On May 8, 2012, I came across two editorials on the subject
of the military trials being held at Guantanamo .
The first was of the Wall Street Journal, coming under the title: “The KSM
Trial Spectacle” and the subtitle: “Is it too much for Eric Holder to defend
these prosecutions?” The second was of the Washington Times, coming under the
title: “The courtroom jihad” and the subtitle: “Islamist antics make a mockery
of justice in 9/11 trial.” This was the day when the defendants were arraigned,
and their courtroom behavior attracted much attention. You can be certain there
were other opinion pieces on the same subject, and certain they were critical
of the way that the arraignment proceeded.
But what was that all about? And why were so many observers
surprised by what they saw? Well, it may be that because the defendants looked
like grownups – which they are physically -- the observers were fooled into
believing they were looking at adults. But the fact is that these are children
who ceased to grow up mentally long ago given what they lived through. To
understand their behavior, you need to imagine the police catching five rowdy
young men who were playing a game of “catch me if you can” with the police.
What you need to know is that it did not just happen that the men and the
police (meaning America )
came to play the game; it happened that they and the police had a long history
together. And it was this history that prompted the men to develop contempt for
the system which the police and the court have come to represent. Thus, you
begin to understand that the behavior of the defendants only reflects the way
that they see America
through their juvenile eyes and through the experience that they had
interacting with America .
The question to ask now is this: How much of what these men
see about America
is seen by the rest of the world. Let me tell you, my friend, if you realize
how close the world view of America
is to the view of these men, you would be horrified. It is that wise people
have always said you earn the respect you deserve by the way you behave and the
way you treat people. On the other hand, the ruffians have always said you earn
the respect that you want by the way that you battle people and the way you rough
them up. For a long time, America
listened to its wise men and women, and was respected the world over. Then America started
to listen to the ruffians that have infested it, and it lost the respect it
earned. The result is the horrifying situation you saw in that courtroom and
see around the world.
The ruffians have invaded superpower America , and
their presence is felt in every corner and at every level of the Republic.
Compared to America , they
are small and powerless but like tiny Lilliputians, they encountered the giant
that is Gulliver America
while he was asleep. They managed to tie him down with strings but it must be
said that unlike the work of fiction authored by Jonathan Swift, the reality of
America
today is that it is supplying the ruffians with the strings they use to keep it
tied down, keep it paralyzed and keep it gridlocked. So you ask: Who are the
ruffians and where did they come from?
It is no secret that the various groups who came to America from
everywhere around the globe have from time to time asked that their adopted
country intervene in matters concerning the country from which they originated.
Such requests were of a short duration, limited in scope and clear in
objective. The result has been that America responded in a way that helped
the causes of these people while advancing its own interests. Thus began and
ended America 's
involvement with every international conflict that has erupted during the
Twentieth Century -- with one glaring exception. It is that there came a group
of people calling themselves Jews who changed the rules of the game with
respect to matters that deal with their agenda.
At first, these people looked like helpless Lilliputians but
they turned out to be the sneaky ruffians that managed to tie down superpower
America, mobilize it effectively, make it work exclusively for them and do so
for a duration they promise will be unlimited, a scope they say is unbounded,
and objectives that look as clear as their moral ambiguity. And the strings by
which they tie down America
are the use of the process of legislation, the law itself when it is enacted,
and the way that the law is implemented. All these are procedures that the Jews
manipulate and abuse; they are tools they use to freeze America 's
ability to act till they are certain the action will work for them, serve their
interests and serve no one else.
You see all this at play in two articles. The first was
written by Brett Schaefer under the title: “UNESCO: Not Exactly Indispensable”
and the subtitle: “Contra Obama and the agency itself, there is no reason for
the U.S.
to keep funding it.” It was published in National Review Online on May 7, 2012.
The second article is a column written by Clifford D. May under the title: “The
Real Palestinian Refugee Problem” and the subtitle: “Most of them aren't really
refugees. They're pawns.” It was published in the National Review Online on May
10, 2012.
The reason for writing his article, says Brett Schaefer, is
that “Last Fall, UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and
Cultural Organization, granted membership to the Palestinian Authority, which
is not a state.” This being his motivation first and foremost, you expect that
he will explain how and why the act of granting membership to a non state is
serious enough a reason to cut off America 's financial contribution to
the Organization. But Schaefer did not have to explain this part because the
funding had already been suspended due to a law that is on the books. What
prompted him to write was that the Obama administration and UNESCO were
pressing the Congress to repeal that law thus allow the funding to resume. And
he is opposed to this idea.
To justify his position, he takes up the argument made by
the administration and the Organization in favor of resuming the funding, and
he refutes it point by point. The argument being of two parts -- one discussing
the work done by the Organization, and the other discussing its role as a voice
of moderation and integrity in the world -- he attacks the Organization on both
fronts. There is no point rehashing those arguments given that they are there
in print for everyone to see. Suffice it to say that Schaefer is not impressed
with anything that UNESCO is doing except the work that relates to Holocaust
education – but here too, he is not very enthused.
To mislead the readers in his presentation, the author
ignores the fact that money is fungible which means that a shortfall to the
funding of one program means a shortfall to general revenue, thus a shortfall
to all programs. And so, he argues that it will be just fine to stop America 's contribution to UNESCO because the
programs it implements -- such as literacy in Afghanistan and the tsunami-warning
systems -- are “not vital and in some cases minimal.” They can be tossed out
the window, he says, while the Holocaust program can be funded by Israel alone.
What he does not realize is that when ordinary human beings of any race,
religion or color of the skin read paragraph after paragraph where everything
is denigrated except the Jewish causes -- chief among them the Holocaust --
people tend to exclaim: the hell with the Holocaust, spread literacy in Afghanistan and
keep installing those tsunami-warning systems! People that died seventy years
ago are no more worthy than people dying today or may die tomorrow.
