It is clear now that the long term strategy of the Jewish
lobby in America has been to infiltrate the legislative branches of government,
especially the federal one, and have them pass laws that benefit Israel and the
other Jewish causes at the expense of the American people, and everyone else
for that matter.
To do that, the Jewish infiltrators employed a devilish
approach: While allowing every law to be made reviewable, amendable and
reversible – which is the democratic and civilized way of doing things – they
fashioned the laws that benefit Israel and the Jews in such a way as to be
ironclad, absolute, irreversible and never subject to be reviewed – which is
the autocratic, savage and very Jewish way of doing things.
The lobby was able to achieve all that by turning the
American legislators into trainable puppies, and conditioning them to obey
their master's voice. And that voice came in the form of simple commands, not
in the form of explanations that may require the engagement of human
intelligence. Just as you train a puppy to respond in a specified manner when
hearing terms like “go fetch,” “catch this” and “sit here,” the Jewish
lobbyists and infiltrators trained the American legislators to respond in a specified
manner to terms like “extremist Palestinians,” “groups of thugs” and
“delegitimizing the Jewish state.”
So now that the European Union (EU) has taken another step
on the road to reduce the effect of the Jewish moral syphilis that has been
ravaging the Planet, the lobby in America called on an Israeli cabinet minister
to write something that will reduce the impact of the European decision on the
psyche of the American legislators who may see the light, thus experience the
canine version of a Spartacus rising among them, and work to free them from the
yoke of Jewish moral enslavement.
That minister is Yair Lapid who is in charge of finance. He
wrote his article under the title: “Europe's Stance on Settlements Is a
Blunder” and sent it to the New York Times that published it on July 20, 2013.
Lapid begins by telling the American readers that the Europeans may be well
intentioned but the people they are trying to help are evil, therefore the
European decision – being a misguided mistake – will cause more calamities than
the evil ones can cause all by themselves.
Using little veiled subtleties to call the Palestinian
opponent “evil,” automatically makes the Israeli-Jewish side the good side –
the one that is saintly and beyond reproach. Okay. Now that we know who the
characters are, we need to know what the plot is. So then tell us, Mr. Minister,
what the plot is about. Here it is: “as a minister and chairman of the party
that is committed to peace, I wish to note one problem with the new EU
directives: They will encourage delay in the resumption of peace negotiations.”
How is that? You want to know how that is? the minister
asks. I'll tell you how that is. Hear me loudly and clearly, ye American
legislators who may be inclined to emulate the Europeans. What we have here are
“extremist Palestinians” and “groups of thugs” who wish to “delegitimize the
Jewish state.” He goes on to explain: They demand that the president of
Palestine stall the negotiations because, as long as the Palestinians steer
clear of the negotiating table, their situation will improve.”
And this is where you scream: What? Are you saying these
people love the occupation or something? No, no, they don't like the
occupation, and neither does the rest of the world. But as long as the occupation
continues, Israel delegitimizes itself in the eyes of the world, you see. So
then why don't you just get the hell out of Palestine, thus end the
delegitimization of the miserable thing you call Israel?
What was that again? A question? Oh, you did ask me a
question. You want to know why we don't just get out of Palestine and be legit
like every civilized being on the planet? Good question, and I am sure I must
have an answer for it. Well, let me think. Oh yes, here is the answer: “These
enemies are powerful, but their argument has recently weakened.” Oh good. But
do you think your argument has strengthened, Minister? Of course, of course it
did get stronger, and I'll tell you why. Remember the taxes we used to collect
from the Palestinians on behalf of Palestinians but stole the money and kept it
for ourselves? Well, we decided to “unsteal” that money, and give it to its
rightful owners. See how good, saintly and beyond reproach we are? Hey,
congratulate me, I'm legitimate; as legitimate as you.
If that is the case, where do we go from here Mr. Minister?
A question? Yes, that too is a question. Let me think now. Oh yes, I have an
answer for that. In fact, it is a two-part answer. There is a part for the
world and a part that is tailor made for the American suckers in the Congress.
The part for the world is this: “It's challenging enough to remain sane.” As to
the part that is tailor-made for the Americans, they must never forget that the
laws for the Jews were fashioned in such a way as to be ironclad, absolute,
irreversible and never subject to be reviewed. Thus, the lesson to be learned
here is that: “The EU would do well to revoke its decision” but if it does not,
don't you Americans emulate it.
If you are puzzled as to what the minister was referring to
when he said he may be insane, you'll find the answer in another article that
was published on the same day, on the same page of the New York Times. It has
the title “The E.U.'s New Guidelines on Israel Are Not a boycott,” and was
written by Daniel Levy. He says this: “Europe has always considered the
settlements to be illegal, and existing E.U. Agreements with Israel already
contain stipulations barring benefits to settlements … Nevertheless, the
reaction in Israel has bordered on hysteria.” He must have meant insane
hysteria.
Does that mean Levy sees the plot line of the ongoing drama
differently from Yair Lapid, the Israeli minister? Yes he does. This is how
Levy sees the plot: “the lack of consequences for Israel has been a key enabler
of the ongoing occupation and denial of Palestinian rights.” But why can't the
Americans see things the way that the Europeans do? Daniel levy responds:
“While Washington has similar stipulations regarding settlements in its loan
guarantees to Israel, domestic US politics (that damned Congress of ill-repute
again) restrict the consequences it can impose on Israel.
And to respond directly to the minister's contentions, Levy
writes: “[This] brings us to the most disingenuous and misleading claim of the
Israeli leadership in opposing Europe's move – that it harms efforts to achieve
peace by empowering Palestinian maximalism.” He elaborates: “Reverse the claim,
and it does ring true: Europe's move helps peace by challenging Israel's
impunity, thus undercutting Israeli maximalists.” And he ends like this:
“Europe's move might be remembered for resuscitating the two-state project.”
What must be resuscitated now are the dead brains of the
primitive puppies in the dog pound that is owned and operated by the American
Jewish lobby.