Sunday, August 5, 2012

Memo To Munib Masri Of Nablus


I saw the article you published in the New York Times on August 3, 2012 under the title: “Occupation, Not Culture, Is Holding Palestinians Back”. I thought it was a good thing that you, in Palestine, know so much already about what goes on in this part of the world, especially what concerns “the altar of distant fund-raising thrones in New York and Los Angeles.” I am sure you know much more about us than what you discuss in the article, hence my reluctance to add something more to what you wrote.

However, a passage in your article caught my eyes about which I would like to make a few comments. Here is that passage: “Mr. Romney believes that Israel's impressive economic growth is because of the country's strong culture and that the Palestinian economy lags because – implicitly – our culture is inferior.” Well, let me assure you, Mr. Masri, that Romney does not believe in something along this line or any line he might have thought up himself. This is because he is incapable of thinking at this level of complexity; it is as simple as that. The truth is that those words were stuffed in his mouth by one of the many Jewish handlers in charge of his campaign. Like ventriloquists who play one scene or another, they take turn using him like a dummy as they make him utter the words that convey the message which suits the role that each of them plays at any given time.

So you ask: Why these words at this time on this occasion? Again, let me assure you, Sir, that the occasion had nothing to do with it. Thus, I suggest that you not take it personally because Romney could have been in some other country, on some other continent; even some other planet -- and he would have uttered similar words because his handlers deemed it to be the right time to start a discussion on culture. You see, Mr. Masri, there is a saying around here which goes this way: “All politics is local politics.” And what you saw happen in occupied Palestine concerns more what is brewing here on this North American continent than what is transpiring in Palestine or anywhere else.

In case you did not know, a culture war has been raging on this continent for several decades now. It started when the people here began to notice that everything said and everything done by a Jewish official was meant to promote Israel and the Jewish causes even if that came at the expense of the United States. A number of patriotic Americans from among the journalists and the pundits began to voice concern about the rising trend. In turn, the concern of the people alarmed the Jewish leaders so much that they warned of the following: to interpret a view expressed by a Jew as a subtle promotion of Israel or a Jewish cause is antisemitic.

This warning coupled with the fear of being accused of antisemitic tendencies forever killed all attempts by anyone and everyone in North America to criticize an idea or a suggestion that may be local or international in scope or in reach, and having to do with Israel. The idea that something was suggested to serve the interests of Israel or the Jewish causes rather than serve the nation became a taboo, the breaking of which was punishable by eternal banishment. And this state of affairs was held fast even when the implementation of the idea or the suggestion was certain to come at the expense of everything and everyone in America.

Thus immunized against any criticism, every Jew that was itching to say something or ask for something was given an audio-visual and/or a print platform through which to express and propagate every desire they had. And of course, a push back against such uttering was considered antisemitic and was therefore banned. Not only did they ban the speeches that criticized them; they also banned the authors who created the speeches. This action deterred everyone else who might have been tempted to slip something through, something that would have ignited a literary revolution or a full blown cultural one having the potential to slow down or kill the spread of the Jewish pseudo-culture in America. I call it pseudo-culture because it is a fraudulent imitation of the ancient Jewish culture that only exists today among a handful of practitioners who are, in fact, at odds with the idea of establishing a Jewish state before the advent of the Messiah. But this is another subject.

Nevertheless, after a few decades of what passes for authentic Jewish culture (and three generations later) we now see the effect of the demonic plan that was prepared by the Jewish leaders and implemented by them as they worked with the surrogates they gathered along the way. What we see in America today is the erection of a polarized nation that is governed by a schizophrenic political system trying to implement a schizophrenic economic plan, itself supervised by schizophrenic individuals who were voted into office by an electorate that is largely schizophrenic.

Of course, the polarization of individuals and of nations is a phenomenon we encounter everywhere and all the time but what makes the American polarization a schizophrenic one is the fact that it was influenced by the pseudo-Jewish culture, fashioned by the self appointed Jewish leaders and implemented by them. Thus, if you ask how did all this originate or where did it come from? The answer is that everywhere you looked; you could see that the Jews had it both ways. They always advanced two contradictory themes simultaneously; one theme promoting their superiority, the other theme trumpeting their fear of being punished. And no one from among the general public or the elite dared to ask a question lest they be called antisemitic.

The consequence has been that by osmosis and by every cultural means you can think of -- generation after generation of American kids grew up carrying contradictory opinions in their heads, their hearts and their souls. The net result of a dual personality becoming the normal state of existence among American individuals, the institutions and the branches of government -- is what makes of this nation the binary weapon of mass destruction it has become. It is what makes of the country the danger that it is both on the local stage where people gun each other down as if in a shooting arena, and on the international stage where so much blood has been spilled needlessly to satisfy the Judeo-Israeli lust for blood.