As to the UNESCO being a voice of moderation and integrity,
Schaefer surpasses himself when it comes to the denigration of the world, which
he does at the same time as he dignifies Israel and all the Jewish causes.
He begins that part of the argument by saying this: “the organization and its
executive board have exhibited repeated lapses in judgment.” From here on, it
is open season on everyone where in paragraph after paragraph, he ignores the
murderous rampage that Israel
has been on since its inception but attacks everyone else for not being
perfect. And he vehemently attacks the Organization for acknowledging the
little things that people he does not like happen to do right. Here too,
ordinary human beings of every race, religion and color of the skin tend to
exclaim: the hell with Israel and the Jewish causes, tell us more about the
beautiful people that live in Africa, Arabia, Asia and Latin America; tell us
what they do that is right in their homes and their palaces; what they do in
their churches, their mosques and their temples.
We now come to the Clifford May column. He begins it by
doing something that is very much a Jewish habit. It is that he sets the stage
in such a way as to draw a false analogy that will be hard to detect by someone
not familiar with what is at stake in the matter he discusses. And so, speaking
of what used to be the Indian Subcontinent, he says this: “[it] was partitioned
into two … nations. One of them would have a Hindu majority, the other a Muslim
majority … Muslims moved to the territory that became Pakistan … Hindus and Sikhs moved to India .” He then
says that the same thing should have happened to Palestine
where Jews moved to what is now Israel
but where many Palestinians are still classified as refugees; a big problem
according to him. This done, he argues for cutting American funding to the
United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) which he says is wholly
responsible for this problem.
Whoa! Get a hold of this, my friend. This part fits with the
subtitle of the article: “Most of them aren't really refugees. They're pawns.”
Until now, this sentence was used to defame the leaders of the Arab countries
who were accused by the likes of Clifford May for “using the Palestinian
refugees as pawns.” Now here he comes; a quintessential mutilator of history
reversing himself and basically saying this: Forget that old history; it is not
serving our purpose anymore. We now decree that the real culprit using the
Palestinian refugees as pawns is UNRWA and not the Arab leaders. And the reason
for the change of heart; for the change of mind and the change of hat is that
it suits us better to have the agency defunded than badmouth the Arab leaders.
We did so for many decades but only managed to make people the world over view
us, Jews as obnoxious stinkers. We want to stink no more -- obnoxious being all
that we can live with at this time.
Thus, Clifford May starts a new argument that sets the
legal, moral and humanitarian reasons why UNRWA must be hated and defunded. The
aim of the argument is to demolish the tons of arguments that the Jewish
propaganda machine has piled up over the decades to blame the Arabs for the
criminal behavior of the Israelis. And when this is done, he and those like him
will want you to start blaming the United Nation agency. But a liar is a liar
is a liar, and having bathed us in a sea of lies, no one has the stomach to
believe what Clifford May or anyone like him have to say now or ever again. No
one, that is, except a couple of Congressional morons in the American Federal
legislature.
What these morons seem to have done is buy the false analogy
that was discussed earlier. They did so instead of recognizing what happened in
the Indian subcontinent as being analogous to say, Belgium breaking up and each
citizen going to the part of the country they feel most comfortable with. This
is also something that could happen here in Canada
where the Province
of Quebec
What you will not see happen is people being bombed or
machine-gunned out of their homes in Belgium or in Quebec – as it happened in
Palestine -- in favor of airlifting hoards from places like Russia and Ethiopia
to occupy the land and the homes thus abandoned by those who sought refuge
somewhere else not because they like being refugees but because they had no
other choice. And the question to ask is this: In the same way that the Muslims
and the Hindus swapped places in India ,
will the Congressional morons now lobby Russia
and Ethiopia
to take in the Palestinian refugees? This would be the sort of thing that a
moron would contemplate but don't hold your breath as to what the answer from Russia or Ethiopia will be.
What the Schaefer and May articles tell the world is the
sordid story that has been trickling out quietly for several decades now; a
story to the effect that America
has become a private toilet and a urinal reserved exclusively for any Jewish
leader that has a leak or a dump he wants to get rid of. These leaders are
given the exclusive right to freeze the Congress and gridlock it till it
massages them and relieves them of the stinking causes they go to dispense of
in the toilet bowl they call Congress of the United States . It is in there that
the Jewish leaders are given the right to do anything they want such as play
with the rules and the procedures to advance their causes at the expense of the
American people; to the detriment of the whole civilized world.
This is what the Guantanamo
detainees have detected as did the rest of the world. Their case is especially
acute because they are the people who, as children, were recruited to fight the
Soviets in Afghanistan under
the leadership of America
that was then posing as the policeman of the world. These kids who never grew
up since that experience were instructed to wear their religiosity on their
sleeve and fight like the dickens in the name of Allah. In exchange for doing
this, they were promised great rewards by the policeman when the Soviet bandits
will have been defeated.
The kids fought till victory but then America was taken over by the Jewish
organizations that made it start a war against their religion; the one they
were told to wear on their sleeve and fight alongside America . This
was the treacherous act – the one committed by a policeman they had come to
trust -- that made them so cynical. They developed a big dose of contempt for
what America
has become, and they expressed that contempt during the court procedures on the
day of their arraignment. Blame them if you want but then look in the mirror
and spit in your own faces.
The rest of the world is now watching with amazement to see
how much more people like Brett Schaefer, Clifford May and others will succeed
at isolating America from the United Nations and the world, thus turn the
superpower into an even more exclusive Jewish toilet bowl and urinal.