There is no doubt that the Jews have been the source of
horrendous calamities on this planet for a very long time. Thus, to determine
what gives them the ability to generate so much pain and suffering has become the
number one preoccupation of those who look into these matters.
A great deal has been discovered and uncovered in this
regard. But the one thing that remained mysterious up to now has been the way
that these people were able to persuade officials at the highest level of
government in the jurisdictions they infiltrated, to betray their own people so
as to serve the Jews. Well, Bret Stephens has laid out the blueprint by which
future historians will be guided to make definitive judgments on how and why planet
Earth was so badly afflicted.
Stephens wrote “The Anti-Israel Money Trail,” a column that
also came under the subtitle: “Pro-Palestinian campus activists have some 'very
smelly' financial supporters.” It was published on April 26, 2016 in the Wall
Street Journal.
Talking about an exchange that involved a member of the
Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), Stephens says it “is another reminder
of the anti-Israel, and increasingly anti-Semitic, environment students now
experience on American campuses.” Linking the notion of opposition to Israeli
policies with the notion of anti-Semitism by calling the opposition “anti” Israel is an
old trick he is reviving. This approach comes around in cycles in that it is
abandoned when Israel is
doing well, and revived when Israel
is doing badly.
But the notion of anti-Semitism no longer has the bite that
used to galvanize people in the media and the political circles. Now, the bite
is felt with the mention of – get this now – terrorism. And this is why Bret
Stephens went on to pave the way for linking opposition to Israeli policies to
terrorism. Here is how he began to do it: “That's the doing of several groups.
None is so prominent as SJP … sponsor[ing[ anti-Israeli events, heckling
pro-Israel speakers and agitating for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)
resolutions on campus”.
Because no one in his right mind would see something wrong
with that, the author has relied on the Jewish trick of using the students' own
words, and make them sound like a terrible thing. Here it is: “SJP's
self-declared goal is to end Israel 's
occupation and colonization of all Arab lands while promoting the rights of
Palestinian refugees to return to their homes”.
But who on earth except a bloodthirsty savage human-looking
animal would object to that? Oh, there are some who are perfectly justified to
object to that, says Stephens. And he explains why. It is because: “that's
another way of saying destroying the Jewish state,” he says.
Well, it must be that he does not have the IQ to realize he
just said that Israel 's
existence depends on occupation and colonization of other people's lands, as
well as the denial of the rights of refugees to return to their homes. Go tell
that to the refugees from Syria ,
Bret Stephens.
But if he does not have the IQ, he had the instinct that
allowed him to sense there was something wrong with his presentation up to now.
And this is why he handed the whole thing over to Jonathan Schanzer, one of the
comics at the troop calling itself, Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
This guy Schanzer fancies himself as an expert on
terrorism-financing. He volunteered to testify before the congress on what he
knows regarding the link between the activities of college students in America and
what he says is terrorism. After going on a long descriptive tour during which
he laid-out a web of relationships that would raise your hair, he mentioned
that the FDD had seen no evidence of illicit activities in any of that.
So you ask: What was the brouhaha all about to begin with?
And Bret Stephens provides the answer. He says this: Everyone has rights,
including to assembly and speech … still it is worth thinking about the
politics that these people support.