And when you look closely, you will see that the trigger mechanism for detonating the weapon on the local stage is the culture of violence that was promoted in the Seventies and the Eighties of the Twentieth Century, a promotion that was done and maintained on the premise that violence was good for America because the Old Testament of the Jews was full of it. As of now, the situation continues to get out of control, and no one knows what will happen next, the reason why the people are arming themselves even more to prepare for the apocalyptic ending they believe will come someday. As to the international stage, the trigger mechanism remains in the hands of the Jewish leaders where they involve America in every war they believe will suit their endgame.

The fact that America was made to serve the Jewish causes at home and abroad forced the Jewish leaders to join the two arguments into one. To this end, they contended that America was faced with one Islamist movement that is a danger to national security both at home and abroad. They made it sound like America can be defeated by a bunch of Muslim kids playing hide and seek as well as cops and robbers with superpower America, the self appointed policeman of the world. And they made it sound like there was an Islamist sleeper waiting under every desk and behind every tree for the order to attack the American homeland from within.

This is what the pseudo-Jewish culture in America had become. It was a culture of fear, incitement and demagoguery of such intensity and concentration against the Arabs and the Muslims; it would have embarrassed even Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi minister of propaganda. But then something happened that was not a surprise to those of us who warned it was inevitable for it to happen. It came as a big surprise, however, to the Jewish leaders who were living in the world of their own fantasy. What happened was that the Arabs and the Muslims were barely affected by the work of the Jewish propaganda machine while the all-American boys and girls, even the adults became affected to a dangerous degree. And all this became apparent when the pilots and flight attendants started to go berserk believing that a local flight in America was meant to go to the Middle East and get Iran and Israel, given that “we already got Iraq.”

This is not what was supposed to happen to the brains and the emotions of the American people when their pastors were going on television to say to the lambs and the sheep who follow them that the Jew was their God while the Muslim was their enemy. They were only supposed to quiver with fear in their boots and proclaim in the name of the cross that they will go liberate the Earth from the grip of the would-be caliphates who are waiting in the wings to take over America and grab the world. Instead, the Americans went crazy in the head and got rattled emotionally while the Arabs were preparing themselves to have a sane and democratic Spring.

The question now is this: What happened that made even the crazies refuse to play the Jewish game the way that the leaders and the sickly pastors had expected? The answer is that one consequence of the schizophrenic mentality is that people can at times see through the fog of their mental and emotional illnesses, and still judge that something is not what it should be – that it is wrong because reality had been reversed.

Under some circumstances, these people can still retain the ability to recognize that they were forbidden to talk about the set up which caused them to badmouth the victim rather than the perpetrator. They feel the pain when they remember that any deviation from saying or doing what they were expected to say or do caused them to be punished at the savage hand of the tyrannical Jewish rule by which they lived. But now that they have gone berserk, they are at liberty to tell it like they saw it. And so, they lash out against the hand that used to punish them; the hand that also robbed them of their sanity to serve Israel and the Jewish causes. It is the way of the crazies to get back at those who made them crazy.

Whether they are crazy and are now talking, or whether they are sane but still afraid to talk, the American people realize that their culture still lives by the adage: “Give me liberty or give me death” and the adage: “Better dead than red”. They live by the culture that praised the passengers who fought against the hijackers on September 11, 2001 and caused the plane to crash in an empty field, thus prevent it from going to the District of Columbia where the plan of the hijackers was to crash it on a government building. This is also the culture that has posthumously decorated the soldiers who died while shielding their fellow soldiers with their own bodies upon seeing that a hand grenade had fallen nearby and was about to explode.

And so they ask themselves: If ours is a culture of heroes and not a culture of death, how could the Palestinians who sacrificed themselves to shield their baby brothers and baby sisters as well as their mothers and the other elders in the family, be called terrorists? How can this be when all that these people had to fight with were their bare hands and their bodies, and having no alternative but to go against the most heavily armed gang of Jewish terrorists in history, now equipped with the deadliest weapons that our American military industrial complex has ever built?

The American people feel guilty about the horror that is heaped on the unarmed people of Palestine, especially that they know this is happening because their government is staffed with cowards whose only impulse is to remain in power regardless as to whom they sell their soul, and what the consequences of the sellout will be. When the Jewish hate machine began to detect this trend among the population, it started to enlist the likes of Mitt Romney so as to badmouth the Palestinian culture which seeks liberty for its people, thus deflect from the fact that the Jewish culture in America is seen as a parasitic culture which lives by sucking the economic and military lifeblood of the nation.

Like I said, don't take it personally, Mr. Masri, because this whole charade is about the tug of cultural war that is ongoing in this sad part of the world. It is that the good people want to cut the Jewish chain around their ankles, and want to remove the Jewish boot that is pressing against their necks, but the Jewish leaders want to maintain the status quo; and more than that, they want to buttress it.

Finally, I should inform you that I received several advisories to the effect that a number of internet servers in the United States blocked this website right after I published the article: “Mitt Romney Is A Cultural Taliban” on July 30, 2012. But the people have assured me that they found a way around this blatant form of censorship, and they are reading my articles as regularly as before. I do not know who is behind this cowardly act, but I can assure you it is not Harry Reid. It is probably someone that has something to hide.

How amusing!