When Charles Darwin observed that nature offers survival to the fittest, he did not mean to say everything that is attributed to him. He only meant to say that when the environment produces less supply than there is demand for it, those who adapt to that environment stand a better chance at acquiring what they need to survive. Because the human brain has the capacity to draw analogies between subjects in different fields, it has what amounts to a blessing and a curse. The blessing is that this kind of analogy has led to the formulation of several scientific theories which, in the end, proved to be correct. The curse is that this kind of analogy can sometimes lead to erroneous conclusions -- which is what happened with the many erroneous interpretations that have appeared on the Darwin theory.
For example, some people make the analogy between what they believe is authentic Darwinism and the ideas they already have in mind. And what they believe about Darwin's theory is something they define as being a fight where the winner vanquishes the loser absolutely and takes all the spoils. They say that this happens in nature all the time, and it happens between the various cultures as well as the civilizations. This is why they predict that a final clash will take place between the civilizations after which the race that adheres to the correct philosophy of life will dominate the Earth and forever impose its will on everyone else.
These people look at the same history as everyone and attribute the fall of every civilization that came and went to the fact that none was so perfect as to remain dominant for ever. Sadly, they add, this also applies to the Roman Empire which they believe came the closest to being perfect but failed to cross the finish line. They think, however, that this does not mean crossing the finish line cannot be done. On the contrary, they view the modern “West” -- which adheres to the democratic philosophy of governance -- as having the perfect formula to take over the world and run it perfectly well. But there is much work to be done before the West can achieve the final victory it deserves, they say, because standing in the way is Islam, a religion and a philosophy of life that is adhered to by Muslims, a people who harbor ambitions antagonistic to those of the West.
But who are the people who interpret Darwin in this manner? The answer to this question is a complicated one because it ties in with subjects such as the science of eugenics, the philosophy of the White supremacists, the ideas of the self-styled master race, the wannabe Aryans and so on. In our era, such groups come; they have their moment under the sun then go away or lay dormant for a while to rear their heads on occasions, be silenced again and be sent back into hiding. Their claim rests on the premise that their historic idols who are the Nazis could make things such as ships and airplanes that no one else could make which proves they were better than everyone therefore entitled to rule the world. But the Nazis were eventually beaten by ships and airplanes that were made by someone else, an event that silenced them and had them accept the reality that they were equal to the rest of us, not better. But this part of history apparently does not register with their modern followers who still cling to the fantasy of Nazi superiority.
To be fair to all, however, it is true that the Nazis sat at the peak of Western Civilization for a time. They saw themselves as being a little better than their look-alike neighbors against whom they fought, and they saw themselves as being exceedingly better than the races from which they were separated by space and by physical appearance. Having failed to establish the thousand years Reich they wished for, and having been defeated militarily, a number of groups arose even in places like their former enemies, Britain and the United States, to idolize them. In fact, these groups idolized the Nazis so much that they claimed their mantle, and emulating them in style and in appearance. But the rule has always been that when they went too far, such groups were silenced by their critics and sent back into hiding. And when they took up arms and became violent, as they did on occasions, they were clobbered by the authorities and dismantled as a group.
There has been an exception to this rule, however. It is the story of a group that is operating with impunity in the English speaking world. It preaches the supremacy of an ill-defined ethno-religious race that is neither a group of any known ethnicity nor a race by any definition or even a religion by any sense of the word. The group advocates the violent transformation of other cultures in the Middle East, and it works feverishly to cause a clash between the Christian civilization and its Muslim counterpart. It is a group of Jews and their sympathizers who claim supremacy over the rest of us because they say that God has chosen the Jews to be his preferred children, therefore has chosen them to reign supreme over everyone and over everything else.
Unlike the other crackpots who claim supremacy because their idols could do things no one else could, the Jews and their followers are not required to prove they can do anything to deserve wearing the crown except demonstrate that they are Jews or wannabe Jews at heart. And since God is never available to be quizzed as to his choice, the supremacy of Jews is never disputed in the English speaking world where children now grow up in an environment that is saturated with things which say it is normal to view the Jew as a master worthy of their love; where it is normal to worship him like a god on Earth.
Because of this mentality and this state of affairs, and despite the promise made to them by that same God -- a promise to the effect that they will multiply and become as many as the grains of sand they see on the beaches and the stars they see in the heavens -- the Jews still cannot fill one mega city, when the religions that came after them easily fill a continent of nations each containing several mega cities. So the question becomes: With this reality staring them in the face, how can the Jews get into a fight to the death with bigger opponents, win decisively against them and come to dominate the world?
They can do it by riding on someone else's back. Here is what works for them; unlike the rest of the English speaking world which gives lip service to the Jewish causes and little else, the Jewish groups have found America to be the land of their opportunity because it is fertile ground that grows more goodness for them the more fertilizer they throw at it. And there is a reason why the American political system is well disposed to bloom with altruistic largess as it consumes the stinky discharges from the Jewish propaganda machine. It is that people originally emigrated to America for two reasons: to be free of tyranny and to get wealthy. In time, the two reasons have fused together, and the American ideal has transformed into the notion that happiness means the freedom to pursue wealth. Thus, if someone or something such as the government tries to curtail this freedom, the Americans lose their happiness which means they get angry. How angry? Well, they once had a civil war and they will not hesitate to have another one if pushed hard enough.
