for their work supporting a democratic transition in Egypt.” Look what a primitive mentality we have here. When you accuse someone of being politically motivated, you mean to say that someone apolitical going about their business was interfered with by someone having politics on their mind. But this is not the case, says the author, in that he asserts that the 43 people were working to support what he calls a democratic transition. This means that they were engaged in a political act which makes it that the response of the Egyptian government was entirely appropriate. Thus, to say otherwise is to be absurd, and this makes you wonder why the Egyptians need to keep in their midst a breed of men and women as inferior as these people who still believe they can tell them what to do?
The fact is that the Egyptian people don't want these foreign characters on their soil doing what they do. Their opposition to America's meddling in their affairs has existed for decades, and has not abated one iota since the Revolution. In fact, they overwhelmingly support the effort of the government to clean up the old mess as it is being done by Ms, Naga who is determined to put an end to the madness of foreign interference in the politics of Egypt. Furthermore, the just elected members of the new parliament have warned the government and all those in it not to interfere with the judicial process that is overseeing this matter. They want to see justice take its course because they want Egypt to remain a nation of laws in reality and not in name only as is the case when it comes to America's respect for international law.
You feel satisfied having dismissed these characters as an inferior breed of men and women who are wallowing in a pool of ignorance. But then you get hit in the face with a cry that says: “Why be so generous?” You get back to reading the article and find this passage: “What is all the more stunning is that the SCAF ... receives $1.3 billion in U.S. aid annually ... Egypt also needs U.S. and European support to secure a $3.2 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund to stem its downward economic spiral since the revolution.” Having falsely described their activity as being apolitical, these low life characters now threaten to stop contributing the 1.3 billion dollars they were making toward the maintenance of peace in the region. Hallelujah would say the Egyptian people because they sensed they were getting the short end of the stick by this deal and they wanted out.
But the matter does not stop here because when it comes to cowardly behavior, a bigger threat always follows a smaller one. This time, the barking dogs have threatened to repeat the performance of their ancestors when the latter pressured the World Bank to refuse loaning Egypt the money to build the Aswan hydroelectric station. Six decades later, the grandchildren of those dogs threaten that their government will work on the IMF to repeat the performance that changed the history of the Middle East, set their country on a course similar to what ended the British empire, and see to it that America is dragged into a Middle Eastern political quagmire that will be no less destructive than the military quagmire which was Vietnam. It must be that when you are as primitive and backward as these people, you never learn from your mistakes but keep repeating them over and over till you find yourself flat on your face. How much farther down will you go, America?
The people of Egypt have seen enough by now to know that it is America which needs to be liberated not them. They know what freedom is and know how to get it back when it slips their finger as it happened countless times over the thousands of years that they have existed as a nation. By contrast, the Americans who have been around for scarcely a few centuries have already lost their freedom to a degree that would have made a dog start a rebellion to free itself. And yet, the Americans don't seem to even realize they are serving their Jewish masters as would a nation of psychologically subjugated slaves.
When you come right down to it, you find that to interfere with the business of someone else used to go against the grain of the old American ideal. What has changed is that America's new masters want to be masters of the world and so, they use their newly subjugated slaves to go out and try to subjugate everyone else so as to bring everyone into the fold under the dominance of their Jewish masters. What this means is that the stance of the people of Egypt is one that will not only maintain their freedom but also free the Americans from the yoke of Jewish tyranny. In fact, it will be good for the whole world. Go Egypt go!