In Israel ,
they talk about having an election in October of this year which would be a
year ahead of schedule. If and when this happens, it will probably look like an
ordinary exercise in democracy but will be something else in reality. What is
important to know is that democracy in Israel is a tool they use on the
world stage the way that smoke and mirrors are used in a Broadway show. It is
to create the right kind of illusion at the right time to keep the fake
narrative of Israel
going. In fact, the current government came to power when it became clear to
the leaders that America
was going to have a new President who will need to be educated in the
Judeo-Israeli ritual. This is a practice that is not much different from the
ancient sacrifice of children to please the gods. In modern Israel it is
the use of American weapons and ammunition to welcome a new American President
with the blood of unarmed Palestinians, both children and older folks.
To make the theatrics look authentic, the leaders of Israel needed
to remove the Kadima Party which had been in power for some time, and replace
it with a Likud Party that was headed by the notorious addict to Palestinian
blood -- Benjamin Netanyahu. That was then; what they have now is a situation
that is somewhat similar where an election will take place in America in
November of this year, an election that may result in a brand new situation.
Depending on what happens in America ,
they will modulate the events in Israel to get the result that will
suit the new circumstances while making the whole thing look like coincidence.
The way things stand now in Israel
is that the Jewish state has managed to make itself isolated from its neighbors
and from the world like never before. It is that the people at the helm have
behaved so strangely, the people below them have started to speak out. Thus, a
conflict was created that needs to be resolved. The denouement of the play will
be written depending on how the American campaign will unfold.
We have an indication as to how this may happen when we
study the events of four years ago. The idea then was to remove Ehud Olmert
from power and call an election that will bring the Likud Party to power. They
created a side show to the effect that Olmert had committed a few criminal
offenses in the past (no surprise here given that criminal behavior is the
natural way of life in Israel) and they said he should call an election then
resign and prepare himself to go to jail. Except for the jail part, it all happened
as planned when Kadima under a new leader lost the election, and the Likud
under Netanyahu won. His first act was to launch an attack on the unarmed
people of Gaza
and kill 1,300 innocent Palestinians in three weeks which, when scaled to the
size of the American population comes to 300,000 dead Americans in three weeks.
Thus, even before ascending to the helm of American power, the newly elected
President had been baptized in the reality of Judeo-Israeli democracy with the
blood of Palestinians being shed with the use of American weapons.
So then, what theatrics are they preparing to stage in Israel at this
time? To search for an answer, we begin by noting that the people at the helm
of an institution do sometimes lose touch with reality and begin to do such
things as to imperil the institution itself and all those in it. In the
majority of cases, the big institutions would have a protocol spelled out in
their code of conduct by which the lower ranking personnel in the command
hierarchy are authorized to take steps that mitigate or neutralize the negative
effect of illegal orders issued by the person at the helm. If necessary, that
person may even be relieved from command altogether. This can happen in a
relatively small institution and it can happen at the national level.
Something close to that happened in America in the
year 1973 when the secretary of defense issued a directive to the military
instructing them to check with him before obeying an order that may come from
the commander in chief. The secretary of defense at the time was James
Schlesinger (a Jew), the commander in chief was President Richard Nixon and the
occasion was the combination of two major events unfolding simultaneously. At
home, there was a Watergate affair raging in the media and in the Congress.
Abroad, there was a full scale war raging in the Middle
East . Schlesinger had feared that Nixon may go crazy under the
strain of the Watergate revelations and do something – well, crazy.
What is known so far is probably as much as we'll ever know
about what happened during those crucial days in 1973. There was the fact that America had participated directly in the Middle
Eastern war to rescue Israel .
And there was the fact that President Nixon had ordered the worldwide
mobilization of American forces, something he did apparently based on reports
-- never substantiated -- to the effect that the Soviet
Union had mobilized its forces in response to the American
participation in the war.
As it happened, President Nixon resigned shortly after that,
the consequence of which being that the world will never know what the response
of the American military to the Schlesinger order had been. It is also doubtful
that historians will ever know whether or not Schlesinger or anyone in the
military would have been summoned to the White House or to some congressional
committee to tell how each one of the participants took the Schlesinger order.
Some people have called the Schlesinger move a mutiny. Of
course, the American military, like everyone else, has a protocol to follow
when a number of officers deem that a higher ranking commander is no longer fit
to command. But Schlesinger never consulted with anyone before issuing his
order, and there is no indication that anyone below him took the order seriously.
But what if Nixon had issued an order after the Schlesinger directive was given
out? Would the chiefs of staff have obeyed it, or would they have checked with
Schlesinger?
Very few people in 1973 believed that America was at
peril, therefore, the unfolding of those events were of little consequence to
the nation. Still, it was a situation that America
will never again want to be in regardless as to what pickle Israel will put
itself in. By contrast, what is happening in the Middle
East at this time looms large in the imagination of Israeli
leaders such as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the minister of defense
Ehud Barack. Opposed to them and worried about what they might do next are
Yuval Diskin who was the head of the domestic intelligence agency, Meir Dagan
who was the head of the foreign intelligence agency, and General Benny Gantz
who is the current chief of staff.
All three believe that the Prime Minister and the minister
of defense are approaching the subject of Iran the wrong way. Diskin has said
that the two Israeli leaders are messianic in their responses, and that
attacking Iran
will accelerate the nuclear program of that nation instead of retarding it.
Contrasting the messianic leaders of Israel
are the leaders of Iran
who, according to Gantz, are a very rational people as it is apparent from the
way that they govern their country. As to Dagan, he put it succinctly when he
said that a military action against Iran is the stupidest idea he ever
heard of. Thus, the accusation leveled by the Israeli leaders to the effect
that the Iranians are irrational and messianic has been thrown back at the
Israeli leaders, not by the Iranians who would not waste their time responding
to a barking dog in Tel Aviv, but responded to by second tier commanders in the
Israeli hierarchy itself.
Piling on top of the Iranian problem are a few other
problems that will play a big role in pushing Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud
Barack over the edge. One of those is the fact that the Israelis need as much
as a billion dollars right away to get out of their financial difficulties.
They have approached America to bail them out again but even the threat that
they will default on the loans endorsed by America could not persuade the
Congress to hand them this much money. And you know how dire the situation is
when they put out stories to the effect that the girls in Israel are
skinny not because they are starving but because they are fashionably anorexic.
When presented with the fact that poverty in Israel
is a serious problem approaching the level of famine, they blame the shortage
of food on the Ethiopian women who, they say, are eating more than their fair
share of the available meat, amounts they never ate in Ethiopia before they were brought to Israel .
This tells you that Israel
which has been up to now a powder keg full of explosives made in America ,
has become a ship commanded by irrational and messianic fools who, when they
look in the mirror, do not see themselves but see someone else as being
irrational and messianic. It is the height of madness.
Watch how the staged play will play itself out but do not be
fooled by how the fools will try to mislead you.