What is crucial here, and what must be understood is that the American culture is still imbued with the notion that you can only get wealthy by the process of exploitation, a process that the Jewish mind has painted as a commendable virtue. Some people see themselves get wealthy by exploiting an oil well or a mine; other people would feel just as comfortable exploiting someone the way their ancestors exterminated the natives to take their possessions or the way they used slaves as cheap labor. Thus, if the government is seen to take away the right to exploit by instituting a program that is deemed to be “socialist” at its core, some people react as if the government had declared war on them and they respond in kind. The resulting confrontation takes the shape of a cold civil war.
In this tumult, the meaning of freedom becomes confused. As it turns out, most Americans believe they enjoy freedom because they are willing to fight for it. But the truth is that the Americans do not have a concept of freedom in the abstract. They only understand the freedom that relates to something they want to do such as the right to bear arms, the right to travel, the right to exploit someone or something, and so on. And this is where the Jewish organizations score big with the Americans. To take advantage of this uniquely American trait, they give their interlocutors the right to choose freely as in the following example: I offer you ten thousand dollars to spend an hour with you little girl, or a hundred thousand dollars to have her for the night. Which do you take? Where a foreigner feel so insulted as to want to administer capital punishment on the spot, the American would feel honored that he was given a choice. He may choose one option or reject the offer but not feel insulted or violated for a moment. In politics, the offer that the Jewish organizations make comes in a form that sounds like this: Choose to do it my way and I'll take you to the promised land, to which the American responds: Show me the way to the promised land, my Lord?
This is what American freedom has come to mean. It can be seen at work in a column written by Clifford May under the title: “How to Stop Putting Gas in The Islamist Tank” and the subtitle: “Enriching your enemy may not be a brilliant strategy.” It was published on March 8, 2012 in the National Review Online. What the author tries to do at the start is respond to the fact that for the last dozen years or so, America has depleted itself in every field of its nationhood in order to fight a ghost that came under the rubric “war on terrorism.” It was a Jewish idea that was proven to be so ill-advised, the people who gave it and the people who took it should, in the name of justice, be locked in solitary confinement for life.
And the way that Clifford May responds is not to say let's back off, take a deep breath and allow America to rebuild itself, but say the following instead: tough luck, America. Our advice did not work this time but do not stop here; continue the fight because if the threat did not come, as we said, from a bunch of Muslim kids out to have fun playing cops and robbers with the biggest cop in the world, then the threat will still come from them and from the fact that someone called Hassan al-Banna once stated he would rather dominate than be dominated. And there is behind him the Islamists who support those same kids and his ideas too. And remember, America, that all these people have oil, a resource they were not smart enough to discover but one that was discovered by the “West”. It is a resource we need badly at this time but one we must wean ourselves off – or else we cease to exist as a civilization in no time at all.
And he offers a remedy. He says that America should drill to unearth more of its own oil and should rely on natural gas of which it has plenty. But the fact is that these ideas are not new at all; they have been discussed non-stop for a number of decades, the last time being a recent article written by Robert McFarlane -- a figure from the past to be sure -- but one he quotes in his column as if the ideas were a light that is starting to shine at the end of the tunnel.
But if those ideas have been around for this long, why is it that no one has acted on them by now? Clifford May has an answer to this question. He says this: “...government is not doing its economic duty. Nor is it doing its national-security duty … at the moment we are knowingly funding the 'violent extremists' who want to kill us, as well as the more moderate Islamists who merely want to dominate us.” And he wants to ram all this down your throat, so he goes on to say this: “...Islamists of both stripes must … wonder: 'How can people … be so stupid? … this must be a gift from Heaven.'”
What is wrong with all this is that there has never been a permanent winner on this Planet and there will never be one. On the other hand, there has been one permanent loser; the Jew who was kicked around for three and a half thousand years by a human race that always appreciated the authentic Arab Semite and the Muslim but never tolerated the real Jew or the fake one.
Clifford May who is a Jew is using everything at his disposal to scare people and to incite America, if not incite the Western world. He wants to maintain the war against the Christian Arabs and the Muslim world in the hope of weakening everybody to give the opportunity for people like himself to dominate the whole world. The scaremongering he does being the stick, he also has a carrot that comes in the form of a promise to the effect that at the end of it all, the West will triumph, will rule everywhere and rule for ever.
This is why it is generally accepted that those who claim to be Jews have always been their own worst enemies. Like a leech with a death wish, they get onto a host and abuse it to death thus come very close to extinction themselves. For thousands of years, everything they touched has turned into the poison that debilitated them as a group and reduced their numbers.
It remains to be said that if someone shows inclination to take the advice of Clifford May or the advice of someone like him, that person should check into a mental hospital and ask the staff to throw away the keys.
It would be the best thing that Clifford D. May could do to save the Western and the Arab civilizations as well as save humanity from himself and his likes.