When I think of Martin Indyk I see in my mind's eye a
transvestite that was a man who transformed into a woman for one reason only,
to become a Madam and take control of the whorehouse that is America 's
foreign policy, and run it in such a way as to implement a secret agenda. And
if you look closely, you will see that everything this character does is
motivated by an instinct that was conceived and nurtured inside a bordello.
You clearly see this tendency in the latest article he wrote
for the online magazine “Foreign Policy” published on July 4, 2013 under the
title: “It's Time to Work With Egypt's Generals” and the subtitle: “In a
turbulent time, Cairo's military is the best friend the United Sates has got.”
Right there, you can tell that this discussion will be on who likes who, and
who hates what. Obviously, Indyk and those of his ilk cannot begin to
understand that international relations are not the same as connubial relations
between spouses, intimate friends, casual acquaintances or strangers. It is
something that does not involve your political genitals, Martin.
To be fair, it must be said that it has only been a few days
since the events in Egypt
prompted this discussion and others like it in North
America . Thus, it is understandable why no one yet has sounded the
right tone loud enough for everyone to hear. Still, amid the cacophony of a
torrent of whorish suggestions saturating the ether, a few faint voices do rise
once in a while to indicate that someone out there may have the right tone. The
trouble, however, is that these are faint voices at risk of being completely
extinguished by the loud noises emanating from the bordellos of the Jewish
lobby; the group whose secret agenda Indyk and company seek to implement.
The faint voices that set the right tone have come from the
American administration. They were to the effect that America stands with the people of Egypt – not one
faction or another; not one person or another. But what is dispiriting is that
they are a faint echo of what used to be the resounding voice of sanity. That
was the time when President Obama went to Cairo
and told the Arabs that America
seeks to establish normal relations with them which meant discarding America 's fabricated tendency to mobilize its
energies and run around the world pimping for and promoting the interests of Israel at the expense of everyone else,
especially the unarmed and vulnerable people of Palestine .
What happened after this episode was the fact that the Indyk
bordello and those of the Jewish lobby banded together with the Congressional
houses of ill repute whereupon they all started to yell, cry and bellow about
the President having visited Arab and Muslim countries but not Israel . And
they promised, as they always do in such circumstances, that peace in the
Middle East and the whole world if not the entire universe rested on one thing
and one thing only – guess what that would be, my friend. You guessed it; they
said that universal peace rested on Obama's visit to Israel . Yes, that's what they said.
In one voice, they all advised: Go visit Israel and the whole wide universe
will be at peace and in perfect harmony again.
The American President went to Israel
as advised, and he repeated every word of love and affection for the Jews and
for Israel
they put in his mouth. He also regurgitated every overt and subtle insult,
denigration and put-down they stuffed in it with regard to the Arabs and the
Muslims. Then guess what happened, my friend. You guessed it; nothing came of
it. And that was a spectacle like the sort you see among adolescents who hang
together in the shopping plazas when their hormones kick in, and they give the
impression that they think more with their genitals than they do with their
brains. The simple truth is that love of the Jews and the simultaneous hate of
the Arabs are not the ingredients that will fix the problems of the universe.
The brain says so; the genitals are confused about the subject.
Not only that, but Mr. Obama also discovered that he had
made a deal with the devil in that he delivered on his part of the bargain and
got nothing in return. It turned out that true to character, the characters in New York and Tel Aviv
conned him, cashed in on what he delivered and ran away with it leaving him
holding an empty bag. It was a repeat of the performance that con artists put
on every time they wear the mantle of Jewish leader, and leave behind the
little guys as well as the big suckers to pay a dear price for their actions.
Well, if nothing good came of that performance, something
bad did come out of it. What used to be a resounding voice of sanity had now
become a faint echo. In fact, you can tell that: “We stand with the people of Egypt ” does not resonate as robustly as: “We
want to establish normal relations” which meant discard the tendency to pimp
for and promote the interests of Israel at the expense of real human
beings everywhere in the world.
What's worse, ever since that time, the cacophony emanating
from Madam Indyk's bordello and all its affiliates, have been smothering the
voices of sanity that went on to become fainter with the passage of time. And
you can tell where the loud noises come from because they articulate the
language of political genitals: Who likes who, and who hates what. And so you
see Martin Indyk begin his article like this: “The Obama administration … would
do well to navigate for the only safe harbor in the relationship between Cairo and Washington :
the Egyptian armed forces.”
Had he started by asking why America
lost just about everyone in Egypt
and the Arab and Muslim worlds, he would have written a different article and
reached different conclusions. But being the bordello Madam that he is, he blew
it this time, the way that he and his likes do all the time. And you can see
this in the two paragraphs that follow the opening one, where he lists one
drivel talking point after the other as he describes a fictitious situation in Egypt that even
its creators are beginning to understand is too far fetched to sound believable.
Here is one example: “The Egyptian officers are heavily
dependent on U.S.
military assistance for their all-American equipped forces.” The fact is that Egypt is not receiving assistance or aid from America anymore than South
Korea or Germany
do. The two “partners” do a job together where each contributes its part. Also,
the Egyptian forces are nowhere near being all-American equipped. These people
produce much of their weapons locally, and they also buy from a number of
sources – America
being one of them.
What Indyk does after that is repeat the talk of the
genitalia you would expect to see come out a house of prostitution. To describe
how America 's moral posture
was tarnished in the Middle East , he avoids
telling the story of the superpower that burned itself on the altar of a false
God. In fact, he avoids telling the truth about generations of Americans who
were raised in the belief that the Jew among them, in Israel or
anywhere in the world had rights that rose above their own. This being the reason
why they must accept being raised in poverty to send the money to Israel .
This also being the reason that should they manage to grow up and stay healthy,
they must accept dying in a foreign land to stroke the ego of someone like
Netanyahu.
Moreover, instead of listing the damage that American money,
weapons and diplomacy has caused the Middle East and by extension America itself – all in the quest to prop up the
useless entity that is Israel
– Indyk says this: “America 's
moral leadership was tarnished by our close association with Mubarak.” In that
same vein, he goes on to say: “...our failure to stand against Morsy …
convinced the opposition that we were in his corner … We spoke out when we
should have worked quietly to remove Mubarak; we stayed silent when we should
have called out Morsy.” No, no, no. America
should have kept its Jewish nose out of Egypt
and the entire Middle East ; period. What vexes
the people there is not this sort of small blunders; what vexes them is what
American money (now borrowed from the Chinese), weapons and diplomacy do to the
region.
And if you believe you can talk about international
relationships of the genitalia without speaking of a moment of orgasm, you are
mistaken for, here comes the Jewish moment of orgasm. Speaking of Israel 's leaders, Indyk writes the following:
“their relations with the Egyptian military have grown much stronger since
Mubarak's overthrow; cutting U.S.
aid is the last thing they will want.”
The rest of the article is not worth commenting on except for
a passage that no one could resist responding to because it is the advice that
the author wishes to communicate to the people and leaders of Egypt. This is
his passage: “Vacating the squares, establishing calm and channeling the
public's energy into an effort to write a constitution and hold elections, are
the prerequisites for economic stability,” to which I am certain many
pedestrians in Egypt will want to tell him in the language of the street: Just
who the f**k do you think you are, you Martin Indyk the Jewish dick.