Like a pyramid, an iceberg is wider at the bottom than it is
at the top. The part that's below the water can also be ten times as tall as
the tip that's observed. This means that the total volume of an iceberg can be
as much as a hundred times as massive as the observed tip.
Now imagine a freak natural phenomenon producing an iceberg
whose tip alone is as massive as the normal icebergs we are accustomed to
seeing. Can you visualize how massive that iceberg would be? By now you must be
anxious to know what this is about. Well, my friend let me tell you it is a
metaphor.
For half a century the Jewish propaganda machine has been
portraying the Israelis as reasonable negotiators despite the fact that they
hold all the trump cards. The machine has also portrayed the Palestinians as
being unreasonable in their demands despite the fact that they sit at the
negotiating table deprived of even a shirt to cover their backs … having been
robbed of it.
Believe it or not, that horrifying situation is maintained
by a government of the United
States which says it adheres to a system of
checks and balances in everything it does and everything it controls. Really?
Many in the world do not see that when it comes to matters pertaining to Jewish
and Israeli interests. But that's why the American public, which ultimately
pays for the crimes against humanity that result, cannot begin to fathom the
size of the horror story that's ongoing in occupied Palestine .
As it happens, a parallel story started to unfold over the
past few years with elements that resemble the situation in Palestine . Whereas the players are more or
less the same, the dimensions of what's observed and what's hidden differ
greatly in the two stories. A metaphor exists because the negotiators are the
Jews who supposedly sit with the Palestinians at the negotiating table … also
appear to publicly advise the Americans on how to negotiate with the Iranians.
Whether or not the Americans are taking the Jewish advice is
beside the point. What matters is that the Jews are making their presence felt,
and thus reveal a great deal about themselves. You can see that much in the
article which came under the title: “Still More Sanctions Relief for Iran 's
Ayatollahs,” written by Ilan Berman and published on April 4, 2016 in National
Review Online.
Here is what the Jews are complaining about: “allowing Iran limited access to the U.S. financial
system for its continued compliance with the terms of the deal.” Terms of the
deal my ass, says Ilan Berman, because the understanding of the Jews is that
“regardless of the provisions of the new nuclear deal, the administration was
committed to keeping existing, and extensive, trade restrictions in place”.
The truth is that no such commitment was made
unconditionally by the administration. The promise was that if Iran violated the deal, “Iranian banks will not
be able to clear U.S. dollars through New York ,
hold correspondent account relationships with U.S.
financial institutions, or enter into financing arrangement with U.S. banks”.
Having lied about what happened, Berman whines in true
Jewish fashion: “Now, however, the secretary and his colleagues are singing a
different tune: 'Since Iran
has kept its end of the deal, it is our responsibility to uphold ours, in both
letter and spirit.'” What offends the Jewish sensibilities is that “the message
is abundantly clear: For the administration, allowing Iran access to the U.S. market has become an article
of good faith.” Good faith? Did you say good faith? My goodness, can you
imagine that? Can you imagine someone uttering the words good faith in the
presence of a Jew? This is like flying the Swastika inside a Holocaust
memorial.
What Berman is promoting here is the Jewish religious
adherence to the principle that the Israelis have been using in their fake
negotiations with the Palestinians. It boils down to asking the Palestinians
what they would give up if Israel
did A, B and C? The Palestinians would say they would give up X, Y and Z. Upon
this, the Israelis use the weapons given to them by superpower America and go
take X, Y and Z by force without giving up A, B or C.
They do that under the pretext that “everyone knows X, Y and
Z will remain in Jewish hands in case of an agreement. So why wait for that
elusive agreement, we'll expedite things and take possession of X, Y and Z
right now. Come to think of it, why have an agreement at all. Things are just
fine the way they are at this point”.
When it comes to Jewish bad faith, the Palestine situation seemed like the tip of an
iceberg. The Israelis got away with nonsense for half a century because a power
imbalance existed between a fully armed Israel
and a fully disarmed Palestine .
But now that we have the parallel of the Jews telling the America that is arming them to adhere to the
same Jewish philosophy of negotiating in bad faith – the entire Palestine iceberg is
reduced to looking like the tip of the full Jewish iceberg of bad faith. And
you can imagine how massive the entire iceberg of Jewish horror must